Slashdot Mirror


User: Pieroxy

Pieroxy's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
3,907
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 3,907

  1. Re:Reality vs idealism on W3C Declares DRM In-Scope For HTML · · Score: 1

    Let me know when you've managed to convince the major OS developers to use a portable container, common SDK and common glucode scripting language.

    Don't hold your breath though, or the joke is on you.

  2. Re:This problem is easily solved on Is It Possible To Erase Yourself From the Internet? · · Score: 1

    Basically, you need to go live in a cabin in the woods.

    I saw the movie. No thanks.

  3. Re:Not Flash, but Silverlight on Six Months Without Adobe Flash, and I Feel Fine · · Score: 1

    Huh? What are you implying by "excellent security history"? That there wasn't many holes discovered?

    Hint: If someone was looking for them, there may have been holes discovered.

  4. Re:upside down keypads? on John E. Karlin, Who Led the Way To All-Digit Dialing, Dies At 94 · · Score: 2

    You have an unbalanced parenthesis. You will be terminated shortly. Resistance is futile.

  5. Re:but but on UK Court: MPAA Not Entitled To Profits From Piracy · · Score: 1

    Where we're going, we don't need roads!

    Push it further: We don't need.

  6. Re:Dear MPAA on UK Court: MPAA Not Entitled To Profits From Piracy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You aren't much into the MPAA's business model are you? The only thing the MPAA creates it wealth for itself.

  7. Re:Aprils Fools? on Gnome Goes JavaScript · · Score: 1

    According to your own link, all languages have features that can be described as making the language suck. JavaScript is exactly the same as the rest of the pack on this regard, which was my point. Just say you don't like it, no need to jump ship and claim the language "suck".

    34 bullet points for JS, 59 for PHP, 16 for Perl, 30 for Ruby, 33 for C++, 40 for Java.... well, some languages are getting more attention than others. Where's Haskell?

  8. Re:Aprils Fools? on Gnome Goes JavaScript · · Score: 1

    Can you point to specifics? The fact that the "==" and "?" operators don"t work as you would expect in another language doesn't means the language is garbage. It just mean you didn't get it.

  9. Re:Are you KIDDING me? on Firefox and Chrome Can Talk To Each Other · · Score: 1

    Ok, my bad, I didn't know about the CORS headers.

    Thanks for the info.

  10. Re:Are you KIDDING me? on Firefox and Chrome Can Talk To Each Other · · Score: 1

    https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/DOM/XMLHttpRequest

    XMLHttpRequest.mozSystem -- Read only -- boolean -- If true, the same origin policy will not be enforced on the request.

    It is false by default in every release of the browser I could get my hands on.

  11. Re:Are you KIDDING me? on Firefox and Chrome Can Talk To Each Other · · Score: 1

    XMLHttpRequest is bound by the same origin policy. It *cannot*call everywhere you want it to, only your domain.

  12. Re:Are you KIDDING me? on Firefox and Chrome Can Talk To Each Other · · Score: 1

    <script>
    var e = document.createElement("script");
    e.src="http://wherever/whatever";
    document.appendChild(e);
    </script>

    Working fine in IE since 1999, and in every browser ever since - not Netscape 4.x though.

  13. Re:Putting the pressure on Microsoft - nice! on Firefox and Chrome Can Talk To Each Other · · Score: 1

    VP8 has considerably less hardware support, making it much much more battery consuming than H264 (the accelerated version that is)

  14. Re:Killed by DRM and licensing on Sony To Make Its Last MiniDisc System Next Month · · Score: 1

    Ah, it's you, sorry about the confusion...

    You said that "Congress banned the importing or making of MiniDisc players until they implemented a DRM system that limited copying" which implied in my mind that the mini disc were released in Japan before the US, and unless SONY devised their DRM scheme in three weeks - highly doubtful IMO - the Wikipedia article disproved your point (Japan November, US December). Maybe there is some data missing in the Wikipedia Article after all since it doesn't mention any of this at all.

  15. Re:Enough rope on Gnome Goes JavaScript · · Score: 1

    big O has almost nothing to do with the language but with the algorithms you're using. To some degree, the default implementation of some libraries could bite you in the ass, but those libraries are so basic that they can be rewritten pretty quickly.

  16. Re:Read more facts here on Gnome Goes JavaScript · · Score: 1

    Hmmm... javascript is pretty much the exact opposite of lock in. It is the closest a language has really come to being "write once run anywhere". Even most node.js stuff runs in the browser and vis versa with ease.

    Hmmm. So many wrongs here, I don't really know where to start. The problem with "write once run everywhere" is that it does not only depends on the runtime, but most of all on the APIs. And there, JavaScript is dangerously close to be the worst offender.

  17. Re:Aprils Fools? on Gnome Goes JavaScript · · Score: 1

    I have programmed with JavaScript. While its usage in browsers make it a PITA, the language in itself is half decent and have some serious merits over any other languages I've tried so far.

    Advocating it for newbies that want to write apps for Gnome seems entirely reasonable to me. Now try to be constructive and tell me why it's such a bad idea to promote JavaScript for beginners.

    As a side note, when you're using the word "fuck" every other sentence, you get modded Flamebait for a very good reason. No need for shills here.

  18. Re:Steeve Keen on the other hand... on Australian Economists Predictions No Better Than Flipping a Coin · · Score: 1

    Modding up a comment is for the rest of us to be able to see when browsing at an acceptable level, not to give Karma. Heck, if it was to give Karma, there would be no point in modding anything "+1, Funny"

  19. Re:Killed by DRM and licensing on Sony To Make Its Last MiniDisc System Next Month · · Score: 1

    CDGuru stated "Around 1993 the first CD recorder was introduced but it cost around $50,000"

    I think that is in direct contradiction with the wikipedia article that claimed: "By 1992 the cost of typical recorders was down to $10–12,000" and "CD-R recording systems available in 1990 were..."

    Did you somehow miss that?

  20. Re:Killed by DRM and licensing on Sony To Make Its Last MiniDisc System Next Month · · Score: 1

    Then the Wikipedia link I provided for your reading is completely and utterly wrong. I suggest you go and edit it.

  21. Re:Killed by DRM and licensing on Sony To Make Its Last MiniDisc System Next Month · · Score: 1

    CD-R dates back to 1990 while the MiniDisc was first introduced in 1992 (unless Wikipedia is wrong, that is). It was also apparently released in Japan 1 month before the US release, which points to your story being bullshit or at least wildly inaccurate.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MiniDisc

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CD-R

  22. Re:Steeve Keen on the other hand... on Australian Economists Predictions No Better Than Flipping a Coin · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, he predicted 20 out of the last 2 recessions.

    That was funny shame it was posted as AC :)

    Huh? Why is it a shame?

  23. Re:Economy is not a science. on Australian Economists Predictions No Better Than Flipping a Coin · · Score: 1

    Have you ever read anything "dilbert" ?

  24. Re:Hmmmmm..... on San Diego Drops Red-Light Cameras · · Score: 1

    As far as gaping holes are concerned, this system is probably not in the worst 50%. That said you are correct, but real world is always going to leave some holes in anything we try to regulate.

  25. Not only that, but Microsoft NEEDED Apple to do well in order to claim they didn't have a monopoly. Bill Gates felt no pity for Apple.