Eh, no? Can you try to gibber even less coherently? I stopped bothering because you keep contradicting yourself horribly. There's no point in continuing this. Besides, we seem to have nothing in commong, you being a Windows user and stuff.
I always wondered what's the point of such stickers at all. My laptop had multiple, and one particularly big-ass sticker which would basically list the entire "spec" of the machine.
I think the only people benefiting from those stickers are thieves...
How is it even relevant that recent versions of Windows don't do it? Obviously they didn't run a recent version, and honestly, that'd be just as bad.
Perhaps you should learn about modern OSs
I have quite in-depth knowledge about modern OSs.
before you lecture others on them.
However this is about Windows, so i don't see how modern OSs are relevant here. Besides, even if you're very proficient in using Windows, you don't know shit about OS concepts. Feel free to prove me wrong.
No. Science doesn't directly deal with reality, but with models of reality. A theory can perfectly and correctly describe a model, yet it might turn out the model doesn't model reality quite accurately [or not at all].
Yes, because supposing there's a creator, the obvious question is ``who created that creator, or did they evolve randomly''? I.e. you're back at the start.
Obviously it's easy to do so, given it's an open system. There are probably 5 different ways of doing so. You're missing the point, though -- the point is, windows does it *by default*, while unix doesn't. (I'm sure linux will, some day)
Ehhhh, what? Plug in the the pretend-to-be keyboard and then? Bruteforce the root password? You do realize unix is a multiuser system right? Well, of course you don't.
Slashdot Mirror
I recently purchased an Android phone, but it wasn't interoperable with my IDevice. So I purchased another IDevice.
...said the obvious fanboy.
You lied about Windows features
Yawn. Where?
Also can you please keep in mind what this story is about?
Eh, no? Can you try to gibber even less coherently? I stopped bothering because you keep contradicting yourself horribly. There's no point in continuing this. Besides, we seem to have nothing in commong, you being a Windows user and stuff.
2: Whoever wants to touch it gets their own user account.
FTFY
Here's a decent list for you:
1. Use free software.
FTFY
Prople who are better then you are, like myself, you ignorant twat.
FTFY
No way. It fucking is my computer, I am the ADMIN so i fuken log in as AS ADMIN. Period.
Also, never let someone else use your computer, period.
How sad that this is what it boils down to, in the Windows world.
Well, it's probably okay if you don't have friends anyway.
You say that like there is some way I could "prove you wrong". I can't.
[...]
Now that I've proven you wrong
Ehm. I don't feel like there was much left to say here.
Well i must have missed that, thanks.
i ssh to work all the time
I always wondered what's the point of such stickers at all. My laptop had multiple, and one particularly big-ass sticker which would basically list the entire "spec" of the machine.
I think the only people benefiting from those stickers are thieves...
If you don't have antivirus, you shouldn't have a computer.
Someone above said:
Editors, please stop pandering to the lowest common denominator end user who will never read Slashdot anyhow
Now here's living proof that there /are/ such people on slashdot after all, seeing this one even thinks Windows and computers are someone the same.
You tried to get your mom a Mac, which she paid for?
Does light gray work, too?
Perhaps you should learn about modern OSs
I have quite in-depth knowledge about modern OSs.
before you lecture others on them.
However this is about Windows, so i don't see how modern OSs are relevant here.
Besides, even if you're very proficient in using Windows, you don't know shit about OS concepts. Feel free to prove me wrong.
No. Science doesn't directly deal with reality, but with models of reality. A theory can perfectly and correctly describe a model, yet it might turn out the model doesn't model reality quite accurately [or not at all].
Yes, because supposing there's a creator, the obvious question is ``who created that creator, or did they evolve randomly''? I.e. you're back at the start.
FTFM
Are these compromised, too?
I got myself a handful for christmas, which should in combination with a MCU give a known-good network tap.
Problem NSA?
inb4 encryption - I assume that they can crack any encrypted files, or they wrote the specs in the first place.
Go back to 4chan, and don't forget your tinfoil hat.
Obviously it's easy to do so, given it's an open system. There are probably 5 different ways of doing so.
You're missing the point, though -- the point is, windows does it *by default*, while unix doesn't. (I'm sure linux will, some day)
And i don't think you realize that the keyboard will talk to login(1), initially. Have fun convincing it to grant you access.
Ehhhh, what? Plug in the the pretend-to-be keyboard and then? Bruteforce the root password?
You do realize unix is a multiuser system right? Well, of course you don't.