Unfortunately, astroturfers and reverse-astroturfers will still be posting, because they have a substantial marketing budget. It costs you no more than the tax and shipping to buy your own product, and the cost to buy your competitor's product is a small price to pay to leave them a negative horror story review.
You understand that a lot of those negative reviews are reverse astroturfing right? The competitor is going onto amazon and leaving detailed negative reviews about their competitor's products.
Even more shocking is how easy it is to fake penthouse letters.
A lot of people joke about this, but penthouse actually sends fact finders out to verify all penthouse letters. They talk to all the parties involved, and require a reenactment before publishing.
He's accused of having non-consensual sex. The claim is that there was consensual sex up to a point, but the woman asked him to stop and he failed to do so, at which point it became non-consensual.
Not everything runs better on more cores, but so many things scale close to linearly with cores that it has become what the majority rightly want. Basically every business function that has to support N users can be partitioned over up to N cores, the more cores you pack per chip, the less chips and sockets and boxes you have to buy.
An increasing number of cores tends to be a challenge to keep clocked at a high speed. Every CPU developer struggles with this, and they all market higher clocked lower core count parts. Choosing to go for a lower core count in your design phase makes a lot of sense if you are single thread bound.
I assume they're talking about improving their multiple dispatch, so that they can go from 3 - 4 (or is it 4-5) ops in parallel on a single core. And probably bring up the clock speed. 8 cores at 2ghz beats 16 cores at 1.5 ghz for a lot of applications.
Sadly, I'm pretty sure there is only one more downfall into fascism ahead of us. This time the technology is really up to the task of making it last forever.
He agrees with you, for the leechers. Do you think the same motivations apply to seeders? If so, how, since they get neither free stuff, nor a hoard out of it?
The article clearly states that they don't see what they are doing as immoral, not that they don't see what they are doing as illegal. They are altruists, not just stupid. This is a pretty important distinction. If they didn't think they were doing something illegal, that's a whole different story.
Is not, nuh-huh! Don't you know that childish replies give you cooties?
So now you're arguing against yourself? I'm confused.
2 is incorrect. 2 happened.
I replied to a +3 message, you retard: q. e. fucking d.
Yes... but for me.
3 is the incorrect label for what I did.
[...] trolled [...] very well.
Ok, so you were trolling, but you were trolling through a "great one" strawman. And now you're just denying the evidence, like a troll. STFU and DIAF already.
No, you misunderstood me again. I wasn't trolling, you just missed the point of both my original post and subsequent hint entirely. Now you have one more hint to work with.
Some would argue that there is a memetic component not determined by genes.
And most would argue that if a behavior is truly genetically determined, such that you literally cannot choose otherwise, it would in fact make infidelity less despicable.
Slashdot Mirror
Unfortunately, astroturfers and reverse-astroturfers will still be posting, because they have a substantial marketing budget. It costs you no more than the tax and shipping to buy your own product, and the cost to buy your competitor's product is a small price to pay to leave them a negative horror story review.
I do sometimes wonder how those people sleep at night. Probably on a comfortable mattress stuffed with money I guess.
You understand that a lot of those negative reviews are reverse astroturfing right? The competitor is going onto amazon and leaving detailed negative reviews about their competitor's products.
What about the DLink router for $139 with over a hundred astroturfed positive reviews?
Even more shocking is how easy it is to fake penthouse letters.
A lot of people joke about this, but penthouse actually sends fact finders out to verify all penthouse letters. They talk to all the parties involved, and require a reenactment before publishing.
Cool, I see a new business opportunity. I'd like to hire you for 100K to write a review on amazon ....
It's unlikely the article author is making an assumption. It is trivially easy to verify that illegitimate reviews are allowed on legitimate products.
Wow ... just wow. Reading comprehension fail.
Take it up with wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_military_casualties_of_war
Look it up yourself, then reread the thread.
Exactly my point.
I fail to see how that's relevant to the definition of a war being won or lost being based on how many soldiers died?
He's accused of having non-consensual sex. The claim is that there was consensual sex up to a point, but the woman asked him to stop and he failed to do so, at which point it became non-consensual.
War lives lost:
Vietnam War: 58,209
WWII: 405,399
Clearly, we lost WWII 8 times as badly as we lost Vietnam.
It could just mean that he's been smeared as a rapist to try to discredit him, which he has.
Not everything runs better on more cores, but so many things scale close to linearly with cores that it has become what the majority rightly want. Basically every business function that has to support N users can be partitioned over up to N cores, the more cores you pack per chip, the less chips and sockets and boxes you have to buy.
An increasing number of cores tends to be a challenge to keep clocked at a high speed. Every CPU developer struggles with this, and they all market higher clocked lower core count parts. Choosing to go for a lower core count in your design phase makes a lot of sense if you are single thread bound.
I assume they're talking about improving their multiple dispatch, so that they can go from 3 - 4 (or is it 4-5) ops in parallel on a single core. And probably bring up the clock speed. 8 cores at 2ghz beats 16 cores at 1.5 ghz for a lot of applications.
Sadly, I'm pretty sure there is only one more downfall into fascism ahead of us. This time the technology is really up to the task of making it last forever.
He agrees with you, for the leechers. Do you think the same motivations apply to seeders? If so, how, since they get neither free stuff, nor a hoard out of it?
The article clearly states that they don't see what they are doing as immoral, not that they don't see what they are doing as illegal. They are altruists, not just stupid. This is a pretty important distinction. If they didn't think they were doing something illegal, that's a whole different story.
1 is true.
Is not, nuh-huh! Don't you know that childish replies give you cooties?
So now you're arguing against yourself? I'm confused.
2 is incorrect. 2 happened.
I replied to a +3 message, you retard: q. e. fucking d.
Yes ... but for me.
3 is the incorrect label for what I did.
[...] trolled [...] very well.
Ok, so you were trolling, but you were trolling through a "great one" strawman. And now you're just denying the evidence, like a troll. STFU and DIAF already.
No, you misunderstood me again. I wasn't trolling, you just missed the point of both my original post and subsequent hint entirely. Now you have one more hint to work with.
Unless of course punishment is also genetically determined, obviously. ;-)
http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.innocentenglish.com/funny-pics/lolcats/funny-bunny-raising-hand.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.innocentenglish.com/funny-amazing-pictures-videos/cute-kitten-puppy-animal-pics/lolcats-macros/funny-lol-bunnies-pics.html&h=659&w=440&sz=60&tbnid=3FMHlootV3kHkM:&tbnh=275&tbnw=183&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dlol%2Brabbits&zoom=1&q=lol+rabbits&usg=__WX2NIdcPgb7EIh-wBRB5ZdZS9QQ=&sa=X&ei=G1f9TO6kN5CqsAO1ktzxBA&ved=0CBkQ9QEwAg
Some would argue that there is a memetic component not determined by genes.
And most would argue that if a behavior is truly genetically determined, such that you literally cannot choose otherwise, it would in fact make infidelity less despicable.