So the mouse study doesn't show that low protein diet extends lifespan as much as a ultra-high protein diet reduces lifespan, which is not really news.
The mouse study shows that much protein is toxic *in mice*. Biologists have a saying that is relevent here: "mice lie and monkeys exaggerate". But mouse models are cheap and easy to arrange; more useful people studies are horribly expensive and far more complex.
Censorship is binary: you are in favour of it or you are not. You can't have "partial censorship".
Actually you can, and we do. Here's an incomplete list of exceptions to the right of free speech: slander, libel, defamation, obscenity, threatening behaviour, perjury, contempt of court, profanity, incitement to violence, noise pollution, copyright infringement, passing trade secrets, treason, espionage, conspiracy, shouting "Fire!" in a cinema, sedition, encouragement of terrorism.
The EU has done more to spread freedom and democracy than any other organisation on Earth. It projects soft power with a single carrot, the offer of membership.
The first success was rehabilitating Germany after the War. Spain, Portugal and Greece all used to be military dictatorships. Now happy, prosperous, modern democratic states. Admittedly there's been some unrest recently in Greece, but there is zero possibility of another military coup, it will stay free and democratic no matter what. That's because of the larger structure it belongs to.
Then it rehabilitated central and eastern Europe. All the countries that were offered membership are free and democratic. Every one of them. Doesn't that strike you as odd? All the non-EU candidates (Ukraine, Russia) are not. Coincidence?
Turkey is far nicer place than it used be. The army stays out of politcs. The Kurds and other minorities are being treated reasonably. All thanks to EU negotiators banging on about human rights during 30 years of talks.
What other organisation can boast such an effective record at democratisation?
Who gives a flying fuck where it comes from? Do you think "what would we ever do without the Arabs" whenever you write down some numbers?
Of course not. However, if someone here posted that the Arabs were doing a better job of implementing our number system than we were, I would call them out on their error.
It's partly because, of course, the Europeans are a number of otherwise independent states so it's like a democracy on an international scale - chances are that SOMEONE will kick up a fuss about something that they disagree with and concessions will have to be made
Actually, the European Parliament has a much better record of standing up for citizens rights than the Member Governments, who are usually the villians in such arguments.
I read this a lot of times, but repetition doesn't make bullshit right. According to Wikipedia: "The Constitution was adopted on September 17, 1787" and we all know the French Revolution started with the assault on the Bastille on July 14th, 1789. So how can a piece of written paper borrow ideals from a revolution that started almost 2 years later?
Both the French Revolution and the US Constitution are products of the Enlightenment Era or Age of Reason as it's also called.
The US Bill of Rights was not adopted until August 21, 1789. They were passed by amendment, remember, they didn't make it into the original document.
Eh? It's the other way round I'm afraid. The french were heavily influenced by what happened in America. Check the dates!
The US Bill of Rights was not adopted until August 21, 1789. These are all amendments, remember, for some reason they didn't make it into the original document.
The Economist estimates 2% of global GDP to meaningfully cut emissions. (By comparison, the recent round of bank rescues cost about 5%)
Nobody know what the cost of adjusting is, because we don't know what scale of the change will be. If the changes are less than 2 degrees, that's likely to be tolerable. ON the other hand, some of the worst case predictions are very, very bad for human civilisation.
This uncertainty is being used to encourage inaction when the opposite is true: any sensible approach to risk management would suggests taking reasonable action to avoid it.
Power in the EU is not with the parliament, but with the commission
Actually the most powerful body in the EU is the Council of Ministers, which made up of serving European government ministers and very much in the euro-driving seat in recent years.
However, the European Parliament does have the power to reject or amend international trade agreements, which ACTA would appear to be.
Personally, I never understood why someone would want to buy money in an MMO...
I've bought MMO money, and did it because I have already spent way too much of my life farming cash in meatspace for it ever to be fun in a game.
The absolutely last thing I want to do when I finally get some computer-based relaxation time is a pretend job. My gaming time is limited and I want to cut straight to the fun parts.
Slashdot Mirror
So the mouse study doesn't show that low protein diet extends lifespan as much as a ultra-high protein diet reduces lifespan, which is not really news.
The mouse study shows that much protein is toxic *in mice*. Biologists have a saying that is relevent here: "mice lie and monkeys exaggerate". But mouse models are cheap and easy to arrange; more useful people studies are horribly expensive and far more complex.
listen to your body
My body loves donuts, apple pies and and wants me to eat chocolate cake all the time.
OSA only applies to government employees. What is being argued for here is an extension of that scope (to everyone).
Type URLs? What are you, Amish?
Why would he want a baseball bat?
Censorship is binary: you are in favour of it or you are not. You can't have "partial censorship".
Actually you can, and we do. Here's an incomplete list of exceptions to the right of free speech: slander, libel, defamation, obscenity, threatening behaviour, perjury, contempt of court, profanity, incitement to violence, noise pollution, copyright infringement, passing trade secrets, treason, espionage, conspiracy, shouting "Fire!" in a cinema, sedition, encouragement of terrorism.
The Daily Mail was the paper that ran a pro fascist piece called "Hurrah for the Blackshirts" in the 1930s.
They are with a shadow of a doubt a tabloid.
http://s2.b3ta.com/host/creative/85367/1322136043/DailyMailCorrectionsbig.jpg
Get the Germans to pay, just like any other day.
I wouldn't dream of it, old bean. That really would be a step too far.
The EU has done more to spread freedom and democracy than any other organisation on Earth. It projects soft power with a single carrot, the offer of membership.
The first success was rehabilitating Germany after the War. Spain, Portugal and Greece all used to be military dictatorships. Now happy, prosperous, modern democratic states. Admittedly there's been some unrest recently in Greece, but there is zero possibility of another military coup, it will stay free and democratic no matter what. That's because of the larger structure it belongs to.
Then it rehabilitated central and eastern Europe. All the countries that were offered membership are free and democratic. Every one of them. Doesn't that strike you as odd? All the non-EU candidates (Ukraine, Russia) are not. Coincidence?
Turkey is far nicer place than it used be. The army stays out of politcs. The Kurds and other minorities are being treated reasonably. All thanks to EU negotiators banging on about human rights during 30 years of talks.
What other organisation can boast such an effective record at democratisation?
Nobody gets credit for ideas they neglected to write down for being too obvious.
Who gives a flying fuck where it comes from? Do you think "what would we ever do without the Arabs" whenever you write down some numbers?
Of course not. However, if someone here posted that the Arabs were doing a better job of implementing our number system than we were, I would call them out on their error.
It's partly because, of course, the Europeans are a number of otherwise independent states so it's like a democracy on an international scale - chances are that SOMEONE will kick up a fuss about something that they disagree with and concessions will have to be made
Actually, the European Parliament has a much better record of standing up for citizens rights than the Member Governments, who are usually the villians in such arguments.
I read this a lot of times, but repetition doesn't make bullshit right.
According to Wikipedia: "The Constitution was adopted on September 17, 1787" and we all know the French Revolution started with the assault on the Bastille on July 14th, 1789. So how can a piece of written paper borrow ideals from a revolution that started almost 2 years later?
Both the French Revolution and the US Constitution are products of the Enlightenment Era or Age of Reason as it's also called.
The US Bill of Rights was not adopted until August 21, 1789. They were passed by amendment, remember, they didn't make it into the original document.
Eh? It's the other way round I'm afraid. The french were heavily influenced by what happened in America. Check the dates!
The US Bill of Rights was not adopted until August 21, 1789. These are all amendments, remember, for some reason they didn't make it into the original document.
It may shock you to learn this, but your home country's stated ideals are all European in origin.
The Economist estimates 2% of global GDP to meaningfully cut emissions. (By comparison, the recent round of bank rescues cost about 5%)
Nobody know what the cost of adjusting is, because we don't know what scale of the change will be. If the changes are less than 2 degrees, that's likely to be tolerable. ON the other hand, some of the worst case predictions are very, very bad for human civilisation.
This uncertainty is being used to encourage inaction when the opposite is true: any sensible approach to risk management would suggests taking reasonable action to avoid it.
Who would have ever thought that European nations would ever be more concerned about liberty and due process than The united States of America?
Because those concepts are both European in origin?
Power in the EU is not with the parliament, but with the commission
Actually the most powerful body in the EU is the Council of Ministers, which made up of serving European government ministers and very much in the euro-driving seat in recent years.
However, the European Parliament does have the power to reject or amend international trade agreements, which ACTA would appear to be.
There's no reason to believe a brute force attack on AES128 will ever succeed.
Even if I use a quantum computer?
> Don't treaties like ACTA trump national laws?
All depends what your national laws say about treaties.
I have every confidence in the entertainment industry finding a Tory to continue his efforts.
If you have to do that, the game is a design failure.
Yes ... yes, it is.
Play something else.
Thank you, I will.
Personally, I never understood why someone would want to buy money in an MMO...
I've bought MMO money, and did it because I have already spent way too much of my life farming cash in meatspace for it ever to be fun in a game.
The absolutely last thing I want to do when I finally get some computer-based relaxation time is a pretend job. My gaming time is limited and I want to cut straight to the fun parts.