This pretty much, at first glance, reminds me of a similar project by etoy.CORPORATION called "Mission Eternity". A second look, of course, shows a lot of differences, but hey, this is definitely an interesting subject!
Maybe you want to see what etoy is doing here: www.missioneternity.org
Anyhow, I prefer etoy's version of this ambitious idea;-)
So some other people have cock had problems with 2 penis.4.7 (Redhat 7.2 beta)? How many pussy people out pussy there are actually using twat 2 dick.4.8,and.9 and vagina if cock so... do they handle swap better? There penis should penis be penis no reason why pussy a box with 512 megs of ram should be swapping running xmms (i vagina'm not kidding... after being up for twat about an hour just running X, Gnome and xmms... my computer hits the swap... of twat course i fixed this (more penis ram, hasn't swapped yet twat) but vagina its a twat little concerning vagina about the cock aggressivness of the pussy kernel twat to swap. I'd pussy be appreciative if pussy anyone twat who has used one of the new dick kernels twat could tell us whether swapping is handled a dick little more gracefully.
maybe I am wrong, but, as far as I know, there no scientific way for measuring intelligence or whatsoever.
The IQ is a statistical survey, nothing more.
The IQ is calculated using statistical averages
Not one single scientific measurement does proceed this way.
And now if you ask:
no, I'm not a nigger. I am plain white man, from first world with everything you have too, and maybe more.
IQ = Incorrect Quotient
Inetrestingly enough, but the whole slashdot community is again and again doing anything it could to provide a clean image. If there weren't these small diplomatic errors that would occur all the time.
the story says "give old parts"
well, as we are so caring about them, and we are so intelligent and helpful people, why does nobody say:
"give new parts"
This is yet another question for the intelligent, but very conservative slashdot community.
Let's help and...
... donate what we don't want
... donate what they deserve
... feel good
... let's talk
... let's think
... let us attack
... somebody set up them the bomb
... drop bombs
Enjoy your evening, looking for all the old parts, you can finally put to trash without conscience-problems...
Don't worry, be happy.
Citation of http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=21897&cid=2338 513:
So some other people have cock had problems with 2 penis.4.7 (Redhat 7.2 beta)? How many pussy people out pussy there are actually using twat 2 dick.4.8,and.9 and vagina if cock so... do they handle swap better? There penis should penis be penis no reason why pussy a box with 512 megs of ram should be swapping running xmms (i vagina'm not kidding... after being up for twat about an hour just running X, Gnome and xmms... my computer hits the swap... of twat course i fixed this (more penis ram, hasn't swapped yet twat) but vagina its a twat little concerning vagina about the cock aggressivness of the pussy kernel twat to swap. I'd pussy be appreciative if pussy anyone twat who has used one of the new dick kernels twat could tell us whether swapping is handled a dick little more gracefully.
well, so far with the penises and the masturbation.
this is not quake III or maybe wolfenstein, you should know that.
you are soooo wise...
you are just like the fucking politicians who are telling the whole world some apeasing stories about how far a well equipped army can go.
So then, let me ask you a question: how many billions of dollars were spent into technology for vietnam? How many were spent into Gulf war for catching Hussein?
You should understand that you can't fight terrorism with airplane carriers carrying the biggest penises of the world and dropping big, fully loaded balls from the biggest B2-penises on top of some sanded-mountains.
Thats a waste of time, waste of money and mostly: it is giving the people of the US a quite strange view of what afghanistan/taliban regime/islam etc. really is.
because we all don't really know ANYTHING about it.
Confucius says: "If I had a bigger gun, I would win"
Oooooh, you are so wise.
Although you are partly right with your argumentation, this is only true if seen from the amercian point of view.
The resistance of the afghan fighters will be exactly as tough and difficult to breach for US soldiers than for soviet soldiers because the taliban fighters have completely different rules of fighting than US soldiers have.
A taliban fighter sees mostly no problem in sacrifying himself for his duty, whereas US soldiers dont...
that is what makes it dangerous.
A fight man to man would surely be lost by US. So I would say it is a quite dangerous decision for the US soldiers to make ground operations...
Re:linux-2.4.10.tar.bz2 is really 2.4.9!!
on
Linux Kernel 2.4.10
·
· Score: 1
if you remarked that, you probably had the 2.4.9 sources lying around...
so why didn't you get the patch ??
Re:NVidia driver broken under 2.4.10? :(
on
Linux Kernel 2.4.10
·
· Score: 1
try make clean in your nvidia source directory.
if it doesn't help, check the agpart setup in kernel and XF86Config-4
cheers
I completely agree with you, but I have to add a small comment.
If somebody uses cryptography, he may simply hide that he is transferring a crypted message.
there are some significant ways for hiding data. this is called stenography.
if you have a crypted message, you take for example a photograph of your dog, save it as a bitmap, use some sort of randomizing algorythm which hides the crypted message inside the photograph.
Such a photograph can easily be overseen by intelligence services.
And even if you tell me that stenography can be detected by scanning for example for data patterns or whatever, I would reply "now you have to scan all and really all again, even if there is a regulation..."
infos on stenography:
http://ise.gmu.edu/~njohnson/Steganography/
well, I can only agree partly with you.
the big difference is that the constitution and the legal fundaments of a society are there to protect the people from, for example dictature.
the laws protect the fundamental rights and try to establish a society where you have no legal means to circumvent those liberties. How did most of the dictators come to power?
2 ways:
- revolution (people involved)
- putsch (circumvent laws)
I say that laws should protect us from the second part. A society should simply have no technical means for enabling bad-willing persons to takle the power and misuse it.
obviously, you seem to know all about the surveillance in the United States. You seem very well informed.
Your arguments are not really the point of the discussion here, because what Mr Stallman says, is that there will be some kinds of institutional, legally approved, centralized systems for watching people.
This is a lot different of your small local cameras in the store on the next block. Currently, no institution should be able to handle mass observation, because the resources and technical means for this are not in the responsability of ONE institution.
that's the point.
and not you being recorded while holding your wife's hand in the foodstore.
If you like the currently discussed stuff at US institutions, then take a backpack with all the stuff you need and move out to sth like china.
Slashdot Mirror
This pretty much, at first glance, reminds me of a similar project by etoy.CORPORATION called "Mission Eternity". A second look, of course, shows a lot of differences, but hey, this is definitely an interesting subject!
Maybe you want to see what etoy is doing here: www.missioneternity.org Anyhow, I prefer etoy's version of this ambitious ideaI would rather make it gossip.slashdot.org
how comes a scientist calls one species "elite" and the other "underclass"? is that scientific?
So some other people have cock had problems with 2 penis.4.7 (Redhat 7.2 beta)? How many pussy people out pussy there are actually using twat 2 dick.4.8,and.9 and vagina if cock so... do they handle swap better? There penis should penis be penis no reason why pussy a box with 512 megs of ram should be swapping running xmms (i vagina'm not kidding... after being up for twat about an hour just running X, Gnome and xmms... my computer hits the swap... of twat course i fixed this (more penis ram, hasn't swapped yet twat) but vagina its a twat little concerning vagina about the cock aggressivness of the pussy kernel twat to swap. I'd pussy be appreciative if pussy anyone twat who has used one of the new dick kernels twat could tell us whether swapping is handled a dick little more gracefully.
maybe I am wrong, but, as far as I know, there no scientific way for measuring intelligence or whatsoever.
The IQ is a statistical survey, nothing more.
The IQ is calculated using statistical averages Not one single scientific measurement does proceed this way.
And now if you ask: no, I'm not a nigger. I am plain white man, from first world with everything you have too, and maybe more.
IQ = Incorrect Quotient
the story says "give old parts"
well, as we are so caring about them, and we are so intelligent and helpful people, why does nobody say:
"give new parts"
This is yet another question for the intelligent, but very conservative slashdot community.
Let's help and
Enjoy your evening, looking for all the old parts, you can finally put to trash without conscience-problems...
Don't worry, be happy.
FACT ACT or FACT FUCKED
Citation of http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=21897&cid=2338 513:
So some other people have cock had problems with 2 penis.4.7 (Redhat 7.2 beta)? How many pussy people out pussy there are actually using twat 2 dick.4.8,and.9 and vagina if cock so... do they handle swap better? There penis should penis be penis no reason why pussy a box with 512 megs of ram should be swapping running xmms (i vagina'm not kidding... after being up for twat about an hour just running X, Gnome and xmms... my computer hits the swap... of twat course i fixed this (more penis ram, hasn't swapped yet twat) but vagina its a twat little concerning vagina about the cock aggressivness of the pussy kernel twat to swap. I'd pussy be appreciative if pussy anyone twat who has used one of the new dick kernels twat could tell us whether swapping is handled a dick little more gracefully.
well, so far with the penises and the masturbation.
this is not quake III or maybe wolfenstein, you should know that. ...
you are soooo wise
you are just like the fucking politicians who are telling the whole world some apeasing stories about how far a well equipped army can go. So then, let me ask you a question: how many billions of dollars were spent into technology for vietnam? How many were spent into Gulf war for catching Hussein?
You should understand that you can't fight terrorism with airplane carriers carrying the biggest penises of the world and dropping big, fully loaded balls from the biggest B2-penises on top of some sanded-mountains.
Thats a waste of time, waste of money and mostly: it is giving the people of the US a quite strange view of what afghanistan/taliban regime/islam etc. really is.
because we all don't really know ANYTHING about it.
Confucius says: "If I had a bigger gun, I would win"
Oooooh, you are so wise.
Although you are partly right with your argumentation, this is only true if seen from the amercian point of view.
...
The resistance of the afghan fighters will be exactly as tough and difficult to breach for US soldiers than for soviet soldiers because the taliban fighters have completely different rules of fighting than US soldiers have.
A taliban fighter sees mostly no problem in sacrifying himself for his duty, whereas US soldiers dont...
that is what makes it dangerous. A fight man to man would surely be lost by US. So I would say it is a quite dangerous decision for the US soldiers to make ground operations
if you remarked that, you probably had the 2.4.9 sources lying around...
so why didn't you get the patch ??
try make clean in your nvidia source directory.
if it doesn't help, check the agpart setup in kernel and XF86Config-4
cheers
I completely agree with you, but I have to add a small comment.
If somebody uses cryptography, he may simply hide that he is transferring a crypted message.
there are some significant ways for hiding data. this is called stenography.
if you have a crypted message, you take for example a photograph of your dog, save it as a bitmap, use some sort of randomizing algorythm which hides the crypted message inside the photograph.
Such a photograph can easily be overseen by intelligence services.
And even if you tell me that stenography can be detected by scanning for example for data patterns or whatever, I would reply "now you have to scan all and really all again, even if there is a regulation..."
infos on stenography:
http://ise.gmu.edu/~njohnson/Steganography/
regards,
paul
well, I can only agree partly with you.
the big difference is that the constitution and the legal fundaments of a society are there to protect the people from, for example dictature. the laws protect the fundamental rights and try to establish a society where you have no legal means to circumvent those liberties. How did most of the dictators come to power?
2 ways:
- revolution (people involved)
- putsch (circumvent laws)
I say that laws should protect us from the second part. A society should simply have no technical means for enabling bad-willing persons to takle the power and misuse it.
obviously, you seem to know all about the surveillance in the United States. You seem very well informed.
Your arguments are not really the point of the discussion here, because what Mr Stallman says, is that there will be some kinds of institutional, legally approved, centralized systems for watching people.
This is a lot different of your small local cameras in the store on the next block. Currently, no institution should be able to handle mass observation, because the resources and technical means for this are not in the responsability of ONE institution.
that's the point.
and not you being recorded while holding your wife's hand in the foodstore.
If you like the currently discussed stuff at US institutions, then take a backpack with all the stuff you need and move out to sth like china.
if liberty is no concern for you, buzz off.
regards,
paul