And how much thought did you give to the possibly millions and certainly tens of thousands who under Saddam got a lot worse treatment then getting their pictures taken while naked wearing a dog leash? I'll bet none, if you didn't find a way to rationalize blaming the US for Saddam.
Look up "moral equivalence" and maybe you will begin to understand how this is fallacious and specious reasoning.
If you don't understand it then come to my neighborhood and I'll sodomize you with a broomstick while talking about what your ancestors did to my ancestors. Maybe then you'll see my point.
Slashdot Mirror
"When asked what he would do if he only had six months to live: Type faster.". Isaac Asimov
And how much thought did you give to the possibly millions and certainly tens of thousands who under Saddam got a lot worse treatment then getting their pictures taken while naked wearing a dog leash? I'll bet none, if you didn't find a way to rationalize blaming the US for Saddam.
Look up "moral equivalence" and maybe you will begin to understand how this is fallacious and specious reasoning.
If you don't understand it then come to my neighborhood and I'll sodomize you with a broomstick while talking about what your ancestors did to my ancestors. Maybe then you'll see my point.
No, he said "I hope more and more images and video keeps coming out"... The worst of the abuses have not yet been seen.
It's because this story was a non-starter.
Traces of sarin were found but it was in such small amounts that it is likely that the bombers themselves didn't even know sarin was present.
Sarin is one the lowest WMD threats since it has a ready antidote and quickly disperses in open air.
Bias is evident in what they don't report vs. what they do report (i.e. editorial decisions) rather than in the "delivery" of the news itself.
Did you see the film? Did you see the competition?