Your reply shows even less knowledge than your original post... The Jewish bible has three parts, of which the Torah is only the first (and having had a Bar-Mitzva, you should have read from the others too). The two books of Chronicles, "Divrey Hayamim" in Hebrew, are the last books of the third part, "Ketuvim" (Scriptures? I'm not a native English speaker).
The GPL does not state any jurisdiction, or courts, to decide claims according to itself. This is not an accident, but a result of RMS's philosophy. In fact, as Pythonistas may know, the FSF claims that citing a local law for your license makes it GPL-incompatible. I, personally, have yet to see an agreement with no specified jurisdiction.
Are there no problems with the validity of such a license? Or is there a deep crevice between licenses and agreements?
Slashdot Mirror
Your reply shows even less knowledge than your original post... The Jewish bible has three parts, of which the Torah is only the first (and having had a Bar-Mitzva, you should have read from the others too). The two books of Chronicles, "Divrey Hayamim" in Hebrew, are the last books of the third part, "Ketuvim" (Scriptures? I'm not a native English speaker).
The GPL does not state any jurisdiction, or courts, to decide claims according to itself. This is not an accident, but a result of RMS's philosophy. In fact, as Pythonistas may know, the FSF claims that citing a local law for your license makes it GPL-incompatible. I, personally, have yet to see an agreement with no specified jurisdiction.
Are there no problems with the validity of such a license? Or is there a deep crevice between licenses and agreements?