Eventually every company will go 'Well, Comcast pulled it off. Okay, we'll also throttle netflix that way and charge an additional fee for 'fast lanes'.
Shaw out here in Canada does that basically. They watch what other large telecoms do first, like Comcast and AT&T. If what they do seems to generate revenue and do well, they implement their strategies out here.
Hydrogen fuel cells. Large industrial ones. Use all the excess electricity to perform the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E... to gather hydrogen into fuel cells.
One of the biggest weaknesses to create hydrogen is the power draw. Renewable solves that.
Use the hydrogen fuel cells in times when renewable energy is not producing enough.
If I recall producing hydrogen isn't the most efficient use of electricity to store it, conversion ratio wise I believe it takes more power to produce the hydrogen than it returns so there is a loss, but the potential storage volumes are massive and it's clean energy.
You might have a point, but at the same time, for those small home bands, wouldn't it actually be better for them to have their content spread with hopes that people enjoy their music to buy it anyway?
Maybe the approach wouldn't be to put out a DMCA, but instead request that the party places a link so that people can purchase their music?
DMCA''s do not do a lot to combat people doing something like downloading music, and although I do believe artists are entitled to sell their works, I don't recommend it as a plan to get what little sales you can if no major player is behind you and try to live off it.
If you want to be rich and have lots of money, create music said no one ever. Some artists just become a hit and happen to get rich. Many more do not, and it has nothing to do with piracy.
Well it's true, it's horrible for adults as well and shouldn't be taken lightly.
The reason there's additional emotion attached to children is because we're genetically predispositioned to it, in additional children do not have the ability to defend themselves reasonably.
An adult can choose to live in safer places, to not walk down that dark alley, to carry pepper spray, or ideally know martial arts and beat the shit out of whomever just tried to rape them (Sadly our laws are so fucked that they would be held accountable for the beating). A child however is not stronger, faster, able to make decisions on where they live and the safety of the area, nor have the experience to make the necessary judgements about people to avoid bad people.
It still matches the energy in and energy out equation. Malnutrition will cause your body to enter survival mode, which will significantly reduce its energy output, meaning you will feel more tired.
It's lowered your energy output to match your caloric intake. So even though you're eating less than you were before, you're still not losing weight as you are also putting out less energy. Even in a resting state your body burns more calories if it has proper nutrition than if it doesn't.
This is why a healthy eating style is essential to losing weight so that you're not crippling your ability to shed fat while reducing consumption.
What the fuck does eating something scientifically marked as waste being compared to meat? Meat is a product we developed into eating long, long ago and people should be god damn thankful they can choose to live off of other food, that wasn't always an option depending on where your geographic location was. Especially given the amount of vegetables etc one needs to eat to maintain weight.
Don't even try that bullshit where you're going to go some beliefs consider meat a waste or some shit, it's not, it's good for your body, your body uses it properly, it doesn't make you ill except for certain genetic conditions.
Pee and vomit are BAD for you period. You can't argue it, you have nothing. It causes damage to ones body to consume these kinds of things.
Let's be you, Glad you're okay with people eating HUMAN FECES AND FLESH TO SURVIVE.
I never said people can just man up over it. Some people will never change, we've proven that in all facets of life, not just depression.
Why they are that way? We can speculate a thousand reasons, some that make them look negative, ones that make society look negative, not a whole lot that are positive.
But it still is what it is. It's still someone not "getting over their fucking sadness". That part doesn't change. We might decide as a whole that it makes sense for them to not get over it or decide it's acceptable, but that doesn't change what it is.
We can set aside the distinction between clinical/nonclinical depression, because for both of those cases you're implying that somehow the sufferer deserves the condition they have presumably due to what you regard as neglect, cowardice or laziness,
No, the cowardice remark was to the person posting as anonymous coward. My response to them was purely out of the fact that people keep trying to change depression from it's original definition to some mystical thing that no one understands so they can brace themselves with the 'You can't understand' (Because we changed the definition into a mystical thing that no one understands)
The original poster was correct in using prison as a reason to be depressed, the response about it not being about sadness it's ignorant. It absolutely is about "sadness" obviously that a simplistic view of it, but at it's core, that's what it is. We can analyze it all we want, as to why, chemical balance and everything else, however if you were to take core emotions - Happy, Angry, Sad, etc. It would fall under sad.
At the end of the day, you can have X reason for being depressed. It does not mean that no one understands you if they disagree with you being in that state as X thing, as depending on the nature of it, a lot of people have put up with X thing, and gotten over it.
It doesn't mean they don't understand you. They understand it entirely, at times. However, this doesn't mean the way you are behaving over it acceptable, or that you can somehow make it socially acceptable. I realize this doesn't apply to all causes, as mentioned some can actually be a chemical imbalance, or it can be things that I really have no idea about, so I couldn't say that nothing is worth being depressed over, not everything that can happen to someone has happened to me.
But there are a lot of things that have, and out of those, some people choose to be depressed over the stupidest shit and it's not going to become socially acceptable.
Getting a speeding ticket doesn't land you in jail. I'd like to think I'm an open-minded person. Why not try an analogy or example that is a little more realistic?
Like why not lobotomize anyone who rapes children? Let's see how many people protest that statement.
That's a big problem with this world. They assume you clearly don't understand it if you don't agree with their point of view.
News flash, a lot of people understand it, have been through it, and just might have a different opinion on it that you do. In addition, I gave you the definitions. If you don't fit in the definition, then you have something other than 'depression'
So many people cling to depression because it's the one thing that has become semi taboo to talk bad about so they can hide behind that and excuse their way of being in a form they feel society should have to accept.
And I said DEPRESSION
Here is CLINICAL DEPRESSION Definition: Clinical depression is the more severe form of depression, also known as major depression or major depressive disorder. It isn't the same as depression caused by a loss, such as the death of a loved one, or a medical condition, such as a thyroid disorder.
"Symptoms may be based on your own feelings or on the observations of someone else.
Clinical depression can affect people of any age, including children. However, clinical depression symptoms, even if severe, usually improve with psychological counseling, antidepressant medications or a combination of the two."
Still about how you fucking feel. It's not some mystical force. It's about you, and how you perceive the world.
What should they hope for? That they can get out? If they focus on that, say a rapist, will just have hope that he can get out one day and rape again.
You need to take hope away among other things so that you can rebuild (reform) them with the hopes and desires society has determined is acceptable. That's what it's about.
Don't violate laws that may cause you to violate the sanctions of your religions.
By proxy you made a decision that put your ability to follow your faith in jeopardy. Not thinking you would get caught doesn't count. People - If my religion demands that I am never in jail, then it is best I follow decisions that do not put me in jail.
If my religion demands that I do not eat meat, then I best make decisions that do not put me in a place where I have no choice but to eat meat. The choice is yours.
By locking them in a room for an extended period of time. Punishment is a correction tool. It is a punishment to encourage correction of behavior.
If your parents grounded you, sent you to your room and locked you in there, did they punish you? Or are they attempting to reform you into being a good child?
If I take a whip, and beat you senseless with it, so that you don't commit a crime again, did I punish you? Or did I simply use a tool of reforming you?
They just wanted to change what it is, it really is what it is. Definition: punishment - the infliction or imposition of a penalty as retribution for an offense
Being locked away is definitely a penalty, and a form of retribution for an offense.
Depression - depression - feelings of severe despondency and dejection. despondency- a state of low spirits caused by loss of hope or courage. dejection - a sad and depressed state; low spirits.
It's actually entirely about being fucking sad. It's about not getting the fuck over your sadness. And if you're in prison, you should feel pretty fucking despondent. Yes, you should have low spirits with a lack of hope and courage. You were caught and are being punished.
Also I wouldn't be citing moral choices when you're committing actions society as deemed criminal and will result in jail. What if you don't like being in prison for moral reasons, do they accommodate you?
Perhaps because of moral reasons you do things that don't land you in jail?
Keep in mind I'm not saying he should have been jailed, or that the laws are correct. I'm just telling you how it is.
Don;'t worry, there is an entire army of people who will quickly rush to your aid and demonstrate how it is not their fault, and how everything else is some sort of condition caused by society and genetics, therefore it is also not their fault.
Fear not though, for their future awaits, when they determine it truly was not their fault and was genetics, and hence begins genetic screening. We're sorry, your gene pool is being eliminated, because you're a fat cheating bitch / bastard who slobs around, is lazy all day, cannot work, has every type of illness, phobia or anti-social behavior.
This sounds like a troll but it isn't. The reality is there are two choices with two outcomes.
1. Your will power influences your body, your decisions affect your genetics, you are responsible for your actions, although you might be pre-dispostioned to have a more difficult time making certain decisions, ultimate the decision is yours.
2. It is not your fault, you are a genetic machine. Free will is more illusionary and all of your problems are based on genetics. As the amount of people with genetic flaws seems to dramatically increase with the ease of life and less being dying from natural selection, the only way society will be able to continue to support itself will be to remove those genetics who do not contribute to what is deemed productive to society.
Who decides that? Those who have the genes that allows them to make decisions on the behalf of society for the betterment of society.
Trust me, you want a world where people are responsible for their own actions. That's the one I believe we're in, now we just need people to stop blaming everything else for not giving them the options they want (Like eating the cheesecake AND staying thin), and start taking responsibility for their choices.
The biggest hinderance to people taking responsibility for their actions means their more inclined not to do whatever they please and get away with it, and people really like doing whatever they please and getting away with it, just often won't admit that. A lot of people are actually terrible people, they just want to be people who are viewed as good people while they continue doing terrible things to get whatever they want.
Actually I think the license is a good thing. Not in this particular case where some nut job is going to get a whole lot of private information for people who he claims to want to pray for but which makes me question how he met all of them in the first place, as I would suspect a man who would pray for these women would not be found in these kind of places.
Nor that he needs their private information to pray for them. I'm confident God doesn't need their name and address to know who he is talking about, you know, he's all knowing right?
The reason I think this information can be important, again excluding this case, is Strippers often use fake names to protect themselves, and people may not know a lot about them, so if something happens to one, and police are involved, they at least have information to start trying to track this person down to see if they're alright. Their neighbors or the local grocery clerk may not know her by her 'stripper name' if she uses one, but they may know her real name.
There are actually lot of mission critical systems that use linux, some modified some unmodified.
But in light of your comment, yes, a lot of places don't use linux for mission critical systems. In fact, they don't use a standard operating system, as they're not designed to be configured by users. They're designed to perform specific tasks, being built up from the ground directly to do those specific tasks and do them well.
I think the problem is many people are more interested in their social importance than their driving.
Where they will still be fully focused on the call and their driving will suffer, I will focus on driving and my call will suffer. So probably as a rule you're correct, but I'd like to think that I'm the exception and that there are others like me.
Every day I get into my vehicle I remind myself I'm driving 2400 lbs of steel which can cause death or significant harm to people. It's one of the reasons I've never been caught drinking and driving. It's because I don't drink and drive.
Yes although humans fully do multiple tasks there is a clear draw to attention, similar to a single processor that is splitting time shared between tasks.
I'd see it similar to sharing keyboard mouse with two windows though to be closer.
I'm fully capable of driving while talking on my cell phone, however only with hands free, and if something happens on the road that requires more thought, my conversation shows my distraction. I'll stop talking or stop / get stuck mid sentence, and I won't be able to complete or finish the thought until driving returns to a nominal level of concentration because I completed my manuever and someone has completed theres, and I'm just driving straight again or following basic interactions.
I wouldn't compare it to how many things the brain can consciously do at once, more how many things it can display it's doing at once.
It's similar to a monitor display I think. Where you could be running to programs / games at once, but to really focus on one or the other you bring it to the front of the window. The other one is sitting behind it, hidden. You're actively processing it and thinking about it, but just displaying one at a time while you interact with it with specific inputs being able to inputed one at a time.
E.G you have one keyboard and mouse, so you can only enter things into the focused excel document at that time, but other documents can still be running, displayed, and information gathered. Even information can be changed in other windows, just not by the keyboard and mouse at the same time.
Valid point, what I would suggest ideally is that people register for a license and get fined if they misuse it, but people could fraudulently sign up for licenses. If they can think of a way to find someone they can hold responsible for the license, either you register with pid, or the company does prior to receiving the license, so misuse or shady information can be denied?
Slashdot Mirror
Bandwidth costs money.
Eventually every company will go 'Well, Comcast pulled it off. Okay, we'll also throttle netflix that way and charge an additional fee for 'fast lanes'.
Shaw out here in Canada does that basically. They watch what other large telecoms do first, like Comcast and AT&T. If what they do seems to generate revenue and do well, they implement their strategies out here.
Hydrogen fuel cells. Large industrial ones. Use all the excess electricity to perform the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E... to gather hydrogen into fuel cells.
One of the biggest weaknesses to create hydrogen is the power draw. Renewable solves that.
Use the hydrogen fuel cells in times when renewable energy is not producing enough.
If I recall producing hydrogen isn't the most efficient use of electricity to store it, conversion ratio wise I believe it takes more power to produce the hydrogen than it returns so there is a loss, but the potential storage volumes are massive and it's clean energy.
You might have a point, but at the same time, for those small home bands, wouldn't it actually be better for them to have their content spread with hopes that people enjoy their music to buy it anyway?
Maybe the approach wouldn't be to put out a DMCA, but instead request that the party places a link so that people can purchase their music?
DMCA''s do not do a lot to combat people doing something like downloading music, and although I do believe artists are entitled to sell their works, I don't recommend it as a plan to get what little sales you can if no major player is behind you and try to live off it.
If you want to be rich and have lots of money, create music said no one ever.
Some artists just become a hit and happen to get rich.
Many more do not, and it has nothing to do with piracy.
Wait, so if I don't bother to think about the consequences I should be better accommodated?
Clearly your vote is for a world without consequences. Or people having to think about consequences to adjust what they do.
Well it's true, it's horrible for adults as well and shouldn't be taken lightly.
The reason there's additional emotion attached to children is because we're genetically predispositioned to it, in additional children do not have the ability to defend themselves reasonably.
An adult can choose to live in safer places, to not walk down that dark alley, to carry pepper spray, or ideally know martial arts and beat the shit out of whomever just tried to rape them (Sadly our laws are so fucked that they would be held accountable for the beating). A child however is not stronger, faster, able to make decisions on where they live and the safety of the area, nor have the experience to make the necessary judgements about people to avoid bad people.
That's where it becomes a bigger thing.
It still matches the energy in and energy out equation. Malnutrition will cause your body to enter survival mode, which will significantly reduce its energy output, meaning you will feel more tired.
It's lowered your energy output to match your caloric intake. So even though you're eating less than you were before, you're still not losing weight as you are also putting out less energy. Even in a resting state your body burns more calories if it has proper nutrition than if it doesn't.
This is why a healthy eating style is essential to losing weight so that you're not crippling your ability to shed fat while reducing consumption.
Your own pee and vomit?
What the fuck does eating something scientifically marked as waste being compared to meat? Meat is a product we developed into eating long, long ago and people should be god damn thankful they can choose to live off of other food, that wasn't always an option depending on where your geographic location was. Especially given the amount of vegetables etc one needs to eat to maintain weight.
Don't even try that bullshit where you're going to go some beliefs consider meat a waste or some shit, it's not, it's good for your body, your body uses it properly, it doesn't make you ill except for certain genetic conditions.
Pee and vomit are BAD for you period. You can't argue it, you have nothing. It causes damage to ones body to consume these kinds of things.
Let's be you, Glad you're okay with people eating HUMAN FECES AND FLESH TO SURVIVE.
Yes, that's how you sound.
I never said people can just man up over it. Some people will never change, we've proven that in all facets of life, not just depression.
Why they are that way? We can speculate a thousand reasons, some that make them look negative, ones that make society look negative, not a whole lot that are positive.
But it still is what it is. It's still someone not "getting over their fucking sadness". That part doesn't change. We might decide as a whole that it makes sense for them to not get over it or decide it's acceptable, but that doesn't change what it is.
We can set aside the distinction between clinical/nonclinical depression, because for both of those cases you're implying that somehow the sufferer deserves the condition they have presumably due to what you regard as neglect, cowardice or laziness,
No, the cowardice remark was to the person posting as anonymous coward. My response to them was purely out of the fact that people keep trying to change depression from it's original definition to some mystical thing that no one understands so they can brace themselves with the 'You can't understand' (Because we changed the definition into a mystical thing that no one understands)
The original poster was correct in using prison as a reason to be depressed, the response about it not being about sadness it's ignorant. It absolutely is about "sadness" obviously that a simplistic view of it, but at it's core, that's what it is. We can analyze it all we want, as to why, chemical balance and everything else, however if you were to take core emotions - Happy, Angry, Sad, etc. It would fall under sad.
At the end of the day, you can have X reason for being depressed. It does not mean that no one understands you if they disagree with you being in that state as X thing, as depending on the nature of it, a lot of people have put up with X thing, and gotten over it.
It doesn't mean they don't understand you. They understand it entirely, at times. However, this doesn't mean the way you are behaving over it acceptable, or that you can somehow make it socially acceptable. I realize this doesn't apply to all causes, as mentioned some can actually be a chemical imbalance, or it can be things that I really have no idea about, so I couldn't say that nothing is worth being depressed over, not everything that can happen to someone has happened to me.
But there are a lot of things that have, and out of those, some people choose to be depressed over the stupidest shit and it's not going to become socially acceptable.
If one is to judge, judge based on their behavior, their actions, not their thoughts.
A man may say homeless people are useless drain on society, but this same man may have also given change to homeless people.
The words and thoughts may sound as if he is saying he hates homeless people. His actions say he hates that people are homeless.
Getting a speeding ticket doesn't land you in jail. I'd like to think I'm an open-minded person. Why not try an analogy or example that is a little more realistic?
Like why not lobotomize anyone who rapes children?
Let's see how many people protest that statement.
That's a big problem with this world. They assume you clearly don't understand it if you don't agree with their point of view.
News flash, a lot of people understand it, have been through it, and just might have a different opinion on it that you do.
In addition, I gave you the definitions. If you don't fit in the definition, then you have something other than 'depression'
So many people cling to depression because it's the one thing that has become semi taboo to talk bad about so they can hide behind that and excuse their way of being in a form they feel society should have to accept.
And I said DEPRESSION
Here is CLINICAL DEPRESSION
Definition:
Clinical depression is the more severe form of depression, also known as major depression or major depressive disorder. It isn't the same as depression caused by a loss, such as the death of a loved one, or a medical condition, such as a thyroid disorder.
"Symptoms may be based on your own feelings or on the observations of someone else.
Clinical depression can affect people of any age, including children. However, clinical depression symptoms, even if severe, usually improve with psychological counseling, antidepressant medications or a combination of the two."
Still about how you fucking feel. It's not some mystical force. It's about you, and how you perceive the world.
What should they hope for? That they can get out? If they focus on that, say a rapist, will just have hope that he can get out one day and rape again.
You need to take hope away among other things so that you can rebuild (reform) them with the hopes and desires society has determined is acceptable.
That's what it's about.
Don't violate laws that may cause you to violate the sanctions of your religions.
By proxy you made a decision that put your ability to follow your faith in jeopardy. Not thinking you would get caught doesn't count.
People - If my religion demands that I am never in jail, then it is best I follow decisions that do not put me in jail.
If my religion demands that I do not eat meat, then I best make decisions that do not put me in a place where I have no choice but to eat meat.
The choice is yours.
By locking them in a room for an extended period of time.
Punishment is a correction tool. It is a punishment to encourage correction of behavior.
If your parents grounded you, sent you to your room and locked you in there, did they punish you? Or are they attempting to reform you into being a good child?
If I take a whip, and beat you senseless with it, so that you don't commit a crime again, did I punish you? Or did I simply use a tool of reforming you?
They just wanted to change what it is, it really is what it is.
Definition:
punishment - the infliction or imposition of a penalty as retribution for an offense
Being locked away is definitely a penalty, and a form of retribution for an offense.
You're the moron, hence the coward post.
Depression - depression - feelings of severe despondency and dejection.
despondency- a state of low spirits caused by loss of hope or courage.
dejection - a sad and depressed state; low spirits.
It's actually entirely about being fucking sad. It's about not getting the fuck over your sadness.
And if you're in prison, you should feel pretty fucking despondent. Yes, you should have low spirits with a lack of hope and courage.
You were caught and are being punished.
You would if you didn't want to die.
Also I wouldn't be citing moral choices when you're committing actions society as deemed criminal and will result in jail.
What if you don't like being in prison for moral reasons, do they accommodate you?
Perhaps because of moral reasons you do things that don't land you in jail?
Keep in mind I'm not saying he should have been jailed, or that the laws are correct. I'm just telling you how it is.
I've heard it from fat people 'nothing I can do will let me lose weight, I've tried everything'
Holy shit, you must be immortal then. If you don't eat any food at all, you'll stay the same size, you must be a scientific breakthrough!
No, you will LOSE WEIGHT as your body EATS THE FAT until you die.
Congratulations, proof that you are either immortal, or lying.
Don;'t worry, there is an entire army of people who will quickly rush to your aid and demonstrate how it is not their fault, and how everything else is some sort of condition caused by society and genetics, therefore it is also not their fault.
Fear not though, for their future awaits, when they determine it truly was not their fault and was genetics, and hence begins genetic screening. We're sorry, your gene pool is being eliminated, because you're a fat cheating bitch / bastard who slobs around, is lazy all day, cannot work, has every type of illness, phobia or anti-social behavior.
This sounds like a troll but it isn't. The reality is there are two choices with two outcomes.
1. Your will power influences your body, your decisions affect your genetics, you are responsible for your actions, although you might be pre-dispostioned to have a more difficult time making certain decisions, ultimate the decision is yours.
2. It is not your fault, you are a genetic machine. Free will is more illusionary and all of your problems are based on genetics. As the amount of people with genetic flaws seems to dramatically increase with the ease of life and less being dying from natural selection, the only way society will be able to continue to support itself will be to remove those genetics who do not contribute to what is deemed productive to society.
Who decides that? Those who have the genes that allows them to make decisions on the behalf of society for the betterment of society.
Trust me, you want a world where people are responsible for their own actions. That's the one I believe we're in, now we just need people to stop blaming everything else for not giving them the options they want (Like eating the cheesecake AND staying thin), and start taking responsibility for their choices.
The biggest hinderance to people taking responsibility for their actions means their more inclined not to do whatever they please and get away with it, and people really like doing whatever they please and getting away with it, just often won't admit that. A lot of people are actually terrible people, they just want to be people who are viewed as good people while they continue doing terrible things to get whatever they want.
Actually I think the license is a good thing. Not in this particular case where some nut job is going to get a whole lot of private information for people who he claims to want to pray for but which makes me question how he met all of them in the first place, as I would suspect a man who would pray for these women would not be found in these kind of places.
Nor that he needs their private information to pray for them. I'm confident God doesn't need their name and address to know who he is talking about, you know, he's all knowing right?
The reason I think this information can be important, again excluding this case, is Strippers often use fake names to protect themselves, and people may not know a lot about them, so if something happens to one, and police are involved, they at least have information to start trying to track this person down to see if they're alright.
Their neighbors or the local grocery clerk may not know her by her 'stripper name' if she uses one, but they may know her real name.
There are actually lot of mission critical systems that use linux, some modified some unmodified.
But in light of your comment, yes, a lot of places don't use linux for mission critical systems. In fact, they don't use a standard operating system, as they're not designed to be configured by users. They're designed to perform specific tasks, being built up from the ground directly to do those specific tasks and do them well.
I think the problem is many people are more interested in their social importance than their driving.
Where they will still be fully focused on the call and their driving will suffer, I will focus on driving and my call will suffer.
So probably as a rule you're correct, but I'd like to think that I'm the exception and that there are others like me.
Every day I get into my vehicle I remind myself I'm driving 2400 lbs of steel which can cause death or significant harm to people. It's one of the reasons I've never been caught drinking and driving. It's because I don't drink and drive.
Yes although humans fully do multiple tasks there is a clear draw to attention, similar to a single processor that is splitting time shared between tasks.
I'd see it similar to sharing keyboard mouse with two windows though to be closer.
I'm fully capable of driving while talking on my cell phone, however only with hands free, and if something happens on the road that requires more thought, my conversation shows my distraction. I'll stop talking or stop / get stuck mid sentence, and I won't be able to complete or finish the thought until driving returns to a nominal level of concentration because I completed my manuever and someone has completed theres, and I'm just driving straight again or following basic interactions.
I wouldn't compare it to how many things the brain can consciously do at once, more how many things it can display it's doing at once.
It's similar to a monitor display I think. Where you could be running to programs / games at once, but to really focus on one or the other you bring it to the front of the window. The other one is sitting behind it, hidden. You're actively processing it and thinking about it, but just displaying one at a time while you interact with it with specific inputs being able to inputed one at a time.
E.G you have one keyboard and mouse, so you can only enter things into the focused excel document at that time, but other documents can still be running, displayed, and information gathered. Even information can be changed in other windows, just not by the keyboard and mouse at the same time.
I think our brains are kind of similar.
Valid point, what I would suggest ideally is that people register for a license and get fined if they misuse it, but people could fraudulently sign up for licenses. If they can think of a way to find someone they can hold responsible for the license, either you register with pid, or the company does prior to receiving the license, so misuse or shady information can be denied?
I think they need to focus on prevention, as random submissions are hard to trace.(E.G why every digital crime in the world isn't already solved)
If you had to submit a license which is accountable and can be revoked, that changes the game.