Well, 500000 may be more accurate. But actually,
if that auto-moderation were to occur,
the forces of truth would be less able to refute the FUD because they wouldn't see it.
Speed bumps? Ok, that makes sense, they've stopped
smoking crack and have started shooting up
speed. Sucks when revenue is down and you
can't afford the crack, eh Darl?
No, it's not hypocritical. Just because software
patents are wrong does not preclude you from
saying that it is wrong for an entity to violate
what currently is the law. Until software patents
are outlawed, only outlaws will violate software patents.
I agree, complacency is a problem.
However, the bigger picture is that if bush
gets re-elected, the level of corruption is
such that MS can buy whatever 'laws' they
need to stifle Linux. However, if that occurs,
then the revolution will start.
It will be much cleaner for the state of the world
if bush is not re-elected, because if he is,
things will become a extremely large mess down
the road.
The problem is that if they have been granted
even though they are currently illegal/un-enforcable,
if for some crazy reason they become legal,
you can bet that they will be grandfathered
anyway. It doesn't matter whether you call it
illegal or un-enforcable, that's just semantics.
So, in reality, there is no difference.
Slashdot Mirror
Well, 500000 may be more accurate. But actually, if that auto-moderation were to occur, the forces of truth would be less able to refute the FUD because they wouldn't see it.
This list would be shorter to post the non-hacked machines.
Possibly. There has been discussion in recent years that they were warm-blooded in some ways. More info here.
Speed bumps? Ok, that makes sense, they've stopped smoking crack and have started shooting up speed. Sucks when revenue is down and you can't afford the crack, eh Darl?
Please cite where the US and Europe said this was OK. That is just MS spin AFAIK.
No, it's not hypocritical. Just because software patents are wrong does not preclude you from saying that it is wrong for an entity to violate what currently is the law. Until software patents are outlawed, only outlaws will violate software patents.
I agree, complacency is a problem. However, the bigger picture is that if bush gets re-elected, the level of corruption is such that MS can buy whatever 'laws' they need to stifle Linux. However, if that occurs, then the revolution will start. It will be much cleaner for the state of the world if bush is not re-elected, because if he is, things will become a extremely large mess down the road.
250MB for patches? You could download a Linux distro in nearly the same amount of time.
Ok, maybe that would be the SCO lawyers.
All your desktop are belong to us.
The logs don't prove crap. They indicate that it was possible that you read it, but it's also possible that your spam filter tossed it.
To allow the record companies to dump their junk as a 'settlement' speaks volumes about how corrupt the system has become.
It's close.
Apparently, there are short lived storms that create much more intense lightning than has ever been seen on the third rock.
Truely a lie. It would be the other way around.
is to cram a distro up the back end of Darl McBride.
Check out LARTC.
Yahoo can just say that their definition of abusive does not agree with the shysters definition of abusive.
Sorta like defining what 'is' is.
That was a mistake by the new pro-MS astro-mods.
Your point is good, but I'm not sure that invoking the 'drinkypoo law' will carry much weight around here.
First chapter? Sorry, but they were written long ago regarding a space rock called 'Earth'. Your other points are quite valid.
No, the +x *allows* /bin/laden to be *executed*.
MS needs to grow up and embrace Linux, not try to kill it.
The problem is that if they have been granted even though they are currently illegal/un-enforcable, if for some crazy reason they become legal, you can bet that they will be grandfathered anyway. It doesn't matter whether you call it illegal or un-enforcable, that's just semantics. So, in reality, there is no difference.
They should not be granted anyway.
The writeup is not clear:
The bug may allow servers to use PuTTY to act as a machine that you trust,...
Well, of course you trust your client machine.
1 mile = 1.609344 kilometers per Google.
They really should have reported it as 440.8 furlongs.