I have never understood why the few archive sites, that I have been to, never back up the entire web site, instead of just a few important pages and images. I can understand not accessing pages that are supposed to be secure, but all other pages should be fair game. This is most important for product knowledge. Some times a company takes down its site and images. It would be nice to have an archive to go to.
Well, a good reason to use AOO is because of the KDE integration. It seems to be more seemless than LO. This is more apparent in the open and save dialogues.
As I said to your sibling poster, after receiving 14 trillion in taxes, they could shred the money, and then continue. Wouldn't that bring things back to normal, except for the fact that the dollar is destablized?
After they get their 14 trillion in taxes, they could just shred it up. Wouldn't that 'revalue' the currency? I suppose that that would destablize the economy, though.
I think that you are right. At least, I believe so, but the US does owe China money, so obviously, it can't only look to the reserve, or it can look to reserve, but doesn't. The fact that US owes China money shows that, in theory, it is possible for each country to loan and borrow money.
Also, I just discovered via a brief Google search that China owes the US money. Money could be cancelled out, if it only involved 2 groups, but the fact that the money can't be cancelled out shows that it is not so simple.
I don't understand the problem fully, so please correct me if I'm wrong. However, I assume that the government borrows from a bank of a country, and that country borrows from the bank of another. Even though 2 countries might borrow the same amount from each other, they don't cancel each other out, because of the banks.
Okay, but I have debated with women who said that women can't give consent when drunk, and seen a site that said likewise [I tried finding it for you, but can't]. So I don't get how drunken sex fits into the picture for those people. The decision always relies on the woman, even after the act. Even if she said that everything was okay going in, it is almost as if she could revoke the consent retroactively.
I think that you are joining in late. The actors that we were originally talking about and then joking about were proposed actors for a test to see if an immigrant is violent and reactive. The user suggested that we put actors behind a plexiglass window, and then have the actors be disrespectful to tempt the immigrant into throwing a blunt object. Then the conversation began to stray.
Regarding the actors in the movie, yeah, I heard that too.
Honestly, I assumed that it was possible to shoot a gun out of a hand once in a while. I allowed it for stories like the Lone Ranger, in the same way that I just believed that Superman could fly. I didn't need the physics or anything like that.
That being said, I never thought about caliber. That should make for interesting information for novels that I hope to write.
As for shooting to wound, and resulting in a death, I think that I was speaking more of intent. Even though a bullet can kill, there is the option of shooting a limb, when the stakes aren't very high. At least, that was what I was trying to say. Now that I've read what you wrote, I think that I would need to see an expert marksman get into a high adrenaline situation to be sure.
I think that there is miscommunication. Joking about the Dutch was pretty obvious without the search. However, I assumed that the responder was also joking by adding more Dutch humour. I just assumed that the second guy wasn't funny and that he was trying to be. If he is using his own humour, then chances are a Google search doesn't turn up anything. In short, absense of a search result doesn't prove that he is humourous or serious.
:^D Yeah, you have a point. Maybe those actors were just starving actors, and only took the gig because of the money. Your polite rational argument has won me over.
How about putting Michael Bay and George Lucas in front of the plexiglass? Would that be a reasonable compromise?
Oh wait. I just realized that the immigrant might throw blunt objects at the directors before noticing the actors and their antics. If the immigrant threw blunt objects as soon as he sees the directors, then we'd never know if we should applaud him or get rid of him.:^/;^)
I vaguely remember reading about the topic. There was some honour to protect, and they literally had a measurable physical response to bad behaviour. The author of the book that I read mentioned a story, where a mother told her son to be a man and fight, or something like that, even after he was wounded.
If I recall correctly, the author also mentioned that an outside could leave a bike unlocked, and it would still be there, a week later. Also, there was very little theft.
It would explain why gun control would do very little in that society. There would always be blunt rocks.
On an interesting note, in western Canada, and I assume most other parts of Canada, it is very common for strangers to nod or wave at each other, as they pass each other on a sidewalk or in a hallway. A Quebecer asked me about this once. I found it odd that she felt no need to wave back.
He's probably talking about sending soldiers into a war to free a people, and then hand them over to a worse government. It would be like all the world powers fighting to free you, and then handing you over to Islamic rule.
Slashdot Mirror
I have never understood why the few archive sites, that I have been to, never back up the entire web site, instead of just a few important pages and images. I can understand not accessing pages that are supposed to be secure, but all other pages should be fair game. This is most important for product knowledge. Some times a company takes down its site and images. It would be nice to have an archive to go to.
And to add to that, we should consider the nocebo effect.
You're welcome. Thanks for the opportunity.
There is a link under the video to hide or show a transcript.
Maybe the install base will increase, when people finally hear about Linux.
Well, a good reason to use AOO is because of the KDE integration. It seems to be more seemless than LO. This is more apparent in the open and save dialogues.
Yeah, I saw that video. It's very demoralizing.
As I said to your sibling poster, after receiving 14 trillion in taxes, they could shred the money, and then continue. Wouldn't that bring things back to normal, except for the fact that the dollar is destablized?
After they get their 14 trillion in taxes, they could just shred it up. Wouldn't that 'revalue' the currency? I suppose that that would destablize the economy, though.
Unless I am missing something, debt doesn't come from printing money.
Maybe the solution is to print 14 trillion, and then, when the books are settled, tax the banks for 14 trillion.
Oh, no. I just got here. Somebody debrief me. Did somebody make another movie? Did western currency offend somebody?? ;^)
I think that you are right. At least, I believe so, but the US does owe China money, so obviously, it can't only look to the reserve, or it can look to reserve, but doesn't. The fact that US owes China money shows that, in theory, it is possible for each country to loan and borrow money.
Also, I just discovered via a brief Google search that China owes the US money. Money could be cancelled out, if it only involved 2 groups, but the fact that the money can't be cancelled out shows that it is not so simple.
Are you kidding me?
I don't understand the problem fully, so please correct me if I'm wrong. However, I assume that the government borrows from a bank of a country, and that country borrows from the bank of another. Even though 2 countries might borrow the same amount from each other, they don't cancel each other out, because of the banks.
Okay, but I have debated with women who said that women can't give consent when drunk, and seen a site that said likewise [I tried finding it for you, but can't]. So I don't get how drunken sex fits into the picture for those people. The decision always relies on the woman, even after the act. Even if she said that everything was okay going in, it is almost as if she could revoke the consent retroactively.
:^D I felt a sense of relief and revenge, when I read that.
So, do you agree that drunken sex should be illegal?
Interesting. Thanks for clarifying.
Hi MH. Long time, no chat.
I think that you are joining in late. The actors that we were originally talking about and then joking about were proposed actors for a test to see if an immigrant is violent and reactive. The user suggested that we put actors behind a plexiglass window, and then have the actors be disrespectful to tempt the immigrant into throwing a blunt object. Then the conversation began to stray.
Regarding the actors in the movie, yeah, I heard that too.
Honestly, I assumed that it was possible to shoot a gun out of a hand once in a while. I allowed it for stories like the Lone Ranger, in the same way that I just believed that Superman could fly. I didn't need the physics or anything like that.
That being said, I never thought about caliber. That should make for interesting information for novels that I hope to write.
As for shooting to wound, and resulting in a death, I think that I was speaking more of intent. Even though a bullet can kill, there is the option of shooting a limb, when the stakes aren't very high. At least, that was what I was trying to say. Now that I've read what you wrote, I think that I would need to see an expert marksman get into a high adrenaline situation to be sure.
Thanks for the info regarding the adrenaline.
I think that there is miscommunication. Joking about the Dutch was pretty obvious without the search. However, I assumed that the responder was also joking by adding more Dutch humour. I just assumed that the second guy wasn't funny and that he was trying to be. If he is using his own humour, then chances are a Google search doesn't turn up anything. In short, absense of a search result doesn't prove that he is humourous or serious.
:^D Yeah, you have a point. Maybe those actors were just starving actors, and only took the gig because of the money. Your polite rational argument has won me over.
How about putting Michael Bay and George Lucas in front of the plexiglass? Would that be a reasonable compromise?
Oh wait. I just realized that the immigrant might throw blunt objects at the directors before noticing the actors and their antics. If the immigrant threw blunt objects as soon as he sees the directors, then we'd never know if we should applaud him or get rid of him. :^/ ;^)
By the way, I think that you and I read it in Malcom Gladwell's book, "The Tipping Point" or "Blink".
I vaguely remember reading about the topic. There was some honour to protect, and they literally had a measurable physical response to bad behaviour. The author of the book that I read mentioned a story, where a mother told her son to be a man and fight, or something like that, even after he was wounded.
If I recall correctly, the author also mentioned that an outside could leave a bike unlocked, and it would still be there, a week later. Also, there was very little theft.
It would explain why gun control would do very little in that society. There would always be blunt rocks.
On an interesting note, in western Canada, and I assume most other parts of Canada, it is very common for strangers to nod or wave at each other, as they pass each other on a sidewalk or in a hallway. A Quebecer asked me about this once. I found it odd that she felt no need to wave back.
Shooting to wound is enough to prevent a successful attack. That still allows for justice according to the law. That seems pretty defensive to me.
He's probably talking about sending soldiers into a war to free a people, and then hand them over to a worse government. It would be like all the world powers fighting to free you, and then handing you over to Islamic rule.
You definitely can. You just have to fight for your right to be heard! ;^P