Slashdot Mirror


User: AndroidCat

AndroidCat's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
7,894
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 7,894

  1. Re:Are they willing to sell? on Microsoft To Acquire Macromedia? · · Score: 2
    After the dot.bombing of their portfolios, most of the shareholders will probably sell their grannies for the right price.

    The fonders don't need a majority, just a big enough lump to make it hard to swallow. However, I'll bet that they don't if Microsoft can make a sweet enough offer to the VCaps and institutional investors. As I said, with the general slashing of tech stocks, a lot of them could really use the money.

    Do not underestimate the power of large amounts of crisp cash.

  2. On the first day... on Microsoft To Acquire Macromedia? · · Score: 2
    On the first day of Christmas Microsoft bought a company...

    Borland, Rational, Macromedia, they might not get them all, but they sure want something under the tree for Bill.

  3. Re:other mistakes on Top Ten Web-Design Mistakes of 2002 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Peeve: Companies that post jobs on their site, but don't provide a street address so you can figure out if it's possible to actually get there if you ever get an interview. I guess they want you to look up their domain registration in whois to prove your L337 skills.

  4. Re:You know what I like? on Top Ten Web-Design Mistakes of 2002 · · Score: 1

    Maybe so, but there's some server in Clueless&Witless/Exodus space that keeps dropping the hop to Slashdot for me.

  5. Re:100:1 Compression Baby!!! on Vote for 2002's "Best" Vaporware · · Score: 1
    That's nothing! I can compress any information down to one bit. Really!

    The decompression? We're working on it. And while I'm waiting on my funds from Nigeria, if you'd like to sign up for our vult^w venture capital investment plan, I assure you that your $10 million will be far more carefully bur^w spent than Zeosync.

  6. Re:The Economy on Vote for 2002's "Best" Vaporware · · Score: 1

    Did he say corner or coroner? (Everything old is old again and again.)

  7. Re:live with it indeed on ISP Chief on Spam · · Score: 2

    But filtering is just automated "Just Hit Delete". The system at the other end, which probably isn't even the spammer's, doesn't even get a 55x bounce message. (Not that spamware pays any attention to those.)

    The "adv" tag idea is part of the Direct Marketing Association propaganda-pack. (The "our shit doesn't stink" defence.) What would happen if even a fraction of companies around the world sent everyone email tagged with "adv"?

    The only way to make it work is to make it unprofitable for ISPs to accept pink-money from spammers. If they know that all their customers will suffer if they turn a blind eye to abuse, then they might rethink their deals with spammers.

  8. Re:World's first? Like hell... on ISP Chief on Spam · · Score: 2
    I don't know if I'd consider RFC2235 a definitive document. I don't have the time to research and pick it apart, but it did seem to be a retro-history [1]. I did notice the lack of any mention of Canadian universities that were on ARPANET long before the mention in 2235 of international or Canadian connections. (University of Waterloo, or just maybe utzoo for starters... :^)

    [1] By retro-history, I mean a history which start with the present-day winners, and traces them back without researching the people who were doing the same thing at the same time, but failed.

  9. Re:Curiosity on FCC Rule Cuts Bandwidth For 72-Mile 802.11b · · Score: 2
    Either recruiting a friendly radio amateur (radio engineer if you can get one) or investing the time to get their own licences would have been a good idea. Not only would they have more radio knowledge (or at least know where to find it), but they could operate in radio amateur frequencies with a much higher power limit.

    That said, it's been a while I tried out for mine (failed the 10 WPM Morse), and I have no idea what available frequencies are up there or how easy it would be to shift those transmitters -- but I bet that they could run a hell of a lot more power. (There are restrictions on the type of traffic, but that didn't seem to a problem in this case.)

    Honestly, if you can pass a Mickysoft "Engineer" exam, you can get your ham licence.

  10. Re:I'm gonna have to say it. on Wi-Fi From The Sky · · Score: 2
    What about that Future World where all your appliances will be on the Internet? With wide-coverage WiFi, you'll be able to put your pants on the Internet! (If your pants are already on the Internet, I don't want to know, okay? I don't need that much life-changing this morning.)

    It's still too early to tell much impact universal broadband will have.

  11. Re:Hrmm Math doesn't seem right on Wi-Fi From The Sky · · Score: 3, Funny

    They use Pringles cans. BIG Pringles cans...

  12. Re:68000ft on Wi-Fi From The Sky · · Score: 1
    I presume it has some means of propulsion for station keeping

    Yes, but their webpage is pretty short on details.

  13. Re:Don't fall for it! on Wi-Fi From The Sky · · Score: 1

    Ah! So the Them are now using black helicopters and white balloons? :^)

  14. 21st Century Airships on Wi-Fi From The Sky · · Score: 2
    Here's the company that makes the airships 21st Century Airships Is it just me or does anyone else think of "Rover" from The Prisoner?

    In the irony dept, Newmarket is north of Toronto, up Highway .. 404.

  15. Cables on Wi-Fi From The Sky · · Score: 1

    Cables are a little hard to drag around with you for communications on the go. I wonder about the large "footprint" that the balloons will have - won't having everyone in range communicating through it tend to chew up the bandwidth? (I guess I could read the article.)

  16. Re:what's the point? on Next-Gen Pop-up Ads · · Score: 1

    It's like all the pr0n sites that get rich displaying each other's banner ads. I never quite figured out how that's supposed to work.

  17. Re:Bob forbid that this should ever come to pass. on The End of Solotrek · · Score: 2

    14. People who drank a lot of beer and suddenly notice the lack of washrooms on board. 'copter whizzz...

  18. Re:Okay ... a few things that really bug me here . on The End of Solotrek · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If they could use them in some of the current roles of expensive to operate police or search helicopters, 5 million would be chump change.

  19. Re:Spews = /m\ on Spam Blocking Engine for OpenBSD · · Score: 1

    How many times are you going to spam Slashdot with the same post?

  20. Re:ultimate solution; bayesian client/server filte on Spam Blocking Engine for OpenBSD · · Score: 2

    That won't work. A 550 error has to be given before the body of the email is sent. A filter can drop the email into /dev/null once the body has been received, but you've already accepted the email from the sender.

  21. Re:Let's face it... on Spam Blocking Engine for OpenBSD · · Score: 2

    Filtering out any email that has "This is not spam" would be a good start. :^)

  22. Re:Spews is NOT the right way to filter e-mail. on Spam Blocking Engine for OpenBSD · · Score: 2
    ...because they'd never unlist anyone

    SPEWS didn't tell you that. Probably it was someone on news.admin.net-abuse.email, which is as about as authoritative as a random reply on Slashdot.

    And further more, it isn't true. SPEWS has frequently reacted to spammer-removal within hours (or less).

  23. Re:Just Justification of Criminal activities.. on Spam Blocking Engine for OpenBSD · · Score: 2

    What illegal act? You're just not accepting the email that they're trying to dump on you.

  24. Re:SpamAssassin vs Theo's Package on Spam Blocking Engine for OpenBSD · · Score: 2
    www.acky.net = 65.165.235.172 S356

    Partial listing:
    1, 65.165.237.126, HUFFNAL / underage-girls.net
    1, 65.165.238.144, HUFFNAL / home-lolita.net
    1, 65.165.235.230, HUFFNAL / mail.webspace4all.net
    0, 65.165.239.144, HUFFNAL / dealsonpc.com (listed)
    1, 65.165.235.205, HUFFNAL / trust-bill.com
    1, 65.165.234.1, HUFFNAL / Spammers Perez/Walls / mortgageleads.tv
    1, 65.165.232.0 - 65.165.239.255, HUFFNAL / Todd Spears/Perez/Walls (Sprint)

    Looks like a pretty scummy net-neighborhood. If their ISP doesn't want to clean it up, I don't think I'd want any email from them either.

  25. Re:Doom on your phone... on Doom Archive Reopened · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "This is your boss. If you keep playing Doom on company time, you're fired."