got through in person interviews twice...
on
Defining Google
·
· Score: 3, Interesting
I tried twice to get to google, passed the phone screens twice, which I guess I should consider myself happy about, but 'failed' the in person interviews both times (that was before IPO, I would assume it is much easier to get it nowadays).
My impression was that they value youth and brightness (as in, just out of school, being able to quickly recall or come up with stuff irrelevant to actual work) over actual experience... (but yes, this is obviously sour grapes !)
I've watched 3 movies so far and even though the regular prices are too high [but if you go through real.movielink.com they have a small number of movies $1 every week, which is how I watched mine], the limitations (24h after first view, IE, windows, etc...) are painful,... It does work suprisingly well.
I have a 100inches front projection home theater and it looks almost as good as a good DVD, and the files are only ~540Mb(*)... They must be using some pretty powerful codecs (better than dvd's mpeg2)
*: Or twice that for the "EQ" (higher quality) but again, standard quality was actually pretty good
That is the most obfuscated program I think I have ever seen.
Thanks ! I'll take this as a compliment because that was the point then: I created this about 7 years ago for a.signature, it shows that PS is a pretty neat programing language and you can express things very compactly. This progam basically can draw any goban and encodes positions of black and white stones on a single character... (See my outdated Go page for other versions)
%!PS-Adobe-1.0 EPSF-10. % PS GoBan (c) 1996 by Laurent Demailly %%BoundingBox: 0 0 150 150 % *** http://www.demailly.com/~dl/go/ *** /D{def} def/d{dup}D/e{exch}D/s{stroke}D/l{lineto}D/M{mul}D/f{fill}D/S{setgray}D /R{grestore}D/m{moveto}D/z 9 D/c 15 D/x z c M D/p{42 sub d z mod 1 add e z idiv 1 add gsave 1 index c M 1 index c M c.5 M 1 0 arc gsave f R.5 S s c M e c M e c.3 M 270 360 arc s R}D 0 0 x 2 M 1 0 arc.9.7.5 setrgbcolor f s 0 S c c x{d c m d x l d c e m x e l}for s(BeJR\\IHP>=6U){p}forall 1 S(?TS[QcGZFOC){p}forall
Fetch (old) code from my site and comment,
or ask people working with me what they
think about my code...
I'll make my own absurd generalization:
"I have yet to see someone coding better than me":-) {Btw be warry that you can always find someone else what will perceive that you have a particular deficiency (like having too complex code...)}
No certificates are name based, not ip based, so no problem. (You may need wildcard certificates if you plan on doing www1... www99... 'manual/explicit' balancing) [see, someone answered;-)]
A client that would understand tcl/tk plus html/xml would pretty much fit your bill in my opinion. You can setup a linux box doing just that. If you throw in the (unfortunatly quasi defunct) tcl plugin for netscape you have something pretty much cross platform and much easier....
Any idea why the Red Hat IPO Update/. article and thread, posted by Hemos on Friday August 13, @17:53 EDT from the lotsa-flame dept. seems to have disappeared from the main page ??
same for me ! got 0 out of my 600 non invitee program:-((( [though I did do everything, monitor the pages, etc... I had hoped the 15 min windows this morning meant at least those making it would get at least 100 shares.. but sadly, not even !] I wonder if asking for 100 I would have got them... I'm still waiting the result for the invitee part... I hope that one will work out ok !!
Uh uh dljdirect requires: investors who maintain a minimum of $100,000 in total account assets aggregated under the same DLJdirect account(s) ID. This is more restrictive than E*Trade afaik! (I was able to get in the Salon IPO (ok I'm actually loosing money on it as it is trading below ipo price, so that might be why I got in 'easily'...) with Etrade while I unfortunatly don't have 100k in stock).
I tried twice to get to google, passed the phone screens twice, which I guess I should consider myself happy about, but 'failed' the in person interviews both times (that was before IPO, I would assume it is much easier to get it nowadays).
My impression was that they value youth and brightness (as in, just out of school, being able to quickly recall or come up with stuff irrelevant to actual work) over actual experience... (but yes, this is obviously sour grapes !)
I've watched 3 movies so far and even though the regular prices are too high [but if you go through real.movielink.com they have a small number of movies $1 every week, which is how I watched mine], the limitations (24h after first view, IE, windows, etc...) are painful,... It does work suprisingly well.
I have a 100inches front projection home theater and it looks almost as good as a good DVD, and the files are only ~540Mb(*)... They must be using some pretty powerful codecs (better than dvd's mpeg2)
*: Or twice that for the "EQ" (higher quality) but again, standard quality was actually pretty good
Just my experience
Well, you can still download the source and adapt the concept to use another vulnerability assesment tool, not just Qualys'.
:-)
Or in general, this shows that there are ways to enhance both tools efficiency by combining them.
ps: I was the lead on Quidscor, so yes, I'm biased
%!PS-Adobe-1.0 EPSF-10. % PS GoBan (c) 1996 by Laurent DemaillyD /f{fill}D/S{setgray}D .5 M 1 0 arc gsave f R .5 S s c M e c M e .3 M 270 360 arc s R}D 0 0 x 2 M 1 0 arc .9 .7 .5 setrgbcolor f s 0 S c c x{d
%%BoundingBox: 0 0 150 150 % *** http://www.demailly.com/~dl/go/ ***
/D{def} def/d{dup}D/e{exch}D/s{stroke}D/l{lineto}D/M{mul}
/R{grestore}D/m{moveto}D/z 9 D/c 15 D/x z c M D/p{42 sub d z mod 1 add e z idiv
1 add gsave 1 index c M 1 index c M c
c
c m d x l d c e m x e l}for s(BeJR\\IHP>=6U){p}forall 1 S(?TS[QcGZFOC){p}forall
Fetch (old) code from my site and comment, :-) {Btw be warry that you can always find someone else what will perceive that you have a particular deficiency (like having too complex code...)}
or ask people working with me what they
think about my code...
I'll make my own absurd generalization:
"I have yet to see someone coding better than me"
No certificates are name based, not ip based, so no problem. (You may need wildcard certificates if you plan on doing www1 ... www99... 'manual/explicit' balancing) [see, someone answered ;-)]
A client that would understand tcl/tk
plus html/xml would pretty much fit
your bill in my opinion.
You can setup a linux box doing just that.
If you throw in the (unfortunatly quasi
defunct) tcl plugin for netscape you
have something pretty much cross platform
and much easier....
Any idea why the Red Hat IPO Update /. article and thread, posted by Hemos on Friday August 13, @17:53 EDT from the lotsa-flame dept. seems to have disappeared from the main page ??
I get an 'empty document' error when I try any member services... Am I the only one ?
same for me ! got 0 out of my 600 non invitee program :-((( [though I did do everything, monitor the pages, etc... I had hoped the 15 min windows this morning meant at least those making it would get at least 100 shares.. but sadly, not even !] I wonder if asking for 100 I would have got them... I'm still waiting the result for the invitee part... I hope that one will work out ok !!
Uh uh dljdirect requires :
investors who maintain a minimum of $100,000 in total account assets aggregated under the same DLJdirect account(s) ID.
This is more restrictive than E*Trade afaik! (I was able to get in the Salon IPO (ok I'm actually loosing money on it as it is trading below ipo price, so that might be why I got in 'easily'...) with Etrade while I unfortunatly don't have 100k in stock).