The carbon released by burning this gasoline would have been pulled out of the atmosphere by the bacteria- making the process carbon neutral. The problem with fossil fuels is that you're taking carbon that sitting quietly underground and putting it into the atmosphere.
We only have one data set for real world performance of an autonomous vehicle, 350k miles by Google's prototype. It has been involved in one accident- when a person backed into it. So it has been perfect thus far.
If it makes you feel better, lots of people thought that horses were superior to cars for years.
Please cite a case of a government agent hacking into someone's laptop, acquiring naked pictures of them, and then blackmailing the person using the naked pictures.
It boggles my mind that multiple people found this comment "insightful".
What size are your glasses of beer? I thought that was a pretty standard glass size. It's the most beer you can drink at a reasonable pace before it gets warm.
I already get emergency alerts directly from my cell service provider and cable operator. The new cable DVR boxes put alert crawlers over recorded programs. If those systems are offline, then Twitter is useless. If they're online, Twitter is redundant.
"With one breath, many parents criticize video games for being so violent, and with the next, they're saying 'thanks' at the counter after picking up these very games for their kids."
Are the same people saying both of these things? Or is it possible that "parents" includes millions of different people who feel differently about many things.
Heck just 5 years ago if you made the statement 'the goverment is spying on all of us'. You'd get some sort of response involving tinfoil and hats
I read this all the time and it's just not true.
In 2006, the front page of the New York Times detailed how the NSA was copying basically all internet traffic right from the backbone. At the time it was seen as a confirmation of what basically everyone had suspected for decades. Obviously if they were gathering all of that data, they were doing something with it.
The carbon released by burning this gasoline would have been pulled out of the atmosphere by the bacteria- making the process carbon neutral. The problem with fossil fuels is that you're taking carbon that sitting quietly underground and putting it into the atmosphere.
When the car in front of you slams on its brakes, how much context do you need?
You sure make a lot of assumptions for someone that doesn't know anything about the subject.
We only have one data set for real world performance of an autonomous vehicle, 350k miles by Google's prototype. It has been involved in one accident- when a person backed into it. So it has been perfect thus far.
If it makes you feel better, lots of people thought that horses were superior to cars for years.
Please cite a case of a government agent hacking into someone's laptop, acquiring naked pictures of them, and then blackmailing the person using the naked pictures.
It boggles my mind that multiple people found this comment "insightful".
The problem is the large percentage of people who *think* they're "perfectly capable drivers", but are not.
And no matter how capable you are, a computer has a faster reaction time.
That's totally insane.
I'm not the one claiming to be smarter than everyone on Wall Street.
Since you're so much smarter than all of those business idiots, you should be able to turn $10 into millions in no time.
And Pets.com did have an IPO. It went bankrupt less than a year later.
I'll bet you $100 that scottbomb isn't paying that.
If your bar is serving beer in 12 oz glasses, you need to go to a better bar. Any decent place in the US uses 16 oz glasses.
What size are your glasses of beer? I thought that was a pretty standard glass size. It's the most beer you can drink at a reasonable pace before it gets warm.
I love Google Earth and use it daily but it crashed about 3 times yesterday
You should ask Google for a refund of the purchase price.
You must have made millions from shorting the stock, then.
Yeah. You're criticizing people for "malinvestments" with the benefit of hindsight. That's not exactly fair.
So you can tell ahead of time which business ideas will be successful? You must have a really big house.
Your basic knowledge of trading has no place here.
Keep in mind that you just replied to someone who thinks copyright laws are a "crime against humanity".
You can have a room full of insightful, creative people. But without investment, they won't be accomplishing much.
I already get emergency alerts directly from my cell service provider and cable operator. The new cable DVR boxes put alert crawlers over recorded programs. If those systems are offline, then Twitter is useless. If they're online, Twitter is redundant.
"With one breath, many parents criticize video games for being so violent, and with the next, they're saying 'thanks' at the counter after picking up these very games for their kids."
Are the same people saying both of these things? Or is it possible that "parents" includes millions of different people who feel differently about many things.
How charmingly elitist of you.
The difference is that texting at a red light is against the law. Driving a fast car slower than the speed limit is not.
Your comment could not be less insightful.
Do you miss paying twice as much for tickets?
Heck just 5 years ago if you made the statement 'the goverment is spying on all of us'. You'd get some sort of response involving tinfoil and hats
I read this all the time and it's just not true.
In 2006, the front page of the New York Times detailed how the NSA was copying basically all internet traffic right from the backbone. At the time it was seen as a confirmation of what basically everyone had suspected for decades. Obviously if they were gathering all of that data, they were doing something with it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Room_641A
You don't think that anyone will get GTA5 for Christmas?