No more energy research, no more parks, no more public education, no more low income housing, no more roads & bridges. What a grand utopia he has planned for us.
Education is handled at the state/ local level. Can you really justify the massive budget of the Dept of Ed? What service do they actually provide? Why do we pay twice for the same services?
Oh My. What a deep dark hole you have dug. Every single piece of propaganda refuted and now all you have is some nonsense on Cuba and veiled accusations that somehow contradict Reagan's position?
Judging by your past citations, im not surprised that is all they left you with but sadly, that too is bullshit.
You owe this man an apology and the next time the Democrat propaganda machine spins some bullshit up, I hope you think twice before playing their card.
Your slipping. And i don't believe for a second you have researched, read or listened to anything from him. It would be impossible to reach your conclusions if you did.
A favorite trick of the Democrats is to create a bill that says one thing but stuff it full of misguided, misleading shit. When the president refuses to sign on, they love to say "why he doesn't support X". Its a lie. Its propaganda and it takes you all of two seconds to get the real story behind it. Stop being so damn lazy.
That makes you another second-hand source to me, why are you more reliable than all the others?
ah - now your starting to get it. if you ask that of all your sources, perhaps there is hope for you.
First, I would start with the Reagan library. Get the "other side" of the argument. For example:
Propagandist: Regan was against civil rights. Reagan: No. I am for civil rights. I am against the affirmative action quotas the Democrats are trying to stuff into the bill. We have been working the civil rights thing for a while in California and we tried that quota thing. It backfired. Quotas result in further discrimination and I am against any discrimination.
Result: : Reagan was right of course. Flash forward to today and you have American students graduating from High School that are being denied access to colleges based on the color of their skin. Somehow, discrimination against white people is not really discrimination (Gratz v. Bollinger). what!?!?!
His speeches are rich. They are worth the listen. Learn about him. Get in his head before you draw your conclusions. Last thing you want to do is falsely accuse someone. Especially someone who is on the right side of the issue. http://cstl-cla.semo.edu/renka/modern_presidents/reagan_speeches.htm
No weak minded little one. Citing propagandists is not research.
I do know his history better than you. I was alive then. I lived it first person. I watched the propagandists attack him and I am telling you first hand that your "resources" are full of shit.
There is plenty of information that contradicts the propagandists. Clearly you have not bothered to read any of that. No, no no. That's not permitted in a brainwashed cult.
You argue Reagan's history with some random, unknown persons words. You don't know who and you don't know if its factual. Your to young to have known him so I bring you Reagan words. Think of it as Reagan speaking from the grave. Personally challenging your accusations.
What you dropped is an excellent example of propaganda. Reagan was Democrat public enemy number 1 and the attackers worked overtime on him. It was another shameful time in the Democrats history.
You have proven you are nothing more than a mindless propagandist. You willfully spread lies and ignore the truth. You have no shame and without hesitation, you commit to maligning and innocent man. Your judged him guilty and never bothered to check your facts
Your a little brainwashed cult member. Doubt me? Go listen to Reagan's speeches. Read his works. Research his actions. It is obvious to any individual that he was a strong civil rights supporter.
so now you have to start making shit up I see... dropping the bullshit card is he democrats way of admitting defeat. in their mind, defeat its temporary... if only they can buy enough time to spin some more lies...
Like I love your girl Pelosi. She "stands in solidarity with the Wall Street Protesters". Ironically, they are protesting the very shit she created. But in her mind, they are cool. She knows all she needs to do is spin some shit and you will eat it all up. sucka. I hope she bitch fucks you again and makes another dozen million off your dumb ass.
Oh little one. I am so disappointed in you. You had a choice. Carefully research and validate your accusations before making them or blindly run with the first thing you think validates your position. You chose to be lazy and reach deep into the propaganda well. All you managed to do was validate my point and make an utter ass out of yourself.
The propagandist preys on your laziness. We all know that Reagans speeches and writings are publicly available and easily searchable. (Look. Its easy http://www.reagan.utexas.edu/search/speeches/speech_srch.html . Try searching for civil rights) But your so well trained, they also know you wont look. You will rely on them to interpret it for you. Your intellectually weak and they know it.
Had you taken a second, you would have come across multiple references that refute your claims. How about his own words on the subject? A reported once asked him this directly:
Q. Mr. President, in the sixties you opposed all civil rights legislation, but more recently you said that you were a part of the Martin Luther King revolution. If that is the case, why is your administration so bent on wiping out the flexible hiring goals for blacks, minorities, and women? And I'd like to follow up.
The President. Helen, we're not wanting to do that. But we have seen in administering these programs, we've seen that the affirmative action program was becoming a quota system. Now, I've lived long enough to have seen quotas when they were employed long before there was a civil rights movement, when they were employed in my youth to definitely discriminate and use the quota as a means of discrimination. And, therefore, we feel that, yes, we want affirmative action to continue. We want what I think Martin Luther King asked for: We want a colorblind society. The ideal will be when we have achieved the moment when no one -- or when nothing is done to or for anyone because of race, differences, or religion, or ethnic origin; and it's done not because of those things but in spite of them.
Or Gee. How about this?
Q. You have strong views about civil rights. What are your views on goals and timetables?
The President. Well, as I said before, I think that we must have a colorblind society. Things must be done for people neither because of nor in spite of any differences between us in race, ethnic origin, or religion. And it's so easy to fall into a bureaucratic practice of saying, ``Well, isn't this the easiest thing? Let's just tell them they have to have x number and that'll settle it.'' Well, let me give you an example. Recently here in the East -- and I won't name the locale -- we had a public housing apartment, and they had on their own set a quota. And the quota was for 30 percent black. Now, they didn't get 70 percent white; they had empty units. And yet because their quota was full, they were turning away every black applicant that came to the public housing because of their quota. This is the type of thing that we want to stop. And it isn't government policy. Again, as I say, you have to recognize that when you go down far enough in the echelons of bureaucracy, things can take place that you find you are almost helpless to stop.
What do you know. Oh so many. Here is another:
Q. Mr. President, are you at all concerned about an apparent continuing perception among a number of black leaders that the White House continues to be, if not hostile, at least not welcome to black viewpoints, and that administration policies are working to widen the income gap between blacks and whites, and also increase black unemployment?
The President. I'm aware of all of that. And it's very disturbing to me, because anyone who knows my life story, knows that long before there was even a thing called the civil rights movement, I was busy on that side.
As a sports announcer I didn't have any Willie Mays or Reggie Jacksons to talk about when I w
"The DoJ also noted that the settlement resolves a lawsuit filed on behalf of the US government by former Oracle employee, Paul Frascella, who will receive $40 million as his share of the recovery in the case. Under the whistleblower provisions of the False Claims Act, private citizens can bring lawsuits on behalf of the United States and share in any recovery obtained by the government."
History is long and deep and that is not something you just erase overnight. I am in the south and I have experienced racism and if there was one political class behind it, it would be the Democrats. In fact, those racist Democrats i knew then are still here now, still proudly wearing blue, still calling minorities - boy, still very rich and still holding fundraisers and parties for their other racist democrat friends.
Second, I would argue that Democrat policies towards minorities proves their continued racism. Democrats built these huge slave housing projects for us, made us shop at the company store and put the union bosses over us to keep us in line. Then they brought us planned parenthood to keep us from breeding. Built a whole shit load of prisons for when we get out of line. The Democrats told us (as today) its for our own good. We too damn stupid you see so they keep on doing whats "right" for us...
On every single political issues my community has fought, it was the Republicans in our corner and now we even have the Libertarians. And don't think racism is just limited to whites. Most of Sheila Jackson Lee's efforts are targeted at a specific group of people. She has often offended the Hispanic community so much so that many label her a racist (she does not like white people either btw).
So stop with your propaganda. It wont work with me. I do hope that you do some real research, open your damn eyes and see past all the lies your being told. The only card the Democrats could play was the blame game and they turn out a whole lotta propaganda in attempt to erase a century of evil shit. But fortunately, there are many people like me that know the truth and will take time out of their day to stand here and tell you - You are full of shit!
over a century of racist democrats and all you got is propaganda. oh, and lets not forget some of the current racist democrats - New Black Panther Party... Tan Klan, Latino KKK, the Brown Berets, La Raza... all hard core democrats.
eat it hombre. I live on the border and get to see it all.
My familia Libertarian (some are former La Raza supporters so dont even try some bullshit that they are not racist). We are honest enough to recognize that Republicans hold the record on civil rights in this country. Anything contrary is propaganda plain and simple. So push your bullshit all you want. Its a lie and nothing will ever change that. Cite other propagandists all you want - it still does not change the fact that it is propaganda. Make sense to your simple little mind ?
Your a little boy playing with fire. Someone will get hurt with your lies and that will be on your hands.
No my friend, the burden of proof is on you. I demonstrated a pattern - well over a century of Republicans fighting and dying for Civil Rights and a century of Democrats not only fighting against it but murdering people to try to keep blacks and women down.
And along comes you who says they magically *poof* switched roles. This in light of the fact that Robert Byrd, former KKK leader, stayed in congress until his recent death. Was he a Republican? No. He was a hard core, blue to the bone, racist Democrat. He traded slave housing for ghetto's and plantation bosses for unions. Same shit.
So, this makes you either an ignorant fool that should read a book, or an unashamed partisan propagandists that must resort to such obvious lies. I hope its the prior. The latter is just so Joseph Goebbels (that's not a compliment btw).
You cant run from the facts. Democrats are historically racist. Republicans have historically fought them on this issue.
There is a century of history to back it up. Robert Byrd was a KKK leader. Voted no on the Civil RIghts Act. And what party was he a member of? Thats right he was a die hard Democrat
Re:Probably neither party with Democratic leanings
on
Facebook Forming a PAC
·
· Score: 1
"out of goodness of their heart and pristine beauty of their souls"....
October 22 1868, a Democratic Party official and Klansman assassinated a Republican U.S. Representative. The victim was James Hinds, of Arkansas, gunned down while campaigning for re-election. Hinds had incurred the wrath of the Democratic Party by speaking in defense of African-Americans.
Re:Probably neither party with Democratic leanings
on
Facebook Forming a PAC
·
· Score: 2
attempt at/sarc or do you really believe the crap they sell u?
March 30, 1868
Republicans begin impeachment trial of Democrat President Andrew Johnson, who declared: “This is a country for white men, and by God, as long as I am President, it shall be a government of white men” October 7, 1868
Republicans denounce Democratic Party’s national campaign theme: “This is a white man’s country: Let white men rule” February 3, 1870
After passing House with 98% Republican support and 97% Democrat opposition, Republicans’ 15th Amendment is ratified, granting vote to all Americans regardless of race April 20, 1871
Republican Congress enacts the Ku Klux Klan Act, outlawing Democratic Party-affiliated terrorist groups which oppressed African-Americans February 8, 1894
Democrat Congress and Democrat President Grover Cleveland join to repeal Republicans’ Enforcement Act, which had enabled African-Americans to vote August 18, 1920
Republican-authored 19th Amendment, giving women the vote, becomes part of Constitution; 26 of the 36 states to ratify had Republican-controlled legislatures January 26, 1922
House passes bill authored by U.S. Rep. Leonidas Dyer (R-MO) making lynching a federal crime; Senate Democrats block it with filibuster October 3, 1924
Republicans denounce three-time Democrat presidential nominee William Jennings Bryan for defending the Ku Klux Klan at 1924 Democratic National Convention June 12, 1929
First Lady Lou Hoover invites wife of U.S. Rep. Oscar De Priest (R-IL), an African-American, to tea at the White House, sparking protests by Democrats across the country August 17, 1937
Republicans organize opposition to former Ku Klux Klansman and Democrat U.S. Senator Hugo Black, appointed to U.S. Supreme Court by FDR; his Klan background was hidden until after confirmation August 8, 1945
Republicans condemn Harry Truman’s surprise use of the atomic bomb in Japan. The whining and criticism goes on for years. It begins two days after the Hiroshima bombing, when former Republican President Herbert Hoover writes to a friend that “The use of the atomic bomb, with its indiscriminate killing of women and children, revolts my soul.” March 12, 1956
Ninety-seven Democrats in Congress condemn Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. Board of Education, and pledge to continue segregation November 6, 1956
African-American civil rights leaders Martin Luther King and Ralph Abernathy vote for Republican Dwight Eisenhower for President June 9, 1964
Republicans condemn 14-hour filibuster against 1964 Civil Rights Act by U.S. Senator and former Ku Klux Klansman Robert Byrd (D-WV), who still serves in the Senate February 19, 1976
President Gerald Ford formally rescinds President Franklin Roosevelt’s notorious Executive Order authorizing internment of over 120,000 Japanese-Americans during WWII September 15, 1981
President Ronald Reagan establishes the White House Initiative on Historically Black Colleges and Universities, to increase African-American participation in federal education programs
Oh my that is a great big Glass House you live in. I bet you power it with evil coal....
Wouldn't it be great if the entire following stopped being so damn hypocritical and disappeared from the grid?
Our problems would be solved.
Right. I have no patience for bat shit religious zealotry. c02 is either evil or its not. There is no room for moderation when your claiming the end time prophesies.
So look at you. You believe this crap. co2 is evil. End of the world. Killing little babies in africa.
But you consume to your hearts content. Sin against your religion. Your carbon existence at the expense of another. But you go around preaching the opposite of what you do.
I could say Hypocrite! and leave it at that but it warrants more. So fuck you, and the religion that brainwashed you. Now go get in your fucking cave.
Slashdot Mirror
Sure you don't fall into that category? We moved into a debt based economy a long long time ago...
http://www.truthinequity.com/video.php?id=1
---
You school clearly spent all your money football team.
No more energy research, no more parks, no more public education, no more low income housing, no more roads & bridges. What a grand utopia he has planned for us.
Education is handled at the state/ local level. Can you really justify the massive budget of the Dept of Ed? What service do they actually provide? Why do we pay twice for the same services?
Oh My. What a deep dark hole you have dug. Every single piece of propaganda refuted and now all you have is some nonsense on Cuba and veiled accusations that somehow contradict Reagan's position?
Judging by your past citations, im not surprised that is all they left you with but sadly, that too is bullshit.
You owe this man an apology and the next time the Democrat propaganda machine spins some bullshit up, I hope you think twice before playing their card.
Stop being a tool.
Your slipping. And i don't believe for a second you have researched, read or listened to anything from him. It would be impossible to reach your conclusions if you did.
Propagandist : Regan supports apartheid.
Reagan: Bullshit. http://www.reagan.utexas.edu/archives/speeches/1986/092686h.htm
A favorite trick of the Democrats is to create a bill that says one thing but stuff it full of misguided, misleading shit. When the president refuses to sign on, they love to say "why he doesn't support X". Its a lie. Its propaganda and it takes you all of two seconds to get the real story behind it. Stop being so damn lazy.
That makes you another second-hand source to me, why are you more reliable than all the others?
ah - now your starting to get it. if you ask that of all your sources, perhaps there is hope for you.
First, I would start with the Reagan library. Get the "other side" of the argument. For example:
Propagandist: Regan was against civil rights.
Reagan: No. I am for civil rights. I am against the affirmative action quotas the Democrats are trying to stuff into the bill. We have been working the civil rights thing for a while in California and we tried that quota thing. It backfired. Quotas result in further discrimination and I am against any discrimination.
Result: : Reagan was right of course. Flash forward to today and you have American students graduating from High School that are being denied access to colleges based on the color of their skin. Somehow, discrimination against white people is not really discrimination (Gratz v. Bollinger). what!?!?!
His speeches are rich. They are worth the listen. Learn about him. Get in his head before you draw your conclusions. Last thing you want to do is falsely accuse someone. Especially someone who is on the right side of the issue. http://cstl-cla.semo.edu/renka/modern_presidents/reagan_speeches.htm
No weak minded little one. Citing propagandists is not research.
I do know his history better than you. I was alive then. I lived it first person. I watched the propagandists attack him and I am telling you first hand that your "resources" are full of shit.
There is plenty of information that contradicts the propagandists. Clearly you have not bothered to read any of that. No, no no. That's not permitted in a brainwashed cult.
You argue Reagan's history with some random, unknown persons words. You don't know who and you don't know if its factual. Your to young to have known him so I bring you Reagan words. Think of it as Reagan speaking from the grave. Personally challenging your accusations.
What you dropped is an excellent example of propaganda. Reagan was Democrat public enemy number 1 and the attackers worked overtime on him. It was another shameful time in the Democrats history.
You have proven you are nothing more than a mindless propagandist. You willfully spread lies and ignore the truth. You have no shame and without hesitation, you commit to maligning and innocent man. Your judged him guilty and never bothered to check your facts
Your a little brainwashed cult member. Doubt me? Go listen to Reagan's speeches. Read his works. Research his actions. It is obvious to any individual that he was a strong civil rights supporter.
...who ended up forgiven for his past by the GOP
so now you have to start making shit up I see... dropping the bullshit card is he democrats way of admitting defeat. in their mind, defeat its temporary... if only they can buy enough time to spin some more lies...
Like I love your girl Pelosi. She "stands in solidarity with the Wall Street Protesters". Ironically, they are protesting the very shit she created. But in her mind, they are cool. She knows all she needs to do is spin some shit and you will eat it all up. sucka. I hope she bitch fucks you again and makes another dozen million off your dumb ass.
Oh little one. I am so disappointed in you. You had a choice. Carefully research and validate your accusations before making them or blindly run with the first thing you think validates your position. You chose to be lazy and reach deep into the propaganda well. All you managed to do was validate my point and make an utter ass out of yourself.
The propagandist preys on your laziness. We all know that Reagans speeches and writings are publicly available and easily searchable. (Look. Its easy http://www.reagan.utexas.edu/search/speeches/speech_srch.html . Try searching for civil rights) But your so well trained, they also know you wont look. You will rely on them to interpret it for you. Your intellectually weak and they know it.
Had you taken a second, you would have come across multiple references that refute your claims. How about his own words on the subject? A reported once asked him this directly:
Q. Mr. President, in the sixties you opposed all civil rights legislation, but more recently you said that you were a part of the Martin Luther King revolution. If that is the case, why is your administration so bent on wiping out the flexible hiring goals for blacks, minorities, and women? And I'd like to follow up.
The President. Helen, we're not wanting to do that. But we have seen in administering these programs, we've seen that the affirmative action program was becoming a quota system. Now, I've lived long enough to have seen quotas when they were employed long before there was a civil rights movement, when they were employed in my youth to definitely discriminate and use the quota as a means of discrimination. And, therefore, we feel that, yes, we want affirmative action to continue. We want what I think Martin Luther King asked for: We want a colorblind society. The ideal will be when we have achieved the moment when no one -- or when nothing is done to or for anyone because of race, differences, or religion, or ethnic origin; and it's done not because of those things but in spite of them.
Or Gee. How about this?
Q. You have strong views about civil rights. What are your views on goals and timetables?
The President. Well, as I said before, I think that we must have a colorblind society. Things must be done for people neither because of nor in spite of any differences between us in race, ethnic origin, or religion. And it's so easy to fall into a bureaucratic practice of saying, ``Well, isn't this the easiest thing? Let's just tell them they have to have x number and that'll settle it.'' Well, let me give you an example. Recently here in the East -- and I won't name the locale -- we had a public housing apartment, and they had on their own set a quota. And the quota was for 30 percent black. Now, they didn't get 70 percent white; they had empty units. And yet because their quota was full, they were turning away every black applicant that came to the public housing because of their quota. This is the type of thing that we want to stop. And it isn't government policy. Again, as I say, you have to recognize that when you go down far enough in the echelons of bureaucracy, things can take place that you find you are almost helpless to stop.
What do you know. Oh so many. Here is another:
Q. Mr. President, are you at all concerned about an apparent continuing perception among a number of black leaders that the White House continues to be, if not hostile, at least not welcome to black viewpoints, and that administration policies are working to widen the income gap between blacks and whites, and also increase black unemployment?
The President. I'm aware of all of that. And it's very disturbing to me, because anyone who knows my life story, knows that long before there was even a thing called the civil rights movement, I was busy on that side. As a sports announcer I didn't have any Willie Mays or Reggie Jacksons to talk about when I w
"The DoJ also noted that the settlement resolves a lawsuit filed on behalf of the US government by former Oracle employee, Paul Frascella, who will receive $40 million as his share of the recovery in the case. Under the whistleblower provisions of the False Claims Act, private citizens can bring lawsuits on behalf of the United States and share in any recovery obtained by the government."
History is long and deep and that is not something you just erase overnight. I am in the south and I have experienced racism and if there was one political class behind it, it would be the Democrats. In fact, those racist Democrats i knew then are still here now, still proudly wearing blue, still calling minorities - boy, still very rich and still holding fundraisers and parties for their other racist democrat friends.
Second, I would argue that Democrat policies towards minorities proves their continued racism. Democrats built these huge slave housing projects for us, made us shop at the company store and put the union bosses over us to keep us in line. Then they brought us planned parenthood to keep us from breeding. Built a whole shit load of prisons for when we get out of line. The Democrats told us (as today) its for our own good. We too damn stupid you see so they keep on doing whats "right" for us...
On every single political issues my community has fought, it was the Republicans in our corner and now we even have the Libertarians. And don't think racism is just limited to whites. Most of Sheila Jackson Lee's efforts are targeted at a specific group of people. She has often offended the Hispanic community so much so that many label her a racist (she does not like white people either btw).
So stop with your propaganda. It wont work with me. I do hope that you do some real research, open your damn eyes and see past all the lies your being told. The only card the Democrats could play was the blame game and they turn out a whole lotta propaganda in attempt to erase a century of evil shit. But fortunately, there are many people like me that know the truth and will take time out of their day to stand here and tell you - You are full of shit!
did you even read what you posted?
... elected on a local tax issue.
His opponent, John Treen was endorsed by U.S. President George H. W. Bush, former President Ronald Reagan, and other notable Republicans,[33]...
He certainly was a Democrat though. fail.
Wonderful. Now go make the world a better place.
over a century of racist democrats and all you got is propaganda. oh, and lets not forget some of the current racist democrats - New Black Panther Party... Tan Klan, Latino KKK, the Brown Berets, La Raza... all hard core democrats.
eat it hombre. I live on the border and get to see it all.
My familia Libertarian (some are former La Raza supporters so dont even try some bullshit that they are not racist). We are honest enough to recognize that Republicans hold the record on civil rights in this country. Anything contrary is propaganda plain and simple. So push your bullshit all you want. Its a lie and nothing will ever change that. Cite other propagandists all you want - it still does not change the fact that it is propaganda. Make sense to your simple little mind ?
Your a little boy playing with fire. Someone will get hurt with your lies and that will be on your hands.
Jokes on me. I was trolled by an ignorant little twat still living with his mama. pero que coño
Now piss off and go clean your room.
Gee. Your right. Radioactive waste is not pollution. What was i thinking.
still want to call that hypocritical airstrike in on yourself?
No my friend, the burden of proof is on you. I demonstrated a pattern - well over a century of Republicans fighting and dying for Civil Rights and a century of Democrats not only fighting against it but murdering people to try to keep blacks and women down.
And along comes you who says they magically *poof* switched roles. This in light of the fact that Robert Byrd, former KKK leader, stayed in congress until his recent death. Was he a Republican? No. He was a hard core, blue to the bone, racist Democrat. He traded slave housing for ghetto's and plantation bosses for unions. Same shit.
So, this makes you either an ignorant fool that should read a book, or an unashamed partisan propagandists that must resort to such obvious lies. I hope its the prior. The latter is just so Joseph Goebbels (that's not a compliment btw).
I can understand that you are embarrassed by your political party history but facts are facts - you cant change that.
The Republican Party has always stood for freedom, liberty and civil rights.
Now stop your lying and go learn some history about the people you support. You just might realize that you have been batting for the wrong team.
What propagandist bullshit are you spouting?
You cant run from the facts. Democrats are historically racist. Republicans have historically fought them on this issue.
There is a century of history to back it up. Robert Byrd was a KKK leader. Voted no on the Civil RIghts Act. And what party was he a member of? Thats right he was a die hard Democrat
"out of goodness of their heart and pristine beauty of their souls" ....
October 22 1868, a Democratic Party official and Klansman assassinated a Republican U.S. Representative. The victim was James Hinds, of Arkansas, gunned down while campaigning for re-election. Hinds had incurred the wrath of the Democratic Party by speaking in defense of African-Americans.
attempt at /sarc or do you really believe the crap they sell u?
March 30, 1868 Republicans begin impeachment trial of Democrat President Andrew Johnson, who declared: “This is a country for white men, and by God, as long as I am President, it shall be a government of white men”
October 7, 1868 Republicans denounce Democratic Party’s national campaign theme: “This is a white man’s country: Let white men rule”
February 3, 1870 After passing House with 98% Republican support and 97% Democrat opposition, Republicans’ 15th Amendment is ratified, granting vote to all Americans regardless of race
April 20, 1871 Republican Congress enacts the Ku Klux Klan Act, outlawing Democratic Party-affiliated terrorist groups which oppressed African-Americans
February 8, 1894 Democrat Congress and Democrat President Grover Cleveland join to repeal Republicans’ Enforcement Act, which had enabled African-Americans to vote
August 18, 1920 Republican-authored 19th Amendment, giving women the vote, becomes part of Constitution; 26 of the 36 states to ratify had Republican-controlled legislatures
January 26, 1922 House passes bill authored by U.S. Rep. Leonidas Dyer (R-MO) making lynching a federal crime; Senate Democrats block it with filibuster
October 3, 1924 Republicans denounce three-time Democrat presidential nominee William Jennings Bryan for defending the Ku Klux Klan at 1924 Democratic National Convention
June 12, 1929 First Lady Lou Hoover invites wife of U.S. Rep. Oscar De Priest (R-IL), an African-American, to tea at the White House, sparking protests by Democrats across the country
August 17, 1937 Republicans organize opposition to former Ku Klux Klansman and Democrat U.S. Senator Hugo Black, appointed to U.S. Supreme Court by FDR; his Klan background was hidden until after confirmation
August 8, 1945 Republicans condemn Harry Truman’s surprise use of the atomic bomb in Japan. The whining and criticism goes on for years. It begins two days after the Hiroshima bombing, when former Republican President Herbert Hoover writes to a friend that “The use of the atomic bomb, with its indiscriminate killing of women and children, revolts my soul.”
March 12, 1956 Ninety-seven Democrats in Congress condemn Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. Board of Education, and pledge to continue segregation
November 6, 1956 African-American civil rights leaders Martin Luther King and Ralph Abernathy vote for Republican Dwight Eisenhower for President
June 9, 1964 Republicans condemn 14-hour filibuster against 1964 Civil Rights Act by U.S. Senator and former Ku Klux Klansman Robert Byrd (D-WV), who still serves in the Senate
February 19, 1976 President Gerald Ford formally rescinds President Franklin Roosevelt’s notorious Executive Order authorizing internment of over 120,000 Japanese-Americans during WWII
September 15, 1981 President Ronald Reagan establishes the White House Initiative on Historically Black Colleges and Universities, to increase African-American participation in federal education programs
more... http://www.black-and-right.com/the-democrat-race-lie/
Oh my that is a great big Glass House you live in. I bet you power it with evil coal....
Wouldn't it be great if the entire following stopped being so damn hypocritical and disappeared from the grid?
Our problems would be solved.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/08/business/patent-bill-could-save-a-law-firm-millions.html?_r=2&emc=tnt&tntemail1=y smoke and mirrors....
Right. I have no patience for bat shit religious zealotry. c02 is either evil or its not. There is no room for moderation when your claiming the end time prophesies.
So look at you. You believe this crap. co2 is evil. End of the world. Killing little babies in africa.
But you consume to your hearts content. Sin against your religion. Your carbon existence at the expense of another. But you go around preaching the opposite of what you do.
I could say Hypocrite! and leave it at that but it warrants more. So fuck you, and the religion that brainwashed you. Now go get in your fucking cave.
oh the stupidity.
blah, blah, blah.... THE WORLD IS GOING TO END!!! blah, blah, blah.... THE WORLD IS GOING TO END!!!
sounds like religious zealotry to me.... We must offer sacrifices (tax tithes) to Gia to stop the END OF THE WORLD!!!!!!
now, go get in your fucking cave and stop whining about others. If you comment here again, I know your a hypocritical bitch.