It's a war of choice for the United States. That is reason enough to at least consider having a doctrine of treading lightly.
(Andy yes, it is a war of choice. Car accidents are a bigger threat to our way of life than radical terrorism. That isn't a sufficient argument for not being in Iraq at all, but it provides a considerable amount of context to the discussion about whether the war is a choice or not.)
It doesn't matter. How many of the 6.5 million downloads do you think are people who are trying it for the first time?
Maybe a few hundred thousand, but that isn't enough to matter, and the high or low quality of the release (beta4 has been fine so far...) will quickly have a much larger impact on the number of users.
The judge has to have some recourse to be able to conduct a trial.
A judge that consistently abused contempt of court would not remain a judge in most jurisdictions (and in the others, legal ideals aren't really the first issue that needs addressing).
Ask them if they think the government should be informed if they buy a pregnancy test or a prescription. Not just the government though, all of the people that work for the government, including their friends.
I don't know, I think it depends a great deal on where you live. I flush my toilet without giving it a second thought, but I live 100 miles from Lake Michigan in an area that receives 2.5 feet of rain each year.
I guess I could get all twisted in knots about it, but people living in Vegas and LA are probably doing more damage to water supplies just by living there than I would by having a hedonistic water park in my back yard.
It could well be running up to an implosion (revenues won't necessarily reflect erosion of long term business), but the stock is up on real revenue and earnings growth:
I was demonstrating that the failure is even worse than you indicated by inventing a narrative that was compatible with the facts, not trying to slam Obama.
curlyjoe@wonder.com, prettyPrincess400@yahoo.com and big_lovin69@hotmail.com are completely within the bounds of what I would expect to find on a list of email addresses.
Modding you down is not the sort of censorship that is comparable to the pernicious censorship that is problematic in a personal rights sense. It's comparable to a newspaper editor choosing not to publish a letter, not to the government throwing someone in prison for saying that they don't like biscuits.
Do you rail against the man because it feeds into the hero story that you tell yourself you are living?
It's telling that you so "those with an agenda" as if you somehow don't have one. *Everyone* has an agenda, even a wino out picking up cans for the deposit.
Slashdot Mirror
extremely accuratean interesting start.
It's a war of choice for the United States. That is reason enough to at least consider having a doctrine of treading lightly.
(Andy yes, it is a war of choice. Car accidents are a bigger threat to our way of life than radical terrorism. That isn't a sufficient argument for not being in Iraq at all, but it provides a considerable amount of context to the discussion about whether the war is a choice or not.)
It doesn't matter. How many of the 6.5 million downloads do you think are people who are trying it for the first time?
Maybe a few hundred thousand, but that isn't enough to matter, and the high or low quality of the release (beta4 has been fine so far...) will quickly have a much larger impact on the number of users.
The judge has to have some recourse to be able to conduct a trial.
A judge that consistently abused contempt of court would not remain a judge in most jurisdictions (and in the others, legal ideals aren't really the first issue that needs addressing).
All people everywhere will always be backward compared to what you want them to be. As the people move forward, your wants will increase.
You didn't mean that the way you phrased it. A "to find out" adds a great deal of clarity.
It happened at least 10 years ago (I'm 28). Maybe about 50 years ago. (Don "Magic" Juan Yo)
More likely than 'when did become' is 'where' not including the area that you grew up in.
Ask them if they think the government should be informed if they buy a pregnancy test or a prescription. Not just the government though, all of the people that work for the government, including their friends.
Deep breaths there skippy, deep breaths.
I don't know, I think it depends a great deal on where you live. I flush my toilet without giving it a second thought, but I live 100 miles from Lake Michigan in an area that receives 2.5 feet of rain each year.
I guess I could get all twisted in knots about it, but people living in Vegas and LA are probably doing more damage to water supplies just by living there than I would by having a hedonistic water park in my back yard.
Regulations against shitting in the creek are regulation for the sake of drinkable water.
If you don't think people would shit in their own drinking water, read a history book.
They'll just take their time complying, rendering the data marginally useful.
It could well be running up to an implosion (revenues won't necessarily reflect erosion of long term business), but the stock is up on real revenue and earnings growth:
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/is?s=IBM&annual
If a piece of software could make computers shit gold bricks, gold would quickly lose much of its value. Then I could finally have my golden toilet.
Recognition is the first step.
The next step is to eat some pudding, it will make you feel better.
Hence the "may be".
I probably would have appreciated it more if you had said that I liked red balloons though.
Your sarcasm detector may be poorly tuned.
I was demonstrating that the failure is even worse than you indicated by inventing a narrative that was compatible with the facts, not trying to slam Obama.
How much have you got?
Moderation isn't a contest. It exists to make the comments more filterable.
You got the rumor all wrong. Obama is a secret Muslim. Of course he has a Christian minister, it helps keep the secret.
What does a fake email address look like?
curlyjoe@wonder.com, prettyPrincess400@yahoo.com and big_lovin69@hotmail.com are completely within the bounds of what I would expect to find on a list of email addresses.
Modding you down is not the sort of censorship that is comparable to the pernicious censorship that is problematic in a personal rights sense. It's comparable to a newspaper editor choosing not to publish a letter, not to the government throwing someone in prison for saying that they don't like biscuits.
Do you rail against the man because it feeds into the hero story that you tell yourself you are living?
It's telling that you so "those with an agenda" as if you somehow don't have one. *Everyone* has an agenda, even a wino out picking up cans for the deposit.
They better not make a mistake against somebody who doesn't like their agenda.
To some extent, the copy speed improvements in SP1 are simply Vista telling you the copy is done before it is actually finished on disk:
http://blogs.technet.com/markrussinovich/archive/2008/02/04/2826167.aspx