What a bunch of moneygrubbing assholes. It's not about the money, huh? Well, 5 billion is an awful lot of money for it to NOT be about, isn't it?
And again, there's the whole "let's blame the giant corporations for our own shortcomings as parents" thing. Bunch of wusses, if you ask me.
The entire crux of the Salon article assumes that:
A.) SEGA is getting out of the hardware business;
and
B.) CSK is looking to sell SEGA.
Neither of these appears to be true. So what's the deal?
Slashdot Mirror
What a bunch of moneygrubbing assholes. It's not about the money, huh? Well, 5 billion is an awful lot of money for it to NOT be about, isn't it? And again, there's the whole "let's blame the giant corporations for our own shortcomings as parents" thing. Bunch of wusses, if you ask me.
The entire crux of the Salon article assumes that: A.) SEGA is getting out of the hardware business; and B.) CSK is looking to sell SEGA. Neither of these appears to be true. So what's the deal?
I don't see a statement here attacking copyright.
You mean Slashdot's endless crusade against any corporation worth anything (read: that actually attempts to make money) doesn't count?
In this context? Nope. I don't see a statement here attacking corporations.
Taco says to go ahead and hack your CueCat even if your EULA says no. What am I missing?
Actually, the text of this article doesn't really touch on hacking the CueCat.
Furthermore, what EULA? I've got one of these things (from Radio Shack), and no licensing agreement of any sort was packaged with it.
I don't see a statement here saying that it's OK to break contracts. Trooooooooooooll!