I assume you were kidding, but obviously just because a device is ferromagnetic, and it is convenient to attach to cars because of that, that that is the only way to attach it to something.
So with the cats you could probably just staple it on instead.
Lots of people care, but we long ago passed the point on the slippery slope where it will cost you your and your family's life to protest, but have not yet reached the point on the slope where it becomes likely to cost their lives NOT to protest.
I know the developers of fingerzilla (http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/fingerzilla/id351733272?mt=8). They made money off of being the #1 game on the app store for a single day. At that rate, you can have 365 indie firms profitable each year.
2160 will offer huge advantages to PCs, where the source material is generated, and to marketing, where it's 'twice as good!'. And since it is relatively cheap to do, you'll likely see it before a lot of those other things.
No automated system can beat the 'drivers claim it is cheating'. If your laws don't explicitly allow mechanical surveillance of this kind, you are out of luck. Even very expensive red light camera systems in the US lose in court basically every time they are challenged.
Good news: the 3d tidal wave is forcing all of the LCD makers to switch to 120 or 240 hz. And after that, the next differentiator is going to be resolution again, e.g., you'll get sets with 2160P advertised as 'twice as smooth as HD' etc.
I meant digital thermometer readings, but the point is that so long as humans are fallible, such a test would be subject to the experimenter retrying a failure until he got the 'right' binary result, and then reporting it.
Right, only in the reporting is the problem, just like they do for purely concrete reporting in medical trials, because doctors will fudge the numbers, even if the thermometer wont.
The blind prevents the executors of the test from fudging the results. Ultimately nothing can prevent the publisher from doing so, except that the executors of the test can note that the published results depart from what they reported, the data is identifiably fudged, etc.
Slashdot Mirror
I assume you were kidding, but obviously just because a device is ferromagnetic, and it is convenient to attach to cars because of that, that that is the only way to attach it to something.
So with the cats you could probably just staple it on instead.
Lots of people care, but we long ago passed the point on the slippery slope where it will cost you your and your family's life to protest, but have not yet reached the point on the slope where it becomes likely to cost their lives NOT to protest.
I know the developers of fingerzilla (http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/fingerzilla/id351733272?mt=8). They made money off of being the #1 game on the app store for a single day. At that rate, you can have 365 indie firms profitable each year.
So the solution, clearly, is never to hire anyone who in the future might cause you to have to resort to disciplinary action.
You have to remember that it's distinguished ... from a decent school.
Parents who care about their children help them overcome any nerdish tendencies.
Robotic lifeguards, hyper oxygenation to prevent drowning, etc.
I don't know, the internet goes to actual places.
2160 will offer huge advantages to PCs, where the source material is generated, and to marketing, where it's 'twice as good!'. And since it is relatively cheap to do, you'll likely see it before a lot of those other things.
No automated system can beat the 'drivers claim it is cheating'. If your laws don't explicitly allow mechanical surveillance of this kind, you are out of luck. Even very expensive red light camera systems in the US lose in court basically every time they are challenged.
Good news: the 3d tidal wave is forcing all of the LCD makers to switch to 120 or 240 hz.
And after that, the next differentiator is going to be resolution again, e.g., you'll get sets with 2160P advertised as 'twice as smooth as HD' etc.
I meant digital thermometer readings, but the point is that so long as humans are fallible, such a test would be subject to the experimenter retrying a failure until he got the 'right' binary result, and then reporting it.
Right, only in the reporting is the problem, just like they do for purely concrete reporting in medical trials, because doctors will fudge the numbers, even if the thermometer wont.
Go read the other follow-ups. Lots of other people made the same wrong claim, and none of them have successfully challenged my counter claim.
The blind prevents the executors of the test from fudging the results. Ultimately nothing can prevent the publisher from doing so, except that the executors of the test can note that the published results depart from what they reported, the data is identifiably fudged, etc.
That doesn't help with the relevant problem.
Neither is a thermometer reading a temperature. You still have to blind the doctor reporting the result. Why is that?
Yeah, you aren't getting it. The thermometer has no bias either, why do you have to blind the doctor who reports the results?
I'd recommend reading more than two paragraphs before deciding you know enough about religions to judge their similarities and differences.
So when doctors are asked to report vital stats on patients, they don't need to be double blinded because they can't bias simple measurements, right?
(Hint: wrong).
Exactly why they start up an audiophile magazine.
Who reports the results of the md5 checks? Biased reviewer? Oh ....
Hence, double blind.
You can check that the results are the same with the double blind. Otherwise maybe your bias will cause you to see what you want to see.
Yeah, but last time I checked, reviews go for $200-300K, and for that you start to have to find a decent number of suckers.
Hmmm ... well, I don't have a recorder, so maybe you could clarify?