George W. Bush has also proven himself...proven himself to be an unmittigated failure.
Obviously the American people didn't see it that way yesterday on 11/2/2004, where the American people made George W Bush the most popular president ever with over 58 million votes. He not only won the popular vote but he won by the biggest margin in resent history, with a 4 million vote lead.
And yesterday the American people spoke and gave Liberal Europe and the "Fat Idiot" Michael Moore a big old Texas Middle Finger.:)
It is a great day for American and a great day for the world.
According to an exclusive report at Drudge, there has been massive fraud in Philly. In many machines around the city they found, nearly 2000, votes already in the machine before voting even started. Nobody is reporting to who the votes belong too, but I guess the concerns (here and here) were valid ones.
Fox News is as "Fair and Balanced" as CNN is. So what article you going to beleive the one from the DNC talking points or the one from the RNC talking points. By using your logic we should just not listen to anybody and vote our gut feeling. Which is one of the things I am doing tomorrow. I am voting for Bush tomorrow because in my gut it feels right. But I know some people are swayed by the written word, so that is why I am posting counter balances to the CNN article that has been linked to many times here.
Well say what you will, but Aerabic isn't an easy language to translate to English, just look at all the trouble them have had converting Aerameic to English (from biblical times). The Arabic type languages aren't straight translations. The question is who are you going to trust, CNN who leans ultra-left or whoever you mentioned above who leans ultra-right. I vote for the latter, because that is who I have come to trust, because CNN has turned me off to their tactics and pandering to John Kerry.
Say what you will, but people are responding to it because, there are alot of people out there that don't like the truth when it is slaped in their face. Because now these 11 people that have replied now know that if they vote for Kerry they voted for a man that has killed 3000 Americans.
You are just taking a different spin to this. If it puts you at mind to call it FUD fine, but remember who you are voting for when you vote for Kerry.
Because road safty is in the hands of the person. It is my choice to go 100 mph down the road and create an accident of 50 or so cars in rush hour. It is another thing to be going about your business and have your air plane jacked and ramed into a building where the common man is working. Same with alcohol poisening, drug abuse, somewhat homocides/murder (but that goes along with terrorists in a parallel sort of way), firearm accidents, drowing, accidental fire, suicides.
I really don't beleive that you just compared something that nobody had control over, such as a terorrist act, to a suicide where it only hurts one person that is them self. A suicide doesn't kill innnocent people.
Your ethics are really off and it really shows that you don't understand what is going on in todays world. And if this is the case of the things you listed up above why do liberals make a big thing about 1000 people getting killed in war, because it is obvious 3000 people killed in a terrorist act in a span of an hour isn't important so why would 1000 people matter to you.
It is obvious you would rather have a president tell you he can correct something he has no power over such as traffic accidents, alcohol poisening, drug abuse, suicides, and etc, than something he has power to help protect the US (and the World) in the future from EVIL vendictive people.
Bin Laden is trying to scare the American people to vote for somebody that won't hunt down and kill his Army of Sucicidal Morons. He is running scared and this NY Post Article proves it by his endorcment for John Kerry, and Bin Laden quoting Michael More, about something nobody knew of before he put it in the movie. (the my pet goat, the book was not known until the movie, or at least I never heard about it.)
I totally agree with you but he probably thinks we are as weak minded as Spain was when their publics support shifted twords the socialist canidate after the bombing in Madrid. Just take a look at the website and tell me what you think it means http://www.nypost.com/news/nationalnews/33124.htm
Since when is the NY Post an RNC taling point? But point taken I see who you are voting for "Anonymous Coward", Bin Laden all the way. Also you are so scared to even show your user name because just like all Liberals you hate to be called liberals and labeled as such.
If Bush serves Osama's purposes wonderfully, why in the Article does Osama want to attack "Red" (Republican) states?
I am getting many replies saying that what I said has no basis in fact. But take a look at what I am using when I stated Bin Laden wouldn't attack Kerry states. NY Post Article
I really think it is a little of both. However I think we are going to have a vast improvement in the turn out this year. But I also worry about the people that are voting for America as the way it will be tomorrow, not years for tomorrow. You hire an executive to make the hard desisions that nobody wants to make and make them for the future of your organization. Why do you think CEO's fire thousands of people at a time, it's not because it's politically popular at the time, it's because it's what needs to be done for the organization to survive.
The real question you have to ask youself tomorrow is who is going to do a better job at looking at tomorrow, and the day after and predicting what American needs even if it is not popular.
John Kerry seems to do everything by polls and polls are based in the present time, you can't take a poll of future events. Or do you want the guy, George Bush, who makes a desision that he thinks is right and runs with it, even if it wasn't popular.
I vote for the latter, and that is how I am voting tomorrow.
For the people who still can't decide take a look at the NY Post Article about how Bin Laden will only attack states that go for Bush. What that says is that Bin Laden fears Bush, and is trying to bargin with the American people to get somebody in office that will not devistate his organization as much as it has been devistated in the last 3 years.
Re:a letter to undecided voters (from my roommates
on
Pre-Election Discussion
·
· Score: 1, Redundant
Check out this article NY Post, where Bin Laden says he will go afters states that go for Bush, and you tell me who is doing the more effective job.
Take a look at this Article from the NY Post. It says how Bin Laden won't attack any states that go for John Kerry and will attack any states that go for George Bush. I guess that means the NY can pack up all the police officers and not screen bags at the air port any more.
Come on this is a load of horse crap. Bin Laden want's Kerry because he is perceived as ineffective, and Bush is perceived as Effectively dismantleing Bin Ladens organization fromt he bottom up. Bin Laden is running scared, so much that he is spilling the montra of Michel Moore.
it is being widely reported that CNN is not showing the whole transcript, because they know who it would lean the voters tword. And CNN leans the other way. And here is a article from the NY Post [http://www.nypost.com/news/nationalnews/33124.htm ].
And if you are voting for Kerry, you are voting for Jock Sherock, Osoma Bin Laden, Michel Moore, Kim Jong-il, Arafat, and all the wacko left of Europe. So just remember who you are voting for. Also he will probably appoint a Supreme Court Justice that will up hold abortions up to the day the child is born (or partial birth), where the baby is born up to its head and then a spike is stuck in the back of its skull and it's brains are sucked out. This is the type of abortion that Bush wanted to stop, because it is inhumane. Bush still supports the right for a child to be aborted up until the end of the 2nd tri-mester.
With the new release of the Osama-Bin-Laden tape supporting John Kerry, I can 100% saying I am going for Bush. If terrorists start saying they are going to start attacking any state the Bush wins and leaves the states the Kerry wins alone, then I am for Bush. Because that shows to me that the teorrists are running scared at another Bush administration. Plus Bin-Laden was spouting everything the idiot Michel Moore was saying just adds to the theory that teorrists and dictators want to see Kerry in office because he will not hunt them down and give their people freedom.
Freedom is as an effective virus as AIDS, and Influenza. It is something that cannot be stopped once it is out in the wild, and it has infected the Middle East, and it is only time when every nation on Earth will be able to say we are Free, the way God (what ever you may call god) has made us.
Bush has my vote 100%. I think you all should give the canidate that has proven himself, instead of the one who hasn't given a single inkling of what his canidancy would be like. He only says his administration will "do a better job".
Well I say to you John, with that slogan, anybody in the United States can run for President. But I know I am not qualified, because I don't have the understanding of what needs to be done in the job and lay it out in an effective way for the American people to understand. But if all it takes is saying "I will do a better job".
Then I am announcing my canidacy for President of the United States. If you want to vote for my just write in "nberardi from slashdot.org".
Terrorists for Kerry -- Communists for Kerry (or Kommunists for Kerry) -- If you blow up children, Kerry is your man. -- If you hate women, Kerry is for you. -- Dictators for Kerry --
Slashdot Mirror
And yesterday the American people spoke and gave Liberal Europe and the "Fat Idiot" Michael Moore a big old Texas Middle Finger.
It is a great day for American and a great day for the world.
According to an exclusive report at Drudge, there has been massive fraud in Philly. In many machines around the city they found, nearly 2000, votes already in the machine before voting even started. Nobody is reporting to who the votes belong too, but I guess the concerns (here and here) were valid ones.
Or like quoting CNN, as a serious news program.
Or he might just be using reverse-reverse psychology to fool all you people that like to over think stuff, because as you said he is a smart guy.
Or he might just be using reverse-reverse psychology to fool all your people that like to over think stuff, because as you said he is a smart guy.
Fox News is as "Fair and Balanced" as CNN is. So what article you going to beleive the one from the DNC talking points or the one from the RNC talking points. By using your logic we should just not listen to anybody and vote our gut feeling. Which is one of the things I am doing tomorrow. I am voting for Bush tomorrow because in my gut it feels right. But I know some people are swayed by the written word, so that is why I am posting counter balances to the CNN article that has been linked to many times here.
Don't ask me but Bush must be doing something right to have Bin Laden running like a scared little girl. http://www.nypost.com/news/nationalnews/33124.htm
Well say what you will, but Aerabic isn't an easy language to translate to English, just look at all the trouble them have had converting Aerameic to English (from biblical times). The Arabic type languages aren't straight translations. The question is who are you going to trust, CNN who leans ultra-left or whoever you mentioned above who leans ultra-right. I vote for the latter, because that is who I have come to trust, because CNN has turned me off to their tactics and pandering to John Kerry.
Say what you will, but people are responding to it because, there are alot of people out there that don't like the truth when it is slaped in their face. Because now these 11 people that have replied now know that if they vote for Kerry they voted for a man that has killed 3000 Americans.
You are just taking a different spin to this. If it puts you at mind to call it FUD fine, but remember who you are voting for when you vote for Kerry.
Because road safty is in the hands of the person. It is my choice to go 100 mph down the road and create an accident of 50 or so cars in rush hour. It is another thing to be going about your business and have your air plane jacked and ramed into a building where the common man is working. Same with alcohol poisening, drug abuse, somewhat homocides/murder (but that goes along with terrorists in a parallel sort of way), firearm accidents, drowing, accidental fire, suicides.
I really don't beleive that you just compared something that nobody had control over, such as a terorrist act, to a suicide where it only hurts one person that is them self. A suicide doesn't kill innnocent people.
Your ethics are really off and it really shows that you don't understand what is going on in todays world. And if this is the case of the things you listed up above why do liberals make a big thing about 1000 people getting killed in war, because it is obvious 3000 people killed in a terrorist act in a span of an hour isn't important so why would 1000 people matter to you.
It is obvious you would rather have a president tell you he can correct something he has no power over such as traffic accidents, alcohol poisening, drug abuse, suicides, and etc, than something he has power to help protect the US (and the World) in the future from EVIL vendictive people.
Bin Laden is trying to scare the American people to vote for somebody that won't hunt down and kill his Army of Sucicidal Morons. He is running scared and this NY Post Article proves it by his endorcment for John Kerry, and Bin Laden quoting Michael More, about something nobody knew of before he put it in the movie. (the my pet goat, the book was not known until the movie, or at least I never heard about it.)
I totally agree with you but he probably thinks we are as weak minded as Spain was when their publics support shifted twords the socialist canidate after the bombing in Madrid. Just take a look at the website and tell me what you think it means http://www.nypost.com/news/nationalnews/33124.htm
Point me to where he says he is going to do anything on his website. With an exact plan. I can't find anything and I dare you too.
Also just a general note to everybody stop quoting CNN they are about as reliable as 60 mins now a days. Take a look at the NY Post http://www.nypost.com/news/nationalnews/33124.htm
Since when is the NY Post an RNC taling point? But point taken I see who you are voting for "Anonymous Coward", Bin Laden all the way. Also you are so scared to even show your user name because just like all Liberals you hate to be called liberals and labeled as such.
If Bush serves Osama's purposes wonderfully, why in the Article does Osama want to attack "Red" (Republican) states?
I am getting many replies saying that what I said has no basis in fact. But take a look at what I am using when I stated Bin Laden wouldn't attack Kerry states. NY Post Article
I really think it is a little of both. However I think we are going to have a vast improvement in the turn out this year. But I also worry about the people that are voting for America as the way it will be tomorrow, not years for tomorrow. You hire an executive to make the hard desisions that nobody wants to make and make them for the future of your organization. Why do you think CEO's fire thousands of people at a time, it's not because it's politically popular at the time, it's because it's what needs to be done for the organization to survive.
The real question you have to ask youself tomorrow is who is going to do a better job at looking at tomorrow, and the day after and predicting what American needs even if it is not popular.
John Kerry seems to do everything by polls and polls are based in the present time, you can't take a poll of future events. Or do you want the guy, George Bush, who makes a desision that he thinks is right and runs with it, even if it wasn't popular.
I vote for the latter, and that is how I am voting tomorrow.
For the people who still can't decide take a look at the NY Post Article about how Bin Laden will only attack states that go for Bush. What that says is that Bin Laden fears Bush, and is trying to bargin with the American people to get somebody in office that will not devistate his organization as much as it has been devistated in the last 3 years.
Check out this article NY Post, where Bin Laden says he will go afters states that go for Bush, and you tell me who is doing the more effective job.
Take a look at this article over at NY Post Article. And tell me who you think that supports.
Take a look at this Article from the NY Post. It says how Bin Laden won't attack any states that go for John Kerry and will attack any states that go for George Bush. I guess that means the NY can pack up all the police officers and not screen bags at the air port any more.
Come on this is a load of horse crap. Bin Laden want's Kerry because he is perceived as ineffective, and Bush is perceived as Effectively dismantleing Bin Ladens organization fromt he bottom up. Bin Laden is running scared, so much that he is spilling the montra of Michel Moore.
it is being widely reported that CNN is not showing the whole transcript, because they know who it would lean the voters tword. And CNN leans the other way. And here is a article from the NY Post [http://www.nypost.com/news/nationalnews/33124.htm ].
And if you are voting for Kerry, you are voting for Jock Sherock, Osoma Bin Laden, Michel Moore, Kim Jong-il, Arafat, and all the wacko left of Europe. So just remember who you are voting for. Also he will probably appoint a Supreme Court Justice that will up hold abortions up to the day the child is born (or partial birth), where the baby is born up to its head and then a spike is stuck in the back of its skull and it's brains are sucked out. This is the type of abortion that Bush wanted to stop, because it is inhumane. Bush still supports the right for a child to be aborted up until the end of the 2nd tri-mester.
With the new release of the Osama-Bin-Laden tape supporting John Kerry, I can 100% saying I am going for Bush. If terrorists start saying they are going to start attacking any state the Bush wins and leaves the states the Kerry wins alone, then I am for Bush. Because that shows to me that the teorrists are running scared at another Bush administration. Plus Bin-Laden was spouting everything the idiot Michel Moore was saying just adds to the theory that teorrists and dictators want to see Kerry in office because he will not hunt them down and give their people freedom.
Freedom is as an effective virus as AIDS, and Influenza. It is something that cannot be stopped once it is out in the wild, and it has infected the Middle East, and it is only time when every nation on Earth will be able to say we are Free, the way God (what ever you may call god) has made us.
Bush has my vote 100%. I think you all should give the canidate that has proven himself, instead of the one who hasn't given a single inkling of what his canidancy would be like. He only says his administration will "do a better job".
Well I say to you John, with that slogan, anybody in the United States can run for President. But I know I am not qualified, because I don't have the understanding of what needs to be done in the job and lay it out in an effective way for the American people to understand. But if all it takes is saying "I will do a better job".
Then I am announcing my canidacy for President of the United States. If you want to vote for my just write in "nberardi from slashdot.org".
Thanks me too.
Yeah that was really stupid. I have no clue what I was thinking. Wow I guess it is time to go home and nurse this flu.
Oh I see new bumper stickers comming out:
:)
Terrorists for Kerry
--
Communists for Kerry (or Kommunists for Kerry)
--
If you blow up children, Kerry is your man.
--
If you hate women, Kerry is for you.
--
Dictators for Kerry
--
Oh they just go on and on...
I really don't think that is the case. It was most likely done to protect against hackers and DoS in the final days.