Slashdot Mirror


User: AndroidCat

AndroidCat's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
7,894
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 7,894

  1. Re:To answer my own question on (Short-, Medium-, Long)wave Radio Meets Digital Stereo · · Score: 1

    So I guess plugging my software into the cassette port of an old micro is unlikely to work right?

  2. Re:I can see it now on SCO Terminates IBM's Unix License · · Score: 1

    it's that army of lawyers that is the only thing that scares me about this case It's not unlike the zergling rush from Hell. Sounds like it too.

  3. Re:Clarification? on SCO Terminates IBM's Unix License · · Score: 1

    I swear, one day I'm going to learn to preview posts that can't posssibly go wrong go wrong go wrong... Imagine a [/b] after "Many".

  4. Re:Clarification? on SCO Terminates IBM's Unix License · · Score: 3, Interesting
    From Micro Cornucopia, Nov-Dec 1989, p.40: "Many years ago, IBM purchased a licence to System V.2 and has independently developed it into AIX .." (bolding mine)

    IBM already had a licence to SysV.2, it would be interesting to see what the licence IBM signed with Novell covered. (And did they pass any AIX code back? Can SCO still use that code if so?)

    This is going to be fun.

  5. Re:If you do quit before the end of project... on 12/7 and Overtime on a Salary? · · Score: 1
    That would be nice. I've worked at far too many companies that operated in continuous "burn mode". I don't mind a big push for a few months to get something out the door, peaking in a couple weeks of insanity. But when it drags on over years, and anyone leaving at 7pm gets funny looks, well... They need to fix their project management.

    I've only ever worked at one place that had good project management, and we still went over deadline and had our two weeks of insanity. Ah well, it's a funny old business.

  6. Re:New Meaning to 'Crash' on Boeing Moves Towards New Planes · · Score: 1

    Caller: The cockpit windscreen blew away and all the crew was sucked out. What are we going to do?
    Tech: Okay, first .. re-install Windows ...

  7. Re:The new layout on Boeing Moves Towards New Planes · · Score: 4, Funny

    I dunno about flying. More likely it'll taxi around in circles on the runway until it runs out of fuel or accidently takes off. In the event of a take off, the crew will have the option selling out to another airline and bailing for large amounts of money. In the event of a dot.bomb on board, all passengers will be abruptly fired off the plane.

  8. Re:New Meaning to 'Crash' on Boeing Moves Towards New Planes · · Score: 1

    I can just imagine the next airplane thriller movie: "Mid-Air Tech-Support Call".

  9. Re:The main selling point on Boeing Moves Towards New Planes · · Score: 2, Funny
    With a name like Dreamliner, I would expect, maybe, a good sleep on my next trip. Then again, I may also expect "dreamlike" services, being able to browse the Internet for no extra cost, or maybe even being able to use a cellphone on takeoff.

    You're dreaming.

  10. And that's why... on QNX: When an OS Really, Really Has to Work · · Score: 1
    Microsoft doesn't recommend Java. I had a look in the Office EULA to see what legal weasel clause they had. Nothing specific except this piece (their damned caps):

    NOTE ON JAVA SUPPORT. THE SOFTWARE PRODUCT MAY CONTAIN SUPPORT FOR PROGRAMS WRITTEN IN JAVA. JAVA TECHNOLOGY IS NOT FAULT TOLERANT AND IS NOT DESIGNED, MANUFACTURED, OR INTENDED FOR USE OR RESALE AS [snip of shouting FUD], DIRECT LIFE SUPPORT MACHINES, OR WEAPONS SYSTEMS, IN WHICH THE FAILURE OF JAVA TECHNOLOGY COULD LEAD DIRECTLY TO DEATH, PERSONAL INJURY, OR SEVERE PHYSICAL OR ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE.

    For damages .NET offers you what you paid or $5, which ever is greater. Whee! (Great Microsoft's yelling set off the lameness filter. *sigh*, I am not going to fix it for them. Hopefully if I type a little more, it'll get past, otherwise you'll never see this. Nope, this is indeed a disapointment. This makes me very angry, very angry indeed!)

  11. Re:A couple things on QNX: When an OS Really, Really Has to Work · · Score: 2, Funny
    * Starting Laser
    ! Garbage collection interrupt
    ! Garbage collection complete
    * Now where was I...

    I'm not saying WinCE couldn't do it, mostly, but Microsoft usually hangs too much stuff in the OS for me to trust it. (There's a reason for that "not to be used in medical uses" legal weasel disclaimer on lots of software.)

  12. Re:If you do quit before the end of project... on 12/7 and Overtime on a Salary? · · Score: 1

    Yes, I think that was the point. Normally it would be a full two weeks, but the deadline got messed up and now it just has to get done on time no matter what. Sorry.

  13. Re:A couple things on QNX: When an OS Really, Really Has to Work · · Score: 1
    If we assume that an embedded OS works correctly

    Is it really safe to assume this for real-time control applications?

  14. Re:If you do quit before the end of project... on 12/7 and Overtime on a Salary? · · Score: 1

    Damn, 80 working hours of course.

  15. If you do quit before the end of project... on 12/7 and Overtime on a Salary? · · Score: 1

    Make sure you give them the full and proper 80 hours notice. ;^P

  16. Re:I fear that IBM will win. on IBM Doesn't Comply With SCO's Deadline · · Score: 1
    This feature was available at least a year before, I'm not exactly sure when version 1.1 came out, but it was the fist version of Apache to support it.

    WebSite had it in 1996 or before. (It is yet another HTTPD descendant.)

  17. Re:SCO stock at 28 month high on IBM Doesn't Comply With SCO's Deadline · · Score: 1
    I wonder what will happen when all the people who bought on Friday in hopes of IBM caving read the headlines on Monday morning:

    IBM BLOWS OFF SCOX

    (I could say something more about bulls and bears, but I think that's enough...)

  18. Re:Who are we cheering for? on IBM Doesn't Comply With SCO's Deadline · · Score: 1

    Either that or the code in question will also be found in some older work that SCO doesn't control like 386BSD.

  19. Re:You're assuming ownership... on IBM Doesn't Comply With SCO's Deadline · · Score: 1
    Considering the rather incestuous family tree that is UNIX that is not so cut and dry.

    Well, you would want a family tree that's been cut and dried, now would you? Unless you wanted to have a bonfire.

    *Ow*! Okay, I'm going... :^P

  20. Re:No way! on Remember The Wizard? · · Score: 1
    Does anyone else remember this?

    "I'm a reasonable man. Give me the map, and you might walk out of here on human limbs..."

    Nope. ObSimp "Does anyone remember the movie TRON?"

  21. Re:I knew it! on The Buttocks Have It · · Score: 1

    Isn't this unreasonable search and seizure? This isn't just taking someone's butt-print.

  22. Re:Too little, too late. on Maintaining Large Linux Clusters · · Score: 1

    There are other projects that could use a lot of spare CPU time. If the humanitarian ones don't excite, how about pissing off Bill Gates? (Click on my sig.)

  23. Re:Mandatory on Brazil Mandates Shift to Free Software · · Score: 1
    there's no way for companies to buy their way into Brazil

    Into the Brazilian government and government owned corporations. Can you sell much to the US government without being ISO 9000 compliant?

  24. Re:Mandatory defies the nature of open source.... on Brazil Mandates Shift to Free Software · · Score: 1
    They might mandate which software. Just like a company might mandate that MS Word is the standard document format, they could mandate OpenOffice.

    It's about organizational standards, not some vague "nature of open software". You want worker X to be able to use workstation Y or department A to be able to give a report to office B.

  25. Re:Tethers? on Lockheed Martin to Build Nuclear Powered Spacecraft · · Score: 1

    Usually tapping magnetic fields for power costs momentum, but Jupiter's environment is pretty complex. Perhaps something clever could be done.