Most of the delay comes from your brain actually waking up, analyze and start braking. Another delay comes from your leg moving and pressing the brake. The controlling part could be automated but not the analyzing part. Otherwise there will be false alarms.
I also hope they measure the brain activity from the correct place, i.e. from the motor pathway controlling the legs.
Maybe the best way would be to totally automate the simplest braking situations (i.e. brake when something is going to hit the car). Have good camera(s) and real time velocity measuring. Leave the more complex cases for the driver.
Dude, I think you give too much importance to random Slashdot posts. The "journalistic piece of art" doesn't exist anymore (alas, not even in Slashdot).
Well, maybe the number of these guys is so much less than muslims so the authorities don't need to listen to their demands? Personally I think it would be better if more "traits" are shown in these pictures: "Why do you wear this horn?" "Because I am a member of the Unicorn Preservation Society".
Maybe not that but anyway these pictures are just "random data". Nobody knows who you are. You could just wear a mask.
Not much will happen when most end users still use IPv4. Truth is that IPv6 offer zero to "some" benefits to the end user and "switch" will happen only after IPv4 is eradicated and not possible to use.
It's worrying how much attention this "radiation problem" receives from the Average Joes. Funny also to see how hard it is for some people to keep their heads cool (no pun intended).
Individuals (people) have the protection against "false claims", "harassment", etc. Science is objective (or should be). It is a "false claim" to point your fingers to somebody and shout "Person X might be a KILLER!" and after that continue investigations for 20 years, trying to find the link. There might be lots of "clues" for this person to be a killer, for example he just played violent games, watched a detective movie or just walked near some crime scene. After 20 years of investigations the public thinks this person is a serial killer when he/she actually ate meat.
Anyway as the brain cancer worries are not about people but instead about objects (phones etc.), the claims must be investigated. And probably the only way to see if it is true is to rearrange the same experiment (probably multiple times) and see the results.
I let you to decide is it good practice in science to say "might cause" when only the initial experiment was finished. This reminds me of "The Science News Cycle" comic strip.
Slashdot Mirror
Most of the delay comes from your brain actually waking up, analyze and start braking. Another delay comes from your leg moving and pressing the brake.
The controlling part could be automated but not the analyzing part. Otherwise there will be false alarms.
I also hope they measure the brain activity from the correct place, i.e. from the motor pathway controlling the legs.
Maybe the best way would be to totally automate the simplest braking situations (i.e. brake when something is going to hit the car). Have good camera(s) and real time velocity measuring. Leave the more complex cases for the driver.
Dude, I think you give too much importance to random Slashdot posts.
The "journalistic piece of art" doesn't exist anymore (alas, not even in Slashdot).
Well, maybe the number of these guys is so much less than muslims so the authorities don't need to listen to their demands? Personally I think it would be better if more "traits" are shown in these pictures: "Why do you wear this horn?" "Because I am a member of the Unicorn Preservation Society".
Maybe not that but anyway these pictures are just "random data". Nobody knows who you are. You could just wear a mask.
Not much will happen when most end users still use IPv4. Truth is that IPv6 offer zero to "some" benefits to the end user and "switch" will happen only after IPv4 is eradicated and not possible to use.
It's worrying how much attention this "radiation problem" receives from the Average Joes. Funny also to see how hard it is for some people to keep their heads cool (no pun intended).
Individuals (people) have the protection against "false claims", "harassment", etc. Science is objective (or should be). It is a "false claim" to point your fingers to somebody and shout "Person X might be a KILLER!" and after that continue investigations for 20 years, trying to find the link. There might be lots of "clues" for this person to be a killer, for example he just played violent games, watched a detective movie or just walked near some crime scene. After 20 years of investigations the public thinks this person is a serial killer when he/she actually ate meat.
Anyway as the brain cancer worries are not about people but instead about objects (phones etc.), the claims must be investigated. And probably the only way to see if it is true is to rearrange the same experiment (probably multiple times) and see the results.
I let you to decide is it good practice in science to say "might cause" when only the initial experiment was finished. This reminds me of "The Science News Cycle" comic strip.