My experience has been that both leaks and overall memory use have gone down between 3.0 and 4.0.
At the moment, Firefox is at about 375 megabytes, with 16 tabs open. It has been open for 3 weeks. I do have browser.sessionhistory.max_total_viewers set to 3 and the anti-malware databases disabled though.
Don't shop at such a stupid store. If you lived in a village and it was the only store, I can see why you would complain (but maybe it would be more productive to open a smarter store). As it is, Apple sells shiny baubles, not necessities.
Maybe the particular reason is odd, but there is nothing about the underlying tone that is beneficial to users (or at least, users that have no need for a corporate censor making them feel safe).
Plenty of people make the mistake of thinking that democracy itself is virtuous (hopefully it is obvious that the situation that does not require the force of government is superior to any situation that does).
It just happens to be a system that has the least impact on virtuous things like liberty and self-determination.
The U.S. has natural gas coming out of our armpits and giant mountains of coal, I think you are being a little bleak.
I guess hastening a move away from petroleum is probably a good idea, but it still isn't very expensive compared to the infrastructure that would be required to replace it.
It just needs to be straightforward for citizens to repudiate the claim that they worked for an employer (which demonstrates that they are not responsible for the taxes on those wages).
That system would surely be abused, but those people could pay a healthy fine and maybe be flagged for extra scrutiny that they then have to pay for (so the employer would have to do extra checks to hire them, checks that they employee would have to pay for).
Making the employer pay the victim doesn't make a great deal of sense, far better to eliminate the inconvenience to the point that they are no longer a victim of anything.
You really think all those businesses that are employing illegal workers are taking reasonable measures to check the documents that are currently required by federal law?
I think the reality is that some businesses are being duped and some businesses are working awful hard to not look real close.
Slashdot Mirror
My experience has been that both leaks and overall memory use have gone down between 3.0 and 4.0.
At the moment, Firefox is at about 375 megabytes, with 16 tabs open. It has been open for 3 weeks. I do have browser.sessionhistory.max_total_viewers set to 3 and the anti-malware databases disabled though.
Max Hardcore is in jail for obscenity.
That some of the freedoms are impinged off the internet doesn't make it any better that they are abused on the internet.
Also, the U.S. Government piracy domain seizures cracked down on lots of people that simply weren't doing anything.
Wait, which one of us is confused here?
There actually is something you can do.
Don't shop at such a stupid store. If you lived in a village and it was the only store, I can see why you would complain (but maybe it would be more productive to open a smarter store). As it is, Apple sells shiny baubles, not necessities.
The census titles their data with "highest driver BAC".:
http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/cats/transportation/motor_vehicle_accidents_and_fatalities.html
Comes out to ~31% above 0.08 and ~5% between 0.01 and 0.07 (with the rest being 0.00).
Less than 14,000 alcohol related fatalities in 2008, and with the large drop in overall fatalities, I would expect less than that in 2010.
Maybe the particular reason is odd, but there is nothing about the underlying tone that is beneficial to users (or at least, users that have no need for a corporate censor making them feel safe).
Obviously, the magic numbers that U.S. banks use to 'secure' accounts and transactions.
Plenty of people make the mistake of thinking that democracy itself is virtuous (hopefully it is obvious that the situation that does not require the force of government is superior to any situation that does).
It just happens to be a system that has the least impact on virtuous things like liberty and self-determination.
I mean that regrowth is being cut more and more aggressively.
The trees are getting smaller.
We have way more plutonium these days than we had in 1900.
The whole idea of inflation is that the value of currencies changes, making comparisons of prices at different points in time difficult.
Blaming high prices on inflation is quite a strange thing to do (because the one is the bread to the others butter).
I guess you could frame your argument in terms of declining purchasing power (but if you do that, don't mention that oil is historically cheap!).
Moore's law is geometric.
Yeah, it isn't really much to celebrate.
But maybe the voters will remember the danger of sanctioning the behavior of rampant assholes.
Well, GP was talking about burning lots of gas and oil, so talking about burning lots of gas and coal instead is probably reasonable.
(and really, if we *knew* global warming was a minor problem, it is quite likely we would go ahead and burn everything there was to burn)
The U.S. has natural gas coming out of our armpits and giant mountains of coal, I think you are being a little bleak.
I guess hastening a move away from petroleum is probably a good idea, but it still isn't very expensive compared to the infrastructure that would be required to replace it.
Why do you think they would not already be generating power from the waste heat?
I ask because you seem to think that it would be straightforward for them to generate useful amounts of power from it.
They are probably going to do crazy things like turn on the backup generators and test out secondary cooling systems.
Imagine if it were a level 8.
This isn't an escalation of the situation, it is an escalation of the reported release.
The situation is approximately as perilous as it was yesterday.
It isn't that little known, there is a plan to replace it, with some international funding already secured.
You are swimming in the ocean. There is a supertanker bearing down on you.
The noise it makes as it passes over you is going to be amazing.
Never mind the part where it is an option, not an obligation.
It just needs to be straightforward for citizens to repudiate the claim that they worked for an employer (which demonstrates that they are not responsible for the taxes on those wages).
That system would surely be abused, but those people could pay a healthy fine and maybe be flagged for extra scrutiny that they then have to pay for (so the employer would have to do extra checks to hire them, checks that they employee would have to pay for).
Making the employer pay the victim doesn't make a great deal of sense, far better to eliminate the inconvenience to the point that they are no longer a victim of anything.
You really think all those businesses that are employing illegal workers are taking reasonable measures to check the documents that are currently required by federal law?
I think the reality is that some businesses are being duped and some businesses are working awful hard to not look real close.