Wearing clothing that covers the face is already illegal in France. The government claimed it was all about 'security' but everyone thought it was about Muslims.
Philip Morris and the others sell a product that kills large numbers of the people who use it. They know this, but attempt to prevent other people finding out.
They research how to make their product more addictive, and sell the more addictive versions as being "low tar" while knowing they are just as dangerous as the old versions. They simultaneously deny that their product is addictive.
They have a history of deliberately aiming their product at children,
When governemnts attempt to convince people not to use the product by taxing it they engage in illegal smuggling to make tax-free product available to addicts.
How do you measure evil? In terms of the number of dead the tobacco companies make the drug cartels look like girl guides.
Drugs would no longer be grown by organised criminal gangs.
They would be grown by respectable businessmen who have no problem with killing 50% of the people who buy their products while deliberately making them more addictive.
"Most people have no idea how much they pay in taxes." proof?
Even though I don't write a check, my tax software it kind enough to provide me exactly how much I paid in taxes, so that I can easily calculate my EffeciveTaxRate (19%)
Don't need software for that in France, the "avis d'imposition" has your effective tax rate printed on it.
Actually "apt-get update" normally breaks things for me. Window updates require a lot of annoying restarts, but at least the GUI comes back. Most of the time when I update one of my linux boxes it completely breaks and then I spend hours trying to figure out what happened. Half the time I give up and do a complete reinstall. I have never had a seemless distro update even though I try it every time [...] actively uses Raspbian, Puppy Linux, Linux Mint DE, and Ubuntu.
200% of the increase? Err... math is not your strong point is it? How do you get more than 100% of the increase? Wait, I don't want to know what passes for reasoning in your head.
It's simple. Our CO2 emissions are about twice the size of the observed CO2 increase.
Average global temp is on the rise, but has been doing so since the end of the last ice age.
Yup, temperatures rose from about -20Ky to about -10Ky, and they have been slowly falling since. Temperatures have not been rising since the end of the last ice age.
show a correlation between any solar parameter and global average temperatures.
Not with SAS interfaces they aren't.
SAS?
eMLC?
The largest amount you are willing to pay for it.
The smallest amount you are willing to sell it for.
Those are its values for you.
But since you decide, and someone else can have different values, in what sense are they intrinsic to the thing being bought and sold?
Fx you could rightly claim that happiness has intrinsic value (see the ethics-definition in link below)
Maybe, buy you can't sell or buy it, so it has no intrinsic value in this context.
Yes.
Next question?
Nothing has "intrinsic value". Stuff is worth stuff to people depending on what they are prepared to pay for it.
What sorts of effects do you think highly soluble radon gas would have on apex predators, like humans, when they drink it?
A lot better than if it was drunk by something further down the food chain.
What beta? I see no beta here.
Sent from his Rasberry Pi.
Wearing clothing that covers the face is already illegal in France. The government claimed it was all about 'security' but everyone thought it was about Muslims.
Maybe,for once, they weren't lying?
Bob is that you?
Why are you so angry?
Venus gets about twice the insolation that the Earth gets, not an amazingly large amount more.
Are you a plant?
Are you an economist?
That's explain it.
Philip Morris and the others sell a product that kills large numbers of the people who use it. They know this, but attempt to prevent other people finding out.
They research how to make their product more addictive, and sell the more addictive versions as being "low tar" while knowing they are just as dangerous as the old versions. They simultaneously deny that their product is addictive.
They have a history of deliberately aiming their product at children,
When governemnts attempt to convince people not to use the product by taxing it they engage in illegal smuggling to make tax-free product available to addicts.
How do you measure evil? In terms of the number of dead the tobacco companies make the drug cartels look like girl guides.
Drugs would no longer be grown by organised criminal gangs.
They would be grown by respectable businessmen who have no problem with killing 50% of the people who buy their products while deliberately making them more addictive.
"Most people have no idea how much they pay in taxes." proof?
Even though I don't write a check, my tax software it kind enough to provide me exactly how much I paid in taxes, so that I can easily calculate my EffeciveTaxRate (19%)
Don't need software for that in France, the "avis d'imposition" has your effective tax rate printed on it.
My comment meant: If the crime rate in the area where you live is so high that being robbed for something as trivial as a cell phone
Why do you persist in thinking he was robbed where he lived?
Parenthetically, I think this might have been the original reason people who could afford it moved out of the city into the suburbs.
How many people who live in the suburbs work in the suburbs?
I didn't say that Tai was the only reservoir, it's just the obvious one for an outbreak in the Guinea - Sierra Leone - Liberia area.
I'm english and I recognise that we stole America from the native Americans. Let's give it back.
Wow, you might consider moving.
In some parts of the world cellphones are known as "mobile" phones or "portable" phones. Maybe he wasn't at home when they were stolen?
Actually "apt-get update" normally breaks things for me. Window updates require a lot of annoying restarts, but at least the GUI comes back. Most of the time when I update one of my linux boxes it completely breaks and then I spend hours trying to figure out what happened. Half the time I give up and do a complete reinstall. I have never had a seemless distro update even though I try it every time [...] actively uses Raspbian, Puppy Linux, Linux Mint DE, and Ubuntu.
Well, there's your problem. Just use Debian.
200% of the increase? Err... math is not your strong point is it? How do you get more than 100% of the increase? Wait, I don't want to know what passes for reasoning in your head.
It's simple. Our CO2 emissions are about twice the size of the observed CO2 increase.
Average global temp is on the rise, but has been doing so since the end of the last ice age.
Got a source for that, big boy?
Geez, go use google.
here let me do it for you:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G...
look for the chart showing temps going up since last ice age peak of 20K years ago.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f5/All_palaeotemps.png
Yup, temperatures rose from about -20Ky to about -10Ky, and they have been slowly falling since. Temperatures have not been rising since the end of the last ice age.
show a correlation between any solar parameter and global average temperatures.
TSI:
http://lasp.colorado.edu/lisir...
easy correlation there. Match to warming trends, much stronger than CO2.
Looks like you have some serious problems reading graphs. Maybe you should see an opthalmologist.
Do you realy see a correlation here:
http://woodfortrees.org/plot/pmod/from:1975/offset:-1366/scale:0.5/mean:12/plot/hadcrut4gl/from:1975/mean:12
How about here:
http://woodfortrees.org/plot/hadcrut4gl/from:1955/mean:12/scale:150/offset:320/plot/esrl-co2
Fuck off you racist troll.
No idea, I was just going off the name.
Sorry, one beer to many.