What makes you think you can't trust "islamic fundamentalists?" They seem pretty up-front guys to me. "Join the caliphate or die". Couldn't be simpler. You certainly know you can't trust the mafia.
My Sony isn't grey, it's black. It weighs 1.2 Kg in place of the macbooks bloated 1.4 kg, It's made of carbon fiber, not tacky aluminium, and it has a DVD drive. So, it's 3cm thick at it's thickest in place of the macbooks 2cm. Big deal.
So, tell me how exciting the macbook is again.
Pretty much totaly incorrect summary
on
Multi-Threaded SSH/SCP
·
· Score: 5, Informative
Almost all the improvements they talk about come from optimising TCP buffer usage. The summary of the fixes:
HPN-13 A la Carte
Dynamic Windows and None Cipher This is a basis of the HPN-SSH patch set. It provides dynamic window in SSH and the ability to switch to a NONE cipher post authentication. Based on the HPN12 v20 patch.
Threaded CTR cipher mode This patch adds threading to the CTR block mode for AES and other supported ciphers. This may allow SSH to make use of multiple cores/cpus during transfers and significantly increase throughput. This patch should be considered experimental at this time.
Peak Throughput This patch modifes the progress bar to display the 1 second throughput average. On completion of the transfer it will display the peak throughput through the life of the connection.
Server Logging This patch adds additional logging to the SSHD server including encryption used...
So the main part of the patch set is "It provides dynamic window in SSH and the ability to switch to a NONE cipher post authentication" and the only part that has to do with threading is marked "This patch should be considered experimental at this time".
By the way, does anybody else think "the ability to switch to a NONE cipher post authentication" is pretty dodgy?
The prior system would of course be the very old (pre-Norman) Engish system and the systems generally used throughout Europe, even today.
You seem to think that juries are a wonderful new invention, not yet adopted by those funny foreigners. Some countries that don't have jury trials don't because they got rid of then (Germany, India). Some countries that most people think don't have jury trials actually do (France, Sweden).
Most countries that do have jury trials restrict them to criminal (felony) cases rather than petty offences.
(One fun twist was that in France people were often reluctant to have jury trials as it used to be impossible to appeal the result of a jury trial - the people had spoken, that was that.)
No, just ordinary nonimmigrant visas, for example an "F-1 student visa" for Hani Hanjoor.
"Background checks"?
No background checks needed - just the consular officers doing their jobs, like actually reading the forms.
"Clinton Administration"?
Well, in the technical sense that all state department employees are part of the administration, but if you have any proof that the applications got to Washington I'd like to hear it.
When I think of the blood I've sweated filling out those fucking forms it pisses me off (and been refused once, having to explain to some stupid consular officer that although I did lurve the USA I didn't actually want to live there).
Besides, I'd be amazed if e.g. India, Pakistan, Brazil, South Korea, Japan, South Africa, and Iran weren't also active (or trying to be active) in this field.
One big difference between Islamic terrorism and the rest of the terrorism community - is that I think they are the only group not only willing to commit suicide for their beliefs, but to kill as many infidels as possible.
Since you've apparently never heard of the LTTE why should anyone bother paying any attention to your witterings about terrorism?
(But I do like the idea of the "terrorism community", like little after-bomb chats between the IRA, ETA, LTTE, PFLP-GC, Al-Queada...)
Colin Powell's speech to the UN mentioned camps in the northern part of Iraq
Ah, the "northern part of Iraq". Which is also known as "Iraqi Kurdistan", or at the time "the northern no-fly zone". What do you think would of happened if Saddam had started military operations in Kurdistan? Who was protecting the terrorists exactly?
Slashdot Mirror
Uh, you don't need movable type to print cartoons.
Then you've never tried carrying one.
Please name a better product - (please note that nothing that is heavier counts as a better product).
What makes you think you can't trust "islamic fundamentalists?" They seem pretty up-front guys to me. "Join the caliphate or die". Couldn't be simpler. You certainly know you can't trust the mafia.
Windows? Who the hell uses windows? I run Debian Sid on my Sony.
Uh, the reason to have a DVD drive is maybe to watch DVDs? You know, like on that boring airplane/train trip?
My Sony isn't grey, it's black. It weighs 1.2 Kg in place of the macbooks bloated 1.4 kg, It's made of carbon fiber, not tacky aluminium, and it has a DVD drive. So, it's 3cm thick at it's thickest in place of the macbooks 2cm. Big deal.
So, tell me how exciting the macbook is again.
By the way, does anybody else think "the ability to switch to a NONE cipher post authentication" is pretty dodgy?
Don't see why we just don't put up "Blank" and "Nieblank" and have done with it.
Oh, you mean those are the problems.
Most countries that do have jury trials restrict them to criminal (felony) cases rather than petty offences.
(One fun twist was that in France people were often reluctant to have jury trials as it used to be impossible to appeal the result of a jury trial - the people had spoken, that was that.)
Nah, there are a few slashdot readers who, unlike you and the previous poster have a tiny glimmer of a clue about economics.
"Diplomatic visas"?
No, just ordinary nonimmigrant visas, for example an "F-1 student visa" for Hani Hanjoor.
"Background checks"?
No background checks needed - just the consular officers doing their jobs, like actually reading the forms.
"Clinton Administration"?
Well, in the technical sense that all state department employees are part of the administration, but if you have any proof that the applications got to Washington I'd like to hear it.
When I think of the blood I've sweated filling out those fucking forms it pisses me off (and been refused once, having to explain to some stupid consular officer that although I did lurve the USA I didn't actually want to live there).
Dunno. Go ask Wernher von Braun.
I can see the Chinese space guys using the shuttle info as a checklist of things not to bother trying.
(But I do like the idea of the "terrorism community", like little after-bomb chats between the IRA, ETA, LTTE, PFLP-GC, Al-Queada...)
Who the hell cares about religion. Would you vote for someone who doubts Newton?
What the fuck is a "far left liberal"?
Liberals are by definition not protectionist.
By the way, Socialists are not liberals.
And International socialists are not protectionist.
No, the real reason is that you* are a bunch of economic illiterates who don't know the difference between Montalban and David.
(*) Like most everyone else.