Nope. It's no different than a religious school not allowing atheists in or a country club that only whites can enjoy.
This is all in the US, of course. I don't know how other countries may treat this sort of thing. In the US, though, discriminating about those that you associate with is a right.
It doesn't matter if they made mistakes. It's a private business and private property. They aren't obligated to allow you on the premises or sell to you. That's why it's PRIVATE.
It appears as though Robert Hanssen, the American FBI agent accused of selling American secrets to the Russians, was a registered Linux user!!! This is further evidence, as if any more was needed, that Linux and communism are inseperable, and that anyone using Linux is supporting the communist murder of millions!
Re:Slashdot is fixed...
on
Data Mining?
·
· Score: -1
Why do you care?
Wanna fuck?
And yes, it's me. I'm not afraid to put a face to the crapflood.
I've been thinking alot about patents and the USPTO as of late, and I've begun to realize a much more politically effective and valid way to make the non-technical understand just how corrupt the US Patent system really is.
Covert taxation backing a none-too-subtle amount of graft.
What, did you think those patents are free?
The United States Patent and Trademark Office has taken to delusions of grandeur. It is not illegal or questionable for a government body to charge for its services--a bill from the USPTO does not a tax make. Taxes achieve their special nature by the fact that they're enforced charges--if you meet conditions x, y, and z, then you pay the tax or face government enforced penalties.
There's obviously a charge element to patents--last I checked, patents cost thousands, sometimes tens of thousands of dollars to file. Every time a patent is rejected for having some trivial grammatical error, that's more money for the USPTO--more cash per patent, more charge per service rendered. The enforcement is, however, where things get hairy. Since everybody else has accepted the concept of attempting to patent any idea, obvious or not, anyone who refuses to pay for patent "protection"(we've heard this word before) is placed at the mercy of their protected competitors. And good luck to any company who crosses a competitor so armed--all profits can disappear with the signing of a court mandate. These same courts, of course, have been muzzled from attacking the USPTO's decisions, so those facing kangeroo justice aren't going to find much support from those who came before. Even genuinely invalid patents cost in the ranges of half a million dollars to address, so even if you win, you lose.
Even the (now kinder and gentler) IRS isn't/wasn't this nightmarish. Imagine if Cisco and 3Com could sue eachother for taking excessive deductions, and thus competing unfairly. The USPTO doesn't need to lift a finger to enforce its taxation--those who have paid to join their little club will be more than happy to emasculate their competitors.
Of course, such emasculation requires nice and expensive patent attorneys, and thus comes the graft. By assigning as many patents as they can get away with, patent attorneys (who, I'm sure, have quite a bit of pull at the USPTO) have more material to wield when hired to attack competing companies, more material to defend with when a company is attacked, greater stakes on either side from which to calculate an hourly rate, and much less predictability and guaranteed freedom for the clients--this translates directly into a greater need for highly trained patent attorneys to be on retainer, as well as longer time spent in court jousting-for-millions. (Look mah, longer hours!)
More taxes for the Agency, and more cash for the agencies apparent constituents. Disguised behind claims of being understaffed and underpaid are patent office employees intentionally overworked and paid to accept, not reject. The lower ranks are mismanaged such that the upper ranks will be richer for it. "It's Net So It's New" has become the mantra for a thoroughly corrupted government body with delusions of being superior to the Judicial Branch, the IRS, the United States Congress, and the American People.
Such oppression is out of place for the otherwise free and democratic ideals the Net so powerfully engenders, and particularly out of line with regards to the separation of powers between the governmental structures.
We need reform. Complaining about patents on a technical level is effective, but needs to be prefaced by an explanation of not only how such patents are ludicrous and valueless, but why.
Your livelyhood could be next. Call your congressman.
Slashdot Mirror
You're dead wrong. Working retail, I can tell you that the only thing people are interested in right now is the Xbox.
You couldn't even be bothered to read the summary?
Fucking idiot.
Hilarious! Somebody mod up this joke that is very original!
PS, you're a jackass!
I've met the guy. Trust me, he's killed lots of jews. He has a necklace made of their huge noses.
Just post your name and address; he'll be glad to service you.
Nope. It's no different than a religious school not allowing atheists in or a country club that only whites can enjoy.
This is all in the US, of course. I don't know how other countries may treat this sort of thing. In the US, though, discriminating about those that you associate with is a right.
It doesn't matter if they made mistakes. It's a private business and private property. They aren't obligated to allow you on the premises or sell to you. That's why it's PRIVATE.
It appears as though Robert Hanssen, the American FBI agent accused of selling American secrets to the Russians, was a registered Linux user!!! This is further evidence, as if any more was needed, that Linux and communism are inseperable, and that anyone using Linux is supporting the communist murder of millions!
Why do you care?
Wanna fuck?
And yes, it's me. I'm not afraid to put a face to the crapflood.
I just keep finding these slashdot problems, and I MUST report them out of the kindness of my heart!
I have found yet another GAPING HOLE in Slashdot.
And here's the patch I used to do it at Sourceforge.
Any praise is appreciated.
I dunno if slashcode is proud, but god damn, I sure am!
FUCK YOU!
And what the hell is this shit about some compression filter? Rob Malda is a piece of horse crap
...thanks to me.
You can read about my heroic patching skills here at sourceforge.
And what the hell is a postercomment compression filter? Fuck the lameness filter.
Fix the gaping hole in slashcode!
Here's the answer to the slashcode problem
There's a report on the first post bug here at sourceforge
FUCK YOU
The LATEST on the trial with 2600 and the injustices against them!
God knows I hate Jews more than anyone else.
I still have part of a coat hanger stuck in my brain.
You seem to have "forgotten" again. It's that, or you're just FUCKING STUPID.
Suck my cock Jon "Take it up the Asshole" Katz!
Thanks!!
Until recently, I had a high paying executive job. Got dot.bombed out of work.
In NYC on a job interview, I was spotted by former co-worker digging in the trash for an old newspaper.
Hell -- I was trying to save 75 cents, but this person gave me a shitty look like I had really hit the skids.
Turned out there was a gross, green, oily stain on my free paper. I kept it anyway.
I've been thinking alot about patents and the USPTO as of late, and I've begun to realize a much more politically effective and valid way to make the non-technical understand just how corrupt the US Patent system really is.
Covert taxation backing a none-too-subtle amount of graft.
What, did you think those patents are free?
The United States Patent and Trademark Office has taken to delusions of grandeur. It is not illegal or questionable for a government body to charge for its services--a bill from the USPTO does not a tax make. Taxes achieve their special nature by the fact that they're enforced charges--if you meet conditions x, y, and z, then you pay the tax or face government enforced penalties.
There's obviously a charge element to patents--last I checked, patents cost thousands, sometimes tens of thousands of dollars to file. Every time a patent is rejected for having some trivial grammatical error, that's more money for the USPTO--more cash per patent, more charge per service rendered. The enforcement is, however, where things get hairy. Since everybody else has accepted the concept of attempting to patent any idea, obvious or not, anyone who refuses to pay for patent "protection"(we've heard this word before) is placed at the mercy of their protected competitors. And good luck to any company who crosses a competitor so armed--all profits can disappear with the signing of a court mandate. These same courts, of course, have been muzzled from attacking the USPTO's decisions, so those facing kangeroo justice aren't going to find much support from those who came before. Even genuinely invalid patents cost in the ranges of half a million dollars to address, so even if you win, you lose.
Even the (now kinder and gentler) IRS isn't/wasn't this nightmarish. Imagine if Cisco and 3Com could sue eachother for taking excessive deductions, and thus competing unfairly. The USPTO doesn't need to lift a finger to enforce its taxation--those who have paid to join their little club will be more than happy to emasculate their competitors.
Of course, such emasculation requires nice and expensive patent attorneys, and thus comes the graft. By assigning as many patents as they can get away with, patent attorneys (who, I'm sure, have quite a bit of pull at the USPTO) have more material to wield when hired to attack competing companies, more material to defend with when a company is attacked, greater stakes on either side from which to calculate an hourly rate, and much less predictability and guaranteed freedom for the clients--this translates directly into a greater need for highly trained patent attorneys to be on retainer, as well as longer time spent in court jousting-for-millions. (Look mah, longer hours!)
More taxes for the Agency, and more cash for the agencies apparent constituents. Disguised behind claims of being understaffed and underpaid are patent office employees intentionally overworked and paid to accept, not reject. The lower ranks are mismanaged such that the upper ranks will be richer for it. "It's Net So It's New" has become the mantra for a thoroughly corrupted government body with delusions of being superior to the Judicial Branch, the IRS, the United States Congress, and the American People.
Such oppression is out of place for the otherwise free and democratic ideals the Net so powerfully engenders, and particularly out of line with regards to the separation of powers between the governmental structures.
We need reform. Complaining about patents on a technical level is effective, but needs to be prefaced by an explanation of not only how such patents are ludicrous and valueless, but why.
Your livelyhood could be next. Call your congressman.