If Canada doesn't require you to accept its own currency to settle a debt, what on earth does constitute a legally satisfactory attempt to discharge a debt?
The limit on coins is not just an urban legend; such a limit exists in the UK, where 20 pence pieces and 50 pence pieces are legal tender in amounts up to 10 pounds, 5 pence pieces and 10 pence pieces are legal tender in amounts up to 5 pounds, and 1 penny pieces and 2 pence pieces are legal tender in amounts up to 20 pence.
It's lucky for me (and everyone else in the UK) that those "studies" are not true (or don't exist). In my lifetime:
Five and ten pence coins introduced to replace one and two shillings (1968) Halfpenny withdrawn (1969) Half crown withdrawn (1970) Twenty pound note issued (1970) Currency goes decimal (1971): Penny, threepence and ten shilling note withdrawn; new half penny, penny, two pence and fifty pence coins issued Ten pound note issued (1975) Old (pre-decimal) sixpence withdrawn (1980) Fifty pound note issued (1981) Twenty pence and one pound coins issued (1982) One pound note withdrawn (1984) Half penny coin withdrawn (1984) Five pence coin reissued at a smaller size (1990) Ten pence coin reissued at a smaller size (1992) Fifty pence coin reissued at a smaller size (1997) Two pound coin issued (1998)
Alias does have some reruns mixed in witht he new episodes, but seems to be pre-empted a lot for scheduling conflicts.
I don't have details on what they were showing on the off weeks, but for example check here for the release schedule for Stargate SG1 season 8, where 20 episodes took about 39 weeks to broadcast.
Other countries have to run behind the US due the the insane American custom of spreading 22 new episodes out over 44 weeks (or thereabouts), and alternating a few new episodes, then a few reruns. No other country's TV-watching population would tolerate this, so they can't start to show a series until it's already been running in the US for six months, to ensure that they can actually show a 22 episode season over 22 weeks.
No, pi's value never changes. But the ratio of the circumference of a circle to its diameter, which is approximately pi (and only exactly in a flat space-time) varies. Consider a circle drawn on the surface of a balloon. For a small circle, the local balloon surface is nearly flat, and the ratio of the circumference to the diameter is nearly pi. But for a big circle, the circumference is much less than pi * diameter, as the diameter has to be measured around the curvature of the balloon.
Pi's definition is mathematical, not physical. No one really knows the exact ratio between the circumference of a circle and its diameter, but it definitely varies depending on how curved space-time is in the vicinity of the circle, and on the size of the circle.
Pi is 4 x (1 - 1/3 + 1/5 - 1/7 + 1/9 + 1/11...). (Or the limit of that series as its length tends to infinity, for the mathematical formalists among you.) Your accuracy in computing pi depends on how many terms of the series you can calculate (actually, there are alternative formulations that converge much more rapidly, but are less easy to write down in ASCII.)
Traditionally, the English-speaking world is divided between North America and the Commonwealth for publishing purposes, and the rights are sold separately. So the UK publisher can't distribute books in the US, as they don't have the rights. This actually makes sense for the authors, as they can effectively get paid twice for the same book -- if a UK publisher could distribute a book in the US, they wouldn't necessarily do so as effectively as a US publisher.
(Yes, Canada is in both North America and the Commonwealth. It generally counts as NA, but sometimes not. The publishing world is not consistent.)
Re:There should be more online awards given.......
on
2005 Hugo Nominations
·
· Score: 1
With "open online voting", there's no way to stop someone from voting twice. Or a dozen times. Or tens of thousands of times, if they happen to 0wn a botnet.
Anything you acquire that is encumbered with DRM is only rented, not purchased. I'd accept it for a similar discount level to rental vs purchased DVDs -- 10% of the purchase price. If a DVD costs $20, but that includes the media, packaging, shipping and retail costs that don't apply to electronic delivery, then a reasonable price for an unDRMed download might be $10. And a resonable price for a DRMed version of the same movie would be $1. For music, $1 for a track without DRM and 10 cents with DRM. Apple and Napster are trying to charge purchase prices for rental product.
Cool! You mean that I just have to enter my iTunes username and password on my Sony Clie (runing Palm OS), my iRiver MP3 player, my Linux box, and the computer I'm going to own in 20 years' time running an OS that hasn't even been conceived yet, and it will play my DRMed iTunes music? Why did no one tell me this before?
But it's only legal because of the GPL, which licenses you to use the code in this way. The GPL only restricts distribution, but it applies to use as well. If it didn't, then use would not be permitted.
Yes, anyone using your code who breaks your conditions is violating your copyright, as they don't have a valid license, and you can sue them in just the same way as Microsoft can sue someone who is using Windows source code in their products. Only with less money to spend on lawyers.
Code that you have written is your intellectual property. You can put whatever restrictions you want on its use. Anyone who doesn't accept the restrictions can simply choose not to use the code -- which would be the situation they were in if you weren't licensing it at all, so they don't lose anything.
If the violator doesn't accept the GPL, nothing else gives them the right to use the code -- it's not public domain, it's licensed under a specific license. It's not a matter of contract law, it's copyright law, and no contract is required, any more than New Line Cinema needs to have a contract with you to stop you from selling a remixed version of The Fellowship Of The Ring.
Apple are probably paying around $50 per Mbit/sec capacity/month. If a music track takes around 6MB, then at 1Mbit/sec it takes one minute to download. So that $50-worth of bandwidth can serve 43,200 tracks. Bandwidth cost/track of $0.001. Which leaves plenty of room for profit if they're getting $0.02 per track.
No, free won't always win. Convenience will always win, and free is part of convenient. But I would rather (for example) pay US$1 to download an episode of a TV show instead of messing around with BitTorrent, as long as they genuinely make it more convenient -- which means a big fat pipe and a choice of unDRMed video formats.
The big mistake that the music industry is making, and the TV and movie industries are stumbling into, is to make their products less convenient on other grounds as well as more expensive -- region codes, release windows, DRM, etc. Once something is released to the public, it needs to be released to the public -- TV shows and movies need to be available for download on the day that they're first shown.
No, because those 12Ah are at 5V, while the mains supply is 110V, 22 times as high (and twice as high again in Europe). So you would actually need a bit under 7A, which is perfectly reasonable.
India, China and Brazil don't need to be involved, as their CO2 emissions per head are so much lower than the western world's that if targets are set based on emissions per head (the only fair way to do it) then their targets will be well above any conceivable view of what their actual emissions will be during the life of the treaty.
You need to put XP Professional and XP Plus! Digital Media Edition on the HP to make its software remotely comparable with the bundled software on the Mac Mini. That will add close to $200.
The website I manage is one of the busiest UK websites, but our traffic is a fraction of LJ's. And we have forty-two web servers, handling around 170 million pages per month. I would be surprised if LJ didn't have hundreds of servers.
Of course, we also have three separate colocated data centres, with data replicated between sites, so if one centre loses power, blows up or is eaten by mighty Cthulhu, we can stay up.
If Canada doesn't require you to accept its own currency to settle a debt, what on earth does constitute a legally satisfactory attempt to discharge a debt?
The limit on coins is not just an urban legend; such a limit exists in the UK, where 20 pence pieces and 50 pence pieces are legal tender in amounts up to 10 pounds, 5 pence pieces and 10 pence pieces are legal tender in amounts up to 5 pounds, and 1 penny pieces and 2 pence pieces are legal tender in amounts up to 20 pence.
She's a cashier; it's her job to know what currency is and is not valid.
It's lucky for me (and everyone else in the UK) that those "studies" are not true (or don't exist). In my lifetime:
Five and ten pence coins introduced to replace one and two shillings (1968)
Halfpenny withdrawn (1969)
Half crown withdrawn (1970)
Twenty pound note issued (1970)
Currency goes decimal (1971): Penny, threepence and ten shilling note withdrawn; new half penny, penny, two pence and fifty pence coins issued
Ten pound note issued (1975)
Old (pre-decimal) sixpence withdrawn (1980)
Fifty pound note issued (1981)
Twenty pence and one pound coins issued (1982)
One pound note withdrawn (1984)
Half penny coin withdrawn (1984)
Five pence coin reissued at a smaller size (1990)
Ten pence coin reissued at a smaller size (1992)
Fifty pence coin reissued at a smaller size (1997)
Two pound coin issued (1998)
And strangely enough, I still know my currency.
Alias does have some reruns mixed in witht he new episodes, but seems to be pre-empted a lot for scheduling conflicts.
I don't have details on what they were showing on the off weeks, but for example check here for the release schedule for Stargate SG1 season 8, where 20 episodes took about 39 weeks to broadcast.
Other countries have to run behind the US due the the insane American custom of spreading 22 new episodes out over 44 weeks (or thereabouts), and alternating a few new episodes, then a few reruns. No other country's TV-watching population would tolerate this, so they can't start to show a series until it's already been running in the US for six months, to ensure that they can actually show a 22 episode season over 22 weeks.
There's no such thing as flat in the real world. Space-time is curved.
No, pi's value never changes. But the ratio of the circumference of a circle to its diameter, which is approximately pi (and only exactly in a flat space-time) varies. Consider a circle drawn on the surface of a balloon. For a small circle, the local balloon surface is nearly flat, and the ratio of the circumference to the diameter is nearly pi. But for a big circle, the circumference is much less than pi * diameter, as the diameter has to be measured around the curvature of the balloon.
Pi's definition is mathematical, not physical. No one really knows the exact ratio between the circumference of a circle and its diameter, but it definitely varies depending on how curved space-time is in the vicinity of the circle, and on the size of the circle.
...). (Or the limit of that series as its length tends to infinity, for the mathematical formalists among you.) Your accuracy in computing pi depends on how many terms of the series you can calculate (actually, there are alternative formulations that converge much more rapidly, but are less easy to write down in ASCII.)
Pi is 4 x (1 - 1/3 + 1/5 - 1/7 + 1/9 + 1/11
Traditionally, the English-speaking world is divided between North America and the Commonwealth for publishing purposes, and the rights are sold separately. So the UK publisher can't distribute books in the US, as they don't have the rights. This actually makes sense for the authors, as they can effectively get paid twice for the same book -- if a UK publisher could distribute a book in the US, they wouldn't necessarily do so as effectively as a US publisher.
(Yes, Canada is in both North America and the Commonwealth. It generally counts as NA, but sometimes not. The publishing world is not consistent.)
With "open online voting", there's no way to stop someone from voting twice. Or a dozen times. Or tens of thousands of times, if they happen to 0wn a botnet.
In 2001 there was no American SF on the final ballot; the only American was George R R Martin's A Storm of Swords.
Anything you acquire that is encumbered with DRM is only rented, not purchased. I'd accept it for a similar discount level to rental vs purchased DVDs -- 10% of the purchase price. If a DVD costs $20, but that includes the media, packaging, shipping and retail costs that don't apply to electronic delivery, then a reasonable price for an unDRMed download might be $10. And a resonable price for a DRMed version of the same movie would be $1. For music, $1 for a track without DRM and 10 cents with DRM. Apple and Napster are trying to charge purchase prices for rental product.
Cool! You mean that I just have to enter my iTunes username and password on my Sony Clie (runing Palm OS), my iRiver MP3 player, my Linux box, and the computer I'm going to own in 20 years' time running an OS that hasn't even been conceived yet, and it will play my DRMed iTunes music? Why did no one tell me this before?
But it's only legal because of the GPL, which licenses you to use the code in this way. The GPL only restricts distribution, but it applies to use as well. If it didn't, then use would not be permitted.
Yes, anyone using your code who breaks your conditions is violating your copyright, as they don't have a valid license, and you can sue them in just the same way as Microsoft can sue someone who is using Windows source code in their products. Only with less money to spend on lawyers.
Code that you have written is your intellectual property. You can put whatever restrictions you want on its use. Anyone who doesn't accept the restrictions can simply choose not to use the code -- which would be the situation they were in if you weren't licensing it at all, so they don't lose anything.
If the violator doesn't accept the GPL, nothing else gives them the right to use the code -- it's not public domain, it's licensed under a specific license. It's not a matter of contract law, it's copyright law, and no contract is required, any more than New Line Cinema needs to have a contract with you to stop you from selling a remixed version of The Fellowship Of The Ring.
Apple are probably paying around $50 per Mbit/sec capacity/month. If a music track takes around 6MB, then at 1Mbit/sec it takes one minute to download. So that $50-worth of bandwidth can serve 43,200 tracks. Bandwidth cost/track of $0.001. Which leaves plenty of room for profit if they're getting $0.02 per track.
No, free won't always win. Convenience will always win, and free is part of convenient. But I would rather (for example) pay US$1 to download an episode of a TV show instead of messing around with BitTorrent, as long as they genuinely make it more convenient -- which means a big fat pipe and a choice of unDRMed video formats.
The big mistake that the music industry is making, and the TV and movie industries are stumbling into, is to make their products less convenient on other grounds as well as more expensive -- region codes, release windows, DRM, etc. Once something is released to the public, it needs to be released to the public -- TV shows and movies need to be available for download on the day that they're first shown.
No, because those 12Ah are at 5V, while the mains supply is 110V, 22 times as high (and twice as high again in Europe). So you would actually need a bit under 7A, which is perfectly reasonable.
India, China and Brazil don't need to be involved, as their CO2 emissions per head are so much lower than the western world's that if targets are set based on emissions per head (the only fair way to do it) then their targets will be well above any conceivable view of what their actual emissions will be during the life of the treaty.
Session IDs have to go in URLs, because there's no other way to preserve session state for users who have cookies disabled.
You need to put XP Professional and XP Plus! Digital Media Edition on the HP to make its software remotely comparable with the bundled software on the Mac Mini. That will add close to $200.
The website I manage is one of the busiest UK websites, but our traffic is a fraction of LJ's. And we have forty-two web servers, handling around 170 million pages per month. I would be surprised if LJ didn't have hundreds of servers.
Of course, we also have three separate colocated data centres, with data replicated between sites, so if one centre loses power, blows up or is eaten by mighty Cthulhu, we can stay up.