Slashdot Mirror


Verizon To Kill All Unlimited Data Plans

afabbro writes "Verizon mentioned in an investor conference that it will be eliminating unlimited data plans, even for those it grandfathered in. From the article: 'Speaking at the J.P Morgan Technology Media and Telecom conference today, Verizon Communications CFO Fran Shammo told investors that the company's 3G unlimited data plans that customers were allowed to hang onto last year when Verizon switched to a tiered offering will soon go away entirely. Instead, the company will migrate its existing and new 4G LTE customers to a new "data share plan." The company has yet to announce the details of this new plan, but it has said previously that the data share plan will be introduced in midsummer. The plan will allow people on the same family plan to share buckets of data each month, much like they share voice minutes and text messaging. It will also allow individuals to share data across different 4G LTE devices.'"

331 comments

  1. the evil get eviler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Ridiculous text message pricing was the gateway drug.

    1. Re:the evil get eviler by linear+a · · Score: 3, Insightful

      More corporate assraping goodness

    2. Re:the evil get eviler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How corporashuny is it? Like mega-corporashuny corporashunness or like just semi-douche-corporashuny assrape corporashuns?

  2. Congratulations, Verizon by CanHasDIY · · Score: 5, Insightful

    On chasing away a good portion of your customer base.

    If they really, really want to let me out of my contract here in a month or two, so be it. T-mobile and Sprint still have unlimited plans, so I guess that's where I'll be heading.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    1. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      T-Mobile has ersatz unlimited - you get full speed data up to your chosen caps (2, 5, or 10gb), and EDGE speeds after.

    2. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by cpu6502 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why wait? The moment Verizon changes your plan from "unlimited" to "limited" the contract terms have changed, and you can reject those new terms (thus voiding the contract).

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    3. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's what they say, but my benchmarks say otherwise. I've hit the cap once or twice on my T-Mobile service, and it's about 60kbps after the cap, whereas EDGE can carry 300-600kbps easily (when you aren't past your cap)

    4. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Why wait? The moment Verizon changes your plan from "unlimited" to "limited" the contract terms have changed, and you can reject those new terms (thus voiding the contract).

      Be careful with that one... the fine print probably says if you reject the changes you are still bound to the contract with existing terms until the end of the
      contract... which means they would still hit you with an early termination fee that you would have to go to arbitration to get back.

    5. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by imcdona · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The only downside to T-mobile is that they compress all images to save bandwidth.

    6. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Makes me glad my new bionic has a sim card!

    7. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by CanHasDIY · · Score: 2

      Kind of complicated: I share a plan with my wife, and for some reason I don't recall, she gets to "upgrade" her phone 2-3 months before I do, which she has already done. When she got her new phone we were grandfathered in on unlimited (with zero effort on our part - thank you Radioshack guy!), but I still have another month or two to wait before I can upgrade myself.

      So, I decided to be fair (I know, a novel concept these days) and wait until they actually try and fuck me before I bail.

      Best case scenario, they drop this stupid idea and get to keep my business, and in exchange I plunk down some serious moolah on the latest root-and-rom-able Android powerhouse.

      Worst case scenario, I'm without a cell phone for a week or two during the transition, which, now that I think about it, really seems a blessing in disguise.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    8. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by the_B0fh · · Score: 2

      Why is that a downside?

    9. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by Jeng · · Score: 1

      That depends on if you need their coverage.

      I use T-mobile, I think it's great, I recommend it to friends and family who nearby me who do not do a lot of traveling.

      The problem with T-mobile are all the dead areas, when I visit the wife's family up in rural New England I end up having to find hotspots and piggyback on peoples wifi to make calls. There is no way I would recommend T-mobile to them because it doesn't work there, Verizon damn near has that region to themselves.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    10. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by ichthus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I was going to reply and tell you that you're mistaken. But, I decided to google it first, just to make sure before I made an ass of myself. Turns out, you're right. I was not aware.

      I tether often, and I don't notice this on pages loaded on the tethered PC. It must be a forced proxy they have set up in the stock browser?

      --
      sig: sauer
    11. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by Filgy · · Score: 1

      The SIM cards in Verizon or Sprint phones (CDMA based networks) are only 4G LTE SIM cards, so you can't just take your phone to any other carrier because your phone "has a sim card", which is what I think your comment is implying.

      Verizon still uses CDMA for all voice traffic, 4G is only used for data traffic currently (the SIM card is only a 4G LTE SIM card, still no cards for their 3G/2G CDMA which is what all voice traffic still uses)...

      --

      -- filgy
    12. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe if unlimited plans die away, contracts eventually will, too. All very interesting to watch. Me, I rarely use my dirt-cheap VOIP much less care where I put my shitty old tracfone, but if you're a jet setter who needs to watch all those videos and surf countless websites on your battery-hog phone, ok. Maybe I'll upgrade when you've paid for all their infrastructure improvements.

    13. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not quite. The change comes when you upgrade your phone. So while your contract is still valid, so is your unlimited plan so there is no monetary change involved with regards to the contract.

    14. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      I tether often, and I don't notice this on pages loaded on the tethered PC. It must be a forced proxy they have set up in the stock browser?

      If that's the case, it's of no consequence to me - I use Dolphin HD.

      Side note: how does T-Mobile treat tethering? Are they dicks about it like the big boys (Verizon locked me out by altering the wifi manager process, the evil fucks), or do they even care?

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    15. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was going to reply and tell you that you're mistaken. But, I decided to google it first, just to make sure before I made an ass of myself. Turns out, you're right.

      I was going to reply and say "you must be new here." But, I decided to look at your UID first, just to make sure before I made an ass out of you. Turns out, you're not.

    16. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm on a T-Mobile unlimited everything non-contract family plan and I pay an extra $10/month to use my phone's hotspot feature. I'm mostly in an EDGE area but even with 2 out of 4 or 3 out of 4 bars, I get reasonable download speed. Slashdot and Techdirt load completely in less than 20 seconds.

    17. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You probably get a lower picture quality as a result. It may not be very noticeable on a smartphone though, unless you try to zoom in.

    18. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by msauve · · Score: 1

      The same "SIM" which authorizes you for 4G data also authorizes you for voice. You can change (4G) phones on Verizon just by swapping SIMs. You can't take your phone to another carrier because the current ones don't do voice over LTE, and other carriers don't support CDMA (Sprint doesn't allow phones they didn't sell on their network, last I knew).

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    19. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Isn't that two typical illegal clauses (termination fee, bounding a contract for only one party)? That's like saying, "if you sign this, you agree to pay an additional 20€ per month, and if we want to change it to an arbitrary amount we can void your contract and you can't get away from us".

    20. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      But GP might be cool with the existing terms.

    21. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by lightknight · · Score: 1

      This is beyond stupi-...I ask you, why do they exist?

      How, how, do you go from an Unlimited plan to Limited plans? The price for bandwidth is constantly dropping. And upgrading towers is not THAT costly.

      The Chairman / CEO lose some serious money in Vegas recently?

      That all the cell-phone companies are getting into this recently, with the costs associated dropping, makes no sense. Collusion?

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    22. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by idontgno · · Score: 1, Informative

      Best case scenario, they drop this stupid idea and get to keep my business, and in exchange I plunk down some serious moolah on the latest root-and-rom-able Android powerhouse.

      We are talking about Verizon, right?

      "root-and-rom-able?"

      HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!... hahaha... Whoa, that's a good one.

      In case you hadn't heard, Verizon specializes in bootlocked fascism. They're proud of it.. I haven't heard of anyone who's successfully unlocked a recent Verizon Android bootblock. Rootable, sure. For now. (Motofail on Droid devices, for instance.) And 2nd-stage loaders like Safestrap will allow you to load and boot an alternate ROM, but not touch the kernel, so I hope you enjoy ICS on a Gingerbread kernel.

      Sorry. Verizon is pretty much bondage-and-domination as far as phone openness is concerned. I am functionally satisfied with my VZW Droid 4, but my needs are modest (root + freeze bloatware), but if I really wanted to load Cyanogenmod or Eclipse, I'd have to settle for half-measures.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    23. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

      Yeah that's unenforceable according to Consumer Protection Laws. It's similar to how Paypal included a bunch of terms in their contract/EULA, but the judge threw most of them in the trash as illegal. --- And the termination fee? Just don't send the check.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    24. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      If they really, really want to let me out of my contract here in a month or two, so be it. T-mobile and Sprint still have unlimited plans, so I guess that's where I'll be heading

      Seriously, you are like the archtypical obscenely fat glutton at the $9 all-you-can-eat-buffet threatening to take his business somewhere else.

      They probably can't wait for you to leave.

      Nice to see you possess an apparent magical ability to assess a person's entire personality based on 2 sentences.

      Look, asshat, I'll make it reeeal simple - Verizon sold me an unlimited data plan. Regardless of how much data I actually use, if Verizon didn't want me to be able to use unlimited amounts of data, they shouldn't have offered me an unlimited data plan Trying to say it's somehow my fault that they can't (or won't) deliver shows you for the egocentric fuck you really are.

      You strike me as the type who blames rape victims for wearing tight jeans. Why don't you do the world a favor and go fuck yourself. Hard.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    25. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahhh, nothing like a good contract of adhesion to stick it to 'em, eh?

      Fortunately, those sorts of terms are just the kind of thing that the company knows are illegal. If you say the magic words "I want to cancel due to a material change in my contract", if, in fact, there was a change, the rep will now cancel your service for free. It's easier than having that text sued out of their forms.

    26. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You can change (4G) phones on Verizon just by swapping SIMs." No, you can't. "Sprint doesn't allow phones they didn't sell on their network, last I knew" Also wrong, and has never been true.

    27. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by Githaron · · Score: 1

      My unlimited 4G data is the only thing that is holding me to Verizon. If I loose my unlimited data, they loose me.

    28. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by Githaron · · Score: 1

      What if you never upgrade but instead just get a new phone online?

    29. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by Githaron · · Score: 1

      I have an unlimited data plan. The most I have used so far in a month was under just under 6 GB. Most of the time my usage is between 2 and 3 GB per month. I don't want a limited data plan because I don't want to have to worry about my data usage not because I am a digital glutton.

    30. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by alex67500 · · Score: 2

      Isn't that two typical illegal clauses (termination fee, bounding a contract for only one party)? That's like saying, "if you sign this, you agree to pay an additional 20€ per month, and if we want to change it to an arbitrary amount we can void your contract and you can't get away from us".

      20$, not 20€ ! We got the Euro crisis, they got Verizon. Each to their own shit.

    31. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this is my situation, i probably use maybe 1 gig a month, maybe, i have wifi where i work and at home so i really don't use there network much, that being said, if a situation arises where i need to use a bunch of bandwidth, then id like to be able to without worrying how much its gonna cost if i go over. So this pisses me off, i am probably in the bottom 1% of bandwidth user, jsut giving them money for almost no reason whatsoever, just my piece of mind, and still they want to screw with my shit, i guess ill take my $180 a month phones and eat at a different buffet.

    32. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by jo_ham · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And to make it "reeeeeeeal" simple for you, Verizon is within its rights to stop selling an unlimited data plan at any time, beyond the terms it initially signed you up for. I am willing to bet that there are terms in the contract that state that they can do this.

      Perhaps they wanted to have unlimited data plans initially, and now that time has moved on a little, they want to offer something else. Saying that they should never have offered it to you in the first place if they were ever planning on changing their services in the future is a little silly, especially if you're calling out the GP as an "egocentric fuck". Look who's talking - you want Verizon to offer you an unlimited data plan for the rest of time, presumably until you die or get bored of them, regardless of what Verizon does in the future (again, without looking at the terms of your contact and just seeing "lolz unlimited that means forever, no backsies, at *my* discretion and not theirs".

      Everyone is quick to demonise them, but they are making changes that people have asked for - for example, shared data plans across multiple devices and shared data among households.

    33. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by Githaron · · Score: 1

      If they force me off my unlimited data plan, I will use that as a weapon to get out of my contract. I will probably just remove the SIM from my phone and use it's WI-FI and non-phone features. I will probably then go buy a dumb prepaid phone since I rarely call anyone.

    34. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Regardless of how much data I actually use, if Verizon didn't want me to be able to use unlimited amounts of data, they shouldn't have offered me an unlimited data plan

      You are right. They shouldn't have. Offering unlimited data is as stupid as the power company offering unlimited electricity. Sooner or later that business model is going to fail.

      Now I don't blame you for taking advantage of them. Not for one second. What? You think I don't have an unlimited plan myself?

      They already got rid of them for new subscribers, and now they are getting rid of them for people who are "grandfathered" as in people who they've already completed a contract with, and then when the user renewed, the plan they were on was no-longer offered as an option, but they elected to allow them to keep it. Now they are saying, hey, you had the unlimited free ride, we even let you keep it after we stopped offering it, and now we're done.

      Unless you think they are obligated to offer unlimited data in perpetuity? Which they aren't. That was never the deal you had.

      You strike me as the type who blames rape victims for wearing tight jeans. Why don't you do the world a favor and go fuck yourself. Hard.

      Class act.

    35. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by Daneurysm · · Score: 1

      "Sprint doesn't allow phones they didn't sell on their network, last I knew" Also wrong, and has never been true.
      [Citation Needed]

    36. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't it say it would happen when you next upgrade ?

    37. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by whovian · · Score: 1

      Why is that a downside?

      I guess the only compressing of images that makes sense from a bandwidth point of view is lossy compression. Otherwise it's just sucking cycles and potentially draining your battery.

      Opera Mini supposedly "compresses data", too, but I don't know how it compares.

      --
      To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
    38. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      When I had T-Mobile I was very unhappy. I download a lot of porn during the day on the many breaks I take
      and while stuff looked good enough on the phone, however when I get to business in the evenings in front of my laptop
      all I got was low res crap. I'm sorry if I'm downloading a 2Mb+ pictures I expect to get that, I want to see every detail of
      their breasts. Thanks for ignoring 98% of the internet, T-Mobile, I sure wont be back.

    39. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by Ksevio · · Score: 1

      Did you just compare a company discontinuing a service for new customers to rape?

      You're still getting to keep your unlimited data plan, but if you want to upgrade to 4G, you need to upgrade your plan as well.

    40. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by msauve · · Score: 1

      "You can change (4G) phones on Verizon just by swapping SIMs." No, you can't.

      You absolutely can. I've done it. Between a Thunderbolt and a Rezound, only moving the UICC ("SIM card") to change between them. I've even used a 4G phone SIM in a 4G modem to get data access.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    41. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      And once you move elsewhere, they will do the same. Its a no-win game for the consumers. I hope you have wifi at your home and business, at least that is a big chunk of your day.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    42. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't understand ... because of this where I work there wont be any corporate verizon phones going forward and neither will we expense any verizon bills on privately owned phones over $35 (and yes the sprint data plan costs are higher than that but they are expensed as long as its unlimited) . You have to have an unlimited data plan, period.

    43. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by vux984 · · Score: 2

      Most of the time my usage is between 2 and 3 GB per month. I don't want a limited data plan because I don't want to have to worry about my data usage not because I am a digital glutton.

      I hear ya, but at some point you have to recognize that in your case then it really doesn't matter.

      There is no reason people using 500GB should be paying the same as you and using 100x as much, just so you can "not worry".

      As long as the overage rates are reasonable, then it doesn't matter... at 25 cents a kilobyte or something the way they used to be one was legitimately terrified of hitting the cap.

      at $10/GB which is the current overage rate, its not really something one should need to worry all that much about even if you do bump into the cap one month.

    44. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by vux984 · · Score: 1

      So this pisses me off, i am probably in the bottom 1% of bandwidth user, jsut giving them money for almost no reason whatsoever, just my piece of mind

      That's insane. Paying for a highend plan just in case one day you might need it?

      Its cheaper to get the plan that actaully fits, and just pay the overage if you bump into it... as long as the overage isn't "punitive". Which with verizon's current plans of $10 / GB it is not.

      I mean, what does unlimited really mean? 1000GB ? 2000 GB? 5000GB? More? If they priced the plan based on the peope who actually felt entitled to use it that much, would you pay for that tier just "for piece of mind" ?

    45. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by Githaron · · Score: 1

      $10/GB is way too much money.

    46. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by drkstr1 · · Score: 0

      If that's the case, it's of no consequence to me - I use Dolphin HD.

      Good man! I almost wrote Android off as unusable, then I found it's only the Browser that sucks. UI opinions aside, Dolphin rocks the house in performance.

      I am curious to know if anyone has used another full featured browser on Android that preforms better than Dolphin. If so, please share.

      --
      Fanboy Status: Apache Flex, C#, Eclipse, KDE, Pirate Party, Ron Paul, Slackware, Windows 7
    47. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by sconeu · · Score: 1

      You are not on Verizon. Verizon is CDMA. They don't have SIMs.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    48. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, and you don't think Verizon compresses images?

      http://support.verizonwireless.com/information/data_disclosure.html

    49. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by imcdona · · Score: 1

      I tether often, and I don't notice this on pages loaded on the tethered PC. It must be a forced proxy they have set up in the stock browser?

      It doesn't matter if you're using the stock browser or not. In the past you used to be able to switch to a different APN (internet2.voicestream.com, internet3.voicestream.com) and avoid the compression. I've heard that modifying the headers with a Firefox addon get's around the issue but I haven't tried it. I personally connect to my router at home via PPTP on my android to get around the compression. If you're curious if your carrier is molesting your images, download the same image over cellular and wifi and compare the size of the two.

    50. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is that not punitive? Watch one movie, pay $50? That's fucking insane. We're living in 2012, this stuff does not really cost that kind of money. The current actual price is about $0.02/GB.

    51. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Verizon can't even tell the difference between 20 American dollars and 20 American cents, and you're throwing euros into the mess?!?

    52. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by toutankh · · Score: 1

      Could it be that it's exactly what they're after? I mean, are customers with unlimited data plans really profitable? I'd guess they are, but maybe someone who actually has a clue can answer?

    53. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why unenforceable? They're not charging the ETF for leaving over the change; they're charging it for leaving your previous contract. They leave the previous contract until its natural time has run.

    54. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But they won't lose you?

    55. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by Githaron · · Score: 1

      I know the 4G data uses one but I am not sure if the phone itself does.

    56. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They don't have SIMs.

      Verizon's LTE phones actually do have SIMs. My Galaxy Nexus needs one for data.

    57. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by Garybaldy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Contract law states otherwise.

      Any change made to a contract by one party is grounds for the other parties to void the contract with zero penalties.
      Regardless of what may be written in the contract concerning contract changes.

    58. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Sprint doesn't allow phones they didn't sell on their network, last I knew" Also wrong, and has never been true.

      That has ALWAYS been true. I got burned twice when I was told by a CSR that I gave the ESN to to check if it could be activated and then bought the phones and when I tried to activate them, I was flat out told "NO, that is not a Sprint phone" and they could not activate it. I even called back several times to get a different CSR and I tried the online activation and never got it done. The problem was that each time I called to "check" these phones, the CSR either didn't understand what I was asking or just simply did not really check and said, yes I could.

    59. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by Kjella · · Score: 1

      And to make it "reeeeeeeal" simple for you, Verizon is within its rights to stop selling an unlimited data plan at any time, beyond the terms it initially signed you up for.

      And the quote that started it:

      If they really, really want to let me out of my contract here in a month or two, so be it.

      Seriously, what are you guys fighting over? If Verizon signed you on for a two year contract they can't come and say that your unlimited data plan is now a limited data plan. If you're released from your contract all is fine and they can offer new contracts on whatever terms they want. I don't see that you're actually saying anything that's in conflict with each other.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    60. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by ohnocitizen · · Score: 1

      I can make it even simpler. No, they are not within their rights to advertise one thing then offer another once they have you locked in. Having a contract that says "we can violate the law if we want to" does not make that contract legal.

      Also, their making a move to do something people have asked for does not remove the fact that they engaged in false advertising.

    61. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by shentino · · Score: 1

      A deal is a deal.

    62. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by vux984 · · Score: 1

      How is that not punitive? Watch one movie, pay $50?

      To stream a bluray rip to your phone after you've hit your data cap? Yeah, $50 isn't punitive at all.

      I think I was being charged 10 cents a kilobyte for a data overage (roaming data mind you) just a couple years ago. Your 5GB rip would have cost me ... uh... $52,000.

      As it was it was about $800 to check a few emails, and look at a couple online maps.

      At $10 a gigabyte for overage, you can be right at your cap, and have a windows 7 service pack hit your internet stick, and still have enough room to download a linux live CD without costing you more than a couple starbucks coffees

      The current actual price is about $0.02/GB.

      Is that on a wireless cellular data network after covering some sort of fixed overhead for infrastructure maintenance... never mind expansion.

      No. I didn't think so.

    63. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congratulations on your old information. Yes, Verizon 3G is CDMA and doesn't use SIMs. 4G LTE, however, DOES use a SIM card.

    64. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by vux984 · · Score: 1

      $10/GB is about what they are charging for the plans themselves.

      The one plan is $30 for 2GB
      Next up is $50 for 5GB
      Next up is $80 for 10GB

      $10/GB is not punitive at all. Its pretty proportional for what one would be paying all along.

      You may feel that $10/GB is too much. And that's your perogative, but you can't argue that they are punishing you for going over your cap, when the rate is proportional to the cap.

      If the price jumped up to $50 or $100 / GB that would be punitive.

      If you want to see truly "Punitive" rates check out what happens when you go over a roaming data cap -- it can be idiotic like 10 cents a kilobyte, which works out to $10,000/GB.

    65. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      That's not what they're doing though, is it?

      They're simply not keeping the grandfathered in plans around once the initial contract periods have expired when they're moved over to the LTE network.

      No one is talking about them breaking the terms of the contract - they didn't do that and instead kept them around as grandfathered in plans until such time that the contract expired, while new customers could only get the newer tiered plans.

    66. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by vux984 · · Score: 1

      A deal is a deal.

      I agree.

      But unless you show me where they promised you unlimited data -for life-, they aren't breaking the deal.

      If you got your 1- or 2- or 3-year contract with unlimited data, and then decide to renew and they tell you can't keep your unlimited data plan anymore, that's not breaking the deal.

    67. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah that's unenforceable according to Consumer Protection Laws. It's similar to how Paypal included a bunch of terms in their contract/EULA, but the judge threw most of them in the trash as illegal. --- And the termination fee? Just don't send the check.

      And who is going to enforce the consumer protection laws? Since the arbitration clause is binding, can you even get a court to look at it? Or only an arbitrar that they picked?

    68. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 1

      I think he means his anus will be thoroughly reamed out.

    69. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by shentino · · Score: 1

      It doesn't even have to be for life.

      They already broke it by throttling.

    70. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by shiftless · · Score: 1

      You must be new here

    71. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by ichthus · · Score: 1

      how does T-Mobile treat tethering?

      In my experience, they don't care how you use your 5gigs/month. I rooted my Galaxy S2 a week after getting it, just so I could install Wireless Tether. I haven't gone so far as to torrent over it, but I've downloaded Linux Mint ISOs and Justified MKV's without any complaints.

      --
      sig: sauer
    72. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      They can't leave you on the existing contract if their intent is to "migrate its existing and new 4G LTE customers to a new data share plan". So they'll either have to leave your grandfathered unlimited plan in place, or let you off the hook.

    73. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      T-Mobile model - where they don't hit you with overchages, but rather throttle you down significantly - makes more sense. You cannot suddenly get hit by a massive charge, and even if you do go beyond your cap, you'll still have basic Internet service that can handle things like email and IM.

    74. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I tether often, and I don't notice this on pages loaded on the tethered PC. It must be a forced proxy they have set up in the stock browser?

      Last time I looked (on T-mobile UK though, YMMV), it was a transparent proxy to replace the images with compressed version. This proxy also rewrites the html to:
      - insert javascript to allow you to get the full resolution version by pressing shift-R on the image
      - insert alt text on images to hint you can shift-R - which screws up the existing alt-text, I first noticed this on xkcd :-(
      - inline all stylesheets links, strip all possible whitespace in them

      Solution: use https.

    75. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Seriously, you are like the archtypical obscenely fat glutton at the $9 all-you-can-eat-buffet threatening to take his business somewhere else.

      That's said to hear. I hope your view isn't typical. If AT&T pulls this I'll be leaving, too. I'm saying this as someone who doesn't even use half of the data available in their tiered plans.

      They probably can't wait for you to leave.

      They cannot wait for me to pay more for less service. If you don't believe me, go look up how they charge for SMS messages.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    76. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by schnell · · Score: 2

      You can't take your phone to another carrier because the current ones don't do voice over LTE

      You're kinda right. Like AT&T, Verizon uses 3G (CDMA EVDO Rev A for VZ, HSPA/HSPA+ for AT&T) for circuit-switched voice, and LTE for packet data. I presume that's what you mean - that 3G CDMA/GSM incompatibility is the reason you couldn't switch networks with a LTE phone.

      The real reason, though, has nothing to do with VoLTE. The reason you can't take your LTE phone to another US carrier is that the carriers use different frequency bands for LTE, and your phone will only carry the antennas to support the carrier who sold it. Extra antennas/filters take up space in the device, so OEMs aren't keen on including them if they don't have to... and carriers get no benefit from subsidizing a device that you could easily take over to another carrier. And as long as American consumers want $99 smartphones instead of $399 smartphones, carriers are going to keep selling the phones and locking them. So, sadly, don't expect that to change anytime soon.

      And just to spread the blame around properly - it's not the US carriers who solely decided to use incompatible frequencies for LTE. For that, you can thank the FCC's f***ed up spectrum policies over the last decade (under both Republican and Democratic administrations). There are no angels in the "why can't I switch my phone between carriers?" debate in the US.

      --
      "95% of all Slashdot .sig quotes are incorrect or completely fabricated." -Benjamin Franklin
    77. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're wrong. VZW Has frequency agile, "world phones," and those won't do voice on non-CDMA networks, either.

    78. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pun intended folks.

    79. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, that is a material averse change to contract. Any lawyer worth anything will tell you that is a get out of jail free card.

    80. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      This has got nothing to do on the amount of data you download. Even if the claim was made you were overloading the network, in would only be during peak times and peak time downloads have nothing to do with total downloads.

      This is all about Verizon becoming the monopoly content distributor on their network, otherwise why include uploads. So how as a content creator do you legally distribute the content you create when you run into the verizon cap, not only for your uploads but for your customers downloads.

      Basically Verizon will be able to out compete you by charging more for the content travelling over it's network than you are charging for your content and of course allowing the content Verizon publishes to travel freely, now add in many regions were Verizon has monopoly network control, so a straight up exploitation of one monopoly to gain another.

      Watch the dosy lazy Obama Department of non-justice do absolutely nothing about a blatant anti-competitive act.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    81. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone who is a debt collector for one of the 3rd party collection agencies that Verizon Wireless uses, I can tell you that their contracts are ironclad, and even if they screw up their end of the contract you'll still end up having to pay.

    82. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by David+Jao · · Score: 1

      I haven't heard of anyone who's successfully unlocked a recent Verizon Android bootblock.

      Uh, what? Verizon Galaxy Nexus? Is that recent enough for you? I'm not saying Verizon is a saint here, but it is possible if you choose wisely. GP is talking about rooting and roms which is definitely possible on the Verizion Galaxy Nexus.

    83. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      The real news here is that Slashdot actually supports the Euro sign!

    84. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not saying that you're wrong, but what Verizon would do next is to submit your name to debt collection agency. They will harass the crap out of you regardless of what the contract says. It's unfortunate you can't do the same to them.

    85. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      people asked for? I seriously doubt that people are really asking for tiered plans.

      the backwards movement to tiered plans is simply because they're afraid of voip happening and doing the same thing to their minutes that fb/aim/etc did to their sms revenues.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    86. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by Ogi_UnixNut · · Score: 1

      Yes, on my T-mobile phone that came with my unlimited contract, everything went through their proxies, including SSL connections to my email etc... Their certificate was installed in the phone so I didn't know. It was only when I tethered it to my PC and tried to connect to my email provider did it tell me that the certificate wasn't valid.

      Once I found that out it was a quick visit and flash to cyanogenmod, and now nothing goes through the proxies.I was not comfortable with everything goind through their proxies, and couldn't be sure what else was going through it.

      Their phones definitely are set up to proxy as much as possible, most likely to save their bandwidth costs.

    87. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by msauve · · Score: 1

      " Verizon uses 3G (CDMA EVDO Rev A for VZ, HSPA/HSPA+ for AT&T) for circuit-switched voice,"

      No. You shouldn't throw in acronyms you don't understand, trying to impress. EVDO is used for data, it does not carry the voice traffic in a CDMA2000 network. It could carry VoIP, but that's not how it's done.

      You're also wrong about the frequencies. Verizon and ATT both use the 850 MHz band, both have evolved from the original AMPS A-Side/B-Side carriers. While differences in frequencies may prevent using a phone on a particular alternate carrier, that is not the general problem. In general, you can't use a Verizon 4G phone on ATT, because they will only do voice over CDMA. There may be specific phones which are an exception - some people have found that there's hidden support for GSM in HTC Rezounds, but most VZW 4G phones simply won't talk to a GSM network.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    88. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the Verizon Galaxy Nexus doesn't count?

    89. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by CaptainJeff · · Score: 1

      Verizon is ... CDMA, CDMA2000 (3G), and LTE (4G). If you're using CDMA (2G data), then your phone most likely does not have a SIM. If you're using CDMA2000 (3G) and you have a US-only phone, then your phone does not have a SIM, but if you have a world-capable phone, it does (the Blackberry Storm, for example, used the internal CDMA2000 radio when in the US and then also had a GSM radio with a SIM for when it was out of the US). If you're using LTE (4G), then you do have a SIM as LTE is a technology that is derived from the GSM-line of technologies as opposed to the CDMA ones (and, yes, Verizon uses LTE).

    90. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ......wow guys... not very smart.. TMO doesn't need to have a proxy setting on your browser to send you through a proxy. you go through their network..they can just proxy you there. duh.

    91. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      including SSL connections to my email etc

      So, bets on whether they were doing MitM logging of SSL connections?

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    92. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by kcitren · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They leave you in your grandfathered plan until that plan expires, usually 1 or 2 years. They simply don't allow you to renew that plan.

    93. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Be careful with that one... the fine print probably says if you reject the changes you are still bound to the contract with existing terms until the end of the
      contract... which means they would still hit you with an early termination fee that you would have to go to arbitration to get back.

      By law, any material change in a contract allows the parties to terminate it without penalty.

    94. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by santiagoanders · · Score: 1

      For LTE networks, even your IP/UDP/TCP/RTP/etc headers will be compressed. Check the ROHC standard (RFC 3095 and others). I'm currently supporting/implementing ROHC code for the carrier side, and they are just starting (a few months ago maybe) to deploy it I think.

      Who wants to bet that even if your IP/UDP headers are compressed to one byte the carrier will charge you for the full 28 bytes?

      --
      "There can be little doubt that union activities lead to continuous and progressive inflation." F. A. Hayek
    95. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Sprint doesn't allow phones they didn't sell on their network, last I knew).

      Shenanigans. The last two phones I've had were purchased privately. They've got web tools and callcenters for provisioning customer-purchased devices.

    96. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by schnell · · Score: 1

      If you actually read my comment, I said different frequency bands for LTE, not the 2G/3G stuff they are running over 850 MHz.

      --
      "95% of all Slashdot .sig quotes are incorrect or completely fabricated." -Benjamin Franklin
    97. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by oh-dark-thirty · · Score: 1

      Have you tried FoxFi for your tethering needs? It works fine on my non-rooted G Nex.

    98. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by Genom · · Score: 1

      There is no reason people using 500GB should be paying the same as you and using 100x as much, just so you can "not worry".

      From an embracement of technology perspective, yes, there is a psychological reason. If you're not limited, you'll embrace and use whatever services you find useful. If you're limited, there's a mental drain involved in assessing limits *constantly*. This slows uptake of new, disruptive, potentially bandwidth-intensive services, since users are far less likely to use their limited resources, for fear of using them up (or getting horrific overage charges, as is usually the case for cellular).

      Fact of the matter is the cellular companies see the future, and it scares the hell out of them. Voice is merely data. Text is merely data. They're being taken out of the equation by data-based services that cut off their cash cows (VOIP, iMessage, etc...) - so they're doing everything they can to slow uptake of those services, while increasing charges for data to compensate It's a losing battle, and they know it, but they're bound and determined to kick and scream (at our expense) all the way.

    99. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by Picass0 · · Score: 1

      True. I tried to carry an Android from another provider to Sprint and they wouldn't allow it. In this case the service provider was Cox Communications, who briefly offered cell service based on Sprint infrastructure. There shouldn't have been a compatibility issue.

      As it turned out I made quite a bit of money during that switch. Cox gave me 150 dollar per line (x2) to switch since they broke the contract (Cox quit offering cell service). Sprint gave me 100 dollars per line as a Cox Customer switching over to them. Sprint also gave me 60 bucks for my old android device. This more than paid for my Samsung Galaxy SII.

      The downside of Sprint is they still don't have their 4G shit together in many cities. My 3G transfer speed is .12Mbps download and .10Mbps upload (speedtest.net) . Needless to say I use a lot of wifi. Later this year Sprint will start offering 4G LTE in these markets, but I've heard that will be due to arrangements they made with other providers.

    100. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's spelled lose, for fuck's sake.

    101. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      To Verizon, when you activate a new phone it is a contract renewal, so that would be an "upgrade". Even if you are reactivating a former phone from your plan because your phone fell in the toilet (happens to many people, but I have not had that issue...)

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    102. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      On my Droid X, Foxfi works well for tethering, never had an issue about being locked out. Verizon as well, though probably not when it is time to upgrade. :(

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    103. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      Actually, I know at least two people in my personal circle of friends in the US who wanted tiered plans. They couldn't justify the original plan on AT&T until they introduced the new tiered structure with the cheaper basic plan.

      Not everyone has a need to be able to torrent Linux ISOs from their phone 24/7 and can get by just fine with less than unlimited data, as long as it's affordable.

    104. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *lose*

    105. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by Nyall · · Score: 1

      If they force me off my unlimited data plan, I will use that as a weapon to get out of my contract.

      Its the other way around. They are waiting for the contract to expire then forcing you off your unlimited plan.

      --
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jury_nullification
    106. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      So, now you agree to pay $600 for that $100 smartphone.

      You aren't paying a fee to terminate the contract. You're paying for the phone that they discounted as long as you paid for the service.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    107. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just thought I'd say hi from my Nexus with its unlocked bootloader on Verizon.

    108. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tether often, and I don't notice this on pages loaded on the tethered PC. It must be a forced proxy they have set up in the stock browser?

      If that's the case, it's of no consequence to me - I use Dolphin HD.

      Side note: how does T-Mobile treat tethering? Are they dicks about it like the big boys (Verizon locked me out by altering the wifi manager process, the evil fucks), or do they even care?

      They say not to, but they never actually stop you from tethering.

    109. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by vux984 · · Score: 1

      If you're not limited, you'll embrace and use whatever services you find useful.

      But bandwidth is limited. Networks have a capacity to transfer data and its not infinite.

      Bandwidth is like electricity. Its relatively inexpensive, but its not FREE.

      Nobody sits around saying metered electricity is inhibiting the embracement of new technology because of the mental drain in assessing what each new widget they plug in is going to cost them.

      And you know what, that's a good thing.

      If you're limited, there's a mental drain involved in assessing limits *constantly*.

      I'm peripherally aware of my electrical bill, or what a trip costs in my car. It doesn't inhibit me from using them normally. However if the fact that they are metered causes me to do a double take on the operating price when my son asks for a flaming gasoline fountain... GOOD.

      High bandwidth on cellular is still something of a luxury the prices are dropping and the service is improving. But for normal inernet requirements its pretty good.

      If some twit decides he's going to transfer bluray rips over the cellular network... and the fact that this might actually cost him something... is a good thing imho.

      Fact of the matter is the cellular companies see the future...

      Yes. One day maybe we'll pay for data the way we pay for electricity. Sounds perfectly reasonable to me.

    110. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by vux984 · · Score: 1

      The future is tiered metered data. very much like tiered metered electricity - first X kWh at one price, next X kWh at another... maybe offpeak kWh at a 3rd price.

      You can scurry to another provider for a while chasing "unlimited", but the endgame is inevitable.

    111. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      That's mainly due to complacency, not due to a limitation of resources. Maybe I'm not in the majority, and that'd make you right, but if they want my money they'll have to offer what I want.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    112. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How intelligent a suggestion. Things like that are put on your credit report which reduce your credit score, you may find that you don't qualify for that loan or mortgage because of things like that.

    113. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by vux984 · · Score: 1

      That's mainly due to complacency, not due to a limitation of resources.

      How do you figure? Bandwidth is a scarce resource in precisely the way electricity is. There is a finite amount available -- sure they can expand capacity, but that's not free.

    114. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by vux984 · · Score: 1

      This is all about Verizon becoming the monopoly content distributor on their network, ...

      Its not really.

      Think about it. If verizon was nothing but an internet pipe, selling bandwidth transfer and nothing else.. no tv, no voip, nothing... just bandwidth

      Then they would still be looking to tier and meter bandwidth.

      The content provider issues you mention are real, but they are an orthogonal problem.

    115. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      How do you figure? Bandwidth is a scarce resource in precisely the way electricity is.

      No, it is not. You cannot, for example, 'bank' bandwidth.

      There is a finite amount available -- sure they can expand capacity, but that's not free.

      Nobody said it was free. But we're not talking about a scenario where they're choosing a fair way to dole out resources, they're choosing a way that involves everybody paying more money. If this were about bandwidth being exactly like electricity, the the billing for it would be WAY different than it is now.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    116. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by nobaloney · · Score: 1

      And who is going to enforce the consumer protection laws? Since the arbitration clause is binding, can you even get a court to look at it? Or only an arbitrar that they picked?

      Actually you can get a court to look at it. Any judge in the US can agree to look at any case. And a contract cannot be used to take away your rights, so it's likely that almost any judge would agree to look at it.

      I'm not a lawyer, and I don't play one on TV, but I pay one. I had a (now dead) uncle who once paid a judge, and even got in trouble for it.

    117. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by dfries · · Score: 1

      Verizon Can't Do Math
      AT&T's Bad Math Strikes MythBusters' Savage
      Does this mean there are more expensive ways to transmit data than SMS Text messaging?

    118. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by the_B0fh · · Score: 1

      Ahh, didn't realize it was lossy compression. Compression by itself, I don't mind. But fucking with my data, that pisses me off.

    119. Re:Congratulations, Verizon by alex67500 · · Score: 1

      Mmmmh. Actually, Slashdot supports the € html entity -- or maybe it's your browser I don't know... ;-)

  3. The first of the pack? by dingo_kinznerhook · · Score: 4, Interesting

    How long before AT&T follows suit?

    --
    "God does not play Minecraft with the world." - Albert Einstein
    1. Re:The first of the pack? by ExploHD · · Score: 2

      Monopoly capitalism suggests it won't be long

    2. Re:The first of the pack? by zlives · · Score: 2

      Oligarchy

    3. Re:The first of the pack? by Jeng · · Score: 5, Funny

      AT&T will not follow suit, they will figure out a way to fuck their customers even harder, they think of it as a challenge I guess.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    4. Re:The first of the pack? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Historically about two to three weeks.

    5. Re:The first of the pack? by dbug78 · · Score: 1

      Oligopoly

  4. Slippery slope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they try to charge ETFs on people who are grandfathered in and decide to cancel, that would be a breach of contract, wouldn't it?

    1. Re:Slippery slope by demonlapin · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not if they offered to honor the original contract terms for the duration of the contract and terminate it immediately upon its completion. Just like credit cards: terms have changed, you either accept them or you live out your existing contract as specified with no further changes allowed.

    2. Re:Slippery slope by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      If they try to charge ETFs on people who are grandfathered in and decide to cancel, that would be a breach of contract, wouldn't it?

      The contract you signed sucks, BTW. (for you, of course, not that you had much in they way of choice if you want a mobile phone).

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    3. Re:Slippery slope by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 1

      Hey, if they'll honor the terms for the remainder of my contract, I'll stay at least that long. If not, I'm gone. Verizon's expensive but I'm willing to pay the premium price for my unlimited data plan (topped out at 8.7 gigs one month!) and decent coverage. But I'm not going to keep paying well over a hundred bucks a month to a company that won't give me the service they sold me. I made a commitment to pay them $$$.$$/month for 24 months and I expect them to provide no less than the level of service I was promised when I made that commitment for the duration of that contract.

      It used to be that service got better over time. My first cell phone plan back in the 90s just got better and better. When I signed up, it was 60 minutes in a 3-county area. Then it was half the state. Then they doubled the minutes. Then my home area was the entire state. By the time I moved to another carrier, my home area was 3 states. The new carrier gave me 240 minutes, free evenings (6pm) and weekends, and 5 states as my home area plus free long distance. All for $10/month less.

      Somehow, it's gotten all flipped around the last few years and carriers are constantly finding ways to reduce the level of service they're offering.

    4. Re:Slippery slope by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 1

      And, after looking at it, I'm not clear whether this is only 3G unlimited data plans or all unlimited data plans, including grandfathered 4G plans.

    5. Re:Slippery slope by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      They only drop your unlimited if you upgrade your unlimited 3g plan to a new 4g plan. This isn't taking effect in the middle of your term, and doesn't seem to happen if you don't upgrade.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  5. Well crap by JadeAuto · · Score: 1

    That sucks. Even though I don't use data much on 3g, it was always nice to know that I didn't have to worry about a cap. Now I have to worry about it. Bah.

    1. Re:Well crap by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

      Maybe Verizon's cap will be like VirginMobile's "cap" which isn't really a cap but merely a slowdown for the speed.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    2. Re:Well crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe Verizon's cap will be like VirginMobile's "cap" which isn't really a cap but merely a slowdown for the speed.

      It will be just like their current cap for people who signed up within the last year or so. When you reach the cap, you start paying overage charges.

    3. Re:Well crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am a extreme user of my data plan (~8-10Gb/Mo) and it isn't from just tethering, which I do on my HTC Incredible 2 using EasyTether.

      VZW has grandfathered my unlimited plan, but if I go over 5Gb I get pinched back down to below EDGE speeds (usually about ~100Kbps, but sometimes as low as 50-60Kbps. This usually is from my podcast downloading and Pandora, but a lot of websurfing as well. WiFi isn't an option in my area at the moment, but that's only a secondary to my data plan.

      I am aware of the bandwidth pinch from TMobile and Sprint, but from what I've been told its nowhere near as bad as that--provided I am in a LTE/3G area. My brother runs a Samsung android on StraightTalk, and says its 3G speed until 500Mb has been reached.

      Decisions, Decisions. More than likely I might be hopping to Sprint since I like their rate structure, but TMobile has better phones...

  6. My contract just expired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Guess I won't be buying a new smartphone any time soon. And I was just starting to enjoy being able to browse 4Chan from anywhere.

  7. Yikes by BStroms · · Score: 1

    I'm up for a discounted phone in June. I'm hoping I can lock in two more years of unlimited before this change goes live. At the prices they currently charge for data, I'll switch to a feature phone and carry around my old smartphone in wifi mode before I switch to one of their limited plans.

    1. Re:Yikes by Glendale2x · · Score: 3, Informative

      You can't really "lock in" anything. The provider is free to change the terms at any time in the future, it's just that you get 30 days to cancel without penalty if you decide you don't like the new terms.

      --
      this is my sig
    2. Re:Yikes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if you switch upgrade to another phone with LTE support before this switch I don't believe they've been altering the contracts for unlimited data plans to include LTE. Basically they can strip unlimited LTE support at the time of their choosing.

    3. Re:Yikes by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

      He can't lock in the unlimited data, but he can keep the shiny-new phone. After all it was Verizon that voided the contract when they changed the terms. He will no longer be bound to them.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    4. Re:Yikes by bhtooefr · · Score: 2

      The shiny new phone that will only work on Verizon, non-US carriers after an unlocking, and the crappy regional CDMA carriers after an unlocking.

    5. Re:Yikes by Delarth799 · · Score: 1

      Except you can't lock it in. They are doing away with it all together including those who were grandfathered in so when this change goes live your screwed and pushed down to limited. Of course as someone else mentioned this means you might be able to void the contract.

    6. Re:Yikes by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      The shiny new phone that will only work on Verizon, non-US carriers after an unlocking, and the crappy regional CDMA carriers after an unlocking.

      Only for the cellular radio. He can always use Wifi+Skype/Vonage/GTalk/Whatever for phone calls.

      I can think of a few other ideas for a carrier-locked phone:

      - install a pentesting distro like PwnExpress* and use it for, er, well, pentesting.
      - root-and-rom it, and give it to your kids to play with
      - App development: a dedicated device beats an emulated one any day of the week.
      - e-reader/web browser

      .. and I'm sure there's a number of other uses I haven't thought of.


      *Yes, I know PwnExpress is for SheevaPlugs and N900's. It's just an example, yo.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    7. Re:Yikes by Sancho · · Score: 1

      He can also sell the phone for more than he paid for it. If he gets a $200 subsidized phone, he can possibly get $350 or more.

    8. Re:Yikes by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      But he can sell the phone for more than he paid for it, because he wasn't required to pay the early termination fee when the other party changed the terms of the contract. Some other schmuck can overpay for the phone to use on Verizon's limited network because they can't or won't sign a contract.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    9. Re:Yikes by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Except it only happens when you renew the contract, so no contract voiding going on.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  8. Is this legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can grandfathered customers join a class action lawsuit and get some money for this?

    1. Re:Is this legal? by the_B0fh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      *HAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA*

      And you'll get $10, where as the attorneys will get $100 mil.

    2. Re:Is this legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can grandfathered customers join a class action lawsuit and get some money for this?

      Getting money from a class action suit .. you're kidding right? It will go to court, which means the lawyers get 50% plus expenses ... which leaves the class
      less then 30% to split.. you'll be luckey to get $2 on the mess .. minus all the crap and paperwork you have to provide to prove that you are part of the class.

      Look at the recently ended Honda Hybrid Civic class action suit.

      Payouts to Civic owners will include an extended warranty, $100 to $200 cash, and a transferrable voucher that can be used toward the purchase of a new Honda vehicle worth up to $1,500.

      http://blogs.automotive.com/honda-wins-appeals-decision-in-civic-hybrid-lawsuit-how-it-happened-91991.html

      Not much for a car that as far as I have met anyone that has ever gotten anything close to the advertised 50 mpg. Of the 117 volunteers on www.fueleconomy.gov .. the vast majority of respondents are under 50 mpg combined.

      IMHO.. it won't be worth being part of a class action.

    3. Re:Is this legal? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      IMHO.. it won't be worth being part of a class action.

      The new trick is that *you* have to pay postage to opt-out of the class. I always opted out when they sent a SASE, but now I mostly shred them. I'm sure they expected this.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    4. Re:Is this legal? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      *HAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA*

      And you'll get $10, where as the attorneys will get $100 mil.

      Yeah, I'm sure Verizon would laugh like that at giving $100 mil. to lawyers.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    5. Re:Is this legal? by Enry · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of the Zip drive click of death. You got a voucher for $10 off any future Iomega purchase at their web site. By then I had no desire to ever purchase any of their products.

  9. Rise of the discount carriers by MrEricSir · · Score: 5, Interesting

    With the el-cheapo carriers heavily advertising their cut-rate plans, how long can AT&T and Verizon keep it up? Why would anyone pay $80/month when they can get the same service from another carrier for less than $50?

    Unless the big boys start offering either better service or lower prices, how will they stay in business?

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    1. Re:Rise of the discount carriers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      By spending all that cash on lobbyists and legislating their oligopoly into perpetuity.

    2. Re:Rise of the discount carriers by Moheeheeko · · Score: 5, Informative

      With the el-cheapo carriers heavily advertising their cut-rate plans, how long can AT&T and Verizon keep it up? Why would anyone pay $80/month when they can get the same service from another carrier for less than $50

      Because that $50 plan from T-mobile or Sprint is next to useless with their shit coverage. I ran T-mobile for 2 years, I had above 2 bars maybe once.

    3. Re:Rise of the discount carriers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sprint coverage has served me well, even in urban areas, and their coverage is continuing to improve with Network Vision. Sites are already being rolled out. Atop that, they roam for free on Verizon.

    4. Re:Rise of the discount carriers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because this is one plan for all devices rather then one plan per device. Many people would prefer such plan in an age where a user can have several devices that support 3g. "Unlimited" was never really unlimited anyways.

    5. Re:Rise of the discount carriers by Apharmd · · Score: 1

      Sprint has good coverage in my area but their data rates are terrible, whether on 3G or WiMAX. They desperately need LTE.

    6. Re:Rise of the discount carriers by vlm · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I've been using a widget called "data counter widget" (creative, huh?) on my android phone and its very unusual to go over 20 megs per day, which is only 600 megs per month. Most of my traffic is wifi. Some map lookup, some fooling around in the web browser, the occasional evernote upload, some runkeeper uploads, some email checking, some geocache application lookups, that's about all I do that requires cell data and can't be done better over wifi. I do all my app updating and podcast downloading over wifi (dogcatcher has a simple checkbox to only download podcasts over wifi).

      My guess is all this is being tooled up in preparation for some kind of "sql slammer" type of worm. Get everything ready to mail out the overage charges, then release the 10 gigs per hour worm and watch the profits roll in.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    7. Re:Rise of the discount carriers by paperdiesel · · Score: 1

      With the el-cheapo carriers heavily advertising their cut-rate plans, how long can AT&T and Verizon keep it up? Why would anyone pay $80/month when they can get the same service from another carrier for less than $50

      Because that $50 plan from T-mobile or Sprint is next to useless with their shit coverage. I ran T-mobile for 2 years, I had above 2 bars maybe once.

      Nice try, verizon rep. I'm a sprint customer, and my coverage is excellent. My experience as a whole is much better than when I was on verizon and at&t before that.

      See how using personal anecdotes as actual evidence is silly?

    8. Re:Rise of the discount carriers by nicholasbbyrd · · Score: 1

      Market manipulation would be your answer.

    9. Re:Rise of the discount carriers by jbolden · · Score: 1

      There isn't really that much of a swing if you do an apples to apples comparison. It works out to about $10 / mo for the cut rate vs. the brand names once you add everything back in. That's not a bad swing if you are OK with lower quality customer service when there is a problem and slightly more frequent problems.

    10. Re:Rise of the discount carriers by grahamwest · · Score: 1

      I pay $35/mo to Virgin, whom I believe just resell Sprint's network. Works great almost everywhere I go. The only exception is Mendocino country, no service whatsoever up there, not even voice.

      I had a cheap, cheap prepaid phone for 7 or 8 years, because I didn't feel like paying $800+/yr for a phone. Mind you, I don't do cable TV because $700+/yr buys a lot of DVD boxsets (and videogames) instead.

      --
      Graham
    11. Re:Rise of the discount carriers by Nidi62 · · Score: 4, Informative

      When I first bought my latest phone from Verizon (back in March), it had with it a widget showing my data usage for the month. Then, several weeks later, it went away with a software update. Now I know why.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    12. Re:Rise of the discount carriers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude... Sprint roams onto Verizon's network (with both voice and data) when you're out of a Sprint service area. Hence, Sprint's coverage area is no less than Verizon's.

    13. Re:Rise of the discount carriers by lightknight · · Score: 1

      Still waiting for Virgin Mobile (runs on / is owned by Sprint) to offer femto-cells (so I can reroute cellphone signals over my FIOS connection).

      "Hey Bob, do you think we should offer femto-cells to our customers, so they can place phone calls in areas where our network doesn't provide any coverage?"
      "Mark, I know what you're thinking, and no."
      "Why?"
      "Because, Mark, that's simply not how we do things at Virgin Mobile."

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    14. Re:Rise of the discount carriers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I get edge on AT&T, CDMA's equivalent of EDGE on Verizon and no non-roaming Sprint or T-Mobile coverage.

      I also live just a few miles from a major city.

    15. Re:Rise of the discount carriers by dave562 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I didn't even notice until you said something. I went to check, and the app is gone on my phone too (Droid Razr on Verizon). Those scum sucking bastards.

    16. Re:Rise of the discount carriers by no_such_user · · Score: 1

      If "el-cheapo" refers to MVNO operators like Virgin, Boost, Page Plus, etc., they're cheaper, but they're just resellers of the big four. As soon as they're seen as a threat, their carriers will up their wholesale costs and MVNOs will be forced to charge rates matching the carriers they're reselling.

      But why does this announcement surprise anyone? Let's not forget, the subscribers are not the customers -- the shareholders are. Until there's a carrier where those two parties are one and the same, the subscribers will always, always be on the losing end of the deal.

    17. Re:Rise of the discount carriers by idontgno · · Score: 1

      I bought my VZW Droid in February, and my wife her Samsung Stratosphere at the same time, and they both came with the same widget. On both phones, it's been updated at least once on the Play market, and it still displays the appropriate monthly usage.

      YMMV, of course, and the singular of "data" is not "anecdote", but I would speculate that something is specifically different with your phone or your particular installation of the app.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    18. Re:Rise of the discount carriers by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      Seems to work for me just fine in the areas I'm in (almost all of Northern Illinois, SF proper, Tampa/Orlando, FL). Hell, there isn't even an extra charge when I'm in Puerto Rico and the US Virgin Islands (I cruise frequently). I'm *easily* getting my money's worth for $50/month with my Galaxy Nexus and 2GB data cap.

    19. Re:Rise of the discount carriers by hawaiian717 · · Score: 1

      They'll stay in business because the discount carriers don't offer good phones. Yes, Virgin Mobile has several Android smartphones, but they're not particularly good ones. No Samsung Galaxy or Droid Razr or HTC Evo phones there, instead you get phones like the LG Optimus V or Motorola Triumph or HTC Wildfire S. On some of their phones, they even denote that they come with Android 2.2 as a feature!

      --
      End of Line.
    20. Re:Rise of the discount carriers by Surt · · Score: 1

      I switched to TMobile because of the terrible outages I experienced with Verizon. I've never had cause to regret that decision.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    21. Re:Rise of the discount carriers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      EXACTLY!!! I had the same problem with sprint! My plan was the original sero for 45/month unlimited but at work where I need the phone most I got 1 bar and little to no 3g or 4g coverage. When I got coverage my speeds were horribly slow... so really i was paying 45 for nothing. Switched to ATT and I can get a good signal anywhere in my office. T-mobile is just as bad if not worse.

    22. Re:Rise of the discount carriers by bws111 · · Score: 1

      The big boys will stay in business because they know how to make money. The el-cheapo carriers, such as Sprint, will not stay in business if they don't figure out how to make money.

    23. Re:Rise of the discount carriers by realisticradical · · Score: 2

      I wouldn't be surprised if one of their desires was to saddle people with ridiculous overage charges. I remember a story a while back about a family whose son used his phone for all of his internet downloading needs. Verizon sent the family a bill for $18,000. Instead of helping their customers stay within the boundaries of their plans they try to rack up as many charges as possible. http://www.boston.com/business/personalfinance/articles/2010/05/18/verizon_forgives_dover_mans_18000_cellphone_bill/

    24. Re:Rise of the discount carriers by djhertz · · Score: 1

      My wife is on Virgin Mobile (which is the Sprint network) $25/month, unlimited text, data, and 300 minutes. Coverage is actually pretty good. It's also pay as you go and you just buy your phone up front (I think it was $100). It's some kind of LG with Android 2.2. It gets it done and it's really cheap. I would highly recommend it as a way to save $50/month vs Verizon.

      --
      Modest doubt is called the beacon of the wise - William Shakespeare
    25. Re:Rise of the discount carriers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the other hand, why would another carrier charge less than $80/mo once they get enough customers to become one of the "big boys".

      You're trading short term gain for long term fucked in the ass.

    26. Re:Rise of the discount carriers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then there are people like me who easily use 5GB or more per month for business reasons (4G offered by T-Mobile is usually faster than the Wifi I use at most of the places I used to work out of). I think it's pretty ridiculous (and extremely ironic) that carriers are making mobile broadband increasingly expensive as it gets faster and more widespread. Verizon is in cahoots with the US Federal Government; couldn't they get a subsidy on infrastructure in exchange for making broadband nationally accessible?

      And, unfortunately, this probably won't make customers angry enough to switch. Most people on Verizon are fully aware of how much more their plans cost in comparison to the other leading alternatives. However, their service is by far the best and most reachable across the US, and they are willing to pay for that advantage. Verizon would've been in serious trouble a LONG time ago if people switched on cost alone. (I'd also bet that this limitation will not affect that many people in the long run. Most people barely use any data on their phone, and those that use it to this capacity probably tether or are doing other things that are not really encouraged.)

    27. Re:Rise of the discount carriers by kobaz · · Score: 1

      Except on Virgin Mobile you only can connect to Sprint towers. No roaming for you!

      (At least that's how it was when I had it... and I think it still is)

      --

      The goal of computer science is to build something that will last at least until we've finished building it.
    28. Re:Rise of the discount carriers by jim9000 · · Score: 1

      Dude... Sprint roams onto Verizon's network (with both voice and data) when you're out of a Sprint service area. Hence, Sprint's coverage area is no less than Verizon's.

      Unfortunately, a lot of this roaming is at 1xRTT speeds which is a little slow. Sprint also has 3G speed issues in some markets but Network Vision is helping with this, along with bringing LTE which will be a big improvement over Clear's spotty 2500MHz WiMAX network.

      The only other issue with roaming is that the phone will desperately hold on to a weak Sprint signal over a stronger Verizon (or US Cellular, or local provider) signal which can still cause missed calls and poor call quality. This is usually only a problem in some buildings, and is partly due to 1900MHz not penetrating buildings as well as 800MHz. Thankfully, it isn't a common issue and they can often be talked into providing a free femtocell (unlike Verizon)

      Despite these issues, Sprint is still a very good carrier in a lot of ways. Their customer service has improved a lot and they are working on their network.

    29. Re:Rise of the discount carriers by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Coverage depends on location. Where I live, T-Mo gives 4-5 bars everywhere I routinely go. AT&T gives 1-2 bars. (I don't know or care about Verizon or Sprint because I buy my own phones)

    30. Re:Rise of the discount carriers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) Virgin Mobile is getting the HTC Evo 3D later this month.

      2) Even better, switch to a GSM/HSPA+ MVNO (like Simple Mobile) and buy an unlocked high-end phone. Even paying full price for the phone, you'll end up spending less money over two years than you would on any of the Big Four.

    31. Re:Rise of the discount carriers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then the FCC will put their foot down and make the Big Four lower their wholesale rates.

      Everything relating to bandwidth wholesaling and MVNOs is strictly under FCC control. The Big Four don't have a choice.

    32. Re:Rise of the discount carriers by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      The Sprint plan was more expensive than Verizon. How do you figure they're "El Cheapo"?

      I assumed the OP was talking about Cricket.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    33. Re:Rise of the discount carriers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That same plan on Sprint is in fact $80/month. And while not the best, their coverage is still exceptional.

      In the future, please start all posts with "I have no idea whatsoever what I'm talking about, and I'm incapable of providing anything useful to the conversation, but..." It will save us all a lot of time.

    34. Re:Rise of the discount carriers by Xyrus · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. My razr has received multiple updates and the data app is still right where I left it on my main screen.

      Perhaps you removed it when you wanted to root the phone or were trying to clean all the Verizon "junk" off the phone. You can always re-download the app.

      --
      ~X~
    35. Re:Rise of the discount carriers by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      Maybe I should take him out to some of the areas that I hunt at in Minnesota. It doesn't matter who your carrier is, T-mobile, Sprint, AT&T, Verizon, etc. None of them get any signal until you get back to the main US highway. Granted there may be just enough signal that you might receive a text message if the atmosphere is cooperating and there aren't may leaves left on the trees, but you won't ever receive a call. These aren't even that remote, it's not like I am taking them up to points past Ely as I am mostly up around Atkin (north side of Lake Mille Lacs)

      --
      Time to offend someone
    36. Re:Rise of the discount carriers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except my phone is not rooted, and I have not erased any Verizon App. Nice try though.

    37. Re:Rise of the discount carriers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'the same thing we do every night pinky, ...'

  10. Verizon is just too damn expensive.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm paying $50/month for 450 minutes and 500 texts.

    I used to pay $90/month for the same minutes and texts but with unlimited data when I had my HTC eris.

    I downgraded (to not break the contract) to my older phone because that was when verizon started to cap your 3G speeds by as much as 80% if you went over 200megabytes of data.

    Now, I'm realizing that I don't need a smartphone since I'm on a computer everyday and have a laptop for when I travel... so, that $50/month is just expensive considering how much minutes and texting I get.

    I will switch over to T-mobile

    1. Re:Verizon is just too damn expensive.... by vlm · · Score: 1

      I'm paying $50/month for 450 minutes and 500 texts.

      Are you actually using 450/500 or are you paying for the option to use up to that amount but only using a fraction of that?

      I was paying about $8 to $10/month for virgin mobile pay as I go.

      You can calculate the crossover point of pay as you go vs contract and its really quite a bit of use, darn near a part time job. I'm convinced most contract people would be better off pay as you go. Not all, but most.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
  11. Just to spite them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll be downloading torrents and the like on my unlimited data plan while it's still here.

    1. Re:Just to spite them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Verizon clearly support file sharing:
      1. Buckets - check
      2. Sharing - check
      3. Family and friends - check
      File sharing is a family friendly activity. Make sure your local Family First representative is aware of the issue.

  12. Like a tick by sdo1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    They're sort of like a tick that attaches itself to a host and keep engorging itself until it pops.

    It's gotten itself firmly attached to the wallets of 93 million people. Now it's sucking hard. The pop will come enough...

    http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/19/verizon-quarterly-revenues-q1-2012/

    --
    --- What parts of "shall make no law", "shall not be infringed", and "shall not be violated" don't you understand?
  13. Just another reason to dump Verizon. by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 4, Funny

    Too bad. They used to be better than the rest. Those were the days. It's unfortunate that they're such dimwits too. Yes, capacity is a problem, until up put a mini-switch/router on every 12th telephone and power pole and then it isn't. The technical problem is solvable, but they'd have to spend some money renting space, placing and maintaining equipment and getting easements. Stock prices would fall for a quarter and some exec wouldn't waddle away with the bonus he truly believes he deserves.

    --
    Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
    1. Re:Just another reason to dump Verizon. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Theyd much rather spend money on more ads

    2. Re:Just another reason to dump Verizon. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this was modded funny and I kept waiting for the punch line, then I didn't find one. okayguy.jpg

  14. Dont you love... by bolthole · · Score: 5, Insightful

    how they market speak that shared plan people are "allowed to pool" their network usage. Rather than the more accurate "forced to share usage". It puts people on family plans at the mercy of their teenage daughter. DOOOOOOoooommmmm.....

    1. Re:Dont you love... by dzym · · Score: 1

      Also those non-phone devices you will be purchasing at un-subsidized prices. Wonderful.

    2. Re:Dont you love... by gral · · Score: 1

      Or it forces you to pay ~$5 per phone to put a cap on the usage.

      --
      Scott Carr
    3. Re:Dont you love... by musikit · · Score: 0

      maybe then you will parent up and actually monitor you child's usage. or do what my parents did when i wanted my own (wired) phone. you pay for it yourself. she wants all that data usage without your monitoring, she's gotta pay the $80 herself. man/woman up. and be a parent for once.

    4. Re:Dont you love... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh the irony. Person on tech websites says good parenting is taking away tech devices from your children.

    5. Re:Dont you love... by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      Why, are parents obligated to include her in the plan if they decide to pool just mom and dad, but keep her separate?

    6. Re:Dont you love... by Wrath0fb0b · · Score: 1

      how they market speak that shared plan people are "allowed to pool" their network usage. Rather than the more accurate "forced to share usage". It puts people on family plans at the mercy of their teenage daughter. DOOOOOOoooommmmm.....

      I would love to pool the data on one plan between my phone and mifi router. If I got a tablet, I wouldn't want to pay another $30 for a different plant for it if I could just tack it on.

      So yeah, I think I like being given that option ...

    7. Re:Dont you love... by Sigg3.net · · Score: 1

      "DOOOOOOoooommmmm....."

      Buddhist temple bell in Tibet?

      Don't you mean Du-du-DUUUUUUUUUH?

    8. Re:Dont you love... by bolthole · · Score: 1

      The key here is "option", or rather, lack thereof. You dont get an option, it's mandatory.

      btw, you still have to pay the extra $30 or something, you are looking to avoid paying. family plans, etc. still have a "per device" fee.

  15. Who said anything about T-Mobile or Sprint? by MrEricSir · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Those guys are just as expensive as AT&T and Verizon. I'm talking about discount carriers, like StraightTalk and Red.

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    1. Re:Who said anything about T-Mobile or Sprint? by hemp · · Score: 1

      StraightAway is $45 for unlimited talk/text/data.

      Much much cheaper than AT&T, even though they use AT&It's network.

      --
      Skip ------ See the latest from http://www.anArchyFortWorth.com
  16. Ugh. by cmv1087 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Verizon's unlimited 3G meant I could play Pandora through my phone while I was driving without worrying about data caps. :s And they have very good coverage from what I noticed. I guess this means I'll just have to actually use my iPod or something, assuming I can remember where I put it and a way to set it up to either play through the car radio or into my hearing aid.

    My contract is up anyhow and I need to trim down expenses. I have the HTC Droid Incredible, which is a nifty enough little phone. All I really need is texting, email, and maybe some minimum amount of minutes. A camera on it would be convenient. I really don't want to move from Verizon because I know their coverage is solid, but I don't want to reward their greedy data tier plan behavior. Any recommendations?

    1. Re:Ugh. by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      Sprint lets you roam free on Verizon's network, so you theoretically get the same great coverage but don't have to (directly) pay Verizon anything.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    2. Re:Ugh. by SydShamino · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Also, be sure to renew and get a new phone just before the change. That way when they change the contract you can break it, keep your new phone without a termination fee, and then resell it for a profit to someone who wants a Verizon phone but can't or won't sign a contract. Verizon can pay you to leave them!

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    3. Re:Ugh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 way to burn the telco!

    4. Re:Ugh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any recommendations?

      T-mobile has a plan which gives you 100 min + unlimited text messages and 5GB of 4G data for $30/month.

    5. Re:Ugh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That way when they change the contract you can break it, keep your new phone without a termination fee, and then resell it for a profit to someone who wants a Verizon phone but can't or won't sign a contract.

      Not bloody likely!

      Keep dreaming though. Don't forget to read the part in the contract that says they can change any part of the terms (but *you* can't) given certain notice, including but not limited to allowing Verizon to sew your lips to a chinaman's asshole.

    6. Re:Ugh. by TennCasey · · Score: 1

      Buy an unlocked phone like this one and get a sim card from a company like Straight Talk for about $50 a month.

    7. Re:Ugh. by cmv1087 · · Score: 1

      This actually looks promising. No contract, pre-paid. I'd just need the money for the phone because I don't think my current one (HTC Incredible) will work with T-mobile. Thank you!

    8. Re:Ugh. by Sollord · · Score: 1

      While sprint lets you roam on Verizon most of the time it's restricted to 1x speed and only lets you do 3g in certain coverage areas plus you're restricted to a limited amount of data usage a month before they flag your account and eventually they will terminate you for to much data roaming which is why some people use it as a way to get out of a contract

    9. Re:Ugh. by nosferatu1001 · · Score: 1

      The part that is entrely unenforceable you mean?

    10. Re:Ugh. by Chickan · · Score: 1

      Check out Pageplus Cellular. Works on Verizon's network with your verizon phone. $30 a month (including taxes) gets you 1200 minutes, 3000 text messages, and 100mb of data. Sure the data is limited, but the price is right. Best of all, no overage charges since its prepaid, and if you don't like it you can leave at any time. I had Verizon for years, but hated paying $30/month just for data when I rarely used it. Its the best of both worlds for me, I can use just about any verizon smart phone (which I buy used), use verizon's network, but its super cheap. I was on Virgin Mobile before, but Sprint's coverage sucks at my work.

    11. Re:Ugh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check your actual usage, I've done similar with Slacker and never passed 1 GB, steaming radio isn't particularly high bandwidth. (even on unlimited the vz wireless app will tell you your usage). I agree this all sucks, but its not as big of an issue for most people as they think.

    12. Re:Ugh. by Nyall · · Score: 1

      I listen to pandora for several hours a day at work and I never go past 1.5 gigs a month.

      --
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jury_nullification
    13. Re:Ugh. by mikey1134 · · Score: 1

      Contract law requires them to give notice of any such changes and allow you out of the contract without penalty if you do not agree to the changes.

      --
      <gir voice> I love this sig... </gir voice>
  17. Re:Still the best coverage in the US by Protoslo · · Score: 2

    I agree. I have a grandfathered plan and this news is somewhat alarming, but many times I have been with other people who have Sprint or AT&T that hit dead spots the moment they leave major metropolitan areas and the interstates. That was the reason I switched to Verizon in the first place. I can't really make a credible threat to leave Verizon, because even with whatever capped plan they introduce (the current ones are ~2GB only!) it is unlikely that Verizon will actually be worse in general than AT&T, etc.

  18. Ok then by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

    Goodbye. Guess you don't want my money anymore. Or rather, you obviously do, you just want more of it. You got greedy, now you get none.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  19. I'm glad they are doing this by Burning1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm glad they are doing this. I'm currently paying ~$100 a month, and the only reason I keep Verizon is that I'm not on contract, and I have an unlimited plan that would be impossible to replace if I cancelled.

    I've been with Verizon since owning a Motorola Startac. Killing the unlimited plan should make the switch to another provider painless.

    1. Re:I'm glad they are doing this by dave562 · · Score: 1

      I've been with Verizon since owning a Motorola Startac.

      Are you sure about that? The Startac came out before "Verizon Wireless" was even incorporated.

    2. Re:I'm glad they are doing this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been with Verizon since owning a Motorola Startac.

      Are you sure about that? The Startac came out before "Verizon Wireless" was even incorporated.

      he probably was part of LA cellular which became verizon wireless.

    3. Re:I'm glad they are doing this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does he really need to say "Ameritech" to appease you?

      Seriously, fuck, go outside or something.

    4. Re:I'm glad they are doing this by idontgno · · Score: 1

      The Startac came out (1996) somewhat before Bell Atlantic renamed itself Verizon Wireless in 1999. As far as I can google, Bell Atlantic had a wireless service which sold and supported, for a brief time, the Startac. So, other then pointless pedantry about a brand name, GPP's statement seems plausible.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    5. Re:I'm glad they are doing this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a Startac on Verizon after it was created by the merger of several other carriers including Airtouch. 1999ish?

    6. Re:I'm glad they are doing this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Startac was on GTE, one of the carriers who merged to become Verizon. I've been with them that long.

      Having said that, I'm now looking at my almost-new Droid 4 and wondering whether I'll be switching to another carrier (and thus phone) soon.

    7. Re:I'm glad they are doing this by Burning1 · · Score: 1

      A lot of variants of the '96 StarTAC were produced, and it continued to sell through the early 2000s, if I recall correctly.

    8. Re:I'm glad they are doing this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been with Verizon since owning a Motorola Startac.

      Are you sure about that? The Startac came out before "Verizon Wireless" was even incorporated.

      And it survived for some time afterward. My first cell phone as a freshly minted adult was a brand-new StarTAC on Verizon in 2001.

  20. Not a surprise by Mr_Silver · · Score: 5, Insightful

    According to Nokia Siemens Networks, the average amount of smartphone data used per day is 15MB (about 450MB per month). If you're using ten times that amount on a grandfathered plan that costs you peanuts, it's hardly surprising that someone somewhere will run the numbers and work out that you are of no value to the company.

    By all means shout "right, that's it! I'm off to Sprint!" but it'll be a hollow victory as Verizon will probably be more than happy to see the back of you.

    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    1. Re:Not a surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe you're just an average customer with average usage who's just tired of everybody trying to hang a meter on every damned thing. Not sure where all the Sprint hate comes from, unless it's just more astroturfing. They've served me well except for the technical limits of their first 4G network, and they are working on capacity instead of resorting to the "screw the customer" strategy first. No wonder Wall Street is irritated with them.

      I don't even use their network as much as I could. I just don't want to run around counting every byte or worrying about associating to every unverified open wifi hotspot I find just to turn the meter off.

      I thought we'd buried this metered data idiocy with AOL, but it seems we have a whole new generation of stupid MBAs who need to learn what standing on the wrong side of history looks like.

    2. Re:Not a surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      15MB per day? seems awful low... The latest iteration of my face w/ 11 minutes of foreground usage and 1hr 22 minutes of background tasks managed to suck down 15.14MB today and upload 2.35MB.

  21. I have never used more than 800meg each month by MONSTER_RANCHER · · Score: 0

    I have never used more than 800meg each month, But somehow I will feel cheated if I dont still have the unlimited.

    1. Re:I have never used more than 800meg each month by Life2Death · · Score: 1

      I too was ready to throw in the towel for phones but I was happy to talk to an alltel provider who was happy to sell me unlimited everything. This included their USB cell modems, so it was an easy choice to switch to them and keep having a cell phone.

      My fiance had verizon and her phone was so locked it wouldnt even let you download pictures it took, compared to mine which was the same model. I was disgusted by cell phones.

      Then VZW purchased them and its been going south ever since. The only reason I have a phone is because its an android, i can hack it if i want to, and I have unlimited data which is fair for the price i'm paying. I get 100Mbps cable for less than my phone gets 1.5Mbps

      Take this away and I feel like you're screwing me harder for phones that now come with crapware, keep installing more crapware, and your support shoots me in the face when my phone overheats and dies in front of you because i have "done bad things to my phones software" which they cannot prove.

  22. share usb stick with cell plan? by ncohafmuta · · Score: 1

    It will also allow individuals to share data across different 4G LTE devices

    does that mean we can now share our 4G cell phone data plan with a 4G usb stick and not have to buy another stupid data plan for it?? because i'm all for that.

  23. Which wouldn't be bad... IF by hsmith · · Score: 1

    They actually increased the GB allotment.

    AT&T has been at $30 for 2GB for four fucking years now, I mean, if they upped it 1GB a year it would seem reasonable - but to keep the bandwidth static is absolute BS.

    I don't mind paying, if it is fair.

    1. Re:Which wouldn't be bad... IF by hawaiian717 · · Score: 1

      AT&T has never charged $30 for 2GB. I don't recall what they charged for the original iPhone, but starting with the iPhone 3G it was $30 for unlimited. Then when they introduced tiered pricing, it was $25 for 2GB. Now it's $30 for 3GB.

      --
      End of Line.
  24. Sudden sudden Schadenfreude by mapkinase · · Score: 1

    Sorry, can't help it. I stuck with Verizon from God knows how many years, switched to my first data plan this year knowing that lucky first adopters had it unlimited and now this brings a sweet joy of satisfaction and sort of commie style equality: NOW we all are in this shit together.

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
  25. Selling a limited resource as "unlimited" by mdvolm · · Score: 1

    Is this really that bad? Selling a limited resource as "unlimited" is not sustainable. I'd rather have the smaller proportion of folks who use a larger proportion of data pay more for it. So what?

    1. Re:Selling a limited resource as "unlimited" by Githaron · · Score: 1

      $15/GB is not reasonable. I would be willing to accept $1/GB.

  26. you're wrong about everything you said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    http://www.droidforums.net/forum/android-roms/45504-updated-droid-rom-links-kernels-themes.html "but not touch the kernel" Wrong. "KERNELS: (please read developer's posts carefully on installation instructions, ROM compatibility, and notes) - ChevyNo1(see ROMS above for other kernels): http://www.droidforums.net/forum/chevyno1/32272-update-new-kernels-low-voltage-medium-voltage-3-25-2010-a.html - Bekit: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1123576/Android/bekit_kernels/0.8/bekit_boot-links.html - P3Droid kernels: http://www.p3designs.info/kernels/ - P3Droid kernels for Koush ROM: http://www.mydroidworld.com/forums/p...ur-flavor.html - Team Chaos kernels: Kernels Thread - Jake's kernels: http://ninebysix.com/page.cfm/android-dev/droid-dev - Dave12308's kernels: http://www.mydroidworld.com/forums/dave12308/" You simply have no idea what the fuck you're talking about.

    1. Re:you're wrong about everything you said by idontgno · · Score: 1, Troll

      WTF is wrong with you? And which what part of "recent" did you not understand? Those links you very carefully (lol) pasted in are for the ancient Droid. Which is not sold anywhere in a 1st World nation, and certainly not by Verizon.

      Seriously. "February". And not February two years ago. Geez. Think.You simply have no idea what the fuck you're talking about.

      And since I know much more than you, what does that make you, other than an asshat troll?

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    2. Re:you're wrong about everything you said by cshay · · Score: 1
    3. Re:you're wrong about everything you said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "lol" and a swear word every sentence. You know a lot about phones for a 12 year old.

    4. Re:you're wrong about everything you said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He mentioned couldn't replace the kernel not couldn't root the d4. read before you argue.

  27. Also we have to have limits by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2

    At least if we want to have it fast. There are just real, physical, limits you hit in to with wireless. There is only so much speed you can get with a given technology on a given amount of spectrum, and spectrum is licensed. That speed is shared with all users on a segment. So the only thing you can do is build out the segments smaller. Well not only does that cost money, but it is hard to get done in many places, since segments require towers, and there are practical limits to how small you can make them.

    So that means people have to play nice and share. If everyone can just use whatever they want, shit will get slowed down to a crawl. If people play nice and share it can be fast for everyone.

    With wired connections it is somewhat feasible to want them to just be faster. Cable companies can start using DOCSIS 3 and allocate more channels to data (it is like 40mbps per channel shared on a segment) and they can also build out their segments to include relatively few houses (even then there are limits). For wireless, you can't do that that, doesn't work that way.

    Now that said, the limits are stupidly low with most providers, they need to up them to something more reasonable. However we do need limits. Otherwise it will be poor speeds all around because some people will want to slam the connection 24/7.

    1. Re:Also we have to have limits by Githaron · · Score: 1

      I might be willing to be to accept caps or metering if it was no more than a dollar a gig. Especially, if I could use the data plan across multiple devices with tethering allowed. That is reasonable for a wireless anywhere internet connection at 4G speeds. I would even accept it if they charge me for the full gig if I used only part of it. $15 dollars a gig is ridiculous ($30 for 2GB).

  28. They pay the government to change the law by kawabago · · Score: 1

    That is how it works. You have money to donate to politicians and politicians can make laws to benefit you. It's a win win situation for politicians and businesses but it isn't so good for everyone else.

  29. failed class action suit in 5-10 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone willing to bet that in the next 2-3 years all operators go to limited data plans.
    Then a few years after that we will find out the industry probably conspired to do this to increase profits.
    By the time 15G superLTE comes out, Verizon will be able to bankrupt a middle class family in 30 seconds.
    Then someone will try to sue them for it.

  30. Wow, really? by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You are comparing his statement to supporting rape? I think maybe you have a problem with blowing shit out of proportion.

    As for not wanting you to use unlimited amounts of data, they don't, which is why they are changing the plan. They tried it, some people, probably you, used way too much data and wouldn't moderate usage, so they aren't selling unlimited plans anymore.

    Unlimited to many reasonable people doesn't mean "No limits at all of any kind," it means "No specific or preset limits." For example at work people have unlimited bandwidth. We have no traffic shaping, no port rate limits, you can use as much is available, which is a lot. However, it is shared among lots of people. If everyone tried to slam it 24/7 we'd get shit speeds. So you have to moderate your usage. Use it when you need it, leave it idle for others when you don't. Fail to do so and we'll notice, and come and talk to you, and if necessary cut your net off. It is "unlimited" in that we don't set any hard limits, but that doesn't mean you can use all of it all the time.

    That entitled attitude is precisely why companies have to start setting limits. People who say "They said unlimited, so I am going to stream video all day, torrent all night, and use every last bit of the bandwidth I can. It is unlimited, that is my right." Well, that gluttonous attitude is unsustainable for people to all have good access since if people won't moderate their usage, they'll impose limits to moderate it.

    1. Re:Wow, really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      To take your work example in another perspective, let's say that your IT department decides to impose a 5 GB per month bandwidth cap on each employee's workstation. Anyone who exceeds the cap will have to obtain approval from the IT Director to retain Internet access, and they will have their pay docked $10 per overage gigabyte if the IT Director denies their request.

      Now let's look at how this is handled in two cases:

      Case 1: Jim the technical writer rarely uses the Internet for his job, since most of his work involves I/O with the local network drive editing Word documents. When he does use the Internet, it's often on his lunch break. He listens to Pandora radio a lot on his computer, and illegally pirates HD movies and syncs them with his tablet. He goes WAY over 5GB. The IT Director notes that his overages were due to personal pursuits and not related to work, so he gets docked the $10 per GB.

      Case 2: Zach the software engineer has to rely on the Internet constantly for his job, since most of his work involves researching the latest technologies, downloading often large SDKs and updates, contributing patches to large codebases, and downloading Linux ISOs to install in virtual machines. He uses the Internet very sparingly for personal use, yet he still goes WAY over 5GB. The IT Director is aware of his business activities, and approves a special plan that increases Zach's monthly cap-without-penalties to 25GB, which is about 5GB higher than what Zach usually consumes to give him a little breathing room.

      This kind of thing sounds perfectly reasonable in a company. The problem is, with Verizon, there *is no IT Director* deciding which traffic is legitimate and which traffic is nonsense. There is no arbitrator that will allow someone to affordably do something that *just takes more data*, even if that "something" is perfectly legitimate but can't possibly be done economically with a per-GB data plan.

      Heck, some people consume gigabytes of bandwidth without even realizing it, because they have a virus or worm on their machine trying to upload copies of itself to every reachable host. Some people consume gigabytes of bandwidth illegally downloading content, sometimes content which *by itself* is illegal regardless of how it's obtained (I'm sure you can think of a few examples of that). Other people consume gigabytes of bandwidth doing legitimate commercial activity, whether it's buying songs from Amazon or working a remote programming job or placing video calls with their shareholders. I would inquisitively ask the Verizon execs how THEY deal with the caps, but then I recall that they are all million or billionaires, and probably don't give a damn about $1000 in overage fees. And that's assuming they don't have a special unlimited plan reserved just for them. Haughty fucks can't even live by their own rules.

      The fatal flaw with "blind" data caps is that there are no truly fair rules you can establish which decide whether someone's traffic should be subsidized or not. So, due to the inability to arbitrate what legitimate usage comprises, the carriers just charge everyone one flat rate that makes them a boatload of money, regardless of whether it's in the "most deserving" case of someone's phone or computer uploading gigabytes of viruses to others, or the "least deserving" case where a software engineer with no access to any other type of internet connection is just trying to download the tools they need to do their job and stay competitive.

      Net neutrality is basically a catch-22: if it *were* possible to fairly judge which data is legitimate and which is not, then it'd be possible to block a huge amount of waste and save bandwidth for legitimate activity. But since we don't have the powers of the Oracle (we're only human, after all), we have to be "fair" and treat everyone equally badly.

      What Verizon and the rest of the capitalists don't realize is that they are hugely stifling their own precious capitalist economy by imposing data limits. People who might want to download

    2. Re:Wow, really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would agree with you if it weren't for the fact that there is a world of difference between "moderate use" and using your monthly data cap in an hour on a 4G network, which is possible on verizon. The limits being set are an indication of what the wireless companies were hoping would be reasonable usage, knowing full well that people might want to use the data connection for more than %.14 of the month. There is a reasonable need for data limits much higher than what some carriers would like to impose, for instance people who have no cable or DSL access, some of whom were sold "unlimited" plans as a solution to their problems. So tell me do you really think that the limits are because of users who refuse to restrain themselves, or could they instead could they be the product of wireless companies that couldn't resist selling something they couldn't deliver to get more subscribers?

    3. Re:Wow, really? by jbolden · · Score: 1

      The 5g data cap applies to over the air, which is an ultra premium service for getting small amounts of data as desired. If you want large quantities of data use a land connection. They shouldn't care about why you want the data. They care about how much you cost them to service.

    4. Re:Wow, really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The they shouldn't sell me a phone with Netflix, MOG, Pandora, etc....

    5. Re:Wow, really? by izomiac · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Unlimited" has a simple meaning -- not limited. Selling a limited plan as unlimited is fraud. Your work internet analogy, while being a decent tragedy of the commons, doesn't really apply since employees aren't buying/promised limitless service. A better analogy (IMHO) would be getting cut-off without refund at an all-you-can-eat buffet, which is sacrilege in the US. Setting limits is fine, e.g. 2 GB or 12 plates of food, but if you sell something without limits then you have to hope you set the price where you make money on average, despite the occasional heavy consumer.

    6. Re:Wow, really? by twocows · · Score: 1

      I'm entitled to something I paid for, yes. If it isn't unlimited, it shouldn't be labeled "unlimited." It should be "unlimited (except not unlimited)." This attitude that the customer isn't entitled to the advertised product is extremely worrisome, I see it a lot in the games industry as well. I really hope it doesn't continue.

    7. Re:Wow, really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone who calls anybody else "entitled" is a sociopath.

    8. Re:Wow, really? by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Your phone works over wifi. I use Pandora over wifi all the time. They expect you to be responsible enough to use those services in places where you are pulling data by landline.

    9. Re:Wow, really? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      You are comparing his statement to supporting rape? I think maybe you have a problem with blowing shit out of proportion.

      No, I'm comparing his statement to blaming the victim, Like it's somehow my fault Verizon hasn't upgraded their infrastructure to support all the unlimited data plans they've sold. I think maybe you have a problem with reading comprehension.

      As for not wanting you to use unlimited amounts of data, they don't, which is why they are changing the plan. They tried it, some people, probably you, used way too much data and wouldn't moderate usage, so they aren't selling unlimited plans anymore.

      Yea, because it's my fault a heavily-taxpayer-subsidized, heavily-immune-from-prosecution telco sold a bunch of bandwidth they didn't have, meanwhile fought against upgrading their infrastructure, and I have the audacity to hold them to their promise of unlimited data. Right. That's a logical conclusion. Sure. And the Pope is an 80-story space lizard.

      FYI, aside from the occasional ISO download, my usage typically falls into the 0-2GB/Mo. range. But some of us are principled people, and when someone sells us something with feature X, it better by-god have it, regardless of whether we plan on using it or not.

      Unlimited to many reasonable people doesn't mean "No limits at all of any kind," it means "No specific or preset limits."

      Ah, I see, didn't realize I was talking to Merriam Webster here, who apparently gets to define both the terms "reasonable" and "unlimited." My bad.

      For those of us who don't write our own dictionaries, "unlimited" is defined as:
      1. not limited; unrestricted; unconfined: unlimited trade.
      2. boundless; infinite; vast: the unlimited skies.
      3. without any qualification or exception; unconditional.

      If that's not what Verizon meant to sell me when they sold me an unlimited data plan, that's their fuck up for not knowing English.

      For example at work.. we have no traffic shaping, no port rate limits, you can use as much is available, which is a lot. However, it is shared among lots of people. If everyone tried to slam it 24/7 we'd get shit speeds. So you have to moderate your usage.

      As a hypothetical employee, let's assume one whose function at the company is not networking related, why should I give 2 fucks about bandwidth usage? That's the network admin's problem, and if he's a useless slacker who can't figure out a load balancer from a hole in the ground that's his problem and fault, not mine.

      Fail to do so and we'll notice, and come and talk to you, and if necessary cut your net off.

      Riiiight, because the "admin" who can't figure out queuing and load balancing will totally be doing deep packet inspection and monitoring.

      In that scenario, I would probably ask management why our IT folks have time to spy on everyone's usage, but not the time to make sure that everything works, and get their worthless asses fired.

      It is "unlimited" in that we don't set any hard limits, but that doesn't mean you can use all of it all the time.

      What you describe is known as a "conditional limitation, " (see definition 3 above), and thus is not unlimited.

      The obvious difference is, at work I am not a customer, and thus have not signed a contract in which the company promises me unlimited data bandwidth in exchange for money, so yea, there's no obligation on the part of my employer to guarantee a specific amount of bandwidth and/or usage. Your example is non sequitur in that you ignore the world of difference between employer/employee and customer/vendor relationships.

      That entitled attitude is precisely why companies have to start setting limits.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    10. Re:Wow, really? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      They shouldn't care about why you want the data. They care about how much you cost them to service.

      *Sigh*... I don't know which is worse - companies treating customers as if they were burdens, or people like this who seem to honestly believe that's how it should be.

      Sad, is what it is.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    11. Re:Wow, really? by msobkow · · Score: 1

      I can see the issue for shared resources like wireless transmissions or cable SHUBS, but with DSL I feel absolutely no guilt about "torrenting all night" or downloading and uploading gobs of software and data.

      With my land link, I pay for a data pipe. Period. I chose the package based on it's speed and capacity. Some months I'd go way over the 250G cap that seems common with many ISPs (I can pull down a good 10G in a day at times), other months I'd be way under.

      I can't imagine ever opting for a "capped" plan that arbitrarily decides that I'm a "bad" user that needs to be screwed in the wallet unless I had absolutely no other choice.

      Fortunately I'm not aware of any ISPs in Saskatchewan that implement caps. SaskTel even offers unlimited wireless device data for less than $60/month. I don't think they even have a package with a cap.

      But that's what happens when you have a government-sponsored "monopoly" that is mandated with providing access to the whole province. In order to stay in business at all under provincial regulations, SaskTel has to provide equal access to everyone in the province. And that implies that their wireless customers have the same "all you can eat" rights (and yes, it is a provincial right!) as the land-line customers.

      There are competitors to SaskTel, but SaskTel owns the market in the province because they provide the coverage and bandwidth to earn the market. They may have been dragged kicking and screaming into providing that access to the province, but they're reaping the benefits now -- they're a consistently profitable company and they don't have thousands of customers up in arms and screaming about being "raped" by their providers as seems to be so common elsewhere.

      Saskatchewan has long taken the attitude that some services and resources are natural monopolies. Rather than fight against the idea of there being anything resembling a monopoly, we created government sponsored monopolies and regulated the shit out of them instead of letting corporations cherry-pick the most profitable market segments and leave the rest of the province screwed.

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    12. Re:Wow, really? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      How would I do that in my car? Though Pandora is a bad example as it uses very little data.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    13. Re:Wow, really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the fuck did this prick get modded Insightful?

    14. Re:Wow, really? by jbolden · · Score: 1

      The original claim was about high usage and business importance and how people with high usage should use land. Obviously in your car you might over-the-air data. But you should responsible, or pay for a large allocation if you are going to be driving a with heavy data usage.

    15. Re:Wow, really? by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Incremental cost of product is one of the primary drivers in any economic model. Of course customers are burdons. They are also the source of profits.

    16. Re:Wow, really? by AnonyMouseCowWard · · Score: 1

      Y'know, when you build a network, you should take this into account. Out of your millions of customers, chances are, you will get a few (hundreds, thousands?) that will consume inordinate amounts of data. But as a whole? I can't believe that 100%, or even 50% of the "unlimited plan" customers use an insane amount, which means that on the scale of your entire network, it shouldn't be a problem. That's a common problem in engineering, isn't it? Your bridge has a max capacity, of course, but you plan for it to be much larger than the load it should be facing, and you estimate that load giving yourself enough buffer for the entire thing to be safe.

      If you don't trust in your network to be able to handle customers with unlimited data plans, don't sell them. Sell 300GB caps if you must, but sell something you can actually provide, else it's just false advertising.

    17. Re:Wow, really? by vux984 · · Score: 1

      but with DSL I feel absolutely no guilt about "torrenting all night" or downloading and uploading gobs of software and data.

      You've fallen hard for the dedicated link DSL marketing myth.

      You do know what happens to your connection at the local CO right? It gets switched onto an uplink shared with all your neighbors...

  31. Re:Still the best coverage in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It doesn't fucking matter. They fucking reneged on unlimited data once the USian sheeple started flocking over. This is capitalism at its finest. The solution: Communism. That's right boys and girls, communism. Naturally the fucktarded USians will simply drool over the newest toy by saying "Ooooh shiney" and forget about all of the evils of capitalism. Fortunately for those outside the US we are inching towards communism and towards ture freedom, while the Usians cling to their Imperialistic capitailism and hatred of anyone and anything that is different.

    Sincerely,

    Signed, the rest of the world.

  32. let me fix that headline for ya by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Verizon To Kill All Unlimited Data Plans

    Verizon To Stop Pretending To Offer Unlimited Data Plans

  33. This wouldn't be so bad if.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They stopped charging for wifi hotspot.

  34. What's in it for the customer? by SixDimensionalArray · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Ok, fine, you don't want us to have unlimited plans anymore.

    If a customer has an unlimited plan (grandfathered in), and Verizon ceases offering it, what will they offer in return?

    It sure would be nice if common practice was, when they take something away, they give you something in return.

    What is the exchange? Lower rates/costs? Better network performance? Higher throughput?

    Don't have anything to give after you take away "unlimited", Verizon? Then give the customer the reason you MUST do it. Prove to the customer that this is necessary, at the very least.

    Show the customer a convincing, legitimate reason to stay, or they're going to wonder why you're simply "taking away from them".

    Don't just take and take and take and take - that's what the customer doesn't like.

    The customer is not stupid, but can easily be misinformed, and perception is everything.

    1. Re:What's in it for the customer? by noc007 · · Score: 1

      Faster data speed. This will be for customers upgrading their phone at the end of their existing contract and assuming there are no 3G smartphones and only LTE smartphones are available to be upgraded to. For those already grandfathered in on an unlimited plan with a LTE phone, I don't see them getting any benefit.

    2. Re:What's in it for the customer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The rational approach for customers to take would be:
      1. supplier changes terms of contract
      2. customer investigates other potential suppliers along with new terms from current supplier
      3. customer weighs criteria for their particular situation (cost, coverage, data allowance, etc...)
      4. customer chooses best option

      Yes, some customers will take a "punitive" approach that says "even though Verizon is still objectively the best option, I'm going to teach them a lesson." But unless it is a very significant percentage, it won't make any difference to Verizon and will be self defeating for the customers that do so.

    3. Re:What's in it for the customer? by Nyall · · Score: 1

      They are allowing individuals to share data between devices. Meaning I can have 1 data plan for my phone and tablet.

      --
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jury_nullification
  35. I like the way the law works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You sign a contract with a phone company, which is binding for you, and binding for them, except when they decide to change the contract. Someone needs to do a study of the following question: Do phone contracts exist because of the particular market structure of mobile communications, or has the fact that these contracts are allowed to exist, created a non-competitive environemnt?

  36. I'd give up unlimited for good shared plan by clay_buster · · Score: 1

    We have 3 data plans, only one unlimited, that would easily fit inside some shared bucket for less money.

  37. Support Mesh Networking by birukun · · Score: 1

    My dream - someday to walk around as my mobile phone is making IP-based calls and getting passed from WLAN to WLAN.

    I was wondering when Google was going to buy up some fiber and a frequency space (or maybe use >3Ghz which is currently unlicensed) to support their own infrastructure for Android devices.

    I am patenting this post. LOL

    --
    Self Defense - A Human Right www.a-human-right.com
    1. Re:Support Mesh Networking by birukun · · Score: 1

      I meant >300Ghz

      --
      Self Defense - A Human Right www.a-human-right.com
  38. Eff them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have an unlimited contract which is grandfathered in until December. I made the phone assistant guarantee me they would not go back on this.
    I'm just now planning to transition to a setup where I would have been using far more data using the hotspot.
    Now I can't do that? They will lose my business immediately.

  39. Well, they picked the most ironic place to do so by Alzheimers · · Score: 1

    'Speaking at the J.P Morgan Technology Media and Telecom conference today,

    At least the picked the most ironic place to announce their plans to lose two billion dollars the honest way - by screwing their customers into cancellations.

  40. Just Called Verizon by Githaron · · Score: 2

    The representative did not know anything about this announcement. He said that grandfathered 4G unlimited users will keep unlimited until they cancel or change their plan. For those of you that are currently unlimited on Verizon, he also told me that you can get unlimited wi-fi tethering for an additional $30 a month. Still kind of expensive when you consider you are already paying $30 for data on your phone to begin with but if you use it all the time it might be worth it.

    1. Re:Just Called Verizon by oh-dark-thirty · · Score: 1

      FoxFi can fix that little $30 problem for free. As long as you keep the tethering to a reasonable level they won't bother you.

    2. Re:Just Called Verizon by Githaron · · Score: 1

      I would rather not risk losing my unlimited data by having my contract cancelled by Verizon because they detected that I was using my phone as a proxy. Of course, if I ran my connection through a VPN, Verizon wouldn't have anyway to detect the data contents would they? Has anyone tried this? How much latency does it tend to add?

  41. Republic Wireless Wave C here I come! by dhickman · · Score: 1

    I have been debating about going with Republic wireless for my phone and Ting for a hotspot. The only thing that was holding me back was my unlimited 4g data on my thunderbolt. I hope wave c gets here before VZ makes the material adverse change in my contract. That way the change will be easy to justify. Right now my ETF is $545 - $40 a month.

  42. Re:Still the best coverage in the US by pjbgravely · · Score: 1

    Strange, in upstate NY's southern tier it is the exact opposite. AT&T and Sprint have coverage and Verizon has none except for the cities and interstates.

    --
    Star Trek, there maybe hope.
  43. Sucks to be them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The unlimited data plan + contract is the only reason I'm still around. As soon as the plan goes, so do I.

    Nice job shooting yourselves in the foot guys!

  44. Before everyone gets upset about this... by jim9000 · · Score: 1

    It should not surprise anyone that Verizon is going to eventually push people off the unlimited plans. However, if you have unlimited data now, you should not worry until you upgrade your device (or your contract expires). They do retain the rights to change plans and pricing at any time, but they would have to let everyone out of their contract. They will just wait out the current contracts rather than let everyone out since the "issue" of unlimited will work itself out in less than 2 years from the date they stop allowing contract renewals on the old unlimited plans. If they want to boot the users who burn through ridiculous amounts of data such as 1TB a month now, they can deal with those on a case by case basis.

    Right now, the only un-throttled unlimited service in the US is with Sprint, who isn't known for fast 3G speeds, and is just getting ready to launch LTE in a handful of markets. Rural customers will be waiting quite some time for Sprint LTE and some may never see it. Also, Sprint may decide to drop unlimited someday. AT&T has caps and overages (and places still stuck on EDGE), and T-Mobile has caps + throttling, and limited coverage in rural areas (also has places stuck on EDGE). The value oriented prepaid carriers all cap or throttle as far as I know. Leaving Verizon just to prove a point isn't likely to accomplish any more than leaving AT&T.

    To the carriers defense, there's only so much capacity to go around. LTE will help, but usage continues to grow. More spectrum helps (but this complicates device design and roaming). More cell sites would help too, but they are becoming next to impossible to build in urban and suburban areas, where they are needed most, due to ridiculous health concerns, aesthetic / property value concerns (which is silly since most people want their mobile phones to work at home), and general local government roadblocks for permits.

    Verizon users used to pay around $40 for unlimited data on a BlackBerry or Windows Mobile device. This was before the iPhone, and before streaming video and music was common over wireless networks. In fact, I seem to recall that streaming was blocked in the terms of service. Typical usage was low - mine was less than 100MB. The browsers on most devices were terrible and couldn't load a full site without crashing or rendering it in an unreadable mess, so it was hard to use a lot without tethering which was also not allowed. Now, 2 GB for $30 seems a little high, but it is more value for the money than what was available just a few years ago.

    I don't want to give up my unlimited plan any more than anyone else, but I never expected it to last forever either. At the end of the day, the carriers are seeing a shift away from voice usage and towards data usage. That's why you can now get an unlimited voice plan for about the same cost as 1,000 minutes a few years ago. Voice isn't the money maker anymore. The wireless carriers are in business to make money, and will make sure that continues to happen. And before anyone suggests having the government run the networks, think of the last time you dealt with the DMV, IRS, or any other government oriented operation. Then look at just about any politician to see the very definition of greed.

    1. Re:Before everyone gets upset about this... by oh-dark-thirty · · Score: 1

      My issue with data caps is the effect it has on innovation. What good is Netflix, Pandora, et.al. on a mobile device if you can't take advantage of them?

    2. Re:Before everyone gets upset about this... by DECula · · Score: 1

      First off, thanks for a well thought out post. You do have some good points.

      I would challenge you on "To the carriers defense, there's only so much capacity to go around."
      The internet is an evolving place, with bandwidth costs being reduced by volume. The T1 for
      $8000/mo is now a $19.95 DSL circuit. It scales out to these larger guys, too.

      The motive here is to milk/bilk every nickle possible out of their customers, and from the postings I've
      seen there are several of us on unlimited that don't use even the lower tier of their new plan. This has
      the potential to actually drive their profits lower by bad customer relations, if nothing else. I was on ATT
      and moved exactly for that reason.

      The main reason * a lot * of people choose unlimited is because of the carriers history of gouging people
      who used "too many" minutes on voice plans is still a vivid reminder of how greedy these folks can be. And are.

      I do agree with your thoughts on government involvement - unless we add the FCC, who is responsible for oversight
      of the carriers already.

      --
      dreaded scurrilous bit-twiddler from Oklahoma
    3. Re:Before everyone gets upset about this... by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 2

      The government also invented the freeway system and the internet, and those didn't turn out too bad.

      This conversation is a moot point in Japan and many other countries, because here (in Japan) we have competition rather than the rampant collusion among the American carriers. There are still unlimited data plans available on every carrier, and they're getting cheaper due to portable wi-fi hotspots in 3G, LTE and Wimax flavors.

      As for capacity, it's not about airwaves, it's about server collisions. As you said, it's going all data, and American phone companies are loathe to cooperate in sharing the actual wired data networks, let alone upgrading their own. They've always been very good on making excuses as to why they can't build out their infrastructure while the rest of the world moves forward. They rely on natural American insularity to protect them from comparisons with successful systems abroad (and no, geography doesn't play as big a role as they'd like you to believe).

      The government has attempted to play fair and leave this in the hands of the carriers since the 90s, even doling out billions in grants to help these companies in building out aforementioned infrastructure, but the companies have merely pocketed the money while thinking up new and interesting ways to screw their customers over.

      --
      "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
    4. Re:Before everyone gets upset about this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sounds like we need to import some of japans excess competition so unlimited plans can grow affordable in usa.

  45. They are now charging $30 to upgrade your phone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And their DSL service is forcing new customers to get phone service. What has gotten into Verizon?

  46. Fight fire with fire. by bratwiz · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The simple solution is for everybody to start calling Verizon to inquire about data plans, get support for anything and everything-- and even just to find out how your favorite verizon person is getting along. Call now. Call often. In fact, don't stop calling. Call, call call. Choke their lines, make it hurt. Plus, I'd bet that it'd be a great idea to check out all their wonderful offerings on their web sites-- all of them-- a lot. Check your bill. Twice. Make sure you read it right. In fact, have your wife / coworker / friend / friend's mom / neighbor-down-the-street / heck, all of 'em read it twice just to make sure you didn't miss anything. You might also want to call their sales line to find out about all their great offerings and add-ons. I'll bet they have a *ton* of cool stuff you could buy. But I know it's hard to decide right away. In fact, you might have to really get them to explain it carefully with plenty of detail in order to fully grasp the sheer awesomeness of their products. In fact, you might even have to think about it some and then call back and ask them to explain anything you didn't completely get the first time. You could also call them to tell them what a wonderful job you think they're doing. I'm sure they don't hear that anywhere near enough. You could really brighten up some verizon employee's day by calling them up just to tell them. And you know, all of the verizon employees do a terrific job and I'd be willing to bet they'd ALL enjoy hearing your opinion! Plus you should also call their bosses to congratulate them. And send emails-- lots of emails. Calling isn't the only way to let them know what a superb job you think they're doing.

    You know, with all their loyal, friendly customers and fanatical fans-- they just couldn't bear the thought of taking away their unlimited Internet...

    1. Re:Fight fire with fire. by sohmc · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Many large corporations have moved from Customer Service to Customer Relations. The difference is that corporations are no longer interested in keeping customers happy. They only need customers to keep paying.

      Verizon has a very large customer base. As long as they don't do something drastic, the majority of their customers will continue paying. They may have crappy customer service, but as long as people don't have problems, they will continue to pay.

      I have no figures on the subject but I suspect that those with unlimited data plans may represent a smaller portion of their customer base...or at least a smaller profitable portion of their customer base. They may lose customers because of this, but they may be hedging that new customers may come to Verizon for it's coverage/speed/etc.

      --
      We don't live in Shouldland.
  47. Not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This dosent surprise me in the least. Everyone is going that direction, and the companys that are not have crappy networks. Of course, if verizon does this right it probally wont be so bad. First, they need to work a wi-fi agreement out with any of the number of companys that offer nationwide wi-fi hotspots in various businesses and other venues, secondly, they need to remove the additional fee charged for using the wi-fi hotspot capability of your phone and have that count towards your data cap. Third, they need to have a reasonable per GB charge. And Finally, grandfather the legacy unlimited users in by having a fairly high GB cap (say 4GB). if they did 3/4 things i'd really happy, if they did 2/4 things, i'd be moderatly happy, if they dident do any of that i wouldent be terrably happy, but seeing how there sint much serious competition to verizon based on coverage and the like i dont have much choice. Since i use mostly wi-fi at home and work (we have an open wi-fi hotspot at work) i dont use much data, but would hate to get dinged on trips and the like, especally since it seems like on my android a lot of apps use a lot of data in the background (which is also an issue that will need addressing as i dont think consumers understand background processes very well, and they are hard to control on some handsets)

  48. Verizon stretches truth by beartek · · Score: 1

    Verizon has a huge billboard by my computer shop boasting of being the nations #1 4g provider... There's no 4 g for 100 miles from the sign! They are charter members of the Obfuscation Bureau!

  49. Offer heavy data use plans by perlith · · Score: 1

    Unlimited mobile broadband plans from Verizon/Alltel stopped being offered awhile ago. The last ones offered by Verizon were in 2007 before they established overage charges, and by Alltel in 2009 before the acquisition was complete. All grandfathered unlimited mobile broadband plans are well past the two-year agreement terms. Unlimited data plans on phone may extend a bit longer into 2013.

    I am on a grandfathered unlimited plan from Alltel. This is the ONLY decent internet coverage where I live. Satellite and Dialup do not count. The other two big networks (Sprint/AT&T) do not reach my house. Right now, we average 50GB per month, topping out at 80GB one or twice a year (usually right around when Steam has their summer/winter sales). Based on current Verizon rates:
    Highest tier current mobile broadband plan: 10GB at $80/month. $10/GB overage. Estimated combined cost ... ~$500/month.


    Offer me a high-tiered plan that costs less than a T1 per month. 30GB is not enough, keeping going into 50GB, 80GB, 100GB range range for those of us that need it. $4 per GB is not unreasonable ... I would be willing to pay $200/month for my 50GB of usage. Others may not be willing to pay that much, in which case, they already have options for lower tier data packages and can moderate their use accordingly. Offer an option to your current heavy data users. You'd be surprised what your heavy data users are willing to pay given the opportunity.

  50. alltel customer here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they can pry our grandfathered, unlimited, cheaper-than-verizon-plans, alltel data plans from our cold dead hands.

  51. Not about now, but about future by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The current data plans are not about now, but about the future. If they start capping the main body of users to squeeze more money out of them right now, there will be wide uproar. Right now it's only a few geeks and mobile workers that are protesting.

    Everyone is shifting from text messaging and voice phone calls to IP based alternatives. People watch media on mobile devices more and more. If the phone companies don't start charging for IP traffic, their business models will fail in the future. If they wait too long, they will not get away with it because everyone will be suddenly influenced. Now people are eased into the business model and once they go over their plan, are already used to pay for the extra usage.

    The real problem here is market dominance. The few players that actually have coverage or roaming agreements for areas big enough to matter, can basically charge what they want. Because of the high investments in setting up networks and the lack of requirement to roam/peer with other providers for the current big providers, that situation will not change. Either the USA will have to put up with it, or cut up their "too big to compete" telephone companies again and do the mini-bell model once over. I'm not saying that is a good solution, but there may come a time that it will be a better solution than the status quo you will be in otherwise.

    --
    I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
    1. Re:Not about now, but about future by evilviper · · Score: 1

      The Baby Bells model was pointless... Still only have one, government regulated, option for local service, now it's just a small company that isn't named AT&T.

      We're already far, far better off in the cellular space. We have at least 5 major players offering overlapping service in the same markets. Don't like AT&T? Switch to Verizon. Don't like either? Switch to Sprint, or T-Mobile (or if you're crazy: MetroPCS, Cricket, net10, etc).

      The competition is there... See VirginMobile unlimited 3g data for $35/mo including 300 mins of voice calls. See BoostMobile's unliminted EVERYTHING for Smartphones for $40/mo after 2 years (starts at $55 then shrinks by 5 every 6 mo).

      If you want some real ground-breaking stuff, see Republic Wireless, which is currently $19/mo, working on the premise that people are usually on WiFi, and so using VoIP for calls, and having software do a transparent hand-off between WiFi and Cell towers as needed... Or look at the upcomming WiFi standard, that provides automatic connectivity to open APs, and transparent hand-off between them, possibly turning the patchwork of WiFi into an ad-hoc cell network.

      The only thing the gub'mint needs to do is to stop the bigger telcos from buying up their competitors... If they do that, the smaller guys will keep undercutting the big guys, even as they improve their networks, and possibly implement newer technologies, until people notice how badly they're being ripped-off and flock away from the big two... Hell, even now AT&T is in a losing fight with Verizon, and they're going to have to do something to turn it around. We could well see consumers getting better deals here soon.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  52. Verizon's loss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Congratulations, Verizon, for driving even more people to MVNOs and regional carriers.

  53. iphones hackable by police? by Ruede · · Score: 0

    iphones hackable by police?

  54. Well played. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I support this if it means I get to take my subsidized device and switch carriers with no cost.

  55. Spectrum problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    US is out of spectrum for mobile phones and the only way to get more is to migrate other users out of their existing slot.
    Until then the cost of over-the-air data will only rise. AT&T CEO bragged about it recently.

    1. Re:Spectrum problem by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 1

      That's a myth perpetuated by the carriers, but actually the US has plenty of spectrum; they just want to make sure they don't have to *share* spectrum with anyone else, and to buy up everything available. Even if they did, they could co-habitate, using new technologies that more efficiently manage the signal. Sending and receiving cell phone data isn't like overlapping trumpet blasts, after all.

      --
      "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
  56. Debtor's rights by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 0

    You can tell debt collectors to stop calling. If they don't they are breaking the law.

    You can even have them stop all contact except to tell you they are going to sue.

    They can hurt your credit rating, but since anything under 720 now will be an automatic denial for almost anything, unless you have such good credit, it likely doesn't matter.

    And if imposing the debt was illegal (an early termination fee on a contract they unilaterally changed is likely to qualify) you have rights to have that removed from credit, and to take civil action.

    If the Republicans win in November though, you could very well end up facing a 5 year prison sentence and being a felon for life.

    Don't think things like that can happen? Look at Arizona, if you fall behind in your car payments it is a FELONY unless you BRING the car to them. (Why the state's car repossesors didn't fight that is a mystery, the law makes them UNNECESSARY.)

    --
    Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
    1. Re:Debtor's rights by bolthole · · Score: 1

      Don't think things like that can happen? Look at Arizona, if you fall behind in your car payments it is a FELONY unless you BRING the car to them.

      Aaaand.. why is that a terrible thing? That when people are in possession of something they no longer own, (when they were responsible for "picking it up" for themselves in the first place), they are expected to return it to the rightful owners? Or similarly, that falling in "breech of contract" has consequences?

      What you seem to be saying, basically, is, "If you like stealing stuff, dont vote republican".

      The implied inverse of that is, if you dont like people stealing stuff, vote Republican.

      Works for me.

  57. A data plan.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .... to end all (unlimited) data plans!!!!

  58. Re:Still the best coverage in the US by oh-dark-thirty · · Score: 1

    I should not be responding to an AC, but please show me just ONE successful communist regime, past or present, where all citizens had an equitable standard of living.

  59. Bullshit by LanMan04 · · Score: 1

    I've had T-Mobile since 2004 and I get just fine service almost everywhere.

    Sure, if I'm waaaay out in the boonies I may be stuck with GPRS data, but I almost always have a signal to make a call.

    Add on the fact that you can make/receive calls over wifi totally seamlessly and that makes it even better. When you're connected to wifi the phone will shut off its GSM radio and you save tons of battery life.

    --
    With the first link, the chain is forged.
  60. Unlimited is a fantasy by tmosley · · Score: 1

    Unlimited was a bad idea to start with. Imagine an electric company that had an unlimited electricity plan. Instead, data needs to be priced like a bulk commodity, just like electricity, or water, or natgas. This means it should be cheap enough that no-one worries about using data, but they don't OVERuse it either.

    And talk and text should be treated as data. The notion that they are different is outdated, and warps that price structure of all mobile services. Text should be so cheap that it is offered for free when you buy a phone. Phone service should all be VoIP, and as such should cost a few dollars a month. Heavy duty downloaders should pay their fair share according to their usage, but there should rarely if ever be a bill for more than $150 absent your phone becoming part of a botnet.

    The world has changed. It's time to stop living in the 90's.

  61. Re:Still the best coverage in the US by tmosley · · Score: 1

    Khmer Rouge worked pretty well. Most everyone there was equally miserable.

    Oh, you said SUCCESSFUL. Nevermind.

  62. Re:Still the best coverage in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Communist regime is an oxymoron and you are just a typical USian moron. Capitalism is akin to racisim, patritoism, soccial darwinism. Communism is akin to democracy and freedom. Show me one problem with communism and I will show you 10 problems with capitalism to every imaginary problem with communism.

    Sincerely,

    Signed, the rest of the world.

  63. Cricket Sounds Better and Better by ilikenwf · · Score: 2

    GSM + No Contract + Coverage in most Cities...and they seem to cost less too. The only real issue is that I'd hate to give my my droid2...it's old but with AOKP, it runs like a dream.

    1. Re:Cricket Sounds Better and Better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually, they're CDMA...so you could port your Droid2 over.

  64. This is why I left Verizon for StraightTalk by IDtheTarget · · Score: 2

    I've been a Verizon customer for a couple of years, but got fed up with the prices they charged while I was deployed and not even using the service, merely to keep my phone number for when I got home.

    I'm tired of it, and tired of being locked into contracts and paying for data. I want freedom! So here's what I did:

    1. - I purchased two unlocked Galaxy Nexus penta-band GSM phones for $400 each
    2. - I purchased StraightTalk unlimited prepaid plans for each phone for $45.

    Yes, I paid an early-termination fee. But by my calculation, even with paying the full cost of the phone, I come out even in six months. And I no longer have to worry about the tyranny of a contract. I'm free to go to any MVNO.

  65. the 2 yr contract will run out by tkprit · · Score: 1

    within two years, of course — if you keep the same phone or buy one elsewhere, you're out of the contract. The option seems to be buying the new phone full price from Verizon to stay with the unlimited plan (pay $800 to keep the contract vs the former $300). Compared to their other plans ($80/10GB), and assuming you use at least the 10GB, staying in the grandfathered plan is still cheaper than tiered. (ESP if you tether everything in your house and use way more than 10GB/month.) But fck it, I was only with VZW for a few of the grandfathered unlimited contracts. I'll find another carrier with better plans.