I happen to get into an HTML/CGI/JS based chatroom (yes, there is IRC. Now, do you know any pagan channels out there? Visited by really knowledgeable people?). Some sites work with frames. And curiously, there is a full frame for a script that calls banners that refresh from time to time. So let's think this script suddenly calls a dead link in flycast or focalink (you'd be surprised of how often this happens), and it leaves your browser for a time long enough to compile Mozilla in a modest Celery 300.
Enough for the problem. Now, for the solution:
Have your browser show page source code (Hey, there's material for yet another patent: pages that won't show its source). Nota bene: you won't copy it. Just pay attention to the <FRAME SRC="foo"...> statements. Then determine which one is the annoyance. Write down the names of the frames that you do care about. Now, open the editor of your choice and create a page like this:
<HTML>
<HEAD>
bla bla bla
<BODY>
<FRAMESET...>
<FRAME SRC="bar"...>
<FRAME SRC="baz"...>
</FRAMESET>
</HEAD>
And there you are: an ad free page. And yes, I have a demonstration of how it works here
It wouldn't be the first time. After all, how many companies keep this close relationship to Microsoft?
The case, as I see, is they "like" what hackers do with their *hardware*. I don't see violations of EULA around. A hacker that respects him/herself won't simply bother opening the software pack.
So... what's *their* point? Motorola and other companies may send us the heck for offering our services to develop a driver for their softmodems, for example. Will we be competing disloyally? I *laugh* back at them.
I had this situation to solve with an NT server:
My customer has an IDE zip for backup purposes. The GUI tools from Iomega were neat and all, but then he asks for automatic backup. "Ok, I'll add it to scheduled tasks" Right? Wrong! It needs YOU to nod at it each time you are to backup. So, by separate another field servoid and I sought for a command line utility that could backup and compress on the fly. He found PZIP 2.04g for DOS. And worse, he installed it and left a scheduled task running.
Guess where I found what I was searching for?. Yes, in GNU. Tar combined with gzip (hadn't checked out whether there was bzip compiled for DOS family). I removed it tranquilly, worked around the complaints NT throws when you ask for a tar cz bla_bla_bla.tar.z and there it was! No need for anyone to know a process was running nor to nod everytime it ran. There was, though, something I didn't like about tar working in NT (runs finely in W98): shortened long filenames. Even so, I don't think working around this would be too hard.
Find something similar, non GNU. Oh, no matter interfaces, just results. -------------------------------------
I can tell about it. I DO program on it. Try debugging an application (VisualCrap, VisualBS or whatever) and not crashing. Something that eventually will make you run out of resources. But hey, I'm happily moving to Linux. -------------------------------------
Slashdot Mirror
*Ahem* There is Emacs... and with LISP
*Ahem* I have no complaint about C, Unix or their descent.
And at last, I think this was the mod's lunch time or something. I see a score of 1 up there.
-------------------------------------
Unix is not an OS,
GNU is not Unix, Ergo
GNU is an OS (?).
if (Windows==OS && Mac_OS_X==OS){
printf('What the heck is Unix in all its flavors?');
}
-------------------------------------
At the risk of sounding silly:
...> statements. Then determine which one is the annoyance. Write down the names of the frames that you do care about. Now, open the editor of your choice and create a page like this:
...>
...>
...>
I happen to get into an HTML/CGI/JS based chatroom (yes, there is IRC. Now, do you know any pagan channels out there? Visited by really knowledgeable people?). Some sites work with frames. And curiously, there is a full frame for a script that calls banners that refresh from time to time. So let's think this script suddenly calls a dead link in flycast or focalink (you'd be surprised of how often this happens), and it leaves your browser for a time long enough to compile Mozilla in a modest Celery 300.
Enough for the problem. Now, for the solution:
Have your browser show page source code (Hey, there's material for yet another patent: pages that won't show its source). Nota bene: you won't copy it. Just pay attention to the <FRAME SRC="foo"
<HTML>
<HEAD>
bla bla bla
<BODY>
<FRAMESET
<FRAME SRC="bar"
<FRAME SRC="baz"
</FRAMESET>
</HEAD>
And there you are: an ad free page. And yes, I have a demonstration of how it works here
<FLAME>
Insert flames here
</FLAME>
-------------------------------------
It wouldn't be the first time. After all, how many companies keep this close relationship to Microsoft? The case, as I see, is they "like" what hackers do with their *hardware*. I don't see violations of EULA around. A hacker that respects him/herself won't simply bother opening the software pack.
So... what's *their* point? Motorola and other companies may send us the heck for offering our services to develop a driver for their softmodems, for example. Will we be competing disloyally? I *laugh* back at them.
-------------------------------------
I had this situation to solve with an NT server: My customer has an IDE zip for backup purposes. The GUI tools from Iomega were neat and all, but then he asks for automatic backup. "Ok, I'll add it to scheduled tasks" Right? Wrong! It needs YOU to nod at it each time you are to backup. So, by separate another field servoid and I sought for a command line utility that could backup and compress on the fly. He found PZIP 2.04g for DOS. And worse, he installed it and left a scheduled task running.
Guess where I found what I was searching for?. Yes, in GNU. Tar combined with gzip (hadn't checked out whether there was bzip compiled for DOS family). I removed it tranquilly, worked around the complaints NT throws when you ask for a tar cz bla_bla_bla.tar.z and there it was! No need for anyone to know a process was running nor to nod everytime it ran. There was, though, something I didn't like about tar working in NT (runs finely in W98): shortened long filenames. Even so, I don't think working around this would be too hard.
Find something similar, non GNU. Oh, no matter interfaces, just results.
-------------------------------------
I can tell about it. I DO program on it. Try debugging an application (VisualCrap, VisualBS or whatever) and not crashing. Something that eventually will make you run out of resources. But hey, I'm happily moving to Linux.
-------------------------------------