Slashdot Mirror


Arrest Made In Webcam Highjacking Extortion Case

Hugh Pickens DOT Com writes "CNN reports that Jared James Abrahams, a 19-year-old computer science student, has been arrested for allegedly hijacking the webcams of young women — among them reigning Miss Teen USA Cassidy Wolf — taking nude images, then blackmailing his victims to send him more explicit material or else be exposed. Abrahams admitted he had 30 to 40 'slave computers' — or other people's electronic devices he controlled — and has had as many as 150 total. His arrest came six months after a teenager identified in court documents as C.W. alerted authorities. She has since publicly identified herself as Cassidy Wolf, the recently crowned Miss Teen USA. Wolf received messages featuring pictures of her at her Riverside County address and others apparently taken months earlier when she lived in Orange County, says the criminal complaint (PDF). The message explained 'what's going to happen' if Wolf didn't send pictures or videos or 'do what I tell you to do' in a five-minute Skype videoconference, according to the criminal complaint. 'Either you do one of the things listed below or I upload these pics and a lot more (I have a LOT more and those are better quality) on all your accounts for everybody to see and your dream of being a model will be transformed into a pornstar (sic),' wrote Abrahams. FBI agents raided Abrahams' Temecula home in June and seized computers and hardware, cellphones and hacking software, court records show. Outside the court, Abrahams' lawyer, Alan Eisner, said that his client's family feels 'profound regret and remorse' over what happened. Eisner told CNN affiliate KTLA that Abrahams is autistic. 'The family wants to apologize for the consequences of his behavior to the families who were affected.'"

311 comments

  1. Autistic huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The current excuse of the day when some nerdy low-life gets caught up to no good. Here is a hint, just because you have problems coping, it does not mean "I am autistic" is an excuse for being an arsehole.

    1. Re:Autistic huh? by ruvablue · · Score: 1

      If he is officially diagnosed, what would you say then? There are so many other diagnostic criteria besides "...you have problems coping...".

    2. Re:Autistic huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Autistic people know right from wrong. It's no more a valid excuse than saying he's ugly.

    3. Re:Autistic huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No you're not. You just want to be.

    4. Re:Autistic huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I would treat it with the disdain it deserves. What has whether he is on the spectrum (yes, I know people who are) got to do with whether he is a criminal low-life. Autism is the modern excuse for people not to bother trying. It used to be ADD/HD. Now it is autism. I know kids whose parents claim to have both, and what it actually means is "I can't be arsed controlling my children, because it's hard work". Yes I am a parent. Had the teenage rows. Been the good guy. Been the bad guy. Step-son understands and appreciates it now. Daughter is just at that age where I am not infallible. It's hard work sometimes, but everyone has to make the effort. As an introverted, shy, socially awkward person, I have to make the extra effort at the time. This does not make me autistic. It just means I have to try harder and my friends and family have to be a bit more understanding - it takes longer for me to be comfortable with people.

    5. Re:Autistic huh? by CauseBy · · Score: 1

      Autism or brain chemistry or whatever might be an explanation but in my opinion it is legally irrelevant. In the past we focused on judging criminals morally -- they are bad people. Western justice has been in a slow-motion process of dealing with the consequences of focusing on moral blame when criminals explain why, for various reasons, they aren't blameworthy: "I killed my dad because he was mean to me", "I have a predisposition to crime", whatever.

      I predict that Western justice will soon do away with those excuses and focus instead on proximate cause. Are you the proximate cause of a crime? Meaning did you do it? If so, the the other dimensions of the defense will be irrelevant.

    6. Re:Autistic huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he is officially diagnosed, what would you say then?

      The same thing, because it's bullshit to list such tripe in a news article when it has fuck all relevance.

      It'd be like the news doing a story on your speeding ticket, and pointing out, "Oh, hey, this guy likes being urinated on by midgets. Just thought you'd like to know."

    7. Re:Autistic huh? by meerling · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Running a blackmail scam is NOT a symptom of autism.
      I sure hope he likes a having a tiny living area and orange jumpsuits.
      I agree, too many people are using pretty weak excuses for antisocial and illegal activities.

    8. Re:Autistic huh? by dkleinsc · · Score: 5, Interesting

      If he is officially diagnosed, what would you say then?

      I'd say that there's a significant difference between autism and sociopathy. An autistic person frequently doesn't understand how to interact with someone else, but they have enough empathy to know some basics of how *not* to interact.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    9. Re:Autistic huh? by Golddess · · Score: 2

      What has whether he is on the spectrum (yes, I know people who are) got to do with whether he is a criminal low-life.

      Because it may change how you end up dealing with the situation. For example, if your intent is to fix the problem, instead of just sending such people away and forgetting about them.

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    10. Re:Autistic huh? by ruvablue · · Score: 4, Interesting

      One feature of autism/Asperger's is obsessions. This and male teenage hormones do not mix well. I had many obsessions as an autistic/Asperger's teenage girl. The "girl" part can be a moderating factor in the expression of autism. [I'm officially diagnosed BTW]

    11. Re:Autistic huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahhh, I presume you are American. In my part of the world the justice systems tries to fix the problem without requiring some "fad of the month" behavioural excuse.

    12. Re:Autistic huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      What we are witnessing is the spread of progressive ideology. For 200 yrs. progressives have been trying to create an impossibility: a society in which no one ever has to feel guilty or ashamed about anything that they do. That's why progressives attack the very idea of societal standards of behavior, try to destroy institutions such as marriage that impose personal responsibilities on individuals, promote policies that mitigate the negative consequences of a person's behaviors, e.g. taxpayer subsidized abortion, and create govt. handout programs that protect an individual from their own poor life choices and their own irresponsibility. It is only natural for progressives to blame criminal behavior on some condition supposedly beyond an individual's control or on "society".

    13. Re:Autistic huh? by michrech · · Score: 3, Funny

      Lies... All lies... Everybody knows there aren't any Girls on Slashdot (let alone the internet)... :P

      --
      bork bork bork!
    14. Re:Autistic huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      As a father of a child on the autism spectrum who also has ADHD, I can tell you that those kids are out there. I can also tell you that you have NO IDEA how much work my wife and I have put in over his lifetime to get him to the point where he can be in a mainstream classroom, and generally come off as just "mildly aloof and a bit forgetful, but friendly" as opposed to "way out there, completely disorganized, and won't make eye contact." He has to work much harder to make friends and get his schoolwork done, but because of all the training, therapy, and professional help that we have gone through (and it takes all of us to do this), you might not be able to tell in a short interaction with him. (It's still the case that in any lengthy interaction with him, if you know what to look for you'll pick some of it up.)

      So don't assume that ASD + ADHD = lazy parent. We also have a typical child, and you can tell the difference in parenting effort between the two easily, but only because we have put that effort in on the atypical one. Parenting is hard for anyone, and even harder for parents of kids with either ASD or ADHD, let alone both. Many parents in one boat or the other get plenty of sideways glances from people with the attitude you wrote above, and I feel it is very disrespectful to the massive amount of time, effort, and money we have spent on our children.

      That said, I agree, it is completely irrelevant whether the blackmailer in this story was autistic or not, because the behavior is not something related to the behaviors autistic people generally express as part of that diagnosis. If his family (IF) is using that as an excuse, shame on them.

    15. Re:Autistic huh? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Diagnosed or not, it's still a crime and no excuse undoes the damage.

    16. Re:Autistic huh? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      The only thing a diagnosis of a mental ailment should do in a criminal trial is change from 10-20 in the penitentiary into 10-20 in a high security hospital.

    17. Re:Autistic huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet whoever noted he is autistic does not know what that means:
      Difficulty Communicating
      Difficulty Socializing
      Self Destructive Behavior (for example, nail biting)

      As someone with High Functional Autism, I can tell you the moral line here is clearly visible. I hope this pervert gets a lot of jail time. I also hope the media will drop the autism connection or at least not over inflate it, I don't want people looking at me as if I was this moron.

    18. Re:Autistic huh? by BonThomme · · Score: 1

      Look in the mirror and witness the spread of neoconservative ideology. Thought idiology might be more apt.

    19. Re:Autistic huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about I have relatives that are mildly autistic and it doesn't allow them to break the fucking law or blackmail people. Send him to jail. What a poor ass excuse.

    20. Re:Autistic huh? by jythie · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that is the element that really annoys me when I hear people complaining about diagnosis. The techniques that help an autistic person develop and the techniques useful for getting a neurotypical under control have very little overlap. Knowing what you are dealing with makes all the difference.

    21. Re:Autistic huh? by tlhIngan · · Score: 2

      One feature of autism/Asperger's is obsessions. This and male teenage hormones do not mix well. I had many obsessions as an autistic/Asperger's teenage girl. The "girl" part can be a moderating factor in the expression of autism. [I'm officially diagnosed BTW]

      The problem is not autism or Asperger's. The problem is using autism or Asperger's as an excuse to behave badly.

      Because you know what happens? The public starts to believe in it.

      If you want a more innocent example - take video games and violence. The two are no inextricably linked together. People start blaming the games for making their kids go psycho and now people get into this belief. And then you have the perpetrators arguing the same thing (even in court) - that video games made them do it.

      Or Asperger's and cursing - just because some find it uncontrollable, everyone else excuses their profane language that way.

      Do it often enough and people will think all autistics (or Asperger's) are anti-social psychos who really cannot be trusted around because it appears everyone is excusing their behavior as a result of it.

      The worst part of it all is it will be a self-perpetuating myth that cannot be killed.

    22. Re:Autistic huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still wouldn't believe it, because psychology has turned into some giant ugly monstrosity of a science that within 20 years everyone will be diagnosed with some sort of personality disorder.

      I have a diagnosis for this guy: he's a dick, he's a sociopath, and he's a criminal.

    23. Re:Autistic huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the excuse is typically some variation of "security was not inadequate and I had a civic obligation to expose that fact".

      Seriously, what is the difference between breaking into some company's system and exposing private information and then proclaiming yourself a servant of the people because you exposed a vulnerability and breaking into an individual's computer and exposing private materials?

      None.
      .

    24. Re:Autistic huh? by erroneus · · Score: 1

      First and foremost, autism is diagnosed through behavior only. There is no medical test for it. It's observational data only.

      Secondly, autism is a spectrum disorder so it could literally be a reason for being an asshole. It could also be a reason for worse or more bizarre behavior. But for some, it's not a good excuse for the behavior.

      *I* am on the autistic spectrum and *I* would not do this to anyone. Then again, I'm asking my 2013 self if I would do that... I guess I would be better off asking a much younger version of myself if I would. I think the answer is the same because it is not within me to hurt anyone else in any way but I could see possibly wanting to find ways to peek through someone's webcam secretly.

      In any case, I suspect he'll end up working for the NSA. Having the "mean gene" helps with the job.

    25. Re:Autistic huh? by erroneus · · Score: 1

      Do you not observe the dual nature of understanding we have of behavior? On one hand, we want to blame the individual for his behavior. "I wouldn't do it. I don't think it's right. He must be an asshole." I get that way too sometimes. It's a "relative" measure though. On the other hand, we recognize that chemical and other external forces on people can have extreme and wildly varied behavioral consequences. We all seem to know and accept it when a drug does something to a person. We all accept it when post traumatic stress does things to people. And we even accept it (to a lesser degree) when a person is is psychopathic or sociopathic in nature. (We even celebrate a few of them -- Steve Jobs is a great example of one of those.)

      I invite you to take this into a deeper consideration to try to reconcile this double-standard of understanding into one that makes more sense and offers a more unified understanding of human behavior.

    26. Re:Autistic huh? by ackthpt · · Score: 2

      If he is officially diagnosed, what would you say then?

      I'd say that there's a significant difference between autism and sociopathy. An autistic person frequently doesn't understand how to interact with someone else, but they have enough empathy to know some basics of how *not* to interact.

      He seems to have been highly organized and quite practiced at what he did. I'm a skeptic of his claims.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    27. Re:Autistic huh? by saleenS281 · · Score: 1

      None of that explains how Autism suddenly makes the person believe that blackmail is legal. There's no way he didn't know what he was doing was wrong. If he didn't think it was wrong, he would've have been contacting them anonymously.

    28. Re:Autistic huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It must be awful for you to know that soon people with your ideology will be so completely marginalized you will have no chance of influencing anything. In the paradise we create from the ashes of your empire i promise you will be remembered, we will be sure to tell our children about the neocons and their desperate attempts to keep us in hell. Children will find this puzzling and will always remember how not to be.

    29. Re:Autistic huh? by ruvablue · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Delusions would help a person believe that he would not get caught. If you have never had an obsession, you may not understand how it affects people with autism. I am not saying that he did not know that it was illegal. I think he should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. In his case autism is not an excuse merely a partial explanation for some of his behavior, that does not excuse him or exclude him from the law. In prison he should be treated for his psychiatric conditions just like other prisoners. It is up to the court psychiatrist to determine if he can live safely with the general population in prison due to his autistic symptoms. BTW They are getting closer and closer to be able to do medical tests to see if a person has one of the many types of autism. See: http://www.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00671/abstract

    30. Re:Autistic huh? by gbjbaanb · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think you have it slightly wrong - Do you not observe the dual nature of understanding we have of behavior? On one hand, we want to blame the individual for his behavior. "I wouldn't do it. I don't think it's right. He must be an asshole."

      that's not the case, its "WE decided it shouldn't be done, we don't think its right. He must be not part of our society". Its a standard herd instinct to have a mostly-conforming community to protect ourselves from predatory factors. So this guy, if he's not behaving how we as a society think is acceptable, then he must be a danger to us. Which, when you consider what he's done, is entirely true.

      So punishment is less about him and more about what kind of society we want (or need) to have. We don't accept when drugs etc influence people - the crazed killer still gets locked up for everyone's good, even if he was under the influence at the time. This also shows why drunk driving is treated less harshly - because its something 'ordinary' (ie normal members of our herd) people might do, and not the anti-societal external 'predators'.

    31. Re:Autistic huh? by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      > Or Asperger's and cursing - just because some find it uncontrollable, everyone else excuses their profane language that way.

      I certainly don't. But then again, I never felt it should need a fucking excuse.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    32. Re:Autistic huh? by catmistake · · Score: 1

      Ok... something happened. But I simply can't believe some of the things of which he's accused, nor even if he somehow is a super 1337 hacker right out of the Oracle's apartment in The Matrix, how they expect to prove in a court of law everything they've accused him of in the media. Granted, all 19yr old heterosexual men, without exception, are perverts. So he's guilty of that, at least... but this smacks of a "snow" job to protect the secret life of young women, who I will also have trouble believing are the innocent and pure white angelic virgin saints they are promoted in the media as being. Call me skeptical, but this Smells like Teen Spirit to me.

    33. Re:Autistic huh? by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      I hope not, that would be terrible. We already overpunish people for minor things like its going out of style. 90% give in without a trial and 90% of those who go to trial get convicted. What world are you living in? When there are trials and people get off...it makes national news. Stuff that happens every day doesn't make national news.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    34. Re:Autistic huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why should it matter anyways? We still imprison (and/or execute) people that are retarded or suffer mental illness. We rarely let people off, even when they really had no control. We do this because we are scared. Anyone, under the right circumstances, can go into full-on, white-rage, no-control, killing-spree mode at any time. We still don't really know anything about the mind, so we punish them. We try to do good with chemistry, but we're just not there yet. Random murders > everyone suspicious on drugs.

    35. Re:Autistic huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to defend the perv, but all it takes to ruin a life is for a pretty girl to accuse a boy of anything at all. All it takes for her to want to do that is for someone to become aware of something she'd rather be kept secret, like moonlighting. Please, for the sake of your noble righteousness (if it indeed exists), don't be such a schmuck. Have doubt.

    36. Re:Autistic huh? by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Prison? How draconian. Yes lets take him out of society, put him in with hardened criminals, and finish ruining any chances he has at legal employment in the future, and do it all on our dime. That has worked so great so far.

      I would rather see him get treatment, supervision, and in house incarceration where he has to get a job and go to work every day. Hell, he can pay a portion of that salary to a fund for abused women (I would say his victims but, they likely don't want to be reminded of him every month).

      Maybe its not punishmenty enough to get some law fetishist cocks hard, but I it would still be loss of liberty and hardship on him for a long time, and would likely lead to better outcomes than producing another petty criminal or eventual homeless person a few years down the road.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    37. Re:Autistic huh? by sjames · · Score: 1

      No more of these namby pamby excuses. WAAAAAAHHHHh but he was going to blow up a school bus, WAAAAAAHHHHHh he beat me all my life WAAAAAHHH, he was trying to stab me. No sir, you did it and in our infinite mercy, we will kill you so you know killing is wrong!

      Yes, criminals have tried some pretty lame excuses. The fact is, they rarely work.

      I'm going to bet right now that this guy won't get let off the hook for autism either.

    38. Re:Autistic huh? by sjames · · Score: 1

      Even if as a result of that illness he really and truly had no idea of what was actually happening?

      What's the point of punishing someone for something they had no control over?

    39. Re:Autistic huh? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Why should he be treated differently than someone without autism? Assuming he's not just making up that to try and get a lenient sentence. Do you also worry about other criminals who lose chances of geting legal employment in the future? If you want him to get treatment, what do you mean by that? Anti-extortion pills, anti-sexual-predator pills, or do you think that treatment for autism would cure him of criminal tendencies and absolve him of his past crimes?

      Autism has nothing to do with this crime, it is not an excuse for it. Now maybe he's also got a psychopathic tendency or lack of empathy or something like that, but none of that is an excuse either.

    40. Re:Autistic huh? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I doubt this is the case here, he undoubtedly knew what he was doing and had complete control over it.

      However hypothetically if someone has no knowledge of what they did we already have precedent for that case: confine to a mental health institute. The idea here is that the mental health institute is not a punishment but serves a dual purpose of attempting to treat the problem while keeping someone who is a danger to the public away from the public.

    41. Re:Autistic huh? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Near as I can figure from the paper, they may be able to tell in a post-mortem. But brain dissection and a usable test aren't the same thing (or even close, in many cases).

    42. Re:Autistic huh? by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Your right, I would generally consider this better than imprisonment in the vast majority of cases.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    43. Re:Autistic huh? by Stan92057 · · Score: 1

      Prisons are for punishment they are not for treatment. He must be punished first and if that mean he gets 20 years, well too stinking bad. He should have though about that first before blackmailing women to be his sex slave. And he IS a criminal, he will be with others who think and as as he did so he will be in good company. Hes nothing but scum.

      --
      Jack of all trades,master of none
    44. Re:Autistic huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      As a fully-diagnosed autistic that has known hundreds of others, I have no idea whether the guy is autistic, but I don't buy the idea that being on the spectrum would result in that kind of behavior. A perseveration is just a pleasurably passionate interest in something, akin to a scientist or programmer that is passionate about their current project -- they aren't the same as obsessions (which are unpleasant & non-constructive), and don't cause delusions or sociopathic behavior.

      Relatedly, autism is neurodevelopmental, not psychiatric -- the only reason it's listed in the DSM is because the diagnostic criteria are focused on the individual's outward appearance, behavior, and language use. It does not cause people to be dangerous: aggression only appears in response to others persistently causing pain or distress and not allowing the autistic to escape -- essentially being cornered when in a fight-or-flight state.

    45. Re:Autistic huh? by Stan92057 · · Score: 1

      I dont disagree with you but ya have to understand society will not stand for this behavior and if caught you will be punished.And citation on over punishment. I dont have a clue what thats all about.

      --
      Jack of all trades,master of none
    46. Re:Autistic huh? by erroneus · · Score: 1

      So... kill the gays? And what about you? Is there anything different about you we should know and kill you over?

      I recognize the "ad absurdum" I am applying here, but it's more of a "wake up." Many people, myself included, seek to understand humanity beyond primitive instincts. The thing that makes humanity what it has become is due to its ability to oppress, limit and overcome its instinctive behaviors. We've still got'm and it helps to be aware of them. (And yes, RACISM is just such an instict and it will never go away -- so please -- anti-racism is still actually racism. Just stop it. It's only a problem when you bring attention to it. When given no option to complain, people will eventually find ways to blend in and work together.)

      So to be clear, are you endorsing the notion that it is fair and reasonable to simply put people away or punish them if they have issues beyond their control? We're seeing an alarming rise in such disorders and indicators all seem to point at environmental conditions as they follow localization patterns which do not follow genetics. So, just punish and stop thinking about it?

    47. Re:Autistic huh? by Gorobei · · Score: 1

      Even if as a result of that illness he really and truly had no idea of what was actually happening?

      What's the point of punishing someone for something they had no control over?

      "I have a nude pic of you; show me more or I'll release it" That's blackmail: he understood the mental state of his victim. There is no "no idea what was happening" defense.

    48. Re:Autistic huh? by jrumney · · Score: 1

      Autism might explain a lack of understanding of the girls' rights to privacy. He might not understand the harm of secretly hacking the computers and viewing the webcams because of his autism. But when it comes to using his saved images for extortion, autism is definitely not an excuse.

    49. Re:Autistic huh? by uniquename72 · · Score: 2

      Want to protect marriage? Make divorce illegal. (Oh wait, Republicaans would never do that. But conservatives would.)
      Want to greatly reduce abortions? Make contraception & sex ed easy to get. (Oh wait, Republicaans would never do that. But conservatives would.)
      Want fewer people on welfare? Make a realistic job training program. (Oh wait, Republicaans would never do that. But conservatives would.)

      This (along with a love of running up ridiculous deficits) is why, as a conservative, I can never, ever vote Republican. Instead, I'm stuck with the shitty centrists the Democrats nominate.

    50. Re:Autistic huh? by sjames · · Score: 1

      In the specific case in TFA, I highly doubt that he had no control or that he didn't understand the nature of his acts. The post I was replying to posited a general case so I replied in the general sense.

    51. Re:Autistic huh? by sjames · · Score: 1

      Agreed, I doubt it applies here. It sounds like he knew exactly what he was doing.

      In the more general case, it is not applied in all of the cases it should. Frequently if the defendant is capable of ethical judgement he is found guilty and sent to prison even if what he thought was going on due to delusions would have made his actions reasonable had they been reality.

    52. Re:Autistic huh? by dryeo · · Score: 2

      Also as a father of an autistic son, I have to agree with the AC. What I will add is that the autism should be taken into consideration when/if accused of wrong doing. My son has enough communication difficulties that if the police showed up and accused him of anything, he'd probably come across as guilty, lack of eye contact and verbal responses would probably trigger a cops guilt sense. Same with court, it would be important for Judge and jury to understand he has communication problems and lack of eye contact and short uptight explanations are normal for him.
      Being autistic doesn't mean he doesn't know right from wrong excepting some really corner cases.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    53. Re:Autistic huh? by dryeo · · Score: 1

      The "No True Scotsman" defense. Actually you sound like a centrist, probably fiscally responsible unlike all the conservatives I've met and socially liberal.
      I agree with you but would never call myself a conservative as I have no urge to control peoples bedroom behaviour or stop them having fun as long as it doesn't hurt others.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    54. Re:Autistic huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of what's posted on slashdot is posted by bots. Also, most comments are the result of monkeys with typewriters. This is why so many comments seem reasonable at first but then sorta ajjiosdu90 e9j9js dhj90weij djjzzsamn ooo ooo aahh aahh!

    55. Re:Autistic huh? by u38cg · · Score: 1

      And assholes like you are the reason. FUCK OFF AND DIE.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    56. Re:Autistic huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck that.

      The FBI found on this pervs computer, not just nude photos of Cassidy Wolf, but nude photos and videos of many other women as well.

      There is no reason to doubt her claims here.

      Besides, it's not like this perv and all the damning evidence they found on his computers won't have their day in court.

      But even the perv himself has not stated he didn't do it, or that the girl is making the story up. He simply said he was autistic and expected that to justify the crime you are claiming was fabricated!

    57. Re:Autistic huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fortunately in this particular case, we won't need to take his potential autism into account.

      Why use things like "he won't make eye contact" and "doesn't respond to questions" to infer guilt, when the FBI found the nude pictures of these women on this persons computer?

    58. Re:Autistic huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well OK, just for the sake of argument, lets ignore societies rules and laws for a second, and also just for sake of argument lets look at the specific difference of this person.

      So you claim sexually attacking women by using nude photos of them to extort further sexual favors should not be treated as something to cast aside.
      OK

      Following that logic through, if it's OK this guy sexually harasses women, then isn't it equally OK for all of his victims to sexually harass him in return?

      If you look at the current situation where he will land in prison, as so long as these women claim they are only seeking out this punishment so that he is also sexually abused, then that should make it OK, right?

      So either way, putting this guy in prison is the correct action to take.

      By one view, he is being removed from society so he can't endanger anyone else in the future.
      By the other view, he is simply being put in a position to be sexually attacked, because that would be OK to do as he sexually attacked others first.

    59. Re:Autistic huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From techdirt and other places on the net:

      Creepy Professor Excuses Upskirt Picture-Taking With Creepy Excuse (Stupidity)
        by Timothy Geigner from the seriously-creepy dept on Friday, September 27th, 2013 @ 5:33PM

      http://www.alligator.org/news/campus/article_cd4e3456-2315-11e3-9d20-0019bb2963f4.html

      Don Samuelson's attorney can now claim the autism defense:)

    60. Re:Autistic huh? by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      That is because you haven't realized why a small increase in lo-jack in cars, without any increase in punishments, equates to a disproportionate decrease in car thefts. Those who are willing to commit just about any crime are more worried about getting caught at all than the punishment after getting caught. Making the punishment longer and harsher has shown to have little benefit.

      Which makes perfect sense, its like the poker adage goes "If you never take a bad beat you are playing to tight", but likewise, the one thing a good player tries to avoid is going in on a likely loss....because more frequent small losses add up way bigger than bad beats. (btw, this is why playing good poker is a boring grind and most people can't hack it consistently enough and people who can rake in the money slowly over time)

      Of course, I imagine it is also why most people make poor criminals too. Planning and waiting and finding the perfect opportunity are actual work and take skill....and are a lot less exciting than bluffing your jack shit offsuit because the king just dropped and he probably has the queen right?

      Sure this guy is a different story but, it hardly matters, his activities could easily be curbed and better deterrents to recidivism could be given than tossing him in to socialize with other miscreants. If you don't think working every day, having his activities monitored, and seeing a good chunk of the money he has to work for, week after week, month after month wont drive the point home that he shouldn't keep tickling the dragon's balls, then why should sending him to club convict help?

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    61. Re:Autistic huh? by Eunuchswear · · Score: 2

      Damn, we've been found out. No bananas for us tonight.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    62. Re:Autistic huh? by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      well no. understand that racism is just prejudice - ie pre-judging someone based entirely on trivial differences. Note that the most racist person I ever met was an Indian, who honestly thought India should nuke Pakistan before they did it back to them! Its very liberal to think racism is about skin colour, but its not. Mind you, such prejudices exist in all kinds of areas not common associated with racism - hillbillies are dumb, blondes are stupid, black guys are going to rob you, old people are bad drivers, etc etc. All based on nothing more that judgements that have nothing to do with any individual.

      I'd say what has made humanity is our instinct to control the world around us, including other people. Most of our major discoveries come about due to war after all. Its just that war all the time would not be productive, like everything, moderation is good. But from a society point of view, we need the occasional war to shake us back to life. Strange, but true.

      There are ways to overcome all this - you need to go places like Sweden where they have a very progressive system of criminal re-education and rehabilitation, but they still lock criminals away for some time.

      As for your line "kill the gays", well there are groups that think this is what should happen, but then there are groups that embrace gay culture. Note that this affirms what I said - its the society herd that matters, whether you're different in that group or not. You can be gay in San Francisco and no-one will care - you fit in to that herd, but you can be a gun-nut white supremacist in San Francisco and be persecuted by your fellows. Until you recognise the rabid NRA member who thinks that homosexuality is the work of the devil and should be stopped is someone you are persecuting, will you truly understand the fact that you're viewing the world from the PoV of your herd that you are trying to protect.

    63. Re:Autistic huh? by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      Prisons are for punishment they are not for treatment. He must be punished first

      Why?

      What is the point of "punishing" people?

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    64. Re:Autistic huh? by Stan92057 · · Score: 1

      He needs to be punished. He lost his right to be free and every asshole who does what he has done should take note. There are alot of minor crime worthy of what you speak having his activities monitored but what he did is far beyond a minor crime and not worthy. Our police have better things to do then having to monitor scum bags like this one.

      --
      Jack of all trades,master of none
    65. Re:Autistic huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quite. Fuck rule of law... fuck due process. Who needs that when we have press releases! I seriously doubt the kid has a publicist... he's so fucked. By the way, all it takes for there to be kiddie pr0n, or whathaveyou, on YOUR computer is for someone to put it there when you're not looking. You sick pervert! GP is right. The FBI proper wouldn't do this, but individuals will... ever notice how every single accused leaker of information also has child pr0n? What are the odds of that? Wipe your chin, looks like you got a little crap on it. The methods by which you judge will be used on you as well.

    66. Re:Autistic huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You and your wife should be applauded for the efforts you have put in. Unfortunately as a school employee, I have seen too many parents either refuse to accept that their kids have something wrong and don't do anything to help them or expect that everyone should bend over and put all their efforts into helping their kid. This is a far greater percentage than you and your wife. Where the parent accepts that we are partners in getting their child an education and ready for as much independence as they will be able to handle, I (and all good teachers) will make every effort to make their kids succeed. The kids that fail are the ones that the parents dump the kids onto the school to "fix them" and take no responsibility.

    67. Re:Autistic huh? by dryeo · · Score: 1

      I was responding in the general case. This particular case seems to have lots of evidence against the suspect.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    68. Re:Autistic huh? by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Yes I agree except in that you wouldn't see what I described as punishment. I find that odd, is it just that invasive surveillance is what we should come to expect normally so it can't be a punative?

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    69. Re:Autistic huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Way to advance the conversation, twat.

    70. Re:Autistic huh? by u38cg · · Score: 1
      Better or worse than OMGZ FEMALE MUST MAKE STUPID JOKE?

      lameness filter does not undertand point i make must write more in small caps.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
  2. she invited him in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    since she didn't secure her computer enough

    1. Re:she invited him in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you forgot the sarcasm tag, not everyone will get it

    2. Re:she invited him in by sycodon · · Score: 2

      You think you are being sarcastic, but that view is widely held here judging from past discussions.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    3. Re: she invited him in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hope you secure your ass, because if not...

    4. Re:she invited him in by Stan92057 · · Score: 1

      He has no business at all exploiting anything. So dont blame the girls its all his fault and noone elses. He or anyone else has no business going into anyone else computer for any reason.

      --
      Jack of all trades,master of none
  3. That's incredibly creepy by RevDisk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well, here's hoping that Abrahams gets a fairly long sentence. Coercion and blackmail is coercion and blackmail, regardless of the circumstances.

    1. Re:That's incredibly creepy by i+kan+reed · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      And blackmail into sexual activities is rape, even if it doesn't meet the legal definition. Seems like it would violate a person in all the same ways.

    2. Re:That's incredibly creepy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What we learn from this:
      If a student spies on someone its a crime but if government does the same it's not.
      How does the saying go, do as I say but don't do what I do ?

    3. Re:That's incredibly creepy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And blackmail into sexual activities is rape, even if it doesn't meet the legal definition. Seems like it would violate a person in all the same ways.

      No, it's not. It may be a "violation," but if it doesn't meet the definition of rape, it's not rape.

      If you expand the definition of rape to include anything you don't like, it will end up being a word with no real meaning at all.

    4. Re:That's incredibly creepy by timeOday · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It won't get your pregnant or give you an STD or get you killed if you struggle. My vote is for preserving the word for its actual meaning.

    5. Re:That's incredibly creepy by Minwee · · Score: 1

      He's guilty. We all know it.

      I'm sorry, is Due Process inconvenient for you? We'll just get rid of it and replace it with "If he was charged, then he must by guilty and if he's guilty then he has no rights so let's go all wild west on his ass."

      Oh, and by the way, there's an armed mob outside who would like to talk with you about some unpaid parking tickets.

    6. Re:That's incredibly creepy by i+kan+reed · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not all rape has any of those, and in fact most rapes don't. Rape doesn't have to be violent to be terribly degrading.

    7. Re:That's incredibly creepy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This kid shouldn't have gotten arrested. The person who found him out should have.

      James Clapper

    8. Re:That's incredibly creepy by FrankSchwab · · Score: 1

      Relationships don't have to be violent to be terribly degrading...
      Seventh grade doesn't have to be violent to be terribly degrading....
      Work doesn't have to be violent to be terribly degrading...

      If "terribly degrading" is your definition of rape, it's a crime far more prevalent than ever before thought.

      --
      And the worms ate into his brain.
    9. Re:That's incredibly creepy by fche · · Score: 4, Informative

      OTOH, a terribly degrading thing doesn't have to be called rape.

    10. Re:That's incredibly creepy by houghi · · Score: 1

      If he asked to play music in the background, that would put him in jail for a seriously long time. Just extortion? Not so much.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    11. Re:That's incredibly creepy by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      You idiot, my definition of rape is quite clear, from the top of the thread "non-consensual sexual activity". I'm sorry you've bought into the myth that rapes are mostly perpetuated by homeless people hiding in the bushes or whatever kind of story is in your head, but that's not how reality is.

    12. Re:That's incredibly creepy by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      If "terribly degrading" is your definition of rape, it's a crime far more prevalent than ever before thought.

      Nowhere did he say that was his definition of the term; i kan reed was ascribing a particular aspect of rape, and in that is not particularly incorrect.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    13. Re:That's incredibly creepy by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 1

      Of course it's not a crime when a government spies, that's a normal part of their activity. Are you simple?

    14. Re:That's incredibly creepy by i+kan+reed · · Score: 0

      Yes, but as a degrading, non-consensual, sexual thing it seems like a convenient shorthand for the category of harm being done.

    15. Re:That's incredibly creepy by misexistentialist · · Score: 0

      Lots of stuff is degrading, but come on now, rape requires force, in the mechanical sense. No, cyber-sex isn't real, you're still a virgin!

    16. Re:That's incredibly creepy by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 4, Funny

      >> If you expand the definition of rape to include anything you don't like, it will end up being a word with no real meaning at all.

      Oh, quit yer raping.

    17. Re:That's incredibly creepy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, he clearly must be guilty and have already been convicted of such in a court of law, else a well-respected and established news organization wouldn't have RELEASED HIS FULL NAME TO THE PUBLIC like some disorganized middle-school journalism class, right? Right? Hey, where's everyone going?

    18. Re:That's incredibly creepy by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      Lots of stuff is degrading, but come on now, rape requires force, in the mechanical sense.

      This is a thing a lot of rapists say. "Oh, sure, she said no, but she didn't fight back."

    19. Re:That's incredibly creepy by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      So what the kid should have done, is get a job with the government.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    20. Re:That's incredibly creepy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What he did was almost digital (virtual) rape. It doesn't have the physical repercussion of a rape, but psychologically it's damn close.

    21. Re:That's incredibly creepy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      not true, the threat of violence or the victim being incapacitated are also grounds for rape classification

    22. Re:That's incredibly creepy by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      Mechanical force isn't necessrary. Threat of violence or threat of other reprocussions are enough.

      I'm with you, though... ...blackmail isn't rape, even if you blackmail people for more nudes.

    23. Re:That's incredibly creepy by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 2

      but come on now, rape requires force, in the mechanical sense.

      Only in the manner that "force, in the mechanical sense" is necessary for all movement. (Including cyber-sex; masturbation is movement and involved mechanical force.)

      Only a minority of rapes involve force in the sense of violence or the threat thereof. Most involve alcohol or other drugs. (Mostly alcohol. "Date rape drugs" are about 90% myth.) This is because the people doing most of the raping are repeat offenders who carefully plan their actions. They're not leaping out of the bushes onto strangers; they're planning an attack on an acquaintance, "friend", or family member, and they're smart enough to know that it's a heck of a lot easier if the victim is intoxicated.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    24. Re:That's incredibly creepy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, a long sentence followed by extradition to Moldovia (where one of his victims is, apparently, located).

    25. Re:That's incredibly creepy by JMandingo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Young Jared James Abrahams, I hereby sentence you to 20 years of coding for the NSA. Our country needs young innovators with such talents to preserve our eternal safety from those who would do us harm. As your reward, you can have access to all the nude webcam photos you want, we have the worlds largest data center chock full of the bestest stuff.

      --
      Vonnegut was right: Of all the words of mice and men, the saddest are, "It might have been."
    26. Re:That's incredibly creepy by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 1

      Please cite a case of a government agent hacking into someone's laptop, acquiring naked pictures of them, and then blackmailing the person using the naked pictures.

      It boggles my mind that multiple people found this comment "insightful".

    27. Re:That's incredibly creepy by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      Like, say, statutory rape?

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    28. Re:That's incredibly creepy by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      "Journalistic standards"

      You people from the 20th century are so cute with your silly archaic ideas.

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    29. Re:That's incredibly creepy by whoop · · Score: 3, Funny

      If we're throwing away definitions, why not call it mass genocide, detonating WMDs, or even worse, patent troll?

    30. Re:That's incredibly creepy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he kant reed

    31. Re:That's incredibly creepy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you expand the definition of rape to include anything you don't like, it will end up being a word with no real meaning at all.

      My wife says that "sex" is anything I do with another woman that my wife doesn't like.

    32. Re:That's incredibly creepy by giorgist · · Score: 1

      You terrorist !!

    33. Re:That's incredibly creepy by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      Well, from my knowledge of cold war spying activities - knowledge I admit is entirely gleaned from books and films and tabloid media - 'honey trap' activities is a well known means to obtain information from a target.

      'course government have hot spies to do this activity in person, no grainy webcam needed.

    34. Re:That's incredibly creepy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      regardless of the circumstances.

      And what if the circumstances were that this boy was purchasing webcam porn, and recognized the artist, and merely opened his mouth and asked "hey, you look like soandso! Are you that beauty queen?" And lets say he ran some trackers through emails or sms to satisfy his curiosity. Then lets say the artist or her handlers made up the entire extortion story, had the boy arrested and informed the papers of his unconscionable crimes.

      Not to sound misogynistic, but the point is, don't just eat the bullshit and condemn another when the only story were getting is coming from a girl.

      I never really believe what women tell me.

      -Steven Wright

      Ladies, I love your gentle gender and I suffer and burn with the rest of mankind... but wiser words were never spoken.

    35. Re:That's incredibly creepy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How the fuck is this MRA shit marked Insightful?

      Fuck you all who wasted mod points on this. Co-ersion by blackmail IS rape you sick fucks.

    36. Re:That's incredibly creepy by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      If you expand the definition of rape to include anything you don't like, it will end up being a word with no real meaning at all.

      O RLY? Origin: 1250â"1300; (v.) Middle English rapen . Try reading the definitions; the original meaning is still a valid meaning. I don't have OED access so I don't know when the meaning narrowed to mostly specify sexual assault, but that's what happened. The legal definition varies and often involves penetration, although those definitions are outdated and being updated.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    37. Re:That's incredibly creepy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And blackmail into sexual activities is rape, even if it doesn't meet the legal definition. Seems like it would violate a person in all the same ways.

      Depends on your locale. In many places, blackmail sex is legally rape.

    38. Re:That's incredibly creepy by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

      No, for that one, the definition of "rape" is the same, it's "consent" that changes definition under statutory rape.

    39. Re:That's incredibly creepy by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      There's no requirement we follow due process before coming up with an opinion. Why do you hate opinions so?

    40. Re:That's incredibly creepy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean, as in crying 'racist' everytime someone disagrees with your opinions?

    41. Re:That's incredibly creepy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LMFAO... Daily Mail. Boy, you stupid or just trollin?

      Are you going to cite The National Enquirer next? I'm sure The Sun is just as reputable.

    42. Re:That's incredibly creepy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh no, it's cool if you just creep on people without extorting them with nude pictures.

    43. Re:That's incredibly creepy by FuzzNugget · · Score: 1

      I think the one you're looking for is: before pointing out the spec in someone's eye, take the plank out of your own.

    44. Re:That's incredibly creepy by evilviper · · Score: 1

      If a student spies on someone its a crime but if government does the same it's not.

      If a *cop* cuffs you, throws you in the back of his car, and locks you up in a tiny cell, it's okay, but if *I* do it to my ex, somehow I'm the bad guy? Hrmph.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    45. Re:That's incredibly creepy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOVINT

    46. Re:That's incredibly creepy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It boggles my mind that multiple people found this comment "insightful".

      There is a world of difference between a government that spies on so-called friends and one that spies on enemies. The fact that you don't seem to be able to tell the difference says more about you than the PP. A government that spies on friends is unethical. Maybe not as much as a blackmailer but on a much larger scale. The NSA doesn't realize it yet but it's actions have made millions of enemies of former US friends around the world.

    47. Re:That's incredibly creepy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an imbecile there's a universe of distance between the "terrible degrading" situation of Seventh grade and that of a rape you fucking clueless cretin.

    48. Re:That's incredibly creepy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do know that blackmail is standard practice in intelligence work, right, both US and non-US? I don't imagine that the police are above suggesting to someone who they think knows something that it might "somehow" slip out that he's a rat and that he should really talk for his own good so they can protect him. Which is blackmail. In any case, the blackmail is not what the OP was talking about, so your response is off topic. He only commented on the spying part of the case, and indeed, merely the spying part of what this person did IS a crime - and should be. At the same time, if the NSA had intercepted those packets going across the internet and stored them, that would not be a crime. The post your are responding to is 100% correct. You would be better off arguing the case that this situation is reasonable (which it might or might not be) than trying to change the subject.

    49. Re:That's incredibly creepy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You idiot, my definition of rape is quite clear, from the top of the thread "non-consensual sexual activity". I'm sorry you've bought into the myth that rapes are mostly perpetuated by homeless people hiding in the bushes or whatever kind of story is in your head, but that's not how reality is.

      That's it not at all clear, actually, but OK, let's go with that. Your definition is profoundly lacking. Looking at someone's breasts is a sexual activity. Many women don't consent to random strangers staring at their chest. You've just defined a stray glance as rape! Women who briefly glance at my crotch (yes, it happens) and whose attention I don't welcome would be raping me too, under your definition, and would need to go to prison for a few years - unless you want to say that some rapes are OK?

    50. Re:That's incredibly creepy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is fairly impossible for a man to interpret correctly all female communications. It is also true that a lot of ladies would behave as they would not want any of it just to increase tension and following pleasure.

    51. Re:That's incredibly creepy by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      Well, given that the US seems to think a few firecrackers in a pressure cooker is a WMD...

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    52. Re:That's incredibly creepy by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      Attempted?

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    53. Re:That's incredibly creepy by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      Given that one of the latest revelations was that NSA staffers were spying on their "girlfriends", just because they could...

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    54. Re:That's incredibly creepy by Fjandr · · Score: 1

      If it was coercion into physical sexual contact between the blackmailer and the victim, it would be rape. That's not what happened. Rape requires actual physical contact between the perpetrator and the victim. Anything else is not rape, and attempting to redefine the word strictly for shock factor is intellectual fraud.

  4. Hope they throw the book at him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This goes *way* beyond teenage fun and games. He deserves to spend some time in custody.

    1. Re:Hope they throw the book at him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Huh? The guy's a adult, not a child!

    2. Re:Hope they throw the book at him by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      I was reading earlier this week that "child" goes up to age 25 now.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    3. Re:Hope they throw the book at him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "a adult"?

      Back to elementary school with you until you learn the difference between "a" and "an". Most people pick this up in first grade, if not kindergarten...

    4. Re:Hope they throw the book at him by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      You were reading that, were you.

      How interesting.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    5. Re:Hope they throw the book at him by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Reading. Try it.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    6. Re:Hope they throw the book at him by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      I read lots.

      You said:

      I was reading earlier this week that "child" goes up to age 25 now.

      Which is pretty much fact free.

      Where were you reading it.

      In some countries where I have lived "child" now seems to end at 10.(*)

      Without context you have no idea what I'm talking about.

      ((*)The two ten year old boys who killed Jamie Bulger were tried as adults)

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    7. Re:Hope they throw the book at him by Fjandr · · Score: 1

      The word used was "teenager," not "child." Someone who is 19 is still a teenager, since the number ends with the suffix "teen."

  5. totally forgiveable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Eisner told CNN affiliate KTLA that Abrahams is autistic.

    Oh, well that's makes his actions okay then.

    1. Re:totally forgiveable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1DX4PJkyCxM

      Replace "retarded" with "autistic" and there you go.

  6. Feeling "profound regret"... by hey! · · Score: 4, Funny

    Funny how being caught does that to people.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    1. Re:Feeling "profound regret"... by LordNimon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That makes sense. Until you are caught, you typically have only your perspective on what you're doing. There's no one else out there telling you that you've made a mistake. A lot of people change their minds about their activities once they realize that other people don't approve.

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    2. Re:Feeling "profound regret"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's his family that is expressing regret, not him.

    3. Re:Feeling "profound regret"... by CanHasDIY · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That makes sense. Until you are caught, you typically have only your perspective on what you're doing. There's no one else out there telling you that you've made a mistake. A lot of people change their minds about their activities once they realize that other people don't approve.

      Ah, bullshit - I stole a pair of JNCO jeans once when I was a pre-teen, and believe me, I didn't need anyone else to tell me that I was in the wrong for doing it.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    4. Re:Feeling "profound regret"... by Solandri · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Until you are caught, you typically have only your perspective on what you're doing. There's no one else out there telling you that you've made a mistake.

      Thing is, extortion isn't something you do alone. There's always the victim you're extorting. And the fact that you're extorting them means you fully understand what you're doing is against their wishes.

      Maybe he didn't fully comprehend the full extent of the emotional distress he was causing in his vicitms. But he damn well knew that "their perspective" of it was that they didn't want it to happen. Otherwise he would've just sent them an email asking them to pose nude, no extortion attempt.

    5. Re:Feeling "profound regret"... by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      In fairness, I think it was his family that was expressing regret. As well they might.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    6. Re:Feeling "profound regret"... by roc97007 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Wow, just the other day, a woman mugged an elderly lady in a restaurant, and when caught insisted the mugging was justified because "the lady was rich. She was eating at a restaurant". It's amazing what mental gyrations people will go through to justify actions that the rest of us are pretty sure are wrong.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    7. Re:Feeling "profound regret"... by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Indeed; I fear that cognitive dissonance has infected the herd mind, and is quickly becoming pandemic.

      The worst part is, I'm not sure there's anything any of us can do to stop it.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    8. Re:Feeling "profound regret"... by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      That makes sense. Until you are caught, you typically have only your perspective on what you're doing. There's no one else out there telling you that you've made a mistake. A lot of people change their minds about their activities once they realize that other people don't approve.

      No, it only makes a sociopath sorry they were caught. Someone actually capable of feeling empathy would have thought about it after the first crime, not continue to do it 40 more times.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    9. Re:Feeling "profound regret"... by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Get out of the way, don't call attention to one's self, take steps to protect one's family, and wait it out. I think that's about it.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    10. Re:Feeling "profound regret"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately you're right on the money. Though banning broadcast of The View and Fox News would go along way toward lessening groupthink.

    11. Re:Feeling "profound regret"... by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      Until you are caught, you typically have only your perspective on what you're doing. There's no one else out there telling you that you've made a mistake. A lot of people change their minds about their activities once they realize that other people don't approve.

      Most people learn that lesson by time they're five or six.

    12. Re:Feeling "profound regret"... by karmawhore · · Score: 1

      Ah, bullshit - I stole a pair of JNCO jeans once when I was a pre-teen, and believe me, I didn't need anyone else to tell me that I was in the wrong for doing it.

      It could be argued that you helped the person you stole them from.

      --
      =kw= lurkin' to please
    13. Re:Feeling "profound regret"... by Beeftopia · · Score: 1

      A lot of people change their minds about their activities once they realize that other people don't approve.

      By trying to hide his activities, he already know that others don't approve. By threatening the victim with pain in order to get them to do what he wants, he shows he understand human motivations and behavior.

      This indicates a normal, or perhaps even above-normal understanding of human behavior. Very far from autistic.

    14. Re:Feeling "profound regret"... by seebs · · Score: 1

      I think it's more complex than that. Autism and sociopathy are wildly different. Sociopaths don't feel sorry even after getting caught, although they may regret getting caught. Autistics may fail to evaluate other people's emotions or responses even in places where you'd expect "everyone" to, but are not necessarily going to be unconcerned once they do notice or get told.

      --
      My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
    15. Re:Feeling "profound regret"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed; I fear that cognitive dissonance has infected the herd mind, and is quickly becoming pandemic.

      The worst part is, I'm not sure there's anything any of us can do to stop it.

      There is something we can do to stop it, but unfortunately the Third Reich made death camps look bad.

    16. Re:Feeling "profound regret"... by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      My god you seem to spend a lot of time reading odd stuff.

      Thanks again for sharing it with us.

      Wouild be nice if you gave enough details for us to work out whether it was just crap running out of your imagination.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    17. Re:Feeling "profound regret"... by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Sigh. very well, I'll do your footwork for you. I recommend reading a newspaper once in awhile. Or you could have googled "she's rich. she's eating at a restaurant" and got several hits from that.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    18. Re:Feeling "profound regret"... by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      Welll I do read a newspaper, but it's libé, so not much New York news.

      I did google "the lady was rich. She was eating at a restaurant", but nothing came up except this slashdot thread.

      I didn't google "“That gave me no right to snatch your stuff, period.” either.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
  7. I've never heard of autism causing extortion by kawabago · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Someone with enough knowledge to commit this crime can't possibly hide behind autism as an excuse. This person formed intent, then a plan and executed the plan uncounted times. He communicated his intentions quite well which doesn't really point to autism. This young man is a sexual predator and probably always will be. Autism doesn't make you a pervert either, you have do that on your own.

    1. Re:I've never heard of autism causing extortion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the modern language, Autism = "a bit nerdy/geeky" - basically like all of us here. Most of us don't consider it to be an illness that excuses not trying to fit in.

    2. Re:I've never heard of autism causing extortion by guanxi · · Score: 0

      and probably always will be

      Is that based on your evaluation of him?

    3. Re:I've never heard of autism causing extortion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and probably always will be

      Is that based on your evaluation of him?

      A life time of observation of people similar to him.

    4. Re:I've never heard of autism causing extortion by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Severe legislative penalties (long terms, put on notification offenders' lists when released) presume a significant chance of recidivism.

      Talk to your legislators the next time they review this

      As for this case, it sounds more like he's a garden-variety piece of shit rather than a sexual predator piece of shit. He just used perve techniques for good old blackmail. Would serve him right though, especially if any victims were underage, hit with child porn production while at it.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    5. Re:I've never heard of autism causing extortion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Autism is a spectrum. This whole story screams Asperger's to me. Most people on Slashdot either have Asperger's or have colleagues with Asperger's.

      That said, I don't think Autism or Asperger's excuses his behavior.

    6. Re:I've never heard of autism causing extortion by jklovanc · · Score: 2

      I have Asperger's Syndrome an Autism spectrum disorder. Autism is a spectrum meaning that almost everyone has it to some degree. The difference between a quirk and a disorder is that a disorder gets in the way of every day life. Sure every geek is awkward at times but autism is a different thing. For example, most people keep eye contact pretty well. I have to think about it because my natural tendency is to watch someone's mouth when they speak because that is where the information is coming from. I get little information from facial expressions until I think about them and compare them with past experiences. This makes social interactions very tiring as I have to think about everything; very little come intuitively. I have learned why I get exhausted and frustrated in social situations and have, since the diagnosis, found ways to deal with it. So your definition of autism disorder being a bit nerdy/geeky is way off.

      That being said, I do not see it as any justification for breaking the law. In fact I see it as a reason for harsher punishment. Autistic people do not get social cues so we have a tendency to be rule followers. Autism has nothing to do with confusing right and wrong. I think the mention of autism was to garner sympathy and maybe a lesser sentence. I say throw the book at him.

    7. Re:I've never heard of autism causing extortion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apologies, my intention was not to imply that autism does not exist. I was just pointing out that there is a modern tendancy for people who would, in the past, fall into the "socially awkward" category to self-diagnose as having autism. Everyone should stop and wonder why all of a sudden there is such an increase in the population who is autistic, and ask where they have all come from - where were these people as a percentage of the population 50 years ago, 100 years ago etc. I do not doubt there are genuine cases. I do doubt that the majority of people who so loudly claim to be autistic actually are. I suspect the genuine sufferers keep it a bit quieter.

    8. Re:I've never heard of autism causing extortion by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      I have to think about it because my natural tendency is to watch someone's mouth when they speak because that is where the information is coming from.

      but my natural tendency is to watch someone's cleavage when they speak because... well, 'cos I'm a bloke. Maybe this is why women think all men are autistic :-)

    9. Re:I've never heard of autism causing extortion by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      Men's cleavage? Oh, wait, that was a joke. I had to thing about that for a minute.

    10. Re:I've never heard of autism causing extortion by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      He communicated his intentions quite well which doesn't really point to autism.

      It may not point to autism being the cause of the crime, but it says *nothing* about whether the person committing it was autistic.

      Autism doesn't make you a pervert either, you have do that on your own.

      What would an Autistic pervert do? I'll be selling WWAPD bumper stickers next week.

    11. Re:I've never heard of autism causing extortion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The older autistics were present all along. There are three primary explanations for this:

      1) 40+ years ago, flamingly autistic children were commonly misdiagnosed as having a severe psychiatric disorder or mental retardation --then new versions of the DSM radically changed diagnostic criteria, and pediatricians started to be educated about how to identify autism. A study of Calfornia's diagnostic rates for various conditions performed several years ago showed that the "epidemic" increase in autism over the decades was in sync with a "decrease" in those other conditions. (One interesting researcher's post I found is here)

      2) After parents stopped institutionalizing their disabled kids in the 70s, if a child diagnosed with classic autism (e.g. lost speech or never developed it) started speaking, the diagnosis was rescinded even if the child still was autistic in every other way. Those kids usually weren't told about the diagnosis, so they had no idea why they struggled in certain areas of life until well into adulthood, at which point most asked their parents and/or had a neuropsych confirm the diagnosis.

      3) This part refers to the people that weren't diagnosed, but might have been if they were kids today:

      50+ years ago, social hierarchy & rules were simple and had little ambiguity, which made it easier for autistic kids to know precisely what to do/say without having to read subtle clues to know how to act. Similarly, fashion was fairly simple, so it wasn't hard to buy the same attire as others. Odd as it sounds, as long as an autistic stayed within the framework of those rules, society was more tolerant than ours is of their individual quirks like rarely making eye contact or perseverating on model trains. (I'm not saying I'd want to live back then, but in terms of being socially accepted, it wasn't as hard.)

      Kids back then were expected to mature at very different rates, and spent most of their non-school time unsupervised from age 5 onwards; the rules were concrete & simple to follow, so they blended in there as well. Classes were quiet & well-behaved, so the auties weren't distracted, and there was enough recess to wear off the edge of their energy so they wouldn't struggle to sit still.

      Young autistics also weren't at a huge disadvantage when it came to employment. The strict social rules made it easy to know what to wear & how to act, and employers hired them at entry-level knowing that it'd involve training them as total newbies, so there wasn't the pressure to be experienced professionals right away.

      So on and so forth.

      As for real autistics speaking openly about it, most of the autistics I've known were open about it (with the exception of the ones ashamed of what they are), but we don't bring it into every conversation. I think that you're picking up on the effect of it being a big media story -- the rare times a possibly-autistic person is mentioned in the media, it's because either they did something horrible or are being interviewed regarding the condition.

    12. Re:I've never heard of autism causing extortion by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      I suspect the genuine sufferers keep it a bit quieter.

      I am actually quite open about autism. It seems to help people understand why I wig out sometimes and need space. The difference is that I do not use it as an excuse and I apologize when I screw up.

      BTW, I agree with everything the other reply said. There are a lot of factors involving the "autism epidemic".

  8. Future job rejection.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mr. Jared James Abrahams,

    We have decided to go with another candidate.

    Thank you for applying.

    Sincerely,

    HR/Hiring Manger person.

    He WILL get those.

    And there's not a goddamn thing he can do about them.

    Suck it.

    1. Re:Future job rejection.... by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      Pretty sure the kitchen crew at his prison will be "hiring."

    2. Re:Future job rejection.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Supplemented as part-time felcher. I hear there's good bank in that profession.

  9. This is a bully. by SternisheFan · · Score: 3, Insightful
    This is what bullying is, taking unfair advantage over someone else. In this case the suspect had enough knowledge to manipulate others computers, but not enough know-how to keep himself from handcuffs. Great! This 19 year old punk-ass is going to jail for (hopefully) a very long time, long term probation at the very least. I don't care that he's still in his 'teen' years, 18 is considered old enough to be considered an adult, and he will be tried as one.

    I applaud this brave young lady for standing up to this creep. She did the right thing.

    1. Re:This is a bully. by CauseBy · · Score: 2

      "This is what bullying is, taking unfair advantage over someone else."

      That's also called "the free market". (Which is one reason why free markets are bad.)

    2. Re:This is a bully. by AK+Marc · · Score: 0

      In a "free market" you have all the information and the ability to set up a competitor at a $0 cost. "Free markets" are hated because they put more power in the buyer's hand than currently. Free markets have never been tried, the amount of regulation to require it is excessive (greater than any other amount of regulations placed on industry so far), and is easily broken by bad actors, so all members of the free market would be working to break it. It's unstable and impossible, that's why it's "bad".

    3. Re:This is a bully. by ruir · · Score: 1

      I bet he will be a sensation in jail and will pick up many soaps in the shower.

    4. Re:This is a bully. by SternisheFan · · Score: 1
      Can't be too clean in 'stir', eh? No, doesn't look like the type who can handle prison well. God knows how much his parents are going to have to pay in lawyer fees. This is why it's so important that a man or woman must develop a moral code asap in their life. Do the right thing, always.

      If this guy hadn't have been stopped, he would likely have continued, hurting more innocents, getting bolder. Might have turned into a full-fledged rapist, murderer. He got some taste of power over people, and found he liked it, and wouldn't have stopped himself. Not a man, imo, just another run of the mill bully coward.

    5. Re:This is a bully. by CauseBy · · Score: 1

      What you described isn't a free market, what you described is "perfect competition". A free market is a market without any regulations, where the state is involved only to enforce contracts.

    6. Re:This is a bully. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      A quick look on Wikipedia, though I did not doubt myself with numerous years of economics study, seems to agree with my opinion, though it did mention that there is some dispute. You can call it whatever you like. A free market is one where the buyers are free. They know what they are getting and sellers are competing for their money.

  10. NSA material by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    He should join the NSA once he's out of jail. He has a bright future there.

    1. Re:NSA material by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This guy is just a script kiddie. He did not come up with anything new, or use any self created malware.

      Anyone could do what he did if they were willing to invest the time in it.

      He is not NSA material, as all accounts point to the hacking that they do being very sophisticated (e.g. Flame, Stuxnet, etc).

  11. Pfffft by WOOFYGOOFY · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Another criminal genius bites the dust!

    Actually what I think is the court should take into account is the fact that this person's brain is not developed yet which might lead him to do... that.. and think 1) it's a fine thing to do and 2) he'd get away with it.

    They do this in Europe- take the age and developmental stage of the defendant into account as it interacts with the defendants s crime.

    We live in a world of humans. Some young humans spontaneously think up criminal acts to engage in. This is always a risk. We have no reliable way of making young humans be other than they are, no way to avoid developing brains doing bad , even outrageous things. Everyone involved really ought to consider that before they put him in the no-rehab hell-on-earth called American prisons for 20 years and turn him into a REAL criminal.

    My liberal bleeding heart at work overtime.

    1. Re:Pfffft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What do you mean "the fact that this person's brain is not developed yet"? He's 19, for fucks sake. When I was 19 I was putting myself through college, working and providing for my younger sister.

      And as for the "autistic" get-out-of-jail-free card, give me a fucking break. It's getting really old, really fast.

      If some loser had done this to my sister I would have shattered both his knee caps without thinking twice. Low life scum doesn't deserve to walk.

    2. Re:Pfffft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      and turn him into a REAL criminal.

      So computer fraud, blackmail, coercion, and 2nd degree rape aren't real crimes. There's not real criminals that are locked up for that? How about this guy becomes your kids teacher or principal then we will see how opposed you are to him getting a 'slap on the wrist' just to appease your 'bleeding heart'.

    3. Re:Pfffft by mrbester · · Score: 1

      He isn't a retard. He's claiming to be autistic. Big difference.

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
    4. Re:Pfffft by Valdrax · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually what I think is the court should take into account is the fact that this person's brain is not developed yet which might lead him to do... that.. and think 1) it's a fine thing to do and 2) he'd get away with it.

      He's 19. He is legally an adult and should have more than a well-enough developed brain to realize that sexually blackmailing women is wrong. Most people would easily grasp the concept years before.

      That knocks out #1, which is really the only relevant point because you don't deserve any leeway for thinking that it's okay to do something wrong so long as you don't get caught for it. Poor impulse control and an inattention to the consequences of one's actions at that age is the opposite of a mitigating factor.

      Everyone involved really ought to consider that before they put him in the no-rehab hell-on-earth called American prisons for 20 years and turn him into a REAL criminal.

      This isn't just some little ha-ha prank or delinquency. He broke into a person's computer, commandeered it for his own amusement, and then threatened the future life and career of a woman if she refused to degrade herself for his sick sexual entertainment. The first half? Maybe your argument holds water. The second? That IS being a real criminal. This was sexual assault in all but contact -- that same sort sexual self-gratification through the control and degradation of an unwilling party.

      I won't disagree that 20 years in the current system will do next to nothing to reform him or prepare him for better integration into society, but let's not pretend that he deserves to get special, kids-gloves attention just because the system is broken. What he did was flat out evil and deserves to be punished -- harshly -- by whatever standards we have as a society set for sexual predators and blackmailers. Because that is what he is.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    5. Re:Pfffft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would have been trace routing the stuff. And basically been doing the police work for myself. Then walking into the local FBI office with 'hey want an easy case of extortion and wire fraud?'. If that did not work my next stop would be my local lawyer for some good ol fashioned suing of the bully and court ordered restraining orders. I would not care the cost.

      Its amazing how far you can go with a nice smile and being nice to those who can really make someone elses life hell.

      This dude is nothing more than a common blackmailer. I am sure there is a flotilla of other crimes he committed here. Once maybe, but 30 different people? And this your dream of being a model will be transformed into a pornstar. Just wow... That is not someone who is 'sick'. This is a calculated person who knows what sort of crime they are committing. If he gets to a jury. The proceedings will not take long for them to come back with a unanimous guilty verdict on all counts.

    6. Re:Pfffft by aitikin · · Score: 2

      Your liberal heart is ignoring the cynic that must be present as well. There's a high probability that this is NOT an autistic individual, merely a person who was diagnosed as autistic at the parents' wishes. This is a HUGE problem in America and one of the reasons that parents of truly autistic children have a hard time with the systems in place.

      My anecdotal evidence for my view point is the fact that the lady who lived at the end of the block I grew up on had a son. That son was not diagnosed by their first physician, nor their second with autism. Finally, after 3, possibly 4 different physicians saw him, she found one that considered him autistic. After finding this, she decided that he needed special attention throughout school and, when the school district wouldn't give him the attention she felt he needed, she tried 4 different schools before she decided to home school him.

      Now, this child (at the time I last saw him, he was approximately 8-10) is odd, and has some weird tendencies (at one point, their neighbor was selling their house and he went over and wrote in chalk on their driveway "WAY OVERPRICED"), I would describe him as socially inept, but he doesn't behave like other autistic children I've encountered. In fact, he doesn't behave like children or people with Asperger Syndrome even. My mother and I were walking our dog and he yelled out to us to say hi and ask if the dog had gone "poopie" yet. Anyone familiar with these disorders knows that this is unusual to the point of it being near impossible.

      Moral of the story, if you look hard enough you can find someone who will say whatever you want them to, and if I were doing something like this and got caught, I'd make it a point to get at least one person to claim me mentally deranged.

      --
      "Don't meddle in the affairs of a patent dragon, for thou art tasty and good with ketchup." ~ohcrapitssteve
    7. Re:Pfffft by roc97007 · · Score: 2

      Actually what I think is the court should take into account is the fact that this person's brain is not developed yet which might lead him to do... that.. and think 1) it's a fine thing to do and 2) he'd get away with it.

      He's 19. He is legally an adult and should have more than a well-enough developed brain to realize that sexually blackmailing women is wrong. Most people would easily grasp the concept years before.

      That knocks out #1, which is really the only relevant point because you don't deserve any leeway for thinking that it's okay to do something wrong so long as you don't get caught for it. Poor impulse control and an inattention to the consequences of one's actions at that age is the opposite of a mitigating factor.

      Agreed.

      What scares me a little was the article earlier this week where the government wants to consider people juveniles up to age 25. Different context, but I wonder when this thought process will spill into the criminal justice realm.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    8. Re:Pfffft by charlesj68 · · Score: 1

      You haven't noticed that the newest trend is to consider *25* as the age of mental maturity?

      http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-24173194

      :-/

    9. Re:Pfffft by rea1l1 · · Score: 1

      Well, there goes another life to a living hell. Its his fault, right? He made an error.

      Whats a good metaphor in computer terms?....
      Developing a program and while running tests, if you ever get an error, trashing the entire program and starting from scratch?

      Whats a good metaphor in sports terms?....
      While playing basketball the person with the ball steps out of bounds and he may now never play basketball again?

      I personally have a very high regard for human life, more than anything else on this planet.
      I feel that we should nurture each other as absolutely best as possible. This is what I want for myself, for everyone.
      If something is wrong, we should try to fix that wrong at whatever expense.
      (that is what being civilized is - being CONSTRUCTIVE as opposed to DESTRUCTIVE

      He caused psychological and social damage to some young women.
      Should society throw his life away now, forcing him into permanent submission to its will?
      Should society make him a slave? Shall we battle them in an area, to exact our price?

      Society should seek to repair him. When he has been evaluated as repaired, return his freedom to him.
      We should also examine and document this whole situation for science, for psychology.
      What happened to him?!? Why did he slip? What events or lack of events can he identify that lead him to his error?
      Run psychological evaluations of this man while treating him humanely. Treat him like a human being.
      Show him the respect of another living creature.
      Don't force him to be raped. Don't force him to be a slave. Don't force him to live in hell.

      Don't act out of anger, vengeance, hate or disgust. Act out of love.

      Act like a father, act like a mother, for society is our ultimate mother, ultimate father.

      No one is perfect. Everyone slips to their carnal callings.

      It is only out of mutual self-understanding that we continue to progress into our mutual full potential.

      Here is someone's son. He has hurt many daughters, no doubt, but he is still someone's son.
      If society decides to ruin his life, they will also be ruining the lives of his family.
      They will also be hurting the lives of all of their family friends.

      His children, should he bare, shall be affected. All of OUR future shall be affected. I want us to create a positive future.

      I don't want to live in a world where rape exists ANYWHERE, where murder exists.

      Where a reactive and non-proactive thoughts prevail.

      Please, can we love each other? Can we help each other?
      Must our response to people breaking rules is to always beat them down into painful submission?
      Must every vibrant and curious and creative soul that wanders out of bounds be crushed?

    10. Re:Pfffft by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      While I generally think much like you do, this wasn't an error. A basketball player that steps out of bounds will continue to play. A basketball player that pulls out a club and beats another player bloody is likely to be banned for life.

      Assuming he did what he was accused of, he repeatedly attempted to blackmail young women into acts that they would likely be revolted by. This isn't an error, and it wasn't caused by hormones. If he'd broken in for nude photos for his own private enjoyment, I might think of it as a hormone-driven error, but it went far beyond that. He was very willing to ruin the lives of dozens of other people; if we have to ruin his to protect their lives, that's a net win. He acted out of what might be hate or might be utter indifference, either of which we can't permit to flourish.

      Was he a "vibrant and curious and creative soul?" I know nobody like him, but I suspect that that is not a good description of him, and he was far, far worse than out of bounds.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    11. Re: Pfffft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right right. But they're lives aren't ruined. they will continue to live their lives and his life doesn't need to be destroyed to right this wrong. We should fix him and his damage instead of damaging him and leaving them to deal with the damage caused by him.

    12. Re:Pfffft by sjames · · Score: 1

      To be fair, you admit yourself that he may need help with socialization and he is far enough out there that it might require special education. I agree that whatever it is, it isn't classic autism, but it sounds like it's something.

    13. Re:Pfffft by aitikin · · Score: 1

      In this instance, I think it's the overprotective mother leading to him being homeschooled and never socialized. By 8, a kid should at least have A friend if not multiple friends.

      --
      "Don't meddle in the affairs of a patent dragon, for thou art tasty and good with ketchup." ~ohcrapitssteve
    14. Re:Pfffft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a lot of experience with people on the spectrum, and can say factually that you're incorrect in saying your young neighbor's behavior is "unusual" or "near impossible". Kids on the autistic spectrum often act overly friendly to the point of weirding people out, commonly have problems with modulating the volume of their voice, and will use language that other kids their age don't. They only withdraw socially due to anxiety after people have reacted by mistreating them.

      FYI I was diagnosed as flat-out oldschool autistic as a temporarily-nonverbal 2-year-old kid way back in the late 70s, and both behaviors you describe sound like things I would've done at that age. It also sounds like a lot of the autistic-spectrum kids whose parents I've advised -- and yes, I've had my diagnosis confirmed both as a teenager and adult.

    15. Re:Pfffft by seebs · · Score: 1

      You haven't really established that this is the case at all. I got told by a shrink that I was obviously not autistic, and I went on muddling along for a few more years before realizing that he was almost certainly unqualified; went and saw a specialist, and got a lot more information. And one of the things I've gotten, from hanging around with autistics, is that there's a whole heck of a lot of variance, and autistic people don't always react or act the same way.

      So, moral of the story, some guy who comes into it overtly hostile and dismissive and hasn't got any relevant qualifications or skills can basically disregard anything. Well-illustrated!

      (And yes, I'm familiar with such disorders, and no, that's not "unusual to the point of it being near impossible". That's just you not knowing, at all, what you're talking about.)

      --
      My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
    16. Re:Pfffft by aitikin · · Score: 2

      So you're telling me that when 2 out of 3 doctors do not diagnose autism, it means the 3rd must be right? You, as someone presumably scientifically oriented in nature, should look at that factor and start questioning whether that's true. Furthermore, the fact that the child has been told he's socially awkward, raised as though he is autistic, sheltered from the rest of the world, and there is 0 interaction with his age group whatsoever, the likelihood, in my book, is that his traits come from an overbearing mother.

      To me, and knowing what I know about the mother, she's the type that follows the belief that the rain dance works. Of course the rain dance works, it works because the Native Americans didn't stop until it rained, which was bound to happen eventually, whether it was an hour later or a month and a half later. You search under enough rocks and you'll find just about anything. She merely asked enough doctors to agree with her and found that it was true in the eyes of one of them.

      Now, I know a decent number of people with autism and people with Aspgerer's. One of them, I see on a semi-regular basis. He makes it out to my facility about once every other year and the conversations, as well as the interactions, are frightfully difficult for him. You can see it in his mannerisms as well as if you every try shake his hand. He cannot handle it, but he has overcome many issues and has even made a speech to, not only a group of people, but the general public. If you want to see the man I'm speaking of and the speech I'm talking about, it's readily available here (1:05ish-3:10ish). In it, he address the public in thanks for a Technical Grammy.

      While I do not doubt your statements about yourself and others, you can call me a cynic as much as you like, but I find it extremely hard to believe that at least two different doctors, two different school districts' special ed specialists (who handle a number of autistic students) as well as a private school's specialist all considered this boy to be non-autistic. Furthermore he was capable of, socially awkward, but standard communication via conversation, I consider it his mother shopping for autism in her child (which there is a push for in this damned country because parents want their children treated as special in the school districts). The father has left them and wants nothing to do with her or the child (since before he was diagnosed with autism from my understanding).

      --
      "Don't meddle in the affairs of a patent dragon, for thou art tasty and good with ketchup." ~ohcrapitssteve
    17. Re:Pfffft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I won't disagree that 20 years in the current system will do next to nothing to reform him or prepare him for better integration into society

      When I skimmed this line, I initially thought it was referring to K-12+college. I don't remember much outright blackmail in school (though some tried), but there was a good deal of arm-twisting, physical intimidation, and group antagonism. Most people don't really consider this wrong; administrators only really want to avoid being blamed for it, which can't happen if no one admits to seeing it. Does it really surprise anyone that a 20-year-old would act as he's been taught?
      That's before even mentioning that the government's actions say it's legally fine (and morally correct). I'm sure he thought he was pretty hot shit if he, himself, invented whatever hack he used, too.

      There's also the issue that this is certain to not be an isolated incident. These women chose to point cameras at themselves, naively assuming no one else was watching. Where were the safeguards? I think the internet is still somewhere between being the wild west and being a settled, consumer-safe mall. We're past the oregon trail, but Mr. Durant and the indians are still out there.
      I think that we don't have the laws, software, basic security training, nor cultural values that are really necessary to so strongly integrate communication technologies into our lives. The point of separating public and private is that not everyone agrees with what everyone else does. By ignoring inconsequential private parts, we all get along. Bringing the private into full view of the world seems bound to be a bad idea. How many really live the socially-acceptable lives seen on fictional tv?

    18. Re:Pfffft by sjames · · Score: 1

      It sounds to me like he was 'off' well before being home schooled. Perhaps his inappropriate social behavior is why he lacks friends at 8.

    19. Re:Pfffft by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1
      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    20. Re: Pfffft by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      Right right. But they're lives aren't ruined. . they will continue to live their lives ...

      Who the hell are you to decide that? These women have been violated. He left at least one in tears. They have had their sense of security in their own home stripped from them. They will never be able to trust their computer again and use it in a way that the rest of us all get to take for granted. He has exerted a cruel power over their lives that will leave them harmed for years if not for life.

      If you've never had your home invaded or never been raped and never have known anyone who has, you probably don't understand how long the effects of this will linger.

      So, why is his suffering the only one that's valid? You seem all too dismissive of what he's done to those women in your sympathy for him. One might draw unfortunate conclusions about your values towards women if you keep dismissing sexual blackmail as just some childish prank that he deserves only to be mildly scolded for and told not to do it again.

      Look, I would like a more reform-oriented judicial system, but we are not going to get there by treating people who did something like he did as harmless scamps. There needs to be punishment. There needs to be consequences. There also needs to be counseling, reformation, and an attempt to help him integrate back into society when he's done, but the lack thereof is no excuse to claim that he doesn't deserve the punishment for the very serious crime he has committed multiple times and with no indication that he'd stop if he hadn't been caught.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  12. No worries by djupedal · · Score: 1

    The perp will be out in 30 days so he can make the rounds on TV talk shows...

    1. Re:No worries by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      The perp will be out in 30 days so he can make the rounds on TV talk shows...

      If so, I'd be tempted to follow him around and heckle from the audience. On second thought, I almost certainly would have to wait in a long line to do this.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  13. Digital Darwinism? by SanDogWeps · · Score: 0, Troll

    I dunno. Sure - there's the pseudo-excuse that is Autism, and the pseudo-apology upon getting caught (didn't regret it when you were viewing the images, did you?). But unless you crawled out from under a rock and into Best Buy after being a hermit for the last decade, then by now you should know enough to take certain precautions. Turn your webcam away from you, close your laptop, don't change clothes in front of it, put your router in standby when not using it, don't click that link, he's not really an African Prince, she's not really going to Western Union you the money plus another hundred for your trouble, these aren't really naked pics of Pink, etc. In 2013, I think survival of the digital fittest should come into play...

    1. Re:Digital Darwinism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      I was wondering how long it would be before some 'blame the victim' asshole came along. Well, you didn't disappoint.

    2. Re:Digital Darwinism? by SanDogWeps · · Score: 2

      No - simply invoking the error chain, though I can see how that might come across in the reading. Take a link out of the error chain, any error chain (in flight collision, at-sea collision, ordnance mishap) and suddenly all you have is a close call instead of a headline. In similar fashion to the related story, taking certain precautions (full night of sleep, drink a six pack instead of a case, put down the phone instead of answering it mid-turn), keeps everyone out of harm's way. Tech is a tool - so are weapons. The user has certain responsibilities for both understanding and usage.

    3. Re:Digital Darwinism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Alternatively, people could behave like respectable human beings and not invade others privacy.

      I'm hoping for a long jail sentence. I hear they like people like him in prison, its not like a number of those killers in there don't have daughters that age...

    4. Re:Digital Darwinism? by SanDogWeps · · Score: 2

      Absolutely! But sadly, the world is full of unpleasant people who will get it into their heads that what they want, they must have, and devil-may-care about the consequences. I'm not about to leave my life savings in a box on my doorstep in the hopes that no one will steal it. I'm going to safeguard it in a vault or a bank (another topic for another thread, perhaps) because there are thieves afoot. My phone has a password on it because I'm not convinced the person to find it in case I misplace it won't be one to call Kenya on my dime. My car door is locked. The list goes on...

    5. Re:Digital Darwinism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you're still blaming the victim, no matter how many sterile, clinical terms you're couching it with. All you did was change "she should've known better than that, so she's to blame" with "she is the weakest link in the error chain, therefore nature demands she be punished for it until she learns better".

    6. Re:Digital Darwinism? by CauseBy · · Score: 2

      I don't think it's a reasonable legal requirement to presume that every lens in your household must covered at all times. I also don't think it's reasonable to expect me to lock my closet doors, just because hey maybe someone snuck into my house while I was away and is in my closet. Do you sweep your house for bugs twice a day? Do you test your milk for poison before you eat a bowl of cereal, just in case someone put cyanide in it?

      In my opinion it would be much better just to prosecute the perverts who illegally hack into personal computers and take surreptitious pictures of unsuspecting victims.

    7. Re:Digital Darwinism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope you get what you deserve. You're a big smelly pile of dog shit.

    8. Re:Digital Darwinism? by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      No, it's not. I agree with you. However, if she had thought to cover her webcam when she wasn't using it, this wouldn't have happened. Do I cover mine? No, because if anybody tried this with me, I'd laugh at them because nobody's going to be that interested in my 64-year-old body and more importantly, my desktop doesn't have a webcam. (My laptop does, but that doesn't get used at home, and I doubt that this little skript kiddie knows enough to hack into Linux.) If anything at all good comes out of this it will be because teens (boys and girls both) learn that things like this not only can, but will happen to them if they don't take a few simple precautions, such as taping over the webcam when it's not in use.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    9. Re:Digital Darwinism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I for one do not plug in my external USB camera until I am about to launch skype.

  14. You have it backwards. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just because you're a nerdy low-life who gets caught up to no good doesn't mean you're autistic. How much do you want to bet that he was diagnosed AFTER?

    1. Re:You have it backwards. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I have it forwards. He is a nerdy low-life, and now he claims to be autistic. I believe that is exactly what you said.

    2. Re:You have it backwards. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Time of diagnosis has no bearing. If someone shoots up a place, and the tests taken after show they had no control; that's it: end of discussion. They. had. no. control.

    3. Re:You have it backwards. by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 2

      If he is a detriment to society because he is a psychopath he should be off the street. If he is a detriment to society because of something about his autism, he should be off the street. If he is a detriment to society because he does criminal things, no matter what his condition or excuse, he should be off the streets. Actions over-ride excuses.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
  15. Worse than a bully by SirGarlon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is worse than bullying, it's sexual harassment and extortion.

    And I agree, Ms. Wolf did a courageous thing to stand up and present evidence so this lowlife could be stopped.

    --
    [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
    1. Re:Worse than a bully by timholman · · Score: 2

      This is worse than bullying, it's sexual harassment and extortion.

      It may even be worse than that. He had lots of photos of underage girls, and that he told one of his victims that he didn't care how old his victims were.

      The Feds may pile on some child pornography charges once they examine all the evidence on his computers.

    2. Re:Worse than a bully by SirGarlon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's possible, and if he did get any of the more-explicit photos he was demanding from underage girls, then he'd deserve it. Coercing minors to perform sexual acts is exactly what the child-pornography laws are intended to prevent!

      --
      [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
  16. I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why don't people slide the webcam cover when not in use?

    1. Re: I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most webcams don't have covers.

    2. Re: I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your webcam doesn't have a cover, put a band aid on it. No, I'm serious. Band aids work great for covering up built-in webcams - just use scissors to trim off most of the adhesive.

    3. Re:I don't get it by PPH · · Score: 1

      Mine doesn't have a cover. But then I don't sit in front of it naked. The worst pic anyone is going get is me with finger up nostril to the second knuckle.

      Bon appetit for those reading /. on their lunch break.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    4. Re: I don't get it by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      a knoblette of blu-tack works well too - especially as it can be pushed in over the camera lens to form a nice smooth and flat surface so it doesn't look as unsightly as a band-aid or tape.

      or paint, that works well too. Course, if you do that you'll need an external webcam - that can be unplugged or turned to face the wall when you're not using it

  17. Yeah, I had to work at being a pervert. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nurture FTW

    * Not to excuse this man's crimes - he deserves what he gets - but if he's a computer science student he should fail all of his classes as well. What an embarrassment he must be to his instructors - he didn't consider some way to anonymize himself? At the very least, don't show your face on Skype. WTF

  18. Autism by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 0

    I really want to slam Slashdot for publishing this story with the reference to autism in it. That is no different from pointing out any other unrelated personal characteristic like race or national origin as part of a news story about a person.

    It is disgusting profiling and really does not belong in a reasonable news story.

    1. Re:Autism by ScottCooperDotNet · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I really want to slam Slashdot for publishing this story with the reference to autism in it. That is no different from pointing out any other unrelated personal characteristic like race or national origin as part of a news story about a person.

      It is disgusting profiling and really does not belong in a reasonable news story.

      His lawyer is already bringing it up, as a possible mitigating factor. So slam him and his lawyer for bringing it up, not for Slashdot for providing details you find unfavorable.

    2. Re:Autism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really want to slam Slashdot for publishing this story with the reference to autism in it. That is no different from pointing out any other unrelated personal characteristic like race or national origin as part of a news story about a person.

      It is disgusting profiling and really does not belong in a reasonable news story.

      Not reporting what his lawyer said would be a miscarriage of journalistic standards, you do not omit facts due to personal feelings, you report the facts as provided.

    3. Re:Autism by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The reason that this story has the reference to autism in it is because the accused is attempting to use his alleged autism (I am going to assume that he has an actual diagnosis, not that it means he is actually autistic) as an excuse for his crimes. This story is actually a perfect example of what is wrong with the way our society (in general) is approaching autism. It is viewed as something which makes one unable to tell right from wrong. I do not actually believe that this man has autism, although I think it likely that he was diagnosed with it. This article does a good job of explaining what I am talking about.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    4. Re:Autism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod Troll.

    5. Re:Autism by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1

      Shut up.

      Unlike race or national origin, Autism affects one's behavior. And he's using it as a defense.

    6. Re:Autism by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree with the article in Salon. Autism spectrum disorder is an overused diagnosis.

      HOWEVER that does not mean it's not a real phenomena. I have a son who was diagnosed with Asperger's syndrome. There are several clear differences between him and my other children (who are bright geeky types) including a near eidetic memory and slowness processing spoken language. You might not notice it in a casual context, but it becomes pretty apparent over time.

      I am still pissed off at Slashdot publishing this summary in this manner. This shit of a lawyer is still engaging in adverse profiling and contributing to a body of ideas that has no justification.

    7. Re:Autism by shadowofwind · · Score: 2

      I think the essential thing to understand is that people have different abilities and needs. No category is quite adequate. I have trouble with speech, but unlike your son, apparently, I have almost no "mind's eye" at all, and a terrible memory for anything that I can't logically relate to other facts or feel in a musical way. I don't think that necessarily means that he's more or less genuinely Asperger's than I am. One of my three children has trouble with speech also, and is overly affectionate with strangers by most people's standards. He is very different from me in a lot of equally significant ways. Some people have characterized my social skills as Asperger's like, but I think the main difference is I have less of a veneer of pretense over everything. I actually don't think I'm lacking in social skills or social perceptiveness at all, relatively speaking. I think that slick, salesman types have just been more successful at getting their particular strengths and characteristics defined as the norm. (Though the 'sociopath' category is a win for my team I suppose.) One of my other children has freakishly good language and social skills: he was able to BS comfortably with adults as if he were a peer when he was 2. I don't think this is a syndrome either though, just something he's really good at, and strengths almost always come with other weaknesses and tradeoffs. He's smart, but his 'Asperger's-like brother is smarter in some ways, and that intelligence has a deep connection to his speech difficulty, in my opinion. He finds it harder to put things into words in part because he's able to think in ways that don't map neatly into a string of grammatical concepts. People are complicated machines, and in everyone a lot of small pieces are broken or don't work well, and other interrelated pieces that may be genius. It just may or may not be recognized depending on how externally obvious those pieces are.

    8. Re:Autism by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      The thing I see in the summary, which seems to be different from what you are seeing, is that this is a story about someone trying to pretend to be autistic in order to cover for bad behavior. My experience is that people with autism are no more likely to behave badly than anybody else (in certain circumstances, they may be more likely to behave poorly but not badly). So, when this guy claims autism as a defense for his behavior it reflects doubly bad on him. First, he committed these acts. Then he attempts to excuse his behavior.
      Actually, make that reflects triply bad on him. The third being that he thinks that autism would be an excuse for bad behavior.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    9. Re:Autism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But race does affect one's behaviour. So your comment is disregarded because you are incompetent in all aspects and easily brainwashed

    10. Re:Autism by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1

      No, culture and upbringing affects one's behavior, you stupid asshole.

  19. Poe's Law by Valdrax · · Score: 1, Redundant

    she invited him in ... since she didn't secure her computer enough

    I really can't tell if you're making a tasteless joke parodying blaming rape victims, expressing a sincere belief in support of that train of thought, or being bitterly sarcastic about it, since any of those are believable on Slashdot.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    1. Re:Poe's Law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's not like blaming the victim. It's like shutting the fence gate from your back yard to the alley. If you're too damn lazy to understand how to shut the gate on your computer, you need to quit putting sensitive information on it or attaching peripherals that provide sensitive information, just as you wouldn't leave your wallet under a pile of cash on the ground next to the alley and expect it to still be there when you come back several hours later. Computers are not toys, and people need to quit treating them like they are.

    2. Re:Poe's Law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never attribute to malice what can be explained by stupidity.

    3. Re:Poe's Law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's not like blaming the victim. It's like shutting the fence gate from your back yard to the alley. If you're too damn lazy to understand how to shut the gate on your computer, you need to quit putting sensitive information on it or attaching peripherals that provide sensitive information, just as you wouldn't leave your wallet under a pile of cash on the ground next to the alley and expect it to still be there when you come back several hours later. Computers are not toys, and people need to quit treating them like they are.

      Since this is a story of targeted hacking -- you are very naive to what good black hats are able to do today, against any system, if you really think you can "shut the gate on your computer" on them. I would be willing to put absolutely all my savings in a bet against you on that.

    4. Re:Poe's Law by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      No, it's not like blaming the victim. It's like shutting the fence gate from your back yard to the alley. If you're too damn lazy to understand how to shut the gate on your computer, you need to quit putting sensitive information on it or attaching peripherals that provide sensitive information... Computers are not toys, and people need to quit treating them like they are.

      I think you have the wrong parallel. This is more like blaming someone whose brake lines get cut because they picked up the wrong girl at a bar for not checking their car out first before driving it every time. Or maybe it's more like blaming the parents of kids killed in school shootings for not home-schooling them and keeping them wrapped up in bulletproof vests whenever they go out.

      We're not expected to have to defend ourselves against every determined attacker from every angle. That's part of why we have police and a court system -- to keep us from having to live in fear of anyone more skilled at offense than we are at defense. The very mark of rule of law is that don't blame those who acted in good faith for the acts of those who do not. Every time some self-centered prick blames the weak for being weaker than they are, they excuse the strong for being predatory. May you never be on the other end of that stick.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  20. may even make the sex offender list as well. by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    and that can be wore then doing jail time.

    1. Re:may even make the sex offender list as well. by SternisheFan · · Score: 4, Informative

      and that can be wor(s)e then doing jail time.

      Sex offender status for life, And yes, that kind of probation is far more stringent than regular probation, and regular probation is not fun. Even if he gets a no jail deal, breaking any of probation's rules is enough to get him sent to a real jail cell. He will have to report whenever he's told to, if he doesn't, jail. He will be monitored for drugs/alcohol. Failing a test means jail. He will have to report his living address whenever he moves (if his probation officer permits him to move). If he doesn't, jail. Any other type of crime he may commit in the future while on probation will carry a heavier than normal sentence. He was studying computer science in college, that career is now out the window, and he'll probably have to stay off computers as part of his probation, so he will probably re-offend.

      He has irrevocably changed the course of his very young and promising life, thinking he would never get caught. Lots of guys like him in jail who thought they were too good to get caught.

    2. Re:may even make the sex offender list as well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no excuse for his actions. Yet when I see ll these mob justice like posting here I start understanding how US justice system got so fueled up.

  21. But that is not what you said. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What you said implies he had been previously diagnosed and was using his condition as an excuse. I take particular exception to that as that idea runs rampant on Internet forums the world over and there is much animosity attached to it. What I said is that he was caught doing no good and may have been since diagnosed for the benefit of the excuse.

    1. Re:But that is not what you said. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't intend to imply that, and not sure I did. In any case, I agree with you.

  22. only 150 bots at age 19? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    What a scapegoated noob. At age 19 most had far more :)

  23. If his initials were NSA by ScottCooperDotNet · · Score: 2

    If his initials were NSA, would you really be surprised by this?

    I can't be the only person who tapes over the camera in my laptop and disables it. Apparently my tin foil hat isn't tight enough, as I haven't unplugged the wires internally yet.

    1. Re:If his initials were NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of the best hardware decisions Apple ever made (imho) is to have the camera on light on their laptops be hardware controlled. Afaik, you cannot turn a macbook camera on without the camera light turning on. It would be really nice if all other laptop manufacturers implemented their hardware similarly.

    2. Re:If his initials were NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do this too. Taped over and disabled. The disabled part will not help when your PC is pwned but they can't get past the tape.

      Have you ever worried about the built in microphone?

      Disconnecting the device. Good idea.

      When my new TV arrives I'll be making a cover for its camera when some duct tape for when it is not in use. I won't be plugging the TV in to the internet although I do worry that TVs now come with wireless built in.

    3. Re:If his initials were NSA by garbut · · Score: 1

      Agreed. My Logitech camera has a light but sadly it's controlled by software and can be turned on or off independently from the camera. W.T.F???

      --
      Oh, should I have sugar-coated that?
  24. Sheeit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like looking at naked women, I will admit. But this sort of thing crosses so many lines, you can't just hide behind a mental illness as an excuse. If you're that kind of mentally ill that this behavior seems okay, then you need to be locked up, plain and simple. I also would be interested in punishing the companies that output such insecure software that this asshole can hack other people's webcams and computers. Sure maybe the girls clicked on a bad link or something but that shouldn't be an excuse- there should be a way to have your personal property be secure, and to know if somebody else is intruding.

    1. Re:Sheeit by houghi · · Score: 1

      I also would be interested in punishing the companies that output such insecure software that this asshole can hack other people's webcams and computers.

      You also want to sue Smith & Wesson for the people killed by their weapons? How about knife companies by people who were knifed? Or any other company that has been used to do harm?

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    2. Re:Sheeit by QRDeNameland · · Score: 2

      I like looking at naked women, I will admit.

      So do I, but man, there's a whole lot of much easier and cheaper ways to look at digital images of naked women, even in real time.

      Hell, redirect that kind of effort, and who knows, he might have even been able to get laid by a flesh and blood woman.

      Stories like this certainly seem to confirm the notion that sex crimes are more about power than about sex.

      --
      Momentarily, the need for the construction of new light will no longer exist.
  25. Link from article - CNN at it's finest. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Different story, first sentence: "Who would have thought that getting naked and naughty
    with a stranger online could have negative consequences?"

    I didn't read past that, seeing as from the start I'm seen as total idiot.

    Police: Naked scammers seduce, blackmail men on Web
    http://www.cnn.com/2013/02/18/tech/web/naked-webcam-blackmail/index.html

  26. How many? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So, how many girls did he extort before he made the mistake of targeting somebody with influence? If you are going to cheat, steal, blackmail, etc., you don't do it to the people the police actually protect.

    1. Re:How many? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      So, how many girls did he extort before he made the mistake of targeting somebody with influence? If you are going to cheat, steal, blackmail, etc., you don't do it to the people the police actually protect.

      You think Miss Teen USA gets any sort of special treatment by the government? You obviously haven't ever known any; I went to high school with a former winner, and believe me, being Miss Teen USA did not prevent her from being stopped, regularly, for DWB.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    2. Re:How many? by haruchai · · Score: 1

      DWB?? Driving While Black? That's a very serious condition in many parts of America that tends to outweigh any other characteristic or accomplishment.

      Here's an old joke that's still relevant:
      Q: What do you call a black millionaire heart surgeon who's been pulled over in his Porsche?
      A: A nigger

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    3. Re:How many? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      DWB?? Driving While Black? That's a very serious condition in many parts of America that tends to outweigh any other characteristic or accomplishment.

      Indeed; ironically, being pretty (at least, pretty enough to win a MTUSA competition) probably didn't help her case, but rather made it worse.

      Here's an old joke that's still relevant:
      Q: What do you call a black millionaire heart surgeon who's been pulled over in his Porsche?
      A: A nigger

      Sorry, but as a "white" guy I'm pretty sure I'm not allowed to think those kind of jokes are funny. At least, not publicly (more irony, the tragic kind this time).

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    4. Re:How many? by haruchai · · Score: 1

      Pretty sure the 1st guy I heard tell that joke was an off-duty cop.
      It was several decades ago but things haven't changed quite as much as some would like us to believe.

      Let's not forget that Jesse Helms was elected for 5 Senate terms up until 2003 and only quit because of failing health.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
  27. RAT Breeders by CrashNBrn · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ArsTechnica covered this "epidemic" in March.

    The article is slightly sensationalist, but interesting ... The Remote Administration Tool is the revolver of the Internet's Wild West.

    Perhaps law enforcement has opened a can of worms... or monkeys... autistic monkeys.

  28. Ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Ironic that there are no pictures of this shitbag attached to any of the stories. His face should be plastered on every page so nobody forgets it. Whatever else happens to him, a life of public shame should be the minimum sentence.

    1. Re:Ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ironic that there are no pictures of this shitbag attached to any of the stories. His face should be plastered on every page so nobody forgets it. Whatever else happens to him, a life of public shame should be the minimum sentence.

      Yeah! Good thing we settled all that "innocent until proven guilty" bullshit and moved straight on to emotionally-charged mob justice!

      I'll note you're letting him off easy, though; since we have successfully accused him, we really should shoot his brain out with a shotgun, defecate into his now-empty skull cavity, and force his family members to eat it while grinding up their still-living pets into hamburger in front of their faces. It's the only way we'll feel better about it! Oh hey, if there's time later, maybe we can even have a trial! Won't that be novel?

  29. It seems like more is wrong than autism by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 2

    His whole plan just doesn't make sense. It relies on the victim to both have issues regarding nudity that cause them to actually believe that nude photos taken with a hacked computer are somehow blackmail material, and to also be willing to send far more explicit images or video for further blackmail purposes. The overlap of these sets has to be pretty small and only contain people with IQs below room temperature. As we see, not even a Miss Teen USA is that clueless.

    1. Re:It seems like more is wrong than autism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "As we see, not even a Miss Teen USA is that clueless"

      one Miss Teen Delaware was a bit clueless ...

  30. We has a promising career in the NSA by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Scumbag-like tendencies and a lack of morals make this his likely career path.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  31. This calls for creative sentencing. by Apuleius · · Score: 3, Funny

    When an attractive young girl accidently shows more of herself than she wants to, you need to be conscientious and respectful and look away.

    When I show accidentally more of myself than I want to, you do not need to be respectful to look away. You will look away for your own sake, or what you see will be its own punishment.

    I think y'all know what I'm getting at. You've seen Clockwork Orange.

    1. Re:This calls for creative sentencing. by Apuleius · · Score: 2

      (And my low Slasdhdot UID should be proof enough that I am not speaking idly.)

  32. Next: "And we couldn't have *caught* him w/out... by kosty · · Score: 1

    "And we couldn't have *caught* him without the NSA's *help!* Thank G** for "domestic surveillance!"

    Here endeth the tinfoil rant...

    --
    "Democracy." It's just a slogan.
  33. Have fun.... by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1

    In Federal Pound Me In The Asshole Prison, fuckstick.

    1. Re:Have fun.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Federal Pound Me In The Asshole Prison, fuckstick.

      You have no idea what you are talking about. Of course that
      doesn't stop a moron like you, with your big talk and your pretense
      at being a badass. I bet you'd last less than a week in prison before
      your bitch ass would beg to be released. Guys like you are all the same :
      you talk like a badass but in truth you are just a weak person who is full of bluster.

      Federal prisons don't tend to involve homosexual rape.
      State prisons may, but federal prisons are administered to
      a much higher standard than state prisons.

      I speak from experience, having spent time in federal prisons and
      having never once even received the hint of a threat of rape. I
      am not a huge guy or an expert fighter, but the truth is that as long as
      you don't act like a victim no one is going to try to rape you in
      federal prison, especially not when they can easily find a willing partner
      who doesn't need rape to help the process along.

    2. Re:Have fun.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God, shut up you fucking convict scum. Nobody gives a shit about the nonsense coming out of your mouth.

      It was a reference to Office Space, dumb shit. I wish you had hanged yourself by your shoestrings instead of wasting our money keeping you alive.

      Uh oh, should I prepare for a long, rambling treatise by an ex-con piece of shit on how you can't actually hang yourself with shoestrings in prison?

  34. just an observation by roc97007 · · Score: 2

    I agree with others that the autism excuse is a little too convenient. But what I wanted to mention is that anyone who says "I have a LOT more of these that are better quality" whether the goal is political, bragging at a share site, or the vilest of extortion, they're always lying. If they had better quality photos, they'd have shown them to you. If the creep is trying to extort based on one or two blurry low light screenshots, chances approach certainty that it's all he has.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  35. Widespread problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've heard about this type of setup numerous times. I'm actually amazed somebody got caught for it, although I guess most of the puppetmasters just watch.

  36. Excuse of the day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Austic my arse. Just another excuse. Darryl Hannah now claims to be autistic. A way into the limelight. This punk did wrong, period. But, if he IS autistic you can bet that he will probably get a short probation and fine.

  37. Just so we're clear... by roc97007 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This was *not* about seeing naked girls. As we all know, there is more highly detailed porn on the internet than one person could experience in a lifetime. (Probably. I haven't, like, taken an inventory. But evidence indicates this is the case.)

    This was about control. It was very specifically about the feeling of control experienced when forcing someone to do an act they find disgusting.

    He wasn't trying to see his victims naked. He could have seen tens of thousands of girls naked for free on the internet. He was very specifically attempting to gain control over his victims, to make them do something that revolted them.

    I wonder how his lawyer is going to try to spin this.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:Just so we're clear... by mkiwi · · Score: 1

      ^^This.

      This guy is a sociopath. Autism and sociopathy are completely different conditions. The former is a brain disorder, the latter is a personality disorder.

      To use "autism" or "mentally ill" as a defense for a crime, you must be defined as mentally insane at the time of the crime. Having autism does not make you insane. Being a sociopath or a psychopath (which has absolutely has nothing to do with severe metal illnesses like schizophrenia) is not an excuse and does not meet the legal definition for insanity. Furthermore, having a low IQ or EQ (for any reason) does not absolve anyone of a crime.

      This guy is a self-obsessed sociopath and he needs to be locked away.

    2. Re:Just so we're clear... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It wasn't necessarily about control ... or at least not entirely. It's also about the arousal triggered by the nudes being of someone you know, someone notable or someone new.

      Sure, there are a million porn stars out there fucking in 1080p. But, imagine some girl from high school you always thought was a hottie started doing porn; most guys would scour the internet until their dicks were skinned raw, just for an 18-second clip of grainy, blurry, shaky video... because, "holy shit, that's HER!!"

    3. Re:Just so we're clear... by SternisheFan · · Score: 1

      I think Roc97007 has it right, it is about control. The feeling of power of being able to get someone to do what you want them to do against their wishes. Power is like a drug that people allow themselves to get hooked on, and usually turns out to be their downfall.

    4. Re:Just so we're clear... by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      I understand what you're saying about there being more appeal with someone you know. It's why men's magazines used to write about the girl, show something of her life, to gain that feeling of connection.

      In this case, if it wasn't about control, it seems likely that he would have saved the photos, gradually collected more, and beat the weasel quietly while paging through them. When he moved on to extortion, it stopped being about seeing someone he knew with her clothes off, and became about the feeling of power from making her do stuff.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  38. "Kiddie porn"? by tygt · · Score: 1

    He took pictures of a 17 year old.
    I'd expect that there are child pornography charges involved too, no?

  39. Autism.... .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So "IF" he is indeed Autistic and professionally and properly diagnosed as such then Mommy and Daddy Should be more on the hook for not knowing just WTF the special needs kid was doing for years now.

  40. Creep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A dawn creep. I hope is still time for him to be rehabilitated.

    1. Re: Creep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fix: damn creep.

  41. Deiik by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hakikaten deiik
    http://www.xn--bidoludnya-geb.com/

  42. Prison is not the best answer in this case. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Unlike a lot of you who are so free with your sadistically joyous
    comments about sending someone to prison, I HAVE BEEN to prison.
    That means that unlike you I actually KNOW what prison is like from
    having been there. It is very different from any portrayal on TV or in
    a movie, though "The Shawshank Redemption" comes closest to
    capturing the vibe of being an inmate.

    Someone who is weird or mentally weak will not do well in the prison
    environment and they may not even live through the experience unless
    they are in protective custody.

    It is obvious the guy who perpetrated the stuff described in the summary
    needs help, and certainly he needs to be shown in a definitive manner that
    what he did is not accepted by society. There are other ways to do this
    which can be as effective as prison and more likely to produce a positive
    outcome. I'd suggest denial of computer access for a period of time and
    a GPS ankle bracelet for the defendant, along with some sort of work
    program which forces him to perform some sort of labor which benefits
    society.

    Prison doesn't ever "fix" people or "teach them a lesson". Prison damages
    people. When people are not going to be in prison for their entire lives it
    really is in the best interest of society to use other solutions than prison
    if the goal is punishment and reform of the offender. And until YOU have
    been in prison yourself, you really have no business suggesting that prison is
    the best answer for a criminal offense which has other possible solutions,
    because you don't know what you are talking about, period.

    '

  43. HOW did he get control of webcams? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    HOW did he get control of webcams? I think this is a major problem, needs to be fixed.

    1. Re: HOW did he get control of webcams? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easy. format C: then install Linux and then LEARN how to use and secure Linux... see? easy.
      If you don't want/can install/learn Linux, then just put tape on the webcams.

  44. Secret webcam by kyncani · · Score: 1

    > I could see possibly wanting to find ways to peek through someone's webcam secretly. Put up a website with a really secret webcam out there. You're sure to have thousands of hits.

  45. I don't believe any of this story by shikaisi · · Score: 4, Funny

    Pics or it didn't happen.

    --
    No left turn unstoned.
  46. Why would she dig her own grave ? by doubletalk · · Score: 0

    I mean, either you contact the police and let the hacker expose a couple of pictures of you in "natural positions" (because you did not know pictures were taken) OR you give the hacker more munitions by sending him pictures of yourself in explicite positions, thus digging your own grave until the hacker gets tired of this game and decide to expose everything anyway.

    I think asking for money would have been perceived in a different way and maybe it would have worked.

  47. Re:'Autistic'? No, A JEW. by SternisheFan · · Score: 1
    You are a fool. The jewish people are to blame, huh? Who else is on your 'list'? Protestants? Catholics? Dark skinned people? Olive skinned? Light skinned? Short people?

    I hope that one day you grow up, see how immature you are, and stop your 'hating', for it really does lead to the 'dark side'.

    Start working on your morality, boy. Perhaps one day you will be a man.

  48. Video or... by shaitand · · Score: 1

    Video and pics or it never happened!

    What were the five things he wanted her to do on the cam? Did she do them. Inquiring minds want to know.

  49. Ars article on how he got caught... by SternisheFan · · Score: 1
    http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/09/miss-teen-usas-webcam-spy-called-himself-cutefuzzypuppy/

    LAW & DISORDER / CIVILIZATION & DISCONTENTS How the FBI found Miss Teen USA’s webcam spy RAT user "cutefuzzypuppy" wasn't all that cute. by Nate Anderson - Sept 27 2013, 7:40pm EDT INTERNET CRIME 83 RATer's moniker was "cutefuzzypuppy."

    Aurich Lawson / Thinkstock The sextortionist who snapped nude pictures of Miss Teen USA Cassidy Wolf through her laptop's webcam has been found and arrested, the FBI revealed yesterday. 19-year old Jared James Abrahams, a California computer science student who went by the online handle "cutefuzzypuppy," had as many as 150 "slave" computers under his control during the height of his webcam spying in 2012.

    Watching all of those webcams to see when a young woman changes her clothes takes a serious time commitment, and Abrahams made one; he "was always at his computer," according the FBI complaint against him. Abrahams yesterday turned himself in after the complaint was unsealed, and a federal judge released him on a $50,000 bond.

    Anatomy of a RATer

    How did Abrahams get his start learning the intricacies of remote administration tools (RATs), the malware used to spy on his victims? Not surprisingly, he was a regular user of hackforums.net, which features a large RAT forum that I profiled earlier this year. As cutefuzzypuppy, Abrahams asked for plenty of help distributing software like DarkComet to victims, since he "suck[ed] at social engineering" and needed to find better ways to spread his spyware.

    He also announced his successes. On May 17, 2012, he told the RAT community at hackforums.net, "Recently I infected a person at my school with darkcomet. It was total luck that I got her infected because I suck at social engineering. Anyway, this girl happens to be a model and a really good looking one at that :D. I was hoping I could use her and her facebook account to further spread my darkcomet rat. I want to mass message all her friends on facebook but I have no idea what to message them to get them to download the rat. Any ideas or suggestions would be greatly appreciated :)."

    The "model" in question appears to have been Wolf, whose machine was infected in mid-2012. Abrahams used DarkComet to snap lots of nude photos of Wolf, whom he watched until March 21, 2013. That day, Wolf received a message from Facebook saying that someone was attempting to change her password. Then came a similar message from Twitter—then messages from Tumblr and Yahoo. Suspicious, she checked her profiles; her Twitter account now displayed a "half nude" photo of Wolf.

    Thirty minutes later, she received an e-mail from her attacker. He demanded that Wolf either send him "good quality" nude pictures through Snapchat, that she send a video of herself, or that she "go on skype with me and do what I tell you to do for 5 minutes." If she didn't, the attacker pledged to release his many nude photos widely—and he attached a few just to prove how many he had.

    Instead, Wolf went to the FBI, and the Bureau's LA cyber squad swung into action. On March 29, the FBI looked at Wolf's laptop and found evidence of both DarkComet and another RAT known as Blackshades, which confirmed how the attacker had taken his photos. But who was he? The IP addresses behind the attacker's e-mails resolved back only to a VPN provider which purposely kept no logs. But the RATs themselves had connected back to the attacker by accessing no-ip.org, a service which allows users to dynamically map their IP address to a domain name (in this case, to cutefuzzypuppy.zapto.org and schedule2013.no-ip.org), thereby allowing the "slaves" to phone home, even when the attacker was using a dynamic IP address from a home Internet account. No-ip.org did keep records, and the FBI obtained them.

    The records showed that the

  50. He hacked nothing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That man hacked nothing and is simply a kidnapper and he recorded them with recording software, consider the courts and police there accomplices.