Absolutely. I have known several people who hoped to become journalists, that never wrote. That's like saying I want to be a fisherman, but never fish. I believe blogging puts the journal in journalism.
Then you really need to go watch some new construction happening.
When the painters recover from thier shellac-induced highs they toss enough of it down to hide the shoddy carpentery. That nice marble seat in your tub? Held up by scraps of ceramic tile and a couple of pounds of mastic.
This is caused by a simple fact : _Unions make people lazy._
The reason software is less than elegant in many cases is due to the urgency placed on developers for rapid development.
...and electronic votes are simply too suscepitble to some type of fraud. We need one that you fill out electronically, It punches the ballot for you, and then spits it out to you so you can see and verify the ballot, and them turn it in to the lockbox.
The machine gives good punches 100% of the time, you get to physically verify your vote, and there is a physical record available if needed.
You bring up a good point, and I would like to it.
Religion and science are not opposite things. Religion is a system of beliefs, science is a tool. The religion of the scientist determines how he translates the data.
Love is not diamonds!
Love is getting your simple, gold wedding bands at a pawn shop for $15 and a Super Nintendo.
Absolutely. I have known several people who hoped to become journalists, that never wrote. That's like saying I want to be a fisherman, but never fish. I believe blogging puts the journal in journalism.
Then you really need to go watch some new construction happening. When the painters recover from thier shellac-induced highs they toss enough of it down to hide the shoddy carpentery. That nice marble seat in your tub? Held up by scraps of ceramic tile and a couple of pounds of mastic. This is caused by a simple fact : _Unions make people lazy._ The reason software is less than elegant in many cases is due to the urgency placed on developers for rapid development.
...and electronic votes are simply too suscepitble to some type of fraud. We need one that you fill out electronically, It punches the ballot for you, and then spits it out to you so you can see and verify the ballot, and them turn it in to the lockbox. The machine gives good punches 100% of the time, you get to physically verify your vote, and there is a physical record available if needed.
The only warrant that was denied was one for that Chinese guy at the nuke lab
You bring up a good point, and I would like to it. Religion and science are not opposite things. Religion is a system of beliefs, science is a tool. The religion of the scientist determines how he translates the data.