What I don't understand is the reactions: - iTunes sends information on what I'm listening to, and suggests other artists: iTunes is evil!!! - amarok does the same: nothing happens, it's even a great feature.
I totally aggree. It was so boring that I finished with god-mode just to see what was the end. I just remember there was more and more monsters. But can't remember the epilogue video, must have been crappy.
Anyway, one day someone said on/. DS1 was a barely clickable screensaver. I doubt DS2 is better than this...
What would be really nice is to have the full texts of articles available P2P.
That's quite easy to do: if I have the article in ps or pdf, then the name of the file is the name of the bibtex-key. And every article is in the 'articles' directory next to the beloved.bib file.
it would be awesome if user comments could be added to each citation.
I use the annote field. However, how can you be sure that the review is accurate?
What I don't understand is the reactions:
- iTunes sends information on what I'm listening to, and suggests other artists: iTunes is evil!!!
- amarok does the same: nothing happens, it's even a great feature.
I don't see where the security is. Especially after telling your method (now everybody knows what this piece of paper is).
With your piece of paper, I just have to guess a 4 letters password with no funny characters. Lot more easier than the 8 one. Thanks!
I totally aggree. It was so boring that I finished with god-mode just to see what was the end. I just remember there was more and more monsters. But can't remember the epilogue video, must have been crappy.
/. DS1 was a barely clickable screensaver. I doubt DS2 is better than this...
Anyway, one day someone said on
Maybe they will manage it with ascii-art rendering?
I will not buy those crapy DVDs, unless Han shoots first.
Those DVDs are not the ones you want to sell me.
What would be really nice is to have the full texts of articles available P2P.
.bib file.
That's quite easy to do: if I have the article in ps or pdf, then the name of the file is the name of the bibtex-key. And every article is in the 'articles' directory next to the beloved
it would be awesome if user comments could be added to each citation.
I use the annote field. However, how can you be sure that the review is accurate?