I won't, it is a solid piece of work. But they have other reasons for not wanting to be regarded as complete idiots, the document itself drops some hints. Something about "clients".
Yes, it is a bad code of conduct. Mixed together with many high minded desiderata there are multiple explicit religious exhortations such as "deny oneself in order to follow Christ." There is also a great deal of fluff having little to do with software development or community behavior such as "chastise the body" and "clothe the naked." I dunno, what is the one piece of advice I most want to give to D. Richard Hipp? Maybe: "review before posting".
I thought so too on a first quick reading, and especially, on reading the horrible article summary. The author's sincerity is clear here. It isn't a joke, it is just a mistake.
SJW is the abusive narcissist's derogatory term for "person who stands on the side of decency."
And if a narcissist happens to have mod points, they will abuse the moderation system in this way. It is just part of maintaining that fictitious self image.
The narcissist's playbook is standard, one edict is "always accuse others of possessing your own undesirable attributes". This is done in order to help maintain the narcissists fictitious idealized image they have created of themselves.
Quoting further from that rather well written article, "an idealized self-image, which they project in order to avoid feeling (and being seen as) the real, disenfranchised, wounded self." It goes on. Not something that a narcissist would be at all comfortable reading. And if that is you, then just don't bother reading it. The consensus opinion is, there is no cure. However, control is possible so that there is such a thing as a functional narcissist who learns to behave according to societal norms, even if it is just an act.
SJW is the abusive narcissist's derogatory term for "person stands on the side of decency making me look bad so I must retaliate to avoid confronting my own inner demons"
Now, after looking at what the author has to say about it, I realize it's not a joke, or a mockery, it is in fact a religious screed put forth in all seriousness. And entirely out of place, if he needs to give a sermon then he should do it in church, or write a song or something.
Now I can see that the author, the original developer, is sincere enough. Just made a mistake. I for one want to be on the side of defusing this, what about you? The last thing I want is to be part of an angry mob running this guy out of his own project.
It's a flippant attempt at a joke, intended to mock the concept of civil interpersonal relations, perhaps because somebody thinks that makes them look cool or smart or edgy or something, but instead sends the clear message "contribute your volunteer effort elsewhere." One word for this: backfire.
Next, the damage control. Or will they double down? Let's see.
Indeed they would, and when they do complete the acquisition they will copy all the storage to drive c: so it is easier to run CHKDSK. If anything goes wrong then Abort, retry, ignore?
Eh, you lost the plot. It is a real vulnerability and people are really exposed to it. It was clarified that vlc servers are vulnerable to malicious clients, not the other way round. That means a much smaller group is exposed, but In a way, it makes it worse.
And somehow managed to muddle through to this day without serious drama. While Sourceforge isn't to my taste, they still host a lot of projects and the price is right.
Slashdot Mirror
Are you sure you're ok?
Speak for yourself.
I don't think he is sincere.
As sincere as any christian. You read his twitter byline, right?
SJWs are already trying to manufacture outrage
Says the outraged troll.
I won't, it is a solid piece of work. But they have other reasons for not wanting to be regarded as complete idiots, the document itself drops some hints. Something about "clients".
I think they have the karma to burn on this.
Yes, and their karma is flaming brightly indeed. Next, the damage control.
You sound angry. Projecting much?
I am amused by absurdity.
So you try to amuse yourself by posting as much absurdity to the internet as you possibly can. Does it enhance your self image?
is it a bad code of conduct?
Yes, it is a bad code of conduct. Mixed together with many high minded desiderata there are multiple explicit religious exhortations such as "deny oneself in order to follow Christ." There is also a great deal of fluff having little to do with software development or community behavior such as "chastise the body" and "clothe the naked." I dunno, what is the one piece of advice I most want to give to D. Richard Hipp? Maybe: "review before posting".
Right, they were posting about pouring hot grits down their pants instead.
this is not off topic. It is a perfect example of the problem with CoCs, how one person's perfectly reasonable attitude is another person's cunt.
It was not a "perfectly reasonable attitude", it was a clear cut ad hominem.
It is OBVIOUSLY a joke.
I thought so too on a first quick reading, and especially, on reading the horrible article summary. The author's sincerity is clear here. It isn't a joke, it is just a mistake.
Doesn't your post exhibit essentially all the attributes that you ascribe to the mythical "SJW"?
SJW is the abusive narcissist's derogatory term for "person who stands on the side of decency."
And if a narcissist happens to have mod points, they will abuse the moderation system in this way. It is just part of maintaining that fictitious self image.
The narcissist's playbook is standard, one edict is "always accuse others of possessing your own undesirable attributes". This is done in order to help maintain the narcissists fictitious idealized image they have created of themselves.
Quoting further from that rather well written article, "an idealized self-image, which they project in order to avoid feeling (and being seen as) the real, disenfranchised, wounded self." It goes on. Not something that a narcissist would be at all comfortable reading. And if that is you, then just don't bother reading it. The consensus opinion is, there is no cure. However, control is possible so that there is such a thing as a functional narcissist who learns to behave according to societal norms, even if it is just an act.
SJW is the abusive narcissist's derogatory term for "person stands on the side of decency making me look bad so I must retaliate to avoid confronting my own inner demons"
You sound angry. Projecting much?
Now, after looking at what the author has to say about it, I realize it's not a joke, or a mockery, it is in fact a religious screed put forth in all seriousness. And entirely out of place, if he needs to give a sermon then he should do it in church, or write a song or something.
Now I can see that the author, the original developer, is sincere enough. Just made a mistake. I for one want to be on the side of defusing this, what about you? The last thing I want is to be part of an angry mob running this guy out of his own project.
SJW is the abusive narcissist's derogatory term for "person stands on the side of decency."
It's a flippant attempt at a joke, intended to mock the concept of civil interpersonal relations, perhaps because somebody thinks that makes them look cool or smart or edgy or something, but instead sends the clear message "contribute your volunteer effort elsewhere." One word for this: backfire.
Next, the damage control. Or will they double down? Let's see.
For what it's worth, sourceforge is still here and googlecode isn't. Probably says more about Google's baby-eating culture than anything.
Indeed they would, and when they do complete the acquisition they will copy all the storage to drive c: so it is easier to run CHKDSK. If anything goes wrong then Abort, retry, ignore?
Nice troll, that was sweet.
Eh, you lost the plot. It is a real vulnerability and people are really exposed to it. It was clarified that vlc servers are vulnerable to malicious clients, not the other way round. That means a much smaller group is exposed, but In a way, it makes it worse.
You can break the worst systems by configuring them correctly.
if not being able to make posts and gists breaks your workflow to the point of "failing miserably"...then you are just a miserable failure :-)
I know right? And any shining star such as yourself out to be able to still succeed brilliantly even if their source repo serves out random files.
And somehow managed to muddle through to this day without serious drama. While Sourceforge isn't to my taste, they still host a lot of projects and the price is right.