Slashdot Mirror


User: Forward+The+Light+Br

Forward+The+Light+Br's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
86
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 86

  1. Re:Complete Bullshit! - You are the problem on Mitnick Charges Dropped · · Score: 1

    okay what civil liberties were violated?

    he has no right to bail (esp as a convicted felon)

    he has chosen to delay his trial, and then chosen to plead guilty...

  2. Re:This Bites by butt on Mitnick Charges Dropped · · Score: 1

    what civil liberties were violated?

  3. Re:everyone deserves a fair go on Mitnick Charges Dropped · · Score: 1

    proof?

    he waived his right to a speedy trial after having been convicted of this crime before...

    he did so so his lawyers could have more time to review the evidence... and then he pled GUILTY...

    your organization was able to rais $3k for his defense... 20c / reader... nice job, no wonder he could only afford the court-appointed lawyers...

  4. Re:Script kiddie, no. on Mitnick Charges Dropped · · Score: 1

    Bullshit

    he is a repeat offender.

    now, "Signal 11", what cracks did he fall through?

    what political movement does he represent?

    What IDEALS does he uphold in defiance of the USG..

    Oh yeah, the script kiddie code...


    oh and what other thing, since you are so smart and knowledgeable about the case, please do tell us WHICH rights of his were violated?...

  5. Re:It could happen to you... on Mitnick Charges Dropped · · Score: 1

    Rallies ought to free people?

    no...

    try learning about the social contract

    It is ENTIRELY irrelevant why he did what he did.

    He did it.

    Society disapproves.

    Society has created the US gov't to do something about it, and said "this is that penalty"

    US gov't does something about it

    he has done it, gotten caught, AND DONE IT AGAIN.

    he deserves this and the darwin award...

  6. Re:wake up it's 1999 on Mitnick Charges Dropped · · Score: 1

    bullshit Kevin's lawyers kept asking, and getting, delays...

    Do you think someone ought to be able to delay his way out of jail?

  7. Re:being connected as well as information is power on Mitnick Charges Dropped · · Score: 1

    try learning social contract theory

    *we* gave the US government this power.

    they have it legitmately, as *we* chose to surrender some rights, that others might be maximized.

    You have the right to wave your hands. The protection of this right ends the moment your hand touches my face.

    To keep people from abusing these rights *we* gave them the power to use coersive force, but only in such circumstances that a *crime* was committed.

    A crime (defined by society) was committed. The US government, the agent of society, did something about it.

    Tough shit, don't live here if you don't like it...

  8. Re:Umm, no you are wrong on Mitnick Charges Dropped · · Score: 1

    you have no right to bail.

  9. Re:X/Linux Software still sucks... on Myth II Linux Demo · · Score: 1

    If it has been that long since you have used linux, no wonder you have never seen a good X app...

    Abi Word
    Grip (ripper/encoder for mp3 creation, CDDB lookup and asynched ripping and encoding, very nice)
    Eterm :-)
    Xcdroast
    gaim
    gnomeicu
    ...

    the list goes on...

    granted the MFC toolkit does not look bad, while straight Xlib _can_ look shitty, you always have gtk (and to be fair, qt)

    and regarding a visual basic..
    get glade...

  10. Re:Government should break up Cisco on Cisco talks up products to /slow access/ · · Score: 1

    ????

    the consumer groups are talking about open access re: cable...

    QoS is not a prob unless it is coupled with a monopoly in the inet access department...

  11. Cisco is doing nothing wrong on Cisco talks up products to /slow access/ · · Score: 1

    first off, who the hell said that the FCC was going to break up CISCO??? this was about the cable operators....

    anyway, Cisco is just implementing a feature than *nix (or at least Linux) has had for a while, the ability to favor some traffic over another... this is prefectly legitimate, even though it COULD be abused... (which is the point of the Consumer groups, that without open access, the cable companies will have vast content-control powers...)

    I am about to move into a house with some friends, we plan to use QoS to make sure that some more important services do not get interrupted by web-surfing, and to make sure that every one gets AT LEAST their fair share of the bandwidth (as much as available, but no less than X)

    (yes we have enough bandwidth to care ;-)