In an environment of sufficient economic inequity. The ability to effectively express ones rights and achieve liberty is reserved almost exclusively for those with the means to control the system to their advantage.
To create a greater liberty for the larger population, by necessity the license of the plutocrats to corrupt and distort the system to their own advantage must be limited.
Sorry. but that wont get you around a GMO patent. They patent the biological function, so even naturally occuring variations are in violation. The only advantage you would have is that it will likely take more than 20 years to get a reliable selective breeding program off the ground and that will require monsanto to slightly tweak their patents before resubmitting them and screwing you again.
Or those luddites are aware than monocultures are incredibly susceptible to catastrophic collapse when exposed to a pandemic against which it has no defense.
Or they are aware than pesticides have a nasty habit of affecting biological systems in ways that are not immediately noticable and build up over time, and genetically engineering our food supply to contain those pesticides until there are 40 or 50 years of rigorous scientific study for each one is a fucking terrible idea.
Or they are aware that engineering an intentionally sterile crop as the default for human consumption places a single corporate entity in a position to hold the entire world hostage.
I am not against genetic engineering, but it needs to be handled with all due caution, and Monsanto isn't. As evidenced by this release of GE lifeforms into the environment, and well, everything else they do.
And a solar thermal heat engine running a turbine with 800 degree pressurized steam can get close to 60% efficient. 60% efficient of the nigh inexhaustible power of the solar systems most powerful thermonuclear furnace.
Are you kidding me? If there is anyone even more blatant in their support for the secret surveillance police state than the democrats, it would be the republicans.
Rifling won't help your accuracy that much. Its the same problem as receiver cover mounted sights on AK's and SKS's. Its a loose fit removable part, every time you change it out it will have to be zeroed again, and that is if you have more than just the most basic non-adjustible sights that typically come with break open shotguns.
To much focus on semi-auto. You should probably add a revolver (I like the.357magnum Ruger GP100 myself) and a bolt action in a heavier rifle caliber to that list.
30 round magazines are very useful for taking down packs of coyote or wild dogs. But you don't NEED a reason to own a high capacity magazine You don't need to have a reason to own a speed boat or a 200mph motorcycle either, and there is even less of a reason for those than a high capacity magazine.
Correct, There are however semi-auto versions of SMG's available. And they almost always count as rifles due to an integrated stock. But really they are no different than any other carbine chambered in a big slow round.
Dude. I am an systems architect/programmer with an advanced degree, a liberal, a socialist even. I also support the right to bear arms and own several of them, including an "assault rifle". When the plutocrats and theocrats finish ruining this country, you will regret it if you don't have the arms to fight back.
I am a radical liberal, and PETA is complete shit. They are anti-humanist scum who would turn back the tide of society to the point where we are all living in mud hovels before our inevitable extinction.
The ToS for residential service forbids running of servers. He was violating the ToS. Sure, he got noticed because he was using a lot of data. But that isn't why they are terminating service.
True. He turned out to by a crypto conservative plant, a false flag operative operating under the guise of hope and change. He is right of Ronald Reagan on a lot of issues, much to the absolute horror of the actual liberals in this country.
Slashdot Mirror
In an environment of sufficient economic inequity. The ability to effectively express ones rights and achieve liberty is reserved almost exclusively for those with the means to control the system to their advantage.
To create a greater liberty for the larger population, by necessity the license of the plutocrats to corrupt and distort the system to their own advantage must be limited.
I am a libertarian socialist.
You become a were-cyborg.
Oh no. That can not stand! Remember my friend, Corporations are people too.
Sorry. but that wont get you around a GMO patent. They patent the biological function, so even naturally occuring variations are in violation. The only advantage you would have is that it will likely take more than 20 years to get a reliable selective breeding program off the ground and that will require monsanto to slightly tweak their patents before resubmitting them and screwing you again.
Or those luddites are aware than monocultures are incredibly susceptible to catastrophic collapse when exposed to a pandemic against which it has no defense.
Or they are aware than pesticides have a nasty habit of affecting biological systems in ways that are not immediately noticable and build up over time, and genetically engineering our food supply to contain those pesticides until there are 40 or 50 years of rigorous scientific study for each one is a fucking terrible idea.
Or they are aware that engineering an intentionally sterile crop as the default for human consumption places a single corporate entity in a position to hold the entire world hostage.
I am not against genetic engineering, but it needs to be handled with all due caution, and Monsanto isn't. As evidenced by this release of GE lifeforms into the environment, and well, everything else they do.
And a solar thermal heat engine running a turbine with 800 degree pressurized steam can get close to 60% efficient. 60% efficient of the nigh inexhaustible power of the solar systems most powerful thermonuclear furnace.
Are you kidding me? If there is anyone even more blatant in their support for the secret surveillance police state than the democrats, it would be the republicans.
purple
Rifling won't help your accuracy that much. Its the same problem as receiver cover mounted sights on AK's and SKS's. Its a loose fit removable part, every time you change it out it will have to be zeroed again, and that is if you have more than just the most basic non-adjustible sights that typically come with break open shotguns.
I've seen those, but accuracy at anything more than point blank range is likely to be very poor.
To much focus on semi-auto. .357magnum Ruger GP100 myself) and a bolt action in a heavier rifle caliber to that list.
You should probably add a revolver (I like the
30 round magazines are very useful for taking down packs of coyote or wild dogs. But you don't NEED a reason to own a high capacity magazine You don't need to have a reason to own a speed boat or a 200mph motorcycle either, and there is even less of a reason for those than a high capacity magazine.
Correct, There are however semi-auto versions of SMG's available. And they almost always count as rifles due to an integrated stock. But really they are no different than any other carbine chambered in a big slow round.
Can't buy made in china "assault rifles" anymore either. Thanks George Bush(41) for 922R! Asshole.
Dude. I am an systems architect/programmer with an advanced degree, a liberal, a socialist even. I also support the right to bear arms and own several of them, including an "assault rifle". When the plutocrats and theocrats finish ruining this country, you will regret it if you don't have the arms to fight back.
From personal experience, anything by Northrop Grumman is complete shit.
The truth is only a defense against libel in America and other reasonable libel law countries. Britain is another matter,
But by PETA's standards, those pets are unnaturally corrupted by the influence of mankind. So obviously they had to be destroyed.
I am a radical liberal, and PETA is complete shit. They are anti-humanist scum who would turn back the tide of society to the point where we are all living in mud hovels before our inevitable extinction.
They don't define server, So xbox may or may not count. Arbitrarily.
The ToS for residential service forbids running of servers. He was violating the ToS. Sure, he got noticed because he was using a lot of data. But that isn't why they are terminating service.
It would be bad for business if his marks knew that they were suckers. Of course he would deny it.
That depends on if Mcaffee has a supply of bath salts.
remember to keep it under 3oz or you might not get through airport security.
True. He turned out to by a crypto conservative plant, a false flag operative operating under the guise of hope and change. He is right of Ronald Reagan on a lot of issues, much to the absolute horror of the actual liberals in this country.