No, it is parsed. Of course, computer illiterate people couldn't tell the difference.
autorun was not enabled.
Source?
And in any case, regardless or version or enabled/disabled whatever, ATMs should not run a proprietary garbage consumer OS Why on earth are you defending this utterly stupid practice? Could you really be this dumbed down? Pathetic.
oh just for clarity, said file will be displayed as "Autorun" on your idiotic windows machines, because a difficult and complicated concept as filename extensions apparently is considered too hard to grasp for the average dumb windows user, by microsoft.
Mac OS X is UNIX by the only definition that still exists.
And yet that definition is de-facto meaningless these days, and OSX feels directly opposed to unix philosophy in a lot of ways.
By a much more realistical definition of what unix is (namely, source code ancestry instead of trademark rights), the BSDs are the only real descendants of unix which still exist (as in, are in widespread use).
It's about being able to combine programs in a CLI.
Program A, which produces useful output O from some input I need not 'support' that flexibility itself, the point is that Program B can take O as its input, performing additional operations/transformations thereon. That is something not possible with a GUI
The data that was acquired through a Snapchat exploit that was recently patched and is being shared to raise awareness of the issue.
FTFY.
On an unrelated note, The data that was acquired through a Snapchat exploit that was recently patched and is being shared to raise awareness of the issue.
You're cute. Obviously the Windows on the ATM in question did it by default, so i guess your claims about me lying are nothing but lies. Or you could be trolling, you're not doing it well in that case, though.
Slashdot Mirror
autorun.inf *is* executed.
No, it is parsed. Of course, computer illiterate people couldn't tell the difference.
autorun was not enabled.
Source?
And in any case, regardless or version or enabled/disabled whatever, ATMs should not run a proprietary garbage consumer OS Why on earth are you defending this utterly stupid practice? Could you really be this dumbed down? Pathetic.
oh just for clarity, said file will be displayed as "Autorun" on your idiotic windows machines, because a difficult and complicated concept as filename extensions apparently is considered too hard to grasp for the average dumb windows user, by microsoft.
there is no "default autorun file to be executed", the program or batch file to run is specified in a file called autorun.inf.
Heck why do i even know that crap, i haven't been using windows in a decade.
A nice anecdote, but it really doesn't apply here
They are getting MAC addresses, not IPv4.
Oh, really. Perhaps try reading GGGP
$665 dollars
cool square-dollars there, bro
Well actually it's more like a /16 since the ipv4 address space is just smaller. whatever.
It's more like a /8, but yeah. Nothing to see here
the problem with climate "science" is that you have exactly one experiment.
could fall behind in the robotics race
Hahaha.
protip: there's also the tag available
Yes, that is pretty much spot on.
One advice though - try not to learn about "linux" development, there are too many linux-centric idiots already. Stick to POSIX. Thanks
Why are pipelines operated at such a ridiculously high pressure?
I am stating that having both can have value in some cases.
IOW, you're conveying exactly 0 information here and might as well have said nothing at all.
This seem to have been accidentally modded down.
Mac OS X is UNIX by the only definition that still exists.
And yet that definition is de-facto meaningless these days, and OSX feels directly opposed to unix philosophy in a lot of ways.
By a much more realistical definition of what unix is (namely, source code ancestry instead of trademark rights), the BSDs are the only real descendants of unix which still exist (as in, are in widespread use).
Linux is trying to become like XP.
Yeah, kind of.
That really only applies to Linux, not to unix.
It's about being able to combine programs in a CLI.
Program A, which produces useful output O from some input I need not 'support' that flexibility itself, the point is that Program B can take O as its input, performing additional operations/transformations thereon.
That is something not possible with a GUI
The data that was acquired through a Snapchat exploit that was recently patched and is being shared to raise awareness of the issue.
FTFY.
On an unrelated note, The data that was acquired through a Snapchat exploit that was recently patched and is being shared to raise awareness of the issue.
40 years really is less than 'no time at all' on astronomical scales...
That really doesn't apply here, and furhermore you're doing it wrong ("control", not "controls").
Eh, what concept exactly needed proving here?
Ehhh, what? No way that's going to be used in cars ever, an that's totally not what TFA is talking about, either.
You're cute. Obviously the Windows on the ATM in question did it by default, so i guess your claims about me lying are nothing but lies.
Or you could be trolling, you're not doing it well in that case, though.
Especially the user.