No fragmentation? A friend was just bitching about his Word With Friends. Apparently some of the buttons are simply not accessible because the UI was created on one phone, and whatever that phone is, had a bigger screen resolution than his phone, so some buttons disappear off screen.
Please. Boies was the lead lawyer in the Microsoft monopoly trial - against Microsoft. He was one of the best trial lawyers to break up illegal monopolies then.
Lawyers argue for the side that is paying for them. Just like everyone else - you do the work you're paid to do.
You probably can't get more commercial grade than Cisco, which is what we use at work. Guess what. It's not just the cost of switches, but also the cost of running those wires. At $50 to $200/drop, it quickly adds up. And if you need to add more...
Wired backbone cost is the same for wired or wireless switches, and so, is irrelevant.
Just have your OSX do a repair - it could be that certain VTOC or directory tables were damaged, and a repair may fix it. The files themselves should be OK, but the pointers to them are fubared.
Also try something like http://www.cgsecurity.org/wiki/PhotoRec or similar to recover deleted files. There's one for OSX. Run it after a repair, and photorec, and you should get most of your crap back.
Kame was well supported on OpenBSD. That Japanese guy was the only guy with write permissions into the kernel source code for a large number of OSes from linux to darwin to all the *BSDs.
umm, there was a recent report that compared ipv6 stacks of a bunch of OSes, and OpenBSD (5.0) came out #1 in terms of compliance to standards. Stands to reason, since these guys sticklers for doing things right.
The only reason it started "eroding" Netscape's market share is because it was bundled. And the only reason for bundling at that time was to kill off Netscape. Did you miss the Microsoft Monopoly trial?
Like I said - depending on what you mean by fail. It's like one of the UNIX guys who took MCSE exams way back when. He went in and took it cold (no prep, no study, nothing). For every question, he asked himself, which answer would make Microsoft the most money, and chose that.
He passed his exam.
Would you say Windows NT 4.0 was successful? Certainly, in terms of sales, it was. In terms of security and availability? Pure fucking piece of shit.
Depending on what you mean by fail. By the way, since you are older, you do realize IE was *BOUGHT*, and so was a bunch of others right? And sharepoint is a fucking piece of shit. Office was and still is a bloated piece of crap.
Slashdot Mirror
If you don't know how to enforce a full time proxy on an iphone...
How the fuck is monitoring your home network come with "legal issues"?!
What's so interesting about a problem that's been solved a thousand times over? If you don't know how to google, go learn how to google.
Ahh, didn't realize it was lossy compression. Compression by itself, I don't mind. But fucking with my data, that pisses me off.
Have you seen this? AES 256 is weaker than AES 128 bit.
http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2009/07/another_new_aes.html
Except that AES 256 bit is weaker than AES 128 bit.
http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2009/07/another_new_aes.html
And when you're losing the fight, you throw everything against the wall, and hope something sticks.
*HAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA*
And you'll get $10, where as the attorneys will get $100 mil.
Why is that a downside?
No fragmentation? A friend was just bitching about his Word With Friends. Apparently some of the buttons are simply not accessible because the UI was created on one phone, and whatever that phone is, had a bigger screen resolution than his phone, so some buttons disappear off screen.
Please. Boies was the lead lawyer in the Microsoft monopoly trial - against Microsoft. He was one of the best trial lawyers to break up illegal monopolies then.
Lawyers argue for the side that is paying for them. Just like everyone else - you do the work you're paid to do.
You probably can't get more commercial grade than Cisco, which is what we use at work. Guess what. It's not just the cost of switches, but also the cost of running those wires. At $50 to $200/drop, it quickly adds up. And if you need to add more...
Wired backbone cost is the same for wired or wireless switches, and so, is irrelevant.
Seriously? Ethernet is cheaper than wifi?
I thought about that. Then I thought about my usage patterns - TBolt display at work, with GigE to my TBolt display, and wireless everywhere else.
Also, while USB->Ethernet sucks, TBolt -> GigE adapter would work for me. Hell, with TBolt, we can do TBolt -> 10GigE
What makes you think the person who wrote that code is the copyright owner?
Not if you use ZFS. Corrupted files get fixed in a mirror.
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=So+does+zfs+do+checksumming+of+all+files%3F+%20
Just have your OSX do a repair - it could be that certain VTOC or directory tables were damaged, and a repair may fix it. The files themselves should be OK, but the pointers to them are fubared.
Also try something like http://www.cgsecurity.org/wiki/PhotoRec or similar to recover deleted files. There's one for OSX. Run it after a repair, and photorec, and you should get most of your crap back.
And what do you think RAID 5 is?
Kame was well supported on OpenBSD. That Japanese guy was the only guy with write permissions into the kernel source code for a large number of OSes from linux to darwin to all the *BSDs.
umm, there was a recent report that compared ipv6 stacks of a bunch of OSes, and OpenBSD (5.0) came out #1 in terms of compliance to standards. Stands to reason, since these guys sticklers for doing things right.
The only reason it started "eroding" Netscape's market share is because it was bundled. And the only reason for bundling at that time was to kill off Netscape. Did you miss the Microsoft Monopoly trial?
Like I said - depending on what you mean by fail. It's like one of the UNIX guys who took MCSE exams way back when. He went in and took it cold (no prep, no study, nothing). For every question, he asked himself, which answer would make Microsoft the most money, and chose that.
He passed his exam.
Would you say Windows NT 4.0 was successful? Certainly, in terms of sales, it was. In terms of security and availability? Pure fucking piece of shit.
No, it's anything that Microsoft forces that shitting marketing "we must make it all look and feel like windows" that causes it to fail.
Depending on what you mean by fail. By the way, since you are older, you do realize IE was *BOUGHT*, and so was a bunch of others right? And sharepoint is a fucking piece of shit. Office was and still is a bloated piece of crap.