I did some reading and it does sound very strange. You will be asked for your exit permit at the airport/border crossing. To get an exit permit, you need to pay bond money promising that you will return back. If you dont return, you forfeit the bond money. The procedure seems to different if you dont plan on continuing you Chinese residency (I have no idea what the procedure to follow is or how it can used as a loophole to avoid paying bond money)
Overall the intent seems to be to discourage people from emigrating from China. The country you are planning to visit doesnt seem to figure in the equation.
Just because the US strong armed Thailand into not requiring a visa for American passport holders, does not mean that Thailand will let any one in visa free. Thailand requiring visas to enter doesnt mean it is not the land of the free. BTW, for most citizens of most countries US requires a visa too.
Are you intentionally being obtuse? If the patents are overturned, there is no case. It doesnt have to go to the jury, the judge will herself throw the case out.
It doesnt matter if Samsung was influenced by iPad or Fidler's tablet. What matters is Apple's design patent is no longer valid, and Samsung has all the right to copy the iPad and Fidler's tablet.
Buy few at a time and donate it to the local library (or you nephew or someone else in your family), as you are done? If you want to read it again, you can buy it again.
It still doesnt matter. If the product is sold by Amazon themselves, you can contact their customer service an have it price matched (and you get prime shipping). The customer service will go beyond their way to verify it (like call my local lowes) and get you their price.
The way I remember it, Apple did not agree to standard industry licensing terms, which if I remember correctly was 2.5%. Nokia had to sue, to force Apple to license them.
This wouldnt work if the user simple opened the file (from the equivalent of Explorer in mac, by double clicking the file (which I believe is the most common way to play a video), or clicking on open from Firefox). And most of the videos in my laptop are in the same folder "Downloads". If I had to go up a directory, open Downloads under MplayerX, and wade though the videos to select the one I want to play, I would be really frustrated (and would start looking for alternative players).
US has not tried to extradite spies for a long time (has it ever tried to?) too. So I dont think execution is off the table in this case. And you try harder with your propaganda next time, it shows badly on the US.
They already have a tab called Featured Content (I think since version 3.x.x) . I always though they were planning to make it more prominent and sort of must view thing.
On reading more, they are using their PSLV for the mars mission. Lesser payload, but no cryogenic stage. So there you go, they already have a rocket, that has been used successfully for so many years (used recently for the moon mission), and they are reusing it. Now go back to your basement and cry that the only complain you could come up with is no longer valid.
Just so you know they are not using the russian engine for the Mars mission (they infact have only one russian engine left, and any further launches would have to depend on the indigenously developed cryogenic stage (which did fail spectacularly in 2010, but they are depending on it for both Chandrayaan-2 & the Mar mission))
Er, thats a civil infraction (in fact I did say traffic violation in my post too, I actually meant civil infraction). Definitely not a crime. Any other sources?
Or move to a country that doesnt track its citizens using license plates. Or you know make your vote and voice count in your own country and limit these.
They usually literally bag the person and declare it as diplomatic mail, during these moments. And one cannot prevent diplomatic mail from leaving the country. All of these governed by the Vienna convention.
Er, the term is diplomatic bag. If the diplomat's vehicle is designated as a diplomatic bag by the embassy, it gets all the protections of a diplomatic bag. It cannot be opened or examined. It has been used numerous times to smuggle people in and out. Though there are treaties that govern what can be send through diplomatic mail/bag, and they prohibit carrying undeclared humans in them. So if you can smuggle without the host country calling your on it, you are good.
I am afraid in this case though, UK is closely monitoring Ecuador's diplomatic mail, and would be willing to move in if they know Assange is in it.
The point is they never have to do it. They only have to threaten to do it and Ecuador has no other choice but to cave in. They cannot afford to go to war with UK or even spoil relations with the UK through a diplomatic spat. Even though they know that the UK wouldnt never do it, the slight chance of that happening would be too much for them.
A very clever move. I am pretty sure Ecuador will cave.
Some sources would be nice, for the statement that idling with keys is a crime. I find nothing more than city ordinances (which at worst are traffic violations). If you have court decisions even better.
Again sources would be nice. I tried to locate the case or any news sources regarding this, but I find none.
Slashdot Mirror
I did some reading and it does sound very strange. You will be asked for your exit permit at the airport/border crossing. To get an exit permit, you need to pay bond money promising that you will return back. If you dont return, you forfeit the bond money. The procedure seems to different if you dont plan on continuing you Chinese residency (I have no idea what the procedure to follow is or how it can used as a loophole to avoid paying bond money)
Overall the intent seems to be to discourage people from emigrating from China. The country you are planning to visit doesnt seem to figure in the equation.
Just because the US strong armed Thailand into not requiring a visa for American passport holders, does not mean that Thailand will let any one in visa free. Thailand requiring visas to enter doesnt mean it is not the land of the free. BTW, for most citizens of most countries US requires a visa too.
Are you intentionally being obtuse? If the patents are overturned, there is no case. It doesnt have to go to the jury, the judge will herself throw the case out.
It doesnt matter if Samsung was influenced by iPad or Fidler's tablet. What matters is Apple's design patent is no longer valid, and Samsung has all the right to copy the iPad and Fidler's tablet.
Always buy stuff sold from Amazon themselves. It will save you this hassle and still be cheaper than most places.
Buy few at a time and donate it to the local library (or you nephew or someone else in your family), as you are done? If you want to read it again, you can buy it again.
It still doesnt matter. If the product is sold by Amazon themselves, you can contact their customer service an have it price matched (and you get prime shipping). The customer service will go beyond their way to verify it (like call my local lowes) and get you their price.
The way I remember it, Apple did not agree to standard industry licensing terms, which if I remember correctly was 2.5%. Nokia had to sue, to force Apple to license them.
Depends. If there is a contest on which check-out operator can check out the most number of items in 10 minutes, count me in.
This wouldnt work if the user simple opened the file (from the equivalent of Explorer in mac, by double clicking the file (which I believe is the most common way to play a video), or clicking on open from Firefox). And most of the videos in my laptop are in the same folder "Downloads". If I had to go up a directory, open Downloads under MplayerX, and wade though the videos to select the one I want to play, I would be really frustrated (and would start looking for alternative players).
US has not tried to extradite spies for a long time (has it ever tried to?) too. So I dont think execution is off the table in this case. And you try harder with your propaganda next time, it shows badly on the US.
Mod UP! Exactly what I was going to say!
Or whitelist a few websites and be done with it.
They already have a tab called Featured Content (I think since version 3.x.x) . I always though they were planning to make it more prominent and sort of must view thing.
On reading more, they are using their PSLV for the mars mission. Lesser payload, but no cryogenic stage. So there you go, they already have a rocket, that has been used successfully for so many years (used recently for the moon mission), and they are reusing it. Now go back to your basement and cry that the only complain you could come up with is no longer valid.
Just so you know they are not using the russian engine for the Mars mission (they infact have only one russian engine left, and any further launches would have to depend on the indigenously developed cryogenic stage (which did fail spectacularly in 2010, but they are depending on it for both Chandrayaan-2 & the Mar mission))
Nope, Anonymous only pointed out that your house has probably already been burnt, you just dont know it yet.
Er, thats a civil infraction (in fact I did say traffic violation in my post too, I actually meant civil infraction). Definitely not a crime. Any other sources?
Or move to a country that doesnt track its citizens using license plates. Or you know make your vote and voice count in your own country and limit these.
That was my point basically. Smuggling people works only when the host country is least expecting it. Right now, nope, nothing will work.
I wouldnt call them regular police. They are from the London TSG
They usually literally bag the person and declare it as diplomatic mail, during these moments. And one cannot prevent diplomatic mail from leaving the country. All of these governed by the Vienna convention.
Er, the term is diplomatic bag. If the diplomat's vehicle is designated as a diplomatic bag by the embassy, it gets all the protections of a diplomatic bag. It cannot be opened or examined. It has been used numerous times to smuggle people in and out. Though there are treaties that govern what can be send through diplomatic mail/bag, and they prohibit carrying undeclared humans in them. So if you can smuggle without the host country calling your on it, you are good.
I am afraid in this case though, UK is closely monitoring Ecuador's diplomatic mail, and would be willing to move in if they know Assange is in it.
The point is they never have to do it. They only have to threaten to do it and Ecuador has no other choice but to cave in. They cannot afford to go to war with UK or even spoil relations with the UK through a diplomatic spat. Even though they know that the UK wouldnt never do it, the slight chance of that happening would be too much for them.
A very clever move. I am pretty sure Ecuador will cave.
Some sources would be nice, for the statement that idling with keys is a crime. I find nothing more than city ordinances (which at worst are traffic violations). If you have court decisions even better.
Again sources would be nice. I tried to locate the case or any news sources regarding this, but I find none.