People have been doing that for years with absolutely no affect. The FCC was going to ignore public comment anyhow, so I would say its downright time gets mad as hell and says they are not going to take it anymore. Also, HBO owns John Oliver. I would expect they would be against net neutrality.
Granted, I don't see how defacing a website will do any good, anyhow.
I simply don't get it. If the police are just investigating normal crimes, why can't get get normal warrants? Are they just lazy, or is there some other motive?
I think it would be easier to ask "Does anyone think Snowden would get a fair trial?" It would be a much shorter list. And most of the people answering yes can be easily identified as flat out liars. (Kerry and pretty much any politician.)
As long as it is cheaper to run competition out of business rather than compete with them; corporations will do so. And they will do so by every means necessary weather it is collusion, lobbying (bribes), or simply buying up the competitors and jacking prices way up.
And they will do this while hiding behind the banner of the "Free Market".
The problem is while I hate shooting down an idea without having a better one ready; I don't see how regulation will cause the ISPs to act in the best interest of the people. It most certainly will not cause competition to suddenly appear.
"Have been successfully fired" does not contradict the conclusion: 'without additional expertise and the right type of ammunition, anyone attempting to fire one would probably maim or even kill themselves.'
Technically this is true for a non-3D printed gun. Using the wrong ammunition and without training, any gun is going to be more dangerous to the shooter than anyone else.
Yes but you and the cat are only in one of those worlds. There is no such thing as "the same cat in a different world". It is a different cat that branched off at some time in the past. Therefore no matter which interpretation you use, the cat is either alive or dead, full stop.
Of the examples given, remaining Spitfires are historical pieces, but there are 70 year old Dakota's still flying and doing work every day. Now that is a mark of a successful plane.
Successful people are those who fail and don't give up. The same is true for aeronautical design. If you don't fail a couple of times, you won't win either.
Not when it comes to engineering. Failure is always an option. Some people are just terrible at it and should pursue other careers, preferably ones where people will not die when they make mistakes.
I guess it depends on how many times you reuse it. At some point the reusable bottle is cheaper when compared to 10 disposable ones. But with the stress these things are going through, I wonder how many times any single part will be able to be reused.
Falcon Heavy will be able to put kilos into orbit. The entire space station is listed at 419,455 k. So this thing could throw the entire space station up in just 8 launches. (including mass only, ignoring physical size limitations) AND Falcon Heavy will be the cheapest $/lbs rate of all time, at less than $1000/pound as compared to the shuttle's over $8000 per pound. It might have been able to do it for less than it cost to do a single shuttle mission.
Slashdot Mirror
Oops, that 'hobbled" not "hacked".
Still blaming John Oliver because people actually used the website is stupid.
This is the same as Dr Tyson talking on Cosmos about evolution not showing up on some flyover state's tv station.
People have been doing that for years with absolutely no affect. The FCC was going to ignore public comment anyhow, so I would say its downright time gets mad as hell and says they are not going to take it anymore. Also, HBO owns John Oliver. I would expect they would be against net neutrality.
Granted, I don't see how defacing a website will do any good, anyhow.
What that doesn't even make sense. Yes, perhaps some people that troll comments also hack, but the claim itself is absurd.
True, no organization that has authority has ever wanted less authority.
I simply don't get it. If the police are just investigating normal crimes, why can't get get normal warrants? Are they just lazy, or is there some other motive?
All of the above.
is how management treats said person.
Probably pretty well, considering management usually is the idiot.
Also, only the even Star Trek is good. Fuck it, this analogy is collapsing faster than a... something something.
Only the odd numbered ones are any good.
Actually, who am I kidding? It's all shit.
I think it would be easier to ask "Does anyone think Snowden would get a fair trial?" It would be a much shorter list. And most of the people answering yes can be easily identified as flat out liars. (Kerry and pretty much any politician.)
As long as it is cheaper to run competition out of business rather than compete with them; corporations will do so. And they will do so by every means necessary weather it is collusion, lobbying (bribes), or simply buying up the competitors and jacking prices way up.
And they will do this while hiding behind the banner of the "Free Market".
The problem is while I hate shooting down an idea without having a better one ready; I don't see how regulation will cause the ISPs to act in the best interest of the people. It most certainly will not cause competition to suddenly appear.
"Have been successfully fired" does not contradict the conclusion: 'without additional expertise and the right type of ammunition, anyone attempting to fire one would probably maim or even kill themselves.'
Technically this is true for a non-3D printed gun. Using the wrong ammunition and without training, any gun is going to be more dangerous to the shooter than anyone else.
Yes but you and the cat are only in one of those worlds. There is no such thing as "the same cat in a different world". It is a different cat that branched off at some time in the past. Therefore no matter which interpretation you use, the cat is either alive or dead, full stop.
Well bamboo is primarily made of carbon, and it is fiberous... so now we can apply the term "carbon fiber" to anything made out of wood, I guess.
Anything used improperly can inhibit learning. Such as books. Hit someone with a book hard enough... and they will have trouble learning.
Of the examples given, remaining Spitfires are historical pieces, but there are 70 year old Dakota's still flying and doing work every day. Now that is a mark of a successful plane.
Wait, they were not sure mid air refueling could work, but they thought they could dock a fighter to a bomber in mid air? What sense does that make?
Successful people are those who fail and don't give up. The same is true for aeronautical design. If you don't fail a couple of times, you won't win either.
Not when it comes to engineering. Failure is always an option. Some people are just terrible at it and should pursue other careers, preferably ones where people will not die when they make mistakes.
Flying at full speed for minutes to get from one end to the other of the enemy mother shit was amazing!
I haven't played a game with the same sense of scale since (I lie, Shadow of the Coleuses and God of War get there at times, but not the same).
Well...
Let's just say that you should not do either. Don't do crimes... and don't talk about crimes you did not do.
Anyone reading this is secretly boring.
I am not sure if I would consider trail-by-error as valid engineering or science.
I guess it depends on how many times you reuse it. At some point the reusable bottle is cheaper when compared to 10 disposable ones. But with the stress these things are going through, I wonder how many times any single part will be able to be reused.
Falcon Heavy will be able to put kilos into orbit. The entire space station is listed at 419,455 k. So this thing could throw the entire space station up in just 8 launches. (including mass only, ignoring physical size limitations) AND Falcon Heavy will be the cheapest $/lbs rate of all time, at less than $1000/pound as compared to the shuttle's over $8000 per pound. It might have been able to do it for less than it cost to do a single shuttle mission.