Slashdot Mirror


Cancer Survival for Software Developers

Paul Pareti writes "Doug Reilly has published an affecting, personal piece about Surviving Cancer if you're a Programmer. You don't have to be a sufferer to benefit from reading it, especially his conclusions, including the perspective-lengthening advice: 'Make sure you are not indispensable!'"

263 comments

  1. Wow by Eightyford · · Score: 2, Funny

    Make sure you are not indispensable!

    Wow. That just may be the first ever selfless good deed.

    1. Re:Wow by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, it should be par for the course, for any consultant. Being indispensable does not create The Warm Fuzzy Feeling (TM).

    2. Re:Wow by Eightyford · · Score: 1

      Actually, it should be par for the course, for any consultant. Being indispensable does not create The Warm Fuzzy Feeling (TM).

      No, but being indispensable is a safety precaution that many workers use to so that they wont become, well, dispensable. That, is selfish.

    3. Re:Wow by Memnos · · Score: 1

      There are none among us who are "indespensable", but we can become "difficult to be dispensed with". Be smart, kind, respectful to your peers, and all those other trite things, then wait for death or life. And of course, wear sunscreen.

      --
      I don't trust atoms -- they make up stuff.
  2. If you are indespensible.. by AltGrendel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...you will never be promoted.

    --
    The simple truth is that interstellar distances will not fit into the human imagination

    - Douglas Adams

    1. Re:If you are indespensible.. by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Same responsability & more money? No problem!

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    2. Re:If you are indespensible.. by TrappedByMyself · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you are a techie with no communication or useful business skills...you will never be promoted.

      There, fixed it for you.

      --

      Help me take back Slashdot. When did 'News for Nerds' become 'FUD and Conspiracy Theories for Extremist Nutjobs'?
    3. Re:If you are indespensible.. by Short+Circuit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      RTFA and/or get a sense of responsibility towards your clients/employers. Among other things, the article talks about how to keep the people from doing business with you from going under if you do.

      That doesn't just apply to cancer, either. It applies to diseases like MS, and even simply going out of business.

    4. Re:If you are indespensible.. by AuMatar · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Why the fuck would you want to be promoted?

      Fixed it again. I'd rather do minimum wage grudge work than management.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    5. Re:If you are indespensible.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That doesn't just apply to cancer, either. It applies to diseases like MS, and even simply going out of business.

      I think putting Microsoft on par with cancer or business failure is a little hyperbolic. Given a choice between the three, I'd go with Windows and Office XP.

    6. Re:If you are indespensible.. by eviloverlordx · · Score: 4, Funny

      That doesn't just apply to cancer, either. It applies to diseases like MS, and even simply going out of business.

      I agree, Microsoft is a disease, and it keeps spreading.

      --
      'Loose' is when your pants are three sizes too big. 'Lose' is when you misuse 'loose'.
    7. Re:If you are indespensible.. by Bellum+Aeternus · · Score: 0
      ...you will never be promoted.

      Quite the opposite actually. As a small company owner, there are people that I cannot afford to promote because nobody could fill their shoes. Sure, they get pay raises but I cannot see giving them additional duties as their plate is already full.

      --
      - I voted for Nintendo and against Bush
    8. Re:If you are indespensible.. by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      it is not that bad actually, if you are indespensible you can avoid the peter principle (competent workers are promoted until they reached their level of incompetence) and stay at the position you like most.

      --
      Conservatism: The fear that somewhere, somehow, someone you think is your inferior is being treated as your equal.
    9. Re:If you are indespensible.. by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      As a small company owner, there are people that I cannot afford to promote because nobody could fill their shoes.

      So you agree with him then - if you are indispensible, you will never be promoted (because no-one else could do your job).

    10. Re:If you are indespensible.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GOOD!

    11. Re:If you are indespensible.. by Bellum+Aeternus · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah - I need to bone up on that reading with accuracy thing I keep hearing about...

      --
      - I voted for Nintendo and against Bush
    12. Re:If you are indespensible.. by dubl-u · · Score: 1

      I'm a recovering sysadmin. One of the things that got me to quit my last sysadmin job was a friend who said, "The graveyards are full of indispensable people."

    13. Re:If you are indespensible.. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Have you ever been offered a 150,000 dollar managment job? Are you really saying you would choose to make 7 bucks an hour over that?

      Good, more room for me.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    14. Re:If you are indespensible.. by scotch · · Score: 1

      The graveyards are also full of dispensible people. I'm sure you're friend had a point, but I can't think of what it might be.

      --
      XML causes global warming.
    15. Re:If you are indespensible.. by russotto · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Only two things can come of a non-management type taking a $150,000 dollar management job

      1) He screws up, gets fired, then is "overqualified" for technical positions he subsequently applies for and ends up taking a $7/hour job.

      or

      2) He screws up, retains his job and even gets promoted, but is miserable as hell doing it. Eventually his company has to downsize (or goes under) due to poor management and he gets laid off.

    16. Re:If you are indespensible.. by dubl-u · · Score: 1

      The graveyards are also full of dispensible people. I'm sure you're friend had a point, but I can't think of what it might be.

      <sigh />

      The point is that no matter how much you think you couldn't possibly leave your job, one day you will, if only on a stretcher. And the world somehow goes on. Nobody is indispensable, and if you're working 70 hour weeks "because they need you" then it's really because you want to be needed, or because you can't say no to people, or because you like the stress and chaos, or for some other equally lame reason.

    17. Re:If you are indespensible.. by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you'd take a management job over a programming job, then you're not a true programmer. As Worf would say, "your heart is not Klingon."

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    18. Re:If you are indespensible.. by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      Yup. I'd be bored and miserable in management. Money isn't everything. In fact, its pretty much one of the least important things in my life.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    19. Re:If you are indespensible.. by TeraCo · · Score: 1
      The point is that no matter how much you think you couldn't possibly leave your job, one day you will, if only on a stretcher. And the world somehow goes on.

      On the other hand, if you're dead, you don't need a job/pay check anymore.

      --
      Not Meta-modding due to apathy.
    20. Re:If you are indespensible.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't get this "promotion" stuff. After having spent most of my life until now studying and working to become a programmer, why would I want to give all that up to become a pointy haired moron? It would mean that all that studying would be wasted, and that I would no longer be doing what I want to do.

    21. Re:If you are indespensible.. by GregWebb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Surely it depends what we're calling manager though?

      I personally have no interest in doing the tech team manager job at my last place. It's a position for minimal project management, a lot of customer interfacing and zero tech oversight. All you're doing really is watching schedules and pushing numbers around on gantt chart.

      On the other hand, you could quite legitimately call a technical architect the team manager. They're interfacing with the client and passing the work around their team, but they're passing the work around based on a self-determined high-level tech plan (potentially developed in conjunction with team members) and acting as a mentor to junior staff. At which point it starts getting more interesting...

      --

      Greg

      (Inside a nuclear plant)
      Aaaarrrggh! Run! The canary has mutated!

    22. Re:If you are indespensible.. by somersault · · Score: 1

      I concur.. I seem to have enough money as it is, and while I'm sure I could understand business, I dont even want to! I actually would prefer to keep things running while others make the decisions about how to run the company.. unfortunately sometimes it's obvious even to me how some things should be done differently. But I'll resist the dark side of management for as long as possible (though I guess I'm IT 'Manager' here just because I'm the only full time IT staffer =p )

      --
      which is totally what she said
    23. Re:If you are indespensible.. by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      See! Not a true Klingon. More like a Romulan hanging out in the neutral zone between the people that write the code, and the Ferengi. Does your technical architect have pointy ears?

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    24. Re:If you are indespensible.. by GregWebb · · Score: 1

      Not so.

      There are some projects where it's interesting to work on something that you're entirely capable of doing everything yourself. For them, it's entirely sensible to want to be the programmer who controls it all yourself.

      And there are others where you're having to work with a common toolkit of parts. Which would be more interesting - using the toolkit that someone else has already built, or being the architect who defined the spec for the entier toolkit?

      Or alternatively, a really seriously big project. Man years of development. You could be a coder, banging out individual components to the common structure and the common interfaces, or you could be the higher level guy coming up with the grand schema and assisting the coders with components as necessary.

      If you want to be the grunt, consuming specs and banging out your small modules of code then fantastic. I enjoy the modules but I also enjoy the big picture, the whole system, and I'm aware there are some systems that are beyond what I can do without assistance. For them, I would much rather be the guy at the top writing and handing out specs than the guy at the bottom blindly consuming them.

      --

      Greg

      (Inside a nuclear plant)
      Aaaarrrggh! Run! The canary has mutated!

    25. Re:If you are indespensible.. by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      OK, I think I have you pinned down now. You're a Vulcan. Your species interprets statements made in jest way too seriously. Still, Vulcan's aren't Klingon. As for me, I follow the path of the great Klingon programmer Ka'leth Torvalds who said "A Klingon programmer who does not show his code has no honor" and "A Klingon programmer's blood boils before the CPU is hot."

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    26. Re:If you are indespensible.. by britneysimpson · · Score: 1

      Well I hope this is not true but it seems like your speaking from experience! The reason being I am in the same boat!

  3. Hmm by u16084 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I found the article a little "wieird", If I found myself with terminal cancer, my family and myself would be on the top of the list. I would spend every last waking momement with my kids. I would take every precaution to say to them what needed to be said and done, The LAST thing on my list would be source codes and clients...
    Sure it sounds WRONG, but take a step back, and think about it. I'm going to die in 6 months, sorry ozzy/harriet daddy has to go take care of some stuff at the office, dont worry, i got 6 months left.
    Unless ofcourse its Curable, which then, I would have to balance the two a little more carefuly.

    --
    -- I Dont Deserve A Sig I Have Bad Karma
    1. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in other words, "Make sure you are not indispensable!"

    2. Re:Hmm by porcupine8 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Right. Notice that for terminal cases, he says "read the next paragraph (regarding learning about new treatments online) and go spend time with your family." The rest of the article was for those people whose cancer is curable, or long-term treatable (as in, you will probably die in the next decade, but will be okay to work for at least a couple more years before things get bad). People in those cases can't/shouldn't give up their normal life because it's not over yet.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    3. Re:Hmm by pete-classic · · Score: 1
      From the article:
      Bobby was fearful of his employer knowing the details of his illness and so the succession plans that would have made things easier for both of them were not in place. As a result, neither my brother nor his employer was properly prepared for his death.


      I think this example amplifies your point. How is it that Bobby wasn't prepared? I don't mean this in a cruel or uncaring way, but I am quite sure that his employer's predicament didn't hinder his passing.

      -Peter
    4. Re:Hmm by XMilkProject · · Score: 1

      Unless of course the software your working on is for researching a cure for cancer.

      --
      Big ones, small ones, some as big as yer 'ead!
      Give 'em a twist, a flick o' the wrist...
    5. Re:Hmm by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Those of us who are older, and have families and houses etc. know that we have to keep working, if at all possible, to keep the bills paid. I woudln't want my family to have to have one of those cans you see on gas station counters that say "help the such and such family." If you stop working, you accumulate huge debt, that maybe your life insurance doesn't cover. When you get older, you will realize life isn't about what you want to do.
      Yes it would be nice if you could sit around for 6 months. But it is selfish.

      --
      And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
    6. Re:Hmm by DougReilly · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Read the article. If you are terminal, meaning there is not cure and no treatment, then of course, stop reading the article and go home. Cancer is more and more a treatable disease that ends up begin chronic. I know folks with similar tumors that have been dealing with the cancer for 10 years no. I likely could get by on disability for quite a while, however 10 years is a long time, and even 2 years would be long enough that I would like to continue doing something useful. I will smell the roses as well, ride my bike and hang out with my adult children as well.

    7. Re:Hmm by Tim+C · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sure it sounds WRONG

      No it doesn't. No-one goes to their death bed thinking "I wish I'd spent more time in the office..."; that's especially true when they go 30 or 40 years before their time.

      If I have only a couple of months to live, then I'm sorry, I'd spend as much time as possible with family and friends. Project deadline? Devil take your client requirements, I have more important things to do and precious little time to do them in.

      Work steals enough of our time as it is; don't let it take your final moments too.

    8. Re:Hmm by AchilleTalon · · Score: 1
      Absolutely right and it's not to say your children will still continue to go to school and your wife working. It's not really sane to stop everyone daily activities to wait for the fatality to happen. Life is not ended yet and most of the world around you will continue to live.

      Spend some time with them, but it is not likely you could spend the whole day, all week days with them. You also need to distract yourself and avoid becoming bitter about life. Still continue to be creative.

      --
      Achille Talon
      Hop!
    9. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if Bobby had been hit by a bus?

      Fact is, people die early for any number of reasons.

      You should always be prepared for the worst. Be indispensable for your skills and knowledge, not for things specific enough that you can't be replaced.

    10. Re:Hmm by hey! · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I found the article a little "wieird", If I found myself with terminal cancer, my family and myself would be on the top of the list. I would spend every last waking momement with my kids. I would take every precaution to say to them what needed to be said and done, The LAST thing on my list would be source codes and clients...

      Well, you do have a terminal disease. It's called aging. It'll get you sooner or later if the proverbial bus doesn't make it's appearance, so it's not a bad idea to keep your actual day to day activities a reasonably close reflection of what your real priorities are.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    11. Re:Hmm by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The guy mentioned that he was a consultant. If you're a consultant, your income can disappear at a moment's notice; All your customers have to do is stop calling you. If you don't want that to happen, you have to be extra careful to not neglect your customers.

    12. Re:Hmm by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 1

      What happens if you have a 70% chance of surviving for another 5 years, and a 40% chance of surviving for another 10 years? And you're a consultant.

    13. Re:Hmm by tverbeek · · Score: 3, Insightful
      How is it that Bobby wasn't prepared?

      Part of preparing for death (assuming you get a chance to) involves talking about it with the important people in your life, and assuring yourself that those you leave behind are going to be OK. While your co-workers probably don't rank up there with your children and beloved partner in that respect, you may very well count them among your friends, and I know that I'd hate to leave my friends in the lurch if I could prevent it.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    14. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why I carry half a million in life insurance. If I get cancer, I may not be happy about the fact that I'm going to die but at least my wife will be provided for. If I have been a good husband then she will be grieving and probably won't feel much like working right away. :)

    15. Re:Hmm by y00tz · · Score: 1

      I'd just like to point out, that, this may not be the case for everyone, but when my dad was diagnosed with cancer, leaving the office, and staying at home would have been surrendering for him. He was optimistic he was going to over come it, and he'd live to be retired, and spend time with us then.

    16. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're married and have a $500,000 life insurance policy with your wife as the beneficiary, cancer isn't what you need to be worried about. :)

    17. Re:Hmm by dubl-u · · Score: 1

      If I found myself with terminal cancer, my family and myself would be on the top of the list.

      A quick reminder for the crowd: None of us knows the day and hour, but we can be sure that it will come. Live now! You may not get the chance later.

    18. Re:Hmm by ipfwadm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes it would be nice if you could sit around for 6 months. But it is selfish.

      If you don't have enough money in savings to sit around for six months, then you've over-extended yourself (or you're poor, but given that this is Slashdot, I'm assuming not). If we were talking about a couple years then you'd have a point, but you should always have at least a several month reserve of money lying around. It may not be cancer or illness that makes you need to use it, it could be a lay-off.

    19. Re:Hmm by Metasquares · · Score: 1
      When you get older, you will realize life isn't about what you want to do.
      Which is why you need to work on your financial goals when you're young if you want to be able to do what you want later. Doesn't it make more sense to do the hard stuff when you're young and healthy, so you can relax when you may not be?
    20. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Shame on you! You read the heartfelt article and just made assumptions. I know Doug very well. I know his family. They are all amazing people! They've fought unimaginable battles against cancer and have remained wonderful and graceful.

      Doug would be the first to admit his faults and correct them.

      Would you?

    21. Re:Hmm by sartin · · Score: 1

      If you don't have enough money in savings to sit around for six months, then you've over-extended yourself (or you're poor, but given that this is Slashdot, I'm assuming not).

      This assumes a lot of things that are not necessarily true:

      "Six months to live" means six months. It can mean six weeks. It can mean six years. I recently had the pleasure of meeting a woman who had a cancer with "0% survival chance" and life expectancy of six months after diagnosis. She was disagnosed eight years ago. She's very glad she didn't quit her job.

      Six months living expenses with terminal cancer are similar to six months living expenses without the cancer. Cancer ain't cheap. Not all expenses are covered by insurance. My son has (non-terminal, quite curable, and in remission, but still requiring two more years of treatment) leukemia. We have excellent insurance. We spent approximately $8,000 out of pocket last year including insurance deductibles, medical co-pays, pharmacy co-pays, extra child care needed for our other child, travel and expenses to visit the oncolcogist, etc.

      The cancer patients doesn't care whether his/her estate gets that money. If I die from cancer, I want my estate to have plenty of money for my wife and my children. I don't want to take a huge chunk away. Heck, under my current circumstances (working very part-time) I might well increase my hours so they got more money.

    22. Re:Hmm by Zaatxe · · Score: 1

      Well, you do have a terminal disease. It's called aging.

      Once upon a time a fortune cookie told me:
      "Life is a sexually-transmitted disease with 100% mortality rate"

      Go ahead, rate me redundant if you wish.

      --
      So say we all
    23. Re:Hmm by ipfwadm · · Score: 1

      "Six months to live" means six months.

      No, I'm not assuming that six months to live means six months. My post was in reply to someone who basically stated that sitting around for six months will cause one to rack up huge amounts of debt. Therefore, it was a given that six months meant six months. My post was independent of the cause of needing to sit around for six months.

      The cancer patients doesn't [sic] care whether his/her estate gets that money. If I die from cancer, I want my estate to have plenty of money for my wife and my children.

      So increase your life insurance to cover how much those months will cost. It's relatively small potatoes compared to life insurance payouts. My employer gives me, as basic coverage that I don't have to pay for, twice my annual salary. An additional four times my annual pay (so triple the basic coverage) would cost me a whopping $200 a year. Of course I'm young, but hey, Christopher Reeve's wife died of cancer at 44. $200 is a miniscule amount to pay for the peace of mind that I could spend my last days with my family or out doing something I would rather be doing, rather than chained to my desk.

      And at the end of the day, I would bet that most children would give up their entire inheritance for just one more day to spend with their lost parent. Money isn't everything.

    24. Re:Hmm by nCnt++ · · Score: 1
      You bring up a good point that I've voiced many times. Whenever I hear a co-worker say "Live today as if it is your last," I have to reply that that is some of the worst advice ever. Because if it really was my last day, and I knew it, I would go to work for 1 hour to say goodbye to a few dear friends; drive to the airport; give my car to someone waiting for a taxi; buy a ticket on CitiBank's dime; and visit my family.

      The problem is, it isn't my last day and now I'm further in debt, car-less and in Arizona.

      A better version is "I will live today as if it is *your* last day".

      --
      Have you ever noticed the best /. comments are long and the best Chuck Norris jokes are short?
    25. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most people are uncomfortable with the whole subject of cancer, and everything related to it. Therefore, it tends to bring out the asshole in them.

      Remember, Slashdot is the Land of the Insensitive Clod (where we pour Natalie Portman down ancient Korean hot grits, in the manner of Soviet Russia).

  4. Got that one covered .... by slightlyspacey · · Score: 1

    'Make sure you are not indispensable!'

    I don't know about you all, but I'm good to go on that one. Quite frankly, there isn't anyone that can't be replaced at a moment's notice.

    1. Re:Got that one covered .... by boldtbanan · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Some people take up to 5 moments to replace...because they have to train their Indian replacements.

    2. Re:Got that one covered .... by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 1

      I might be able to replace my wife with a little effort, I'd say my kids are pretty indispensable. Sure, I could live without them, but would I want to? If you've got young children you know what I'm talking about...

    3. Re:Got that one covered .... by lixee · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In the words of my former boss: "Graveyards are full of people who thought they were indispensable"

      --
      Res publica non dominetur
    4. Re:Got that one covered .... by jaysones · · Score: 1

      You worked for Charles De Gaulle?!

    5. Re:Got that one covered .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Graveyards are full of people who thought they were indispensable"
      And of course there's the corollary to that: Offices are full of people who should have died or been eaten by predators long ago.

    6. Re:Got that one covered .... by blowhole · · Score: 3, Funny

      What's the olive oil for?

      --
      "Ask me about Loom"
    7. Re:Got that one covered .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Insert joke about French generals having their indispensable men in graveyards.

    8. Re:Got that one covered .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What's the olive oil for?"
      He he he he. I don't get it...

    9. Re:Got that one covered .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Frying things. What's Loom?

    10. Re:Got that one covered .... by DahGhostfacedFiddlah · · Score: 1

      Head ye over to an Abandonware site and find out. It was one of the best LucasArts games of the 386 era.

      <reality>Of course, that's probably just nostalgia talking and you'll hate it, </reality> but I still pick it up and play occasionally.

  5. Yeah right by warsaw303 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If I'm going to die of cancer I could give a shit less how my employer makes out when I'm dead.
    I'm dying...UH OH, I'd better make sure all my code is documented. That's ridiculous.

    1. Re:Yeah right by jlarocco · · Score: 1

      Wish I had mod points. I couldn't agree more.

    2. Re:Yeah right by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      Guess what: we all die.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    3. Re:Yeah right by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1
      ...we all die

      Yes, but hopefully after the new Battlestar Galactica series finishes.
      Then I can pass in peace.

    4. Re:Yeah right by kpainter · · Score: 5, Funny

      Employee Bob: "Boss, I hate to bring bad news but I have incurable cancer. I need to review the comments in my code right away and make sure that someone can step in for me when I am gone".

      Boss: "Bob, this in a strange way, is very fortunate. Meet Rajii here from India. He was going to be replacing you anyway. Its a win-win!"

    5. Re:Yeah right by fumblebruschi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't agree. I like my work, and while it's not my entire life, it's a big part of it. Why wouldn't I want it to be well-maintained? I actually do maintain a file (I call it my "I got hit by a truck" file") that has a pile of information that whoever took over for me would need. It's true, no one is indispensable (except Bill Belichick) but I can make my successor's job a lot easier.

      Also, I've never really bought the "I'd spend all my time with my kids" argument. For one thing, there isn't that much time you could do that anyway. Are you going to keep them out of school until you die? Do you think your kids really want to be around you 24 hours a day anyway, whether you have terminal cancer or not? Plus, you know, while you're alive you usually have to work. My landlord wouldn't stop asking for his rent just because I was dying.

    6. Re:Yeah right by Urusai · · Score: 1

      We're all gonna die anyway, so you might as well blow off work while you're alive regardless of your cancerosity.

    7. Re:Yeah right by dubl-u · · Score: 1

      If I'm going to die of cancer I could give a shit less how my employer makes out when I'm dead.

      And I'd bet your code looks like it, too. Why waste your life doing something you don't really care about?

      For all you know, you are going to die of cancer; you're certain to die of something. Might as well sort out your priorities now.

    8. Re:Yeah right by DahGhostfacedFiddlah · · Score: 1

      If that's not already a Dilbert, it should be.

    9. Re:Yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then, you are not going to get along with people very well in your life. Your attitude here reflects how you treat other people and it's stupid to go through life saying "It's all about me - screw everyone else" And he wasn't saying to do everything at the moment you find out - the point is - that should be the way you should do it all along. He's just making a better point to do it now. Sheesh I sure wouldn't want you around me in a sinking ship.

  6. This should be standard practice by weegiekev · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The following points from the article should be followed regardles of having a potentially terminal illness:

    * Make certain that source code is where it should be.
    * Clearly document anything "strange" in the source code you deliver. .
    * Make certain you have a "buddy" developer who knows what you are doing.

    If nothing else, the first two are essential if you want to read your _own_ source code after a year or two's time and figure out what is going on.

    1. Re:This should be standard practice by Tim+C · · Score: 4, Interesting

      * Make certain that source code is where it should be.

      My fellow seniors and I have a little rule where I work - if it's not in CVS, it doesn't exist. Nothing gets deployed to a server that isn't in source control. Hard drives die, things are deleted by accident, and developer PCs are not backed up. The CVS server is (or should be - if it isn't, at least we are blameless if the shit hits the fan).

      * Clearly document anything "strange" in the source code you deliver.

      That's just common courtesy if nothing else. If you think something is odd while you're writing it, imagine how it's going to look to someone else coming to it cold. I've lost count of the time I've seen wasted (and have wasted myself) investigating weirdness in code, or even removing things that look completely wrong only to have something break subtley in an apparently unrelated area.

      * Make certain you have a "buddy" developer who knows what you are doing.

      This one I'm much less bothered about. However, that may be because I tend to actively discourage any concept of code ownership. It's not *my* code, it's the $feature code. If someone else needs to get in there in the course of their work, all the better - they may catch a mistake I've made, or a bad assumption. Even if it's perfect, it's one more person who knows the code. I think that ideally everyone on a team of developers should get stuck in to pretty much every module. It's rare (in my experience at least) that any part of an application is so specialised as to only be within the ability of a single team member.

    2. Re:This should be standard practice by weegiekev · · Score: 2, Funny
      That's just common courtesy if nothing else. If you think something is odd while you're writing it, imagine how it's going to look to someone else coming to it cold. I've lost count of the time I've seen wasted (and have wasted myself) investigating weirdness in code, or even removing things that look completely wrong only to have something break subtley in an apparently unrelated area.
      Or for my favourite variation on this, spend ages investigating the weirdness, trying to clean it out whilst complaining "Who wrote this mess!?" only to find your name written at the bottom of the file.

      And lets face it, we've all done it!
    3. Re:This should be standard practice by Javaman59 · · Score: 0
      If you think something is odd while you're writing it, imagine how it's going to look to someone else coming to it cold.
      Working on one job, we received some third party code which included the comment on a #define "I don't know why this is needed, but it is". Some of us laughed at this, and thought the author must be a half wit. My view was that it was a great comment, as it was an aweful lot more useful than the #define without any explanation. Often we are reluctant to put in comments which admit that we don't fully understand something, but it is in these situations that a comment like "I don't know why this works" is most necessary. Sure, some people will think it looks foolish, but if you don't put it in, there will be others who are grateful that you've saved them the trouble of investigating the weirdness, only come up with, half a day later, the same conclusion as you.
      --
      I'm a software visionary. I don't code.
  7. Incurable cancer business plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    1. Call boss: "I quit"

    2. Sell house, possessions.

    3. Move to tropical island paradise.

    4. When the pain sets in - gun to head.

    5. Afterlife????

  8. Facing death... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A few months after my mother died from breast cancer, my boss was harrassing me for not being willing to put in 80+ hours per week because I was spending too much time with family. When he told me I needed to work his way or take the highway, I took the highway. My dad and I took a road trip to from California to Idaho to bury mom's asshes with her folks, I went back to school for a year and got a better paying job two years after I left my old company. Unless you work for a great company that cares about the employees, you got to deal with the jerks.

    1. Re:Facing death... by Lord_Slepnir · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If any boss asks your to put in 80+ hours a week for more than a week or two at a time (IE, right before a release), you need to take a good solid look at the highway, no matter what your situation is. Once they know that you'll work 80+ hours a week, they'll exploit that to the fullest.

    2. Re:Facing death... by Kithraya · · Score: 1

      A couple of years ago, I had a fairly close extended family member pass away in the night. The following morning, I told my project manager that I would be taking half a day in either two or three days, depending on when the funeral was scheduled. He chewed me up one side and down the other for not giving him enough notice. Honestly.

    3. Re:Facing death... by stunt_penguin · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Which is the situation at the moment in the games industry, where 70 hours is basically mandatory all the time in all companies and at all stages of a project.

      That's why the games industry holds no interest for me- I'm a pretty decent 3D modeller but you couldn't pay me enough money to sell every waking hour to EA. Especially on a sequel. Until they all grow up I'm not going to touch them with a bargepole.

      --
      When the posters fear their moderators, there is tyranny; when the moderators fears the posters, there is liberty.
    4. Re:Facing death... by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      You need to find a better job. In the past 5 years, I've had:

      1)An old friend die. I had to take 2 days off to fly cross country for the funeral
      2)My grandmother die. I missed a solid week to sit shiva, this was 3 days before my project was due to release.
      3)My father have a heart attack. I had to go home to take care of my mother, and waited until after my father's surgery (which was further delayed to let his heart strengthen a bit).

      I never got any shit for missing the time. I never had more than a day's notice, on at least one occassion given by email due to it already being a weekend. Not only was I never given shit for taking off, they actively worked with me on the heart attack when I went over my FTO allotment for the year. This is the way it should be. If they give you shit over missing time, tewll them to fuck themselves.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    5. Re:Facing death... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I hate those people who don't die on schedule. Really messes up MY schedule.

      Bastards.

    6. Re:Facing death... by Castar · · Score: 1

      ...70 hours is basically mandatory all the time in all companies and at all stages of a project.

      You've been misinformed. This is not the case for all companies, and certainly not in all stages of the project. It may very well be for EA, but they are the evil empire of the gaming industry. There are many companies who hold up "no crunch" as a badge of pride. I was even reading about one in Game Developer Magazine that has mandatory 40-hour weeks - you're not even *allowed* to stay late. (It sounded like a pretty horrible company in other respects, though).

      Crunch does happen in the gaming industry more than other software development, that's true. But saying it happens all the time in all companies is false.

      --
      I yearn for you tragically. A. T. Tappman, Chaplain, U.S. Army.
    7. Re:Facing death... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Crunch does happen in the gaming industry more than other software development, that's true. But saying it happens all the time in all companies is false.

      It would not be too far from the truth. When I left Atari two years ago, I had worked 28 days straight because the QA manager expected me to work every day until the project was done. (That was clear violation of HR policy, but HR was looking the other way because this QA manager got his numbers in every month.) Had I stayed on until my project was done, I would probably not get a day off because the next project would require that I work every day until it was done. Crunch time used to be seasonal. For a lot of companies, crunch time is all the time.

      There are a few companies that maintain reasonable work schedules, but they're not the ones leading the industry now. Until the industry grows up, it's going to continue losing talented people when they figure out that there are better paying jobs out there with reasonable work schedules.

    8. Re:Facing death... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what? I've been in the business 35 years, and I haven't seen a programming job in over a decade that required less than 80 hours a week. 80 is the norm. I've worked 112 for over 16 months straight. Yes, that's 16 hours a day seven days a week. To compete against $1/hour programmers you have to be very productive. Forty hour weeks just mean you'll be fired and replaced with someone from India or Bangladesh. In the last company where I worked, we had a bunch of lazy programmers that only worked six days a week and no more than 10 hours a day. Of course we went out of business. If you want to work with computers, just expect to not have a life. Out of the 40 programmers I work with, only two are married. They got married while in college before they started working in this horrible industry.

      Proud AC since Oct '98

    9. Re:Facing death... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's people like you who dig your own grave proudly.

      Us English people get arsey if we have to do more than our contracted 37.5 hour week (for which I get paid a happy equivalent of $70000). Sod the company - if it says 37.5 hours on the contract I'm not lifting a finger further. I've turned down $90000 salaries before because of the hours. Not only that, I spend an hour a day learning and not being productive.

      Why? Family are more important than the company you are working for. Forget the American work ethic and grow up.

    10. Re:Facing death... by Castar · · Score: 1

      Hmm. I've seen a number of different departments and companies, and there's certainly crunch, and some places are really bad. But my personal experience is that it's not all the time, everywhere. Personally I've only crunched for about two weeks in the past year, and prior to that only about two months a year (and not tough crunching, either, just 9am-9pm weekdays, less on weekends).

      --
      I yearn for you tragically. A. T. Tappman, Chaplain, U.S. Army.
  9. Quoi? by BecomingLumberg · · Score: 1

    This is about responsible programming/working in general. I don't think it really has a damn thing to do with cancer compared to retirement/other death/going to jail.

    --
    If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be.-TJ
    1. Re:Quoi? by Euler · · Score: 1

      exactly. most people just call this the 'hit by a bus factor.' Unfortunately, it's very hard to overcome when your co-workers don't want to know what you are working on. They don't understand when you try to get them to cross-train. I have a pretty healthy curiosity for what is going on outside my immediate scope, but many people just aren't willing to do the same. I get very nervous when I get closer to a deployment schedule that something bad could happen knowing I'm the only one that can make it work.

  10. Most everyone nowadays is dispensable by digitaldc · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We should ensure that, no matter what happens, we have taken care of our responsibilities such that, in the event of our departure, our clients and employers can continue to function normally.

    Well, if you are dying, you may have other priorities in your last days. The above quote might be relevant if you own or run a company, but not for the average Joe.

    Most people would not think twice about quitting their boring jobs and actually try to enjoy the last hours of their lives.

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:Most everyone nowadays is dispensable by porcupine8 · · Score: 4, Informative
      Well, if you are dying

      Yeah, but the article isn't aimed at people who are actively dying. It's aimed at people who probably aren't going to die, but do have a better chance than the average person under 50 years old.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    2. Re:Most everyone nowadays is dispensable by DougReilly · · Score: 1

      If you are in your last days, sure. Cancer thses days can often be a chronic condition. I know folks with my cancer who have died after a year or two, others who have lived for a number more years. I happen to enjoy my work, the people I work with, and my job gives me the ability to buy toys, travel, go to conferences, and otherwise keep my family fed until I do die.

    3. Re:Most everyone nowadays is dispensable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      the article isn't aimed at people who are actively dying
      We are all actively dying, dumbass.
    4. Re:Most everyone nowadays is dispensable by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Which is amazing that we all keep working since we are dying the day we are born.

      Yet we give away 50% of our waking lives without a thought to what that means.

      Ignoring the folks whose work really is exactly what they wanted to do in life (maybe 15% of people- probably less).

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    5. Re:Most everyone nowadays is dispensable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >It's aimed at people who probably aren't going to die

      the Immortals? ;-)

  11. No, its about doing the comments in the 1st place by cprice · · Score: 1

    You insensitive clod.

  12. You forgot step six... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    6. Prophet

    1. Re:You forgot step six... by Cruciform · · Score: 1

      That was priceless. :)

    2. Re:You forgot step six... by biocute · · Score: 1

      What about virgins?

    3. Re:You forgot step six... by kalirion · · Score: 3, Funny

      Depending on the TOS, step 4 may disqualify you...

    4. Re:You forgot step six... by engagebot · · Score: 1

      Props for that one. Classic stuff.

      --
      Han shot first.
    5. Re:You forgot step six... by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 1

      What about virgins?

      This is Slashdot. There's plenty of 'em.

      --
      Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
    6. Re:You forgot step six... by lebski · · Score: 1

      Cheers for that... you made my evening.

    7. Re:You forgot step six... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can keep all of your darn virgins.

      *My* paradise is full of porn stars!

  13. Re:Incurable cancer business plan by ghostunit · · Score: 1

    it's pretty hard to get a gun in countries other than the United States, especially so if you have a terminal illness (it's easy to guess what you would do with it).

  14. Cancer Shmancer by ltbarcly · · Score: 1

    If I had any cancer which was seriously threatening my health I would delete everything I could possibly delete and then laugh until I cried.

    Well, not really. But I certainly would be more worried about myself than about how I could arrange for my clients to keep making money. The only reason you want your clients to make money is so that they will then have to give some of that money to you in the form of your fees. Beyond that they can go fly a kite.

    1. Re:Cancer Shmancer by PitaBred · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And it's attitudes like this that cause you to curse at the asshat who cut you off in traffic, or shortchanged you, or spits in your burger, or just laughs as you get robbed. Because as far as they're concerned, you can go fly a kite.

    2. Re:Cancer Shmancer by ltbarcly · · Score: 1

      That's not quite the same. The person who cuts me off, the person who shortchanges me, and the person who spits in my burger hurt me, and they hurt themselves. They risk being at fault in a car accident, getting fired, and getting fired. They don't help themselves at all. They are stupid.

    3. Re:Cancer Shmancer by broohaha · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But I certainly would be more worried about myself than about how I could arrange for my clients to keep making money. The only reason you want your clients to make money is so that they will then have to give some of that money to you in the form of your fees. Beyond that they can go fly a kite.

      In November, 2004, an uncle of mine discovered he had lung cancer. Knowing him, it was no surprise that he, an engineer, continued working. Coming into 2005, he was still working but from home. It gave him a sense normalcy and kept his mind active (as well as kept him distracted). Even if it was for only a few hours a week, whenever he had the strength he'd spend time working. Through it all, he helped his colleagues in transferring as much of what he knew to them. And in May, he passed away.

      His employers showed their appreciation by paying his salary as a fulltime employee till the time of his death. And they even sent his widow his annual bonus check at the end of the year. Many of them were there at his wake.

      Sometimes, what goes around comes around.

    4. Re:Cancer Shmancer by ltbarcly · · Score: 1

      It is nice that your uncle was treated nicely by his employer. He did what he thought was best and what made him happiest.

      Not everyone actually likes their job, and certainly not their coworkers. Some people have to put up with coworkers who couldn't find their butt with both hands, but golf with the execs and so get away with murder.

    5. Re:Cancer Shmancer by dubl-u · · Score: 1

      The only reason you want your clients to make money is so that they will then have to give some of that money to you in the form of your fees. Beyond that they can go fly a kite.

      Perhaps you should choose your clients more carefully. I make sure all of mine are doing things that I think are worth doing. Why would you spend a lot of time on something that you don't care about?

    6. Re:Cancer Shmancer by ltbarcly · · Score: 1
      Why would you spend a lot of time on something that you don't care about?


      $$$$
    7. Re:Cancer Shmancer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh, didn't you say it was NOT the same thing.

  15. This is not for people who are actively dying.... by porcupine8 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Several commenters are saying how, if they were dying of cancer, they'd ignore all this stuff and spend time with their family etc etc etc.

    Of course you would. If you were currently dying of cancer. He says very clearly that if your case is terminal, that's what you should do. The article isn't for those people

    It's for people with either curable cancer, or cancer that is long-term treatable (will likely kill you in the next decade, but you'll be fine for at least a few more years). People in those situations can't afford to quit work entirely (not with those Dr bills, trust me!), and in all likelyhood shouldn't give up their normal lives. But it does mean that they have a better-than-average chance of dying, and should probably take a few precautions just in case.

    Yes, if you hate your job, hopefully something like that would be a wake-up call to change your situation. But if you're fine with your job, and are most likely not dying anytime soon, quitting is not necessarily the obvious solution.

    --
    Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
  16. Well... by Benanov · · Score: 2

    The problem is that isn't quite what he was getting at.

    Doug's first cancer was curable (as it was contained only in his liver and is completely gone after the tumor was removed.)

    His second is treatable, and he may live as long as 10 years.

    I don't know about you, but I can't spend 10 years with my family. I would need to work to have a bit of money, especially for these cancer treatments.

    Now were it terminal, I'd tie up loose ends and get the hell out of dodge. But if I saw a lot of hope in hanging on for quite a few more years, I'd slowly back off instead.

    Like he's doing.

  17. Do you recall him ever mentioning Source Code? by hof · · Score: 1

    Years ago, wherever I worked, I had a cartoon that hung in my office. It was from an early source code control company, and it showed a woman with two small children at a graveside. A man in a suit walks up, and the caption says, "Do you recall him ever mentioning Source Code?"

    Anyone have a link?

  18. Don't take this the wrong way, but... by rehtonAesoohC · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...I thought that article was retarded.

    I'm just stating my opinion here, but it's talking about living life from the wrong end of the spectrum. For one things, one of the first things that came to my mind when I read it was, "Get a freakin life!!" If a person is so concerned about what will happen to them after they die, then they should really re-evaluate the way they live. I live my life in such a way that if I had to be replaced because of death, people wouldn't think, "Oh I wish he had left us the password to his computer so we could get his source code." More importantly though, I don't sit around thinking of ways that I can make my passing invisible to most people around me. But then again, I don't have cancer...

    I have nothing against the author of the article, I just disagree completely with the validity of the argument's origin. Who cares whether you're going to die or not, you should do those things regardless.

  19. Re:Incurable cancer business plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Walk into shooting range.
    2. Rent handgun, buy 50 rounds of ammo.
    3. Practice target shooting, 49 shots total.
    4. Turn around 180 degrees.
    5. Put handgun in mouth.
    6. BOOM!

  20. Awkward Article by moehoward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I am in the same boat as the author of the article. I found, however, the conclusions and advice to be rather awkward if not just plain weird. To be honest, I doubt the accuracy or sincerity of the author. Sounds a bit James Frey-ish to me.

    Here is how it works... You get diagnosed with cancer and then you freakin' forget ANYTHING about work. Period. I don't frickin' care if you are the president or Sheryl Crow. You take care of yourself and your family. Managing your work is just below the bottom of any priority or list you may have.

    Been there, done that with too many family members and others in our support network. The article is pure sci-fi/fantasy/victim-hood non-sense. I don't think that in my life that I have ever been offended by anything, but the editor who put this on Slashdot is getting pretty close to being the first to do so.

    --
    "If you want to improve, be content to be thought foolish and stupid." - Epictetus
    1. Re:Awkward Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What happens if you survive?

    2. Re:Awkward Article by porcupine8 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      You get diagnosed with cancer and then you freakin' forget ANYTHING about work. Period. I don't frickin' care if you are the president or Sheryl Crow. You take care of yourself and your family. Managing your work is just below the bottom of any priority or list you may have.

      Unless, like the author says, your cancer is treatable and you know most likely won't be dying anytime soon. I continued in grad school (both classes and a research assistantship) full-time while I was getting chemo and radiation. My family wanted me to move back with them (1000 miles away), but I knew that would be completely stupid in my case. I only had about a 20% (or less) chance of dying, but if I'd quit school and done that I would have had a 100% chance of severe depression, which is shown to reduce surivial rates. Not to mention losing my insurance, which would mean that once I was done with treatment I'd probably have to declare bankruptcy, and boy would THAT make the next few years of my life more fun.

      Over all, there was no way in hell I was going to let cancer dictate my life. Now, if the initial treatment hadn't worked, and my chances got significantly lower, needed a bone marrow transplant, etc - then I would have pretty much had to quit, and would have gone back to be with my family. But that didn't happen, and my family eventually realized I'd made the right decision.

      Dying of cancer and having cancer are two very different situations, and have to be dealt with very differently. It's also the kind of thing that's totally different for different people - I was able to take 3 classes and work 10-20 hours a week during chemo, some people on the same regimen aren't able to. I liked what I was doing a lot; others who don't like their job may see it as more of a nuisance during treatment, or may not have supervisors as understanding and flexible as mine.

      I don't know what your current situation is, but I hope that your treatment is going well. And I hope that you're only letting cancer tell you what to do when you absolutely have to.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    3. Re:Awkward Article by moehoward · · Score: 1


      Most cancer patients survive the initial cancer. And they move on with their lives. I have 6 survivors in my immediate family and 5 of the 6 have changed their lives and how they live in very significant ways.

      In terms of work, which is what your snotty little one-liner seems to be getting at, you go back to work when you are up to it and you move on. If your bosses or colleagues or customers are not understanding of your situation and why you were away all of a sudden, then you have really crappy bosses and colleagues and customers. I have never seen this happen and the cold-heartedness of the workplace that the article implies (and you seem all too willing to accept) simply does not exist. Yes, even co-workers and bosses are human beings no matter where you work. Except for municipal government employees. Those people are just frickin' evil.

      --
      "If you want to improve, be content to be thought foolish and stupid." - Epictetus
    4. Re:Awkward Article by moehoward · · Score: 1

      Here. Roll this six-sided dice. If you get a 4, you die. You get to roll once. Do it now.

      Does that change your mind?

      I think that you need to take a very long walk and do some thinking. Your family loves you and wants to support you and you rejected them. I think that you have other problems with your personality and stubborness that are probably worse than the depression you mention.

      Right now would be a really good time to grow up. Do it fast.

      Finally, in terms of the roll-of-the-dice, you have to understand that comprehension of risk does not fully biologically develop in your brain under you are at least 25. Given that proven fact and your knowledge of "depression risk", is THAT something you should also consider? Or do you just want to consider risks that favor your pre-determined point of view?

      --
      "If you want to improve, be content to be thought foolish and stupid." - Epictetus
    5. Re:Awkward Article by porcupine8 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wow, I'm glad you could do a full personality analysis on me based on one post. Because I obviously explained my situation in full, not leaving out a single detail. In fact, every detail of my entire life was in that post, so obviously you were able to fully analyze it.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    6. Re:Awkward Article by moehoward · · Score: 1

      Um... yeah... About that whole growing up thing... Anyway... Yeah. Um. OK.

      Yeah...

      --
      "If you want to improve, be content to be thought foolish and stupid." - Epictetus
    7. Re:Awkward Article by porcupine8 · · Score: 1
      Oh, you think I should grow up because I gave a sarcastic response to someone who assumes they know what path I should take in life based on the contents of one post on slashdot?

      Yeah, maybe I should. It actually wasn't worth responding to at all.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    8. Re:Awkward Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ....uh, I think it was your signature that lead him to make the "grow up" comment.

    9. Re:Awkward Article by porcupine8 · · Score: 1
      Ok, I just realized that I did come across as a bit more nonchalant than was necessary on the 20% odds of dying thing.

      This goes back to the fact that I did not include every detail of my life/illness in that post, and in this case it was an omission that I probably should not have made.

      I was, in fact, visiting my family on a holiday when I was diagnosed. At the time of diagnosis, my odds of surviving were around 80%.

      Now, in the case of my cancer (hodgkin's lymphoma), generally the chemo either works or it doesn't. If there is improvement in the first couple of treatments, there is little chance of it not eradicating the cancer. (Though there is still risk of recurrence - but that's separate and may happen two or three years later.) My family and I came to an agreement - I'd get my first two chemo treatments there, and if it was working, I'd go home for the rest. Within 24 hours of the first treatment, my visible tumor (a lump over my collarbone) had shrunk in size by half. It was working like crazy.

      Given that, my odds of survival had risen dramatically. And this is not coming from me, who at 24.5 would be biologically incapable of assessing such a risk (I'm 26.5 now, just so you know, so it's all good) - this is coming from my oncologist, who was at least in his forties. I never got a hard number, but from everything I've read I would say that the odds of the chemo failing to work after that point was lower than 10%. Probably around 5%. Again, still a chance of recurrence later, but I was going to be cancer-free for a while at least.

      I am glad that I was with my family at the beginning; it put their minds at ease to see the chemo working and know I would be ok. But I'm equally glad that I then went home and got on with my life, rather than restructuring my entire life around an illness that didn't require it.

      So, yeah, that one omission did make me sound more cavalier about my health than I really was. The others - well, they're not really any of your business, and you're still being a presumptive asshole to think that you know what I should do without them.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    10. Re:Awkward Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing personal, but what fucked up country do you live in where people who need cancer treatment have to declare for bankruptcy if they stop college/work because it will leave them without insurance?

      Don't answer that, I've got this nagging feeling I already know :-/

    11. Re:Awkward Article by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You get diagnosed with cancer and then you freakin' forget ANYTHING about work. ... The article is pure sci-fi/fantasy/victim-hood non-sense.

      [shrug] Not everyone reacts to cancer, or any other life-changing (and potentially life-ending) event, the same way. When my mother was diagnosed with breast cancer, she told the people she thought needed to know, and kept on living her life exactly the same as she had before the diagnosis. She worked right up until the day before her surgery, and was back at work, IIRC, a week afterwards. Now, years later and (fortunately) with no sign of recurrence, she still feels that was the right decision -- that to give up on such a large part of her life (she's one of those lucky people who genuinely loves what they do) would have been tantamount to giving up on her life, if you see what I mean. She also cheerfully acknowledges that there is no one-size-fits-all approach.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    12. Re:Awkward Article by Dave+White · · Score: 1

      I don't think that in my life that I have ever been offended by anything, but the editor who put this on Slashdot is getting pretty close to being the first to do so.

      Hear hear. I too was diagnosed with cancer a few years ago. I had treatment and am now undergoing regular observation to check that it has gone.
      I found this article insulting and fucking irritating. My world came crashing down around my eyes when it happened, and my ONLY concern was getting better and being with my family.

      --
      --D
    13. Re:Awkward Article by honkycat · · Score: 1

      Wow, glad you've got all the answers for everyone.

      Cancer is not usually like a car wreck. It's not a roll of the dice followed by sudden, unexpected death. Very often, there are good estimates of the amount of time left -- at least on the order of do you have days or months or years. In some cases, maybe you get little to no warning, but hell, you might get run over a bus while you're taking that long walk trying to get some perspective. There's no way you have enough information about the parent poster's condition to draw any of the conclusions you try to draw.

      If I learned I was going to die within the month, then I'd probably drop everything and make the most of it. If I learned I was probably going to die within the decade, I don't think I would change much of anything, since the odds of dying in any given decade are already pretty high. You can't just put your life on hold and curl into a fetal ball and hide.

      Anyway, right now would be a really good time to climb down off your high horse and learn to respect others. Do it fast.

    14. Re:Awkward Article by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

      Hey, sorry this is off topic but.. You wouldn't happen to use some sort of IM client or be willing to post your e-mail would you? Your sig makes my head spin and I was wondering if I could ask you a few questions (without my karma being eaten by repeated off topic posts).

      --
      I like muppets.
    15. Re:Awkward Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a very similar situation as the grandparent poster. Three months before I left the country for graduate school, I was diagnosed with melanoma. I began my initial surgeries and learned the my condition was much worse than originally thought. Two weeks before I left for school, I completed my second surgery. Four weeks later, I began interferon injections that lasted a year. Two months later, I had to endure another surgery to remove a mysterious lump. Before I began treatment, there was roughly a 21% chance that I would die. Even after treatment, there's about a 14% mortality rate.

      There's several things to consider when making these decisions. In my case, I knew that I could tolerate the emotional pressure of continuing school despite my disease. However, my family was very torn, especially my mother. Although I could have taken a year off, going to school was the best thing that I could do for my family. While the extra time with them would have been wonderful, I could show them a strength that makes accepting the disease far easier. This wasn't a decision out of arrogance or denial. Continuing school and a mostly normal life truly was the best way to comfort my family.

      It has been a year and a half since I was first diagnosed. There is no way to tell if I have been cured, but I do know that I had made the correct deicision.

    16. Re:Awkward Article by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

      You can use my slashdot name at gmail. Although, I don't check it often at all (I don't really like gmail much), but I'll check it sometime in the next couple days to see if you've emailed me.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    17. Re:Awkward Article by shotgunefx · · Score: 1

      I dunno. My mother and brother were diagnosed two weeks apart. My mother only lasted 3 months, my brother a long, hard fought 10 months. (My father has it as well, actually before they did, but it was misdiagnosed for years but that's another rant)

      I pretty much stopped my life to take care of my mother in hospice. I think I left her side 2 or 3 times to reboot a server. Luckily, almost all the people I work for were great about it. Putting off their plans while I took care of my family.

      I'm actually in the process of tidying up things at the moment so if God forbid something happens to me, they won't be in a lurch. I can tell you if I found I had three months left to live tomorrow, I would spend some time setting those things in order. Sometimes work is just work, sometimes it's more than that. The clients that stuck by me, I consider friends. I'd try really hard not to fuck them on the way out.

      Plus, sometimes you need something to throw yourself into to keep your head straight.

      --

      -William Shatner can be neither created nor destroyed.
  21. Cancer by Elektroschock · · Score: 1

    Oh, I expected another article about software patents :-) You know the EU is currently pushing for the Community patent.

    But here it's cancer or more explicit death. A student I knew suffered liver cancer and did not write a testament. He died three yrs ago. So his property went to the Government and his friend (he was homosexual) had to move out of his flat.

    The advice the adeveloper gives to us is very intresting and should apply to all of us. Truck numbers of projects have to be kept low (A truck number is the number of people that can be hit by a truck without the project collapsing).

    The truth is that we will die. Make sure people will not find it hard to hack your code or your code will die too. Intrestingly the gplv3 includes a death provision but it is for software patents.

    1. Re:Cancer by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      You mean truck numbers should be kept high. A low truck number means you're in dangerous territory if you lose someone.

    2. Re:Cancer by Knara · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't one want the "truck number" to be high in a project, given your definition?

  22. Why does it take impending death ? by Builder · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A lot of comments here are along the lines that if they were dying they would screw work and spend time with their families. I gotta ask - why would it take your impending death to spend this time ?

    Every day you go to work before your child gets up and get home after they've gone to sleep is a day that you both lose. Every saturday you spend getting those TPS reports done is another day of play and growth that you will miss with your child.

    An earlier poster said that they would spend the time making sure that their kids know what they need to. That kinda implies they aren't doing it now. People say that they would spend the time with their family.

    Maybe I've got the wrong end of the stick - maybe you already do that. But to me, every day I live is one day closer to the end of my life. I only work to make sure that I can keep my family safe, warm, healthy and educated. Once I've worked enough to make that happen, the rest of the time is for them, because each day is one less day that I have to share with them.

    1. Re:Why does it take impending death ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeahhhhhhhhhh......ummmmmmmmm

      About those TPS reports...

      -
      Bill Lumbergh

    2. Re:Why does it take impending death ? by MrNovember · · Score: 1

      We all have a terminal disease -- it's called life and it's going to end sometime for everyone. Could be next week, a year, 10 years, or maybe 100 years.

      You never know what's going to happen so living in the now is the only way to go. My priorities (as someone unlikely to die soon) are:

      1. Family
      2. Health
      3. Work

      You're dying right now -- what are you going to do about it?

    3. Re:Why does it take impending death ? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Why? because working at "home depot" or other low stress low skill job that lasts only 8 hours and is very close to home is not an option today if you want to supply "safe, warm, healthy and educated" to your family.

      Good school districts are expensive, good neighborhoods are expensive, houses that dont leak all the heat like a screen door are expensive. All of those things require a job where the employer either treats you like dirt and works you 10+ hours a day and usually requires you live 1+ hours away from work more if you work anywhere near a metro area and some idiot decided to cream himself stopping traffic for another hour.

      I tried. I looked very close at the working a low end job so I can be with my family. You cant afford a $900.00 a month house payment, $180.00 a month hating bill because your house is from 1920, $400.00 a month car payment, $200.00 a month insurance, $50.00 a month phone bill. This is not having internet or cable/sattelite or food or electricity. gotta add those. The only way to make that is live in a trailer park in the slums, hope your kid doesnt get killed by the gangs at school and kiss their education good-bye because you certianly will never afford college.

      You just cant do it. both you and your wife making the paltry $8.00 an hour means you can not live.

      So you have to take the corperate skilled professional job. Work 10+ hours a day spend 2.5-3.5 hours a day in the car and then spend another 1 hour at home on the phone because they have you in perpetual oncall. so you ask the wife to show the kids a photo of you once in a while so they do not freak when they finally see you.

      Pick one. Live or family. Because the current situation is set up to make sure you cant live without selling most of your time.

      The only jobs in america paying decent wages are set up for employee abuse.

      because it is cheaper to pay a single employee 40 hours plus 40 hours of overtime then hire 2 people.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    4. Re:Why does it take impending death ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My child? My family?

      I'm sorry, were you looking for a soapbox somewhere else? This is slashdot.

    5. Re:Why does it take impending death ? by Jonboy+X · · Score: 1

      Thank you, Captain Cliche!

      So, why exactly are you wasting time here on Slashdot instead of revelling in family bliss?

      --

      "In a 32-bit world, you're a 2-bit user. You've got your own newsgroup, alt.total.loser." -Weird Al
    6. Re:Why does it take impending death ? by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

      I would also argue that if getting the news of cancer would make you drop your career like a hot potato, you're wasting your time on the wrong career. You should be doing something you love, whether or not you think you're going to die soon.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    7. Re:Why does it take impending death ? by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 1

      So, why exactly are you wasting time here on Slashdot instead of revelling in family bliss?

      Everyone in his family has Slashdot accounts, so it counts as family time.

      --
      Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
    8. Re:Why does it take impending death ? by AlterTick · · Score: 1
      A lot of comments here are along the lines that if they were dying they would screw work and spend time with their families. I gotta ask - why would it take your impending death to spend this time ?

      Is that a rhetorical question? The answer is obvious. People don't blow off work on a lark to spend time with their families because unless we specifically know otherwise, we have to assume we're going to be around until age 70+. We don't want to spend our sunset years supplementing our Social Security check with a part time job at WalMart, or telling our children that it'll have to be community college instead of Harvard. If you live each day as if you were going to die tomorrow, you're likely to find yourself in financial trouble you run into expenses you were pretending you wouldn't be around to have to deal with.

      --
      Conclusion: the Empire squashes the Federation like a bug. Accept it.
    9. Re:Why does it take impending death ? by brsmith4 · · Score: 1

      Heh, much easier said than done. Sure, I consider myself one of the lucky ones, but of all the other people I know, no one is satisfied with their current employment. Then again, there's the job you love and the things you love to do outside your job which, because of your job, don't get done all that often. Even if you love your job, chances are that it's not the only thing you love in life and if possible, it might be worthwhile to drop the job to enjoy your remaining time (if you were given a year or less to live) doing other things. And of course, we're talking about programmers here... I've never met one who said they could contemplate nothing better to do than to write code. Although they love coding, there are other things they'd like to be doing that probably don't involve taking home a paycheck.

    10. Re:Why does it take impending death ? by Builder · · Score: 1

      Uh, that seems to be a mistake that a lot of people make. I've actually found the opposite though - the further up the food chain you crawl, the less you work. I've now made it to an international investment bank. I'm making good money, but my contract is only for a 35 hour work week. On top of this, I get free health insurance and some other perks.

      This means that I can afford the good schools, but I can also be there to spend time with my family almost every night.

      When I was working SA for a web hosting company, I almost NEVER had any free time. The 70 hour week was the norm. I've doubled my salary and halved my hours.

      Don't get me wrong - I know how incredibly lucky I am. There are not that many openings for my kind of role and I lucked out big time in getting it. But I think there are other options out there too.

    11. Re:Why does it take impending death ? by CharlieG · · Score: 1

      I go to work just as my kids are getting up - 50-50 I'll see them in the Morning.

      BUT, in exchange, I get HOME by 5:00pm most days - not leave work - HOME, with those same children. Then it's HUG time, help with homework time, take them to the park time, cook dinner time, etc

      I'll give up the 10 minutes of seeing them in the AM, to get an hour with them that evening - I think it's a fair trade

      --
      -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
  23. Here's the story of my coworker by PIPBoy3000 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A few years back, I had a close coworker who was diagnosed with cancer. He decided that he wanted to work, be productive, and fight it as best he could, even though his chances were slim. He came to work every day he could and did his job, even when he was losing hair and using a laptop from the hospital bed.

    After he died, our team was devistated. I'm not sure we accomplished more than simple maintenance activities for months afterwards. Even though he'd tried to put things in order, it was still tremendously difficult to fill where he'd been. It probably took a good year before things felt on track again.

    It's strange even now, running across his name in code or tucked away in a database somewhere. I support his few remaining applications, which some day will be retired as well. The things we leave behind . . .

    1. Re:Here's the story of my coworker by somersault · · Score: 1

      I know that feeling, my dad died suddenly a few years ago, Doctor's had no clue why (he was SCUBA diving but hadnt even got under the surface, wonder if the cold stopped his heart or something..).. anyway after going through Uni I'm now basically doing the same job he did years ago, I'm an IT Admin at my uncle's company.. very strange seeing things left behind by others, and difficult sometimes..

      --
      which is totally what she said
  24. My first response is "Screw 'em"... by maillemaker · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Today there is no such thing as loyalty in the business place.

    Employers will dump you in a nanosecond if the finance number crunch that way, and they will not in the least be concerned with /your/ welfare after you are gone.

    Why should I be concerned about theirs?

    --
    A work that expires before its copyright never enters the public domain and thus enjoys eternal copyright protection.
    1. Re:My first response is "Screw 'em"... by rehtonAesoohC · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's not true at all.
      br> I work for a government contracting company in which business can be volatile if we lose a contract. For instance, I was slated to work on a massive $300 million contract 2 years ago, but we lost it to Lockheed Martin. A lot of people thought they would lose their jobs, but the company has an internal research and development (IRAD) budget, so everyone was moved to research until permanent spots could be found. I was bounced between two different IRADs before I was placed on an actual contract last December. If it was all about the finances, the company would have laid me off, but they kept me on the payroll for almost 2 years on a project that meant $0 in revenue.

      I'm sorry you've had bad experiences with loyalty and employers... But I beg to differ with you.

    2. Re:My first response is "Screw 'em"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are still speaking of only 1 company that did that for you..
      I have known and worked at more companys that will own you as described, way more than a company that will keep you around for 2 years and they make no money..

  25. RTFA by alexborges · · Score: 1

    The article starts making the distinction between curable and non. Even goes on about Lance Armstron and all...

    Well, slashlot will be slashdot.

    --
    NO SIG
  26. My thoughts on work and death... by QuasiEvil · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Quite frankly, the onus is not on me to assure the continuity of business as a lowly analyst in a huge company. Part of my job is to do work in accordance with company policies - including documentation. These policies were set up by someone because they realized that documentation of how things work is almost as important as actually making them work. Thus, I document, both for my own good and because it's part of the prescribed process to follow.

    I work on an internal system at a large company that's mission critical to our core business. Five people in the history of the company have worked on it - two moved on, one died, and there are two of us left. He's a private pilot, I'm a suicidal driver, and we spend quite a bit of time together outside of work. The question comes up regularly, "What if you guys get hit by a bus?"

    My answer: Then I'm dead, I no longer give a @#$^.

  27. Cancer comments by linuxwrangler · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Good comments. I even have a copy of the mentioned "source code" cartoon somewhere in my files.

    My mother died of breast cancer 6 years ago. She was diagnosed in her mid/late 50s and insisted that we not tell anyone. She didn't want to be viewed or treated differently. When her cancer recurred, her doctor called it "terminal recurring breast cancer" and gave her 6 months to a year to live. She lived 8 more years after the reappearance and died of cancer at age 80.

    When first diagnosed and for most of the time following that the web didn't exist but she did take advantage of other resources like medical libraries. Research is important as the author attests. Equally important, however, is finding the right experts.

    My mother saw one doctor who, after a cursory exam and x-ray viewing, declared that the cancer had spread and had eaten away part of her ribs and said, "come back next week and we'll start chemo". No discussion of options (other than joining a statistical study the Dr. was involved in). She saw another doctor who spent some time on the case. She saw the same x-rays and patient but was able to determine that the darkness on the x-ray was not due to "dissolved ribs" but due to dense soft-tissue blocking the x-ray and that the range-of-motion issues were due to the tumor. A couple months of Tamoxifen and the tumor had shrunk to golf-ball size and was removed with relative ease. The range-of-motion issues started easing within a couple weeks of starting Tamoxifen.

    Also, don't get complacent. My mother had a mastectomy so she didn't think cancer when she started having discomfort raising her arm on that side. She assumed that if she did get cancer it would be on the remaining breast. Wrong. If you have cancer, be extra careful about continuing checkups even after you are "cured".

    My dad got prostate cancer which was discovered due to urinary symptoms. Routine screening wasn't done at that time and through careful research and good medicine he lived 13 more years. He died last year at age 76. With earlier detection he might still be with us.

    So for the rest of us, get those exams. I'm in my 40s but get regular PSA and prostate checks due to the family history. I also get a full body check for skin-cancer every couple years (from birth to age 18 I lived in the Mojave desert sun with my hair turning white and my skin turning brown every summer - we didn't know from sunscreen back then). When I turn 50 I'll probably be first in line for the colonoscopy. If I do get cancer, I want to catch it early.

    --

    ~~~~~~~
    "You are not remembered for doing what is expected of you." - Atul Chitnis
    1. Re:Cancer comments by CharlieG · · Score: 1

      You don't have to wait till 50 for the colonoscopy - my first was at age 35, due to the fact my Grandfather died YOUNG of colon cancer - I'm not even 45, and I feel it's time again

      50 is the MINIMUM recomended standard - sort of like buying a PC that is the minimum recomened standard to run the software you want. You do better, right?

      --
      -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
  28. With all due respect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    With all the deep sympathy for anyone with a serious disease, I find the ideas in the article ridiculous at best, appaling at worst.

    To put it bluntly - who gives a flying fig about employers convenience, when life and health of individual are at stake. If only a few years are left for one to live, it is far better to spend them with loved ones or doing something that is important to the person (or makes a difference to the world, or both) then wasting your time writing useless code for someone's profit. Unless of course this happens to be "what is important to that person" - and then I would strongly suggest reviewing priorities, while there is still time.

    Pretending that there is such a thing as "work ethics" and "loyalty" on part of employees when nothing is given or guaranteed by employers is both silly and dangerous.

  29. Re:Incurable cancer business plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Growing up I always heard that about the US and other countries, especially from pro-2d Amendment people. As an adult, traveling to a number of countries with supposedly communistic level gun laws, I saw lots of firearms. In fact, the more stringent the laws, the more likely people had them (I have never been to the UK, which I expect would be the exception). In Hungary everyone knew a deer hunter and those cheap ass Markov pistols were everywhere; I visited a gun shop in Debrecen, for example, which looked like any American shop with usual range of deer rifles, shotguns, and a sexy looking .44 Magnum with a huge barrel prominently displayed. Forget about Mexico, the only people who don't have guns there are too poor to afford them. And if you think Texans have lots of guns, visit the island of Cyprus sometime. Those fuckers keep guns.

    I am sure the average Blair supporter has fewer guns than the average Bush supporter, but in general, I think most of the world doesn't really pay attention to laws the way Americans and Brits do. The legality of owning a gun just doesn't enter into the discussion if a Bulgarian with extra cash sees his cousin's pistol freshly "liberated" from army service. The rest of the world is used to and expects unfair laws, so they don't get irate about them the way either the NRA or Handgun Control does here, they just go about their lives avoiding cops as much as possible regardless of what they are doing. And for most of them, they have about as many guns in their daily lives as we do.

  30. I thought it was kind of dumb too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    1. I agree - If I was dying - I wouldn't really care too much.

    2. Write legible code and document it ANWAY - you should have to be dying to do so!

    3. A terminal disease nonwithstanding - you could get hit by a bus tomorrow.

    4. There is a far greater chance that anyone reading this will get layed-off by their employeer and cast them into the same situation.

  31. www.cancercode.com - also Good Reading by pg--az · · Score: 0

    I personally bought and read "The Cancer Code" from www.cancercode.com What I found especially interesting was the art of "concealing weakness" from other businesses during negotiations. Also I downloaded the free reader from www.mindjet.com - it IS pretty amazing that something like that could be conceived in a Leukemia Ward ! That male instinct to create a legacy somehow, it's well described introspectively here.

  32. 1 out of 1 people die. Everyone is Terminally ill. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With odds like that, I hope everybody would find something useful to do with the time they have left.

    If you could be helpful and leave the world a different place than when you got here - that would be nice.

    I would hope some good programmers out there get into genetic engineering.
    Gene boosting people to live a few hundred years - while having the body of a 27 year old would be a nice way to live.

  33. What A Jackass! by PhatboySlim · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Cheers to this guy for surving cancer, but the article states in the footnote that the author is the owner of this business. He also continues to drone on about the employees obligation to his/her employer explains itself if you start from the bottom of the article.

    If you are reading this article, I strongly suggest you read the following before listening to anything at all this guy has to offer, especially his request that you "look for another job". That is completely ludicrous.

    Questions and Answers About Cancer in the Workplace and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)

    --
    Be sure to remember the Programmers Prayer
    1. Re:What A Jackass! by dubl-u · · Score: 1

      Cheers to this guy for surving cancer, but the article states in the footnote that the author is the owner of this business. He also continues to drone on about the employees obligation to his/her employer explains itself if you start from the bottom of the article.

      I know it's out of fashion, but this is known as "professionalism". I own my own business, and I feel the same way. Not because I have employees (I don't), but because I want to do a good job. I only take on projects that I want to see succeed after I'm gone. Whether that happens because I take a different project or because I'm pushing up daisies doesn't matter for that.

      If you think he's a jackass, I'm sure you think I'm crazy, too. But I think it's part of living in what some call the Long Now. When I die, it's not like they're going to turn out the lights and pack it all up. The world will go on. I try to think of the choices I make in that bigger context.

  34. "Make sure you are not indispensable" by BarnabyWilde · · Score: 1

    Well, there goes my only strategy.

  35. And if you discover somebdy is indispensible... by winkydink · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Change their role immediately. Like cancer, this is a condition that usually doesn't get better all by itself.

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

  36. Maybe not the Employer's biggest concern by kpainter · · Score: 2, Funny

    Once they find out you are going to die of a long, painful and VERY EXPENSIVE death, I am guessing they are more concerned at how much their medical insurance costs are going to increase because of your illness. Maybe they are thinking it would be better if you were hit by a bus (since you are going to check out anyway). And, oh yeah, make sure those comments are up to snuff.

  37. Very well said by avoisin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Excellent article, and I agree with everything he wrote. I've thought about this too, as although I'm still quite young (26) I know from family history and my own personality I'll work until I literally drop dead. It would drive me insane to just sit at home "retired" because I love my work so much.

    Don't get me wrong, I don't really care what my company does or doesn't do after I'm gone, but I have some great friends here and I do care quite a bit about them. I wouldn't want to suddenly drop tons of work on them when I know a 10 minute conversation or copying code would have saved the day.

    Perhaps it's a bit selfish, but I would like to leave the impression when I'm gone that "Yeah, he was a great guy" rather than "He was a great guy, but now we're screwed". I try not to leave projects unfinished and I see no reason why my career as a whole needs to be any different.

  38. Agree to an extent by mnemonic_ · · Score: 1, Interesting

    He dances around random topics, only getting to the title subject after about a thousand words. Much of it is completely obvious:

    Once you are cured, I believe there is no requirement that you tell future employers or clients about your prior illness

    No shit? I thought I was obligated to tell everyone my health history. Then there's this golden bit:

    A large number of cancers are not, strictly speaking, curable.

    Gee, what about not strictly speaking? Are these cancers curable then? No? I guess cancer is a bit worse than the flu.

    Summing Up

    If you're gonna die as a programmer, be responsible. This is no different from any other spotaneous leave without contact. Don't be stupid.

    1. Re:Agree to an extent by porcupine8 · · Score: 3, Informative
      Gee, what about not strictly speaking? Are these cancers curable then?

      Well, yes. I think his point is that there are cancers that are not considered to be curable, as in the vast majority of patients are not cured - but even most of these do have a cure rate of 5-10%. So even if it's "not curable" it actually is occasionally curable. Just not usually curable. I'm not sure there is any cancer with a 0% cure rate, but it might exist.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    2. Re:Agree to an extent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. I remember when my mother was dying of leukemia my boss always said "take care of her", "I understand", etc. etc. and then quickly turned on me and I was suddenly on his shit list. He went from friendly and understanding to a complete prick. I was lucky and got a new boss at the same place. Things went better with the new boss, my mom passed away 6 months later. I continued to press on, worked hard. That's what she wanted me to do. I was able to be with her, my new boss understood. Then I began having heart problems. My boss understood. I understood if you complain to much you become "heart guy". Then my boss left and I got a new boss. The guy was the worst. I collapsed one night and was rushed to the ER. I knew he was a zero sympathy type. I came in 2 days later, tired and he yelled at me next week "You don't come in and do a half-assed job! I'll mark you at 100% capacity if you come to work!". I eventually had to have a heart operation. Everything went well, I was cured. When I came back, his first words were "let me know when you're back to normal so I can grade you as such." I did a good job. He criticized me at every chance he could. He gave me less work or tasks that relied on someone else to complete them before I could work on my part. I was told I wasn't completing my tasks. He took a 6 week vacation 3 months after my operation, came back. Fired me. This was for a large company in the north west. I'll never trust anyone I work for again. I will never believe I owe an employer anything but 9 to 5.

  39. Confirmation by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    As a European now living/working in the USA this just really highlights what I've personally observed as a frequent difference between Americans and Europeans at work.

    Many Americans will chose to give their qhole lives over to their company even at a cost to their family and own personal lives. (e.g. giving up weekends to go into the office even without anyone telling them to). It seems to me that either most Americans are crazily work-addicted or possibly too scared to risk being perceived as non-conformist. I'm not clear which, but its definately sick, and legitimises abuse by employers.

    The European attitude is much more that you should work to live, not live to work.

    1. Re:Confirmation by CaffeineAddict2001 · · Score: 1

      Where do you live? D.C., New York, Silicon Valley? The vast majority of Americans are not like that at all.

    2. Re:Confirmation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of us choose this as an alternative to starving. If I didn't arrange my life around their stupid deadlines, my employer will fire me and hire an unemployed guy who'll be happy to work all the overtime. If its a big company, they also have the option to get 2 India programmers for the same price as me.

  40. I'm one of those Programming Cancer-Types by JoshDM · · Score: 5, Informative

    Java developer out of work due to the big dot-bomb crash of 2001; had my fiance's insurance. We got married in September, had a honeymoon, Sept 11th happened on the day we were supposed to come back. I'd been having night sweats for months and had lost a lot of weight for the wedding; wasn't eating much, but thought that fat guys sweat a lot at night, so didn't think much of it. Lost 60 pounds. Night sweats. Drenched the bed. After our honeymoon, I started having CHILLS. and Night Sweats. Crazy stuff. Teeth chattering, etc. I got to the doctors and he said I had Montezuma's Revenge and... something else. Hepatitis? Blood work was coming up weird. He ran more tests then sent me to an oncologist at the "Cancer Center". "Don't be scared of the name," he told me. "It just says Cancer. Doesn't mean you have cancer." My oncologist was great. I had a lump under my armpit. She and the surgeon could feel it. I couldn't tell. Married for 2 weeks. No job. Whee, fun. I had a bone marrow test; no cancer there. Surgery told us it was Hodgkin's Disease. Later to be renamed by Larry David as "The Good Hodgkin's" [ http://tinyurl.com/lpcsz ] He's a crackup. Stage 3B. It's spread across my chest and into my spleen and liver. Curable, they told me. On the roulette wheel of cancers, you want Hodgkin's. No one in my family had ever had it. A blood aunt had Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma. A non-blood aunt also had had NHL. My mom kept a clean home - they say that many Hodgkin's cases come from clean homes. That bitch. :-) I was told 6 months of chemo and then radiation treatment. In the meantime, I was frantically looking for a job, but no one was hiring. Had my first chemo, then 2 days later an interview. Java development. They wanted to hire me, but I told him, "Look, I have to be honest with you. I can easily do what you ask, but I just started chemotherapy. It's curable they tell me, but I need one day off every 2 weeks for treatment; they only do treatment on a weekday. I just had my first treatment 2 days ago (true) and I'm right here, fine, and coherent." My future manager really liked me and agreed, but I wasn't paid top dollar for my position. Who cares; we had 2 incomes and I had something to think about instead of mulling my "doom" in the apartment. They were fantastic to me, but have been out of business for 3 years (through no fault of mine - they were bought out and everyone was laid off or forced to move to Utah). I had ABVD chemo on Mondays. In retrospect, I should have scheduled for Thursdays or Fridays. I was violently ill on Wednesdays and couldn't properly taste anything until the next Wednesday. Of course, that didn't stop me from eating and my mom said I'm a miracle - the first person to gain weight while on chemo. :-) That bitch. :-) I got a potocatheter in my chest; if you're going to get Chemo, that's the f*cking Rolls Royce of chemotherapy. Just plug right into the chest. Chemo ended up being 8 months, but no radiation. I involunterily vomited every time they injected me with saline to "clean the pipes". Told me that the old people didn't notice it, but since I was young, it was bad. I still can't swallow salt water without a little retching. After 8 months, the PET Scan showed it was clear. Gone. Vanished. I was good to go. Remission. Had cat scans to follow up every 3 months and then 6 months after that. After 5 years, I'll be considered cured. Regarding the weight thing; I was scared to lose weight for the last 3 years. I realized that I subconsciously related weight loss to having cancer. Saw a therapist and she helped me move on with a little advice. Told me that I was "easy because I'm a self-realized hypocondriac". She's was right. I eventually joined the Dr. Siegel "Cookie Diet" and lost 70 pounds. On the cancer side, I just had one of my 6-month cat scans and bloodwork. I'm relatively clear; nothing is there, but the radiologist did spot a 2 mm item in on

    1. Re:I'm one of those Programming Cancer-Types by JhohannaVH · · Score: 1

      Your courage and strength are amazing. My best wishes that you continue to remain free and clear. One of my best friends suffers from NHL. He has had it for 20 years. It's very sad. But he lives every day to it's fullest, as the best of his ability. You guys make it easy to deal with my own issues. :)

      --
      Sorry man... the Internet pooped on me.
  41. Re:Incurable cancer business plan by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

    Well, the United States has tropical island paradises. As for being hard to get a gun, I think just about everywhere on the planet has a firearm you can buy with some cash, since theres about 600 million guns around the world.

  42. Re:I'm one of those Programming Cancer-Types (fmt) by JoshDM · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Java developer out of work due to the big dot-bomb crash of 2001; had my fiance's insurance. We got married in September, had a honeymoon, Sept 11th happened on the day we were supposed to come back.

    I'd been having night sweats for months and had lost a lot of weight for the wedding; wasn't eating much, but thought that fat guys sweat a lot at night, so didn't think much of it.

    Lost 60 pounds. Night sweats. Drenched the bed.

    After our honeymoon, I started having CHILLS. and Night Sweats. Crazy stuff. Teeth chattering, etc.

    I got to the doctors and he said I had Montezuma's Revenge and... something else. Hepatitis? Blood work was coming up weird. He ran more tests then sent me to an oncologist at the "Cancer Center".

    "Don't be scared of the name," he told me. "It just says Cancer. Doesn't mean you have cancer."

    My oncologist was great. I had a lump under my armpit. She and the surgeon could feel it. I couldn't tell. Married for 2 weeks. No job. Whee, fun.

    I had a bone marrow test; no cancer there. Surgery told us it was Hodgkin's Disease. Later to be renamed by Larry David as "The Good Hodgkin's" [ http://tinyurl.com/lpcsz ] He's a crackup.

    Stage 3B. It's spread across my chest and into my spleen and liver. Curable, they told me. On the roulette wheel of cancers, you want Hodgkin's. No one in my family had ever had it. A blood aunt had Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma. A non-blood aunt also had had NHL.

    My mom kept a clean home - they say that many Hodgkin's cases come from clean homes. That bitch. :-)

    I was told 6 months of chemo and then radiation treatment. In the meantime, I was frantically looking for a job, but no one was hiring.

    Had my first chemo, then 2 days later an interview. Java development. They wanted to hire me, but I told him, "Look, I have to be honest with you. I can easily do what you ask, but I just started chemotherapy. It's curable they tell me, but I need one day off every 2 weeks for treatment; they only do treatment on a weekday. I just had my first treatment 2 days ago (true) and I'm right here, fine, and coherent."

    My future manager really liked me and agreed, but I wasn't paid top dollar for my position. Who cares; we had 2 incomes and I had something to think about instead of mulling my "doom" in the apartment. They were fantastic to me, but have been out of business for 3 years (through no fault of mine - they were bought out and everyone was laid off or forced to move to Utah).

    I had ABVD chemo on Mondays. In retrospect, I should have scheduled for Thursdays or Fridays. I was violently ill on Wednesdays and couldn't properly taste anything until the next Wednesday. Of course, that didn't stop me from eating and my mom said I'm a miracle - the first person to gain weight while on chemo. :-) That bitch. :-)

    I got a portocatheter in my chest; if you're going to get Chemo, that's the f*cking Rolls Royce of chemotherapy. Just plug right into the chest. Chemo ended up being 8 months, but no radiation. I involunterily vomited every time they injected me with saline to "clean the pipes". Told me that the old people didn't notice it, but since I was young, it was bad. I still can't swallow salt water without a little retching.

    After 8 months, the PET Scan showed it was clear. Gone. Vanished. I was good to go. Remission. Had cat scans to follow up every 3 months and then 6 months after that. After 5 years, I'll be considered cured.

    Regarding the weight thing; I was scared to lose weight for the last 3 years. I realized that I subconsciously related weight loss to having cancer. Saw a therapist and she helped me move on with a little advice. Told me that I was "easy because I'm a self-realized hypocondriac". She's was right. I eventually joined the Dr. Siegel "Cookie Diet" and lost 70 pounds.

    On the cancer side,

  43. dispensible by tverbeek · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've never really understood the "make yourself indispensible" mindset anyway. I've always tried my best to make myself as unnecessary as I can, by making the equipment, the users, etc. as reliable and self-sufficient as possible. Not only does it make my job less stressful in the long run, but it also shows up in others' assessment of my skills, which is where real job security (or at least most of it) comes from. Of course it's never possible to make myself completely dispensible in the real world, and that's where the rest of my job security comes from.

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    1. Re:dispensible by backwardMechanic · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I've managed to make myself dispensible, and lost the job. I set up an instrumentation/computer system for some psychologists, to make their fMRI experiments simpler to run. I did such a good job that my boss decided he didn't need my skills any more. Even if you play nice, your boss can still be a bastard!

    2. Re:dispensible by mi · · Score: 1
      Even if you play nice, your boss can still be a bastard!
      What's so bastardly? They don't owe you a job... The progress of humanity did not need you there anymore either — it is great, that you improved the thing to be so simple, now go and improve something else. Thank you!
      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    3. Re:dispensible by backwardMechanic · · Score: 1

      Fair point, I guess. I thought the job as ongoing support. I made the system easier to support. My boss then decided it was easy enough to support that it didn't need an employee. I feel a bit cheated, but you're right. Onward and upward...

    4. Re:dispensible by DahGhostfacedFiddlah · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In many cases, that can be even better in the long run. It's an excellent interview talking point, and if they ever need an upgrade/bugfix, they know exactly who has the most experience (you).

  44. digitize vs cure by CyberSpyder · · Score: 1

    The better solution than dealing with the cancer would just be to digitize yourself but that solution isn't feasible quite yet.

    --
    CyberSpyder has spoken listen well to the words of the CyberSpyder
  45. What About Incurable Life? by Greyfox · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Why should you view the warning that you potentially have 30 or 40 years left any differently than the warning that you have 3 months left? Shouldn't you be living your life the same way in either case? You're going to die anyway, so why should you wait for the last few months to get the most out of it?

    I know that to some extent you have to work to keep the symptoms of incurable life in check. Having to eat, having to have shelter, that sort of thing. But I think you should at least be doing something you like. To date I've known 3 guys who came down with cancer while working in the IT industry. They all kept working for as long as they were able to, not because they had to but because they wanted to. I think if I got cancer I'd want to keep working as long as possible as well. Admittedly I don't have much in the way of close family, though.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:What About Incurable Life? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why should you view the warning that you potentially have 30 or 40 years left any differently than the warning that you have 3 months left? Shouldn't you be living your life the same way in either case? You're going to die anyway, so why should you wait for the last few months to get the most out of it?

      Well, for one thing, I'd probably put less money into my 401k if I was going to be dead in 3 months.

      Seriously though, your point is absurd. Of COURSE things are different if you know that you will cease to be sometime in mid-July.

    2. Re:What About Incurable Life? by BeanThere · · Score: 1

      Seriously though, your point is absurd. Of COURSE things are different if you know that you will cease to be sometime in mid-July.

      Yup, I agree fully, it's absurd. I have enough savings to go perhaps a year without working, so if I'm going to live only 3 months then sure as hell I'll stop working and burn through my money trying to enjoy the last few months. OTOH if I have to live another 30-40 years then I need to keep working to maintain my skillset and savings to plan for that, so that I can actually still eat and have a roof over my head.

    3. Re:What About Incurable Life? by woolio · · Score: 1
      If I was single and had 3 months left, with little/few family connections:

      • Quit my job,
      • Sell my house,
      • tour Europe/world/etc
      • Spend time with family?
      • ...


      If I was happily married, had kids, a wife, and knew I had 30 years left
      • I would have to do things differently


      True, I wouldn't choose to work 80 hrs/week in either case. But knowing the immediacy of one's death does cause them to change how one spends their last days...

  46. We are ALL terminal in some form or another by Goldenhawk · · Score: 1

    Okay, not to be crass or anything, but we are ALL going to die sometime. I'm only 38 and I'm already well aware that I'm no spring chicken anymore - college grads see me as the greybeard already. I know I won't live much past 100 even if things go perfectly. I'm over 1/3 done.

    In my opinion, we should ALWAYS live our lives as if we will die anyday. Knowing (or thinking) that you have a fixed endpoint doesn't seem that much different.

    So it seems to me that we should always handle our job skills (not to mention our MUCH more important family life) as if it ought to stand on its own merits all the time. If you want it passed on, keep it sorted and organized and marked so that anyone else can pick up what you were doing and carry on with it. If it doesn't matter after you die, why are you bothering with it right now?

    All that said, this is basically a reality check for ALL of us. What are you doing to cover those you care about? I think this is an excellent article with good thoughts for how to handle the practical aspects of being long-term ill on the job, much more than an article about what happens AFTER you die.

    --
    --Brandon / Split Infinity Music

    1. Re:We are ALL terminal in some form or another by geekoid · · Score: 1

      " Okay, not to be crass or anything, but we are ALL going to die sometime"

      thats just a theory, you can't prove that.

      Aging is a disease, one that can be fought. It is speculated that if you can live 30 more years, you can live forever. Speculation based on extrapulating the medical and technological trends of the last 50 years.

      in 30 years, technology with be 100000 times more powerfull, and human knowledge will be 1000 time greater.Kinda cool.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:We are ALL terminal in some form or another by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      Aging is a disease, one that can be fought. It is speculated that if you can live 30 more years, you can live forever.

      But would you want to?

  47. What a good samaritan. by j.a.mcguire · · Score: 1

    That guy sounds like a jerk, in a time of dire straits when you're battling cancer, considering my responsibilities to business clients would not be top of my priorities. I think he has a few wires crossed.

    1. Re:What a good samaritan. by DougReilly · · Score: 1

      well, were i dying tomorrow, or next week, then maybe I would not care about clients/employers. in my case, I expect cancer will be a chronic condition for, I hope, years. so, unless i am independently wealthy, i may need to deal with work issues for the next few years...

  48. Re:I'm one of those Programming Cancer-Types (fmt) by DougReilly · · Score: 1

    Gaining weight on chemo! Congratulations. Not I. I am haivng a terrible time with keeping weight up. Glad to hear things are going well for you now! Brings to mind Steve Job's Pancreatic cancer. When I heard that, I thought "Gonner." He happened to have the "Good" pancreatic cancer, and was cured through surgery. There are more and more of us around these days, both cured and managing chronic cancer.

  49. to everyone who thinks this article is silly by mrpeebles · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Many, many comments focus on how silly this article is, the posters implying or outright stating that if they had a terminal disease, they would quit everything and go live on a tropical island for the rest of their days, or something like it. I think these posts show a very poor appreciation of death. I am still young, and don't think I have a good appreciation of death either, but my impression is that one of the really crappy things about death is that its not, eg, trumpets playing in the background while the fallen hero captain kirk slowly exits, stage left, after having saved billions of lives one last time. Instead death is telling your spouse where you put the phone bill while you still can, or having to choose whether the funeral is on Friday or Saturday, and deciding whether to have a graveside service with all the rain. Death is not dramatic, it is pedestrian. This article reflects this fact, which probably makes it terrifying, but not "retarded", or any of the other pejorative adjectives I have seen used.

  50. Re:I'm one of those Programming Cancer-Types (fmt) by porcupine8 · · Score: 1
    Hey, I'm a fellow Hodgkin's survivor. :) Hodgkin's is definitely "the cancer to get".

    I'm glad to see another survivor that didn't give up work for treatments. I couldn't have, I would have been horrifically depressed if I had. I was in grad school, and I LOVED what I was studying. Quitting would have just added insult to injury for me. Not to mention losing my insurance, which would have been very, very bad. Even with insurance, I'm still negotiating the $20K left on my oncologist's bill. But mainly because I'm not the kind of person who can just sit on their butt all day every day for six months, thinking about how sick I am.

    It's actually common these days to gain weight on chemo; most other HD patients I know have. I gained 20 lbs (I hadn't lost any weight beforehand - stage 4A), and am still working my butt off over a year later to lose the last 10. That shit really screwed with my metabolism.

    Gotta agree on the port-a-cath. Mine was under the skin, so they still needed a needle, but I couldn't even feel it go in. My first treatment was via IV in my arm - incredibly painful, took 8 hours. With the port, couldn't feel a thing, out of there in under 4 hours. I know some stick out of the skin, but those seem like a pain with having to keep them clean and all. The saline never actually made me vomit, but at my CT scan a couple months ago, when they put in the IV for the dye and ran saline into it, it definitely brought back some old familiar (unpleasant) feelings. Ugh. I didn't get my port taken out for a few months after treatment (just in case), and when I went in to get it flushed with whatever it is they put in to keep it from clotting - THAT nearly made me sick every time.

    --
    Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
  51. I do this everyday and AFAIK I do not have cancer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I chose to struggle through life by working at home trying to code my way through life. My coworkers are my loving wife, 10 yr daughter and 5yr old son. It has been very hard to get by and sometimes I have to take a "job for the man" but I try to get out asap. I do not care about things I want, I just want the things that I need. If I knew I was to die soon I wouldn't change that much. I moved the family to live at Disney World so I don't have to worry about saving for vacations anymore. We have one car and my TV is only 32inches (so pity me...NOT).

    I was the youngest of 6. At that time my dad was going to funerals every other week because his coworkers were in the killing years (40-60). I can't count how many times I was told that "you do not want to get here and look back sorry you did not follow your dream" or some such words. To this day I gag at the smell of funeral parlors, but I took that message to heart. I look back and wish it turned out better, but I do not regret doing it.

  52. When your kids are parents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... what do you think they would rather have? Memories of you spending your last days with them, or being able to tell their children how you took care of business before you died?

    I know, it's a balance that is required, but my wife and I have talked about it and we've decided if either of us gets hit with an illness like that, we'll sell the house, get a houseboat, and spend the remaining days as a family on a worldwide adventure. "irresponsible"? Maybe if you're idea of responsible is to be good little corporate citizen.

    But different people have different priorities I guess.

    1. Re:When your kids are parents... by crucini · · Score: 1

      A worldwide adventure in a houseboat? Crossing oceans in a houseboat will at least ensure that you don't die of cancer.

  53. Hospice nurse's perspective.... by Nurseferatu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Such bitterness out there! A few notes.... 1. You are all gonna die of something, sometime. 2. If you get advance notice, like a cancer diagnosis, you will have some cleanup to do in your life. This includes both personal and business issues. 3. If you are doing what you love and are good at, especially if you are self employed, then RTFA. It is good advice. 4. If you hate your job, or are just one of many little cogs in the great corporate machine, GO DO SOMETHING ELSE. There are no do-overs, you get one shot to do THIS life right. If you believe in reincarnation, consider how many times you want to relive that horrid job until you finally get a clue! I know this seems either unrealistic or simplistic but there is little comfort in realizing that your entire life was spent doing jobs you hated and working towards "someday" only to discover someday is a terminal diagnosis and early death. 5. Tell people you love them every day. Seems sappy, but you have a better chance of being killed on the highway than having a long final illness. 6. If you do get a chance to tie up loose ends before you die, it will be important to feel a sense of closure and satisfaction with whatever you have spent the majority of your waking hours doing most of your adult life. This includes making sure your clients, patients or employer will be able to continue after you are gone. 7. MOST employers whom I have dealth with on behalf of family members and clients are very supportive and generous when a family memeber or employee is ill. There are a few bastards out there, and you know who they are before you reach this situation. LIFE IS TOO SHORT. Go do something you love.

    --
    Wouldn't it be much worse if life were fair and all the terrible things that happen to us, come because we actually dese
    1. Re:Hospice nurse's perspective.... by porcupine8 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      3. If you are doing what you love and are good at, especially if you are self employed, then RTFA. It is good advice. 4. If you hate your job, or are just one of many little cogs in the great corporate machine, GO DO SOMETHING ELSE.

      I think that this is the whole point that so many people are missing. I kept working/going to school during chemo because I loved what I did, and not doing it would depress me enough to interfere with my treatment. If I were some corporate drone with a job I hated, then I probably would have taken it as a sign to get out - but luckily, I've worked hard since high school to make sure I'm never in that position. I know what kind of impact I want to have on the world, I know how I want to get there, and I love everything about it. So cancer had no effect on my career plans whatsoever - although it did cause me to make one decision in my personal life that I would not have made otherwise, that did slightly affect my career. But only slightly.

      Some people do need to keep working through treatments, and working a sucky job during treatment would just make a bad situation worse.

      If you don't love what you're doing, don't wait for cancer to get out of it. Just like people are saying that you should comment your code whether you're dying or not - you should actively pursue a career that you would MISS if you had to give it up for chemo, whether or not that chemo is imminent.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
  54. Don't get hit by a bus by Phandros · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's a very noble point of view...one that I would definitely share should it ever happen to me. However, it's just good business etiquette to make sure your employer is up to date on all of your source, documentation, etc because cancer isn't the only thing that can incapacitate you. Certainly there are more ways to leave this world than I can dream up so I find myself asking, why would you only practice this if you had a terminal disease? Getting hit by a bus comes to mind. People die suddenly every day, people who have jobs, spouses, kids....a future. To everyone who thought that they would follow suit with the original author, try to get over your belief that 'it could never happen to you' and clue in and make sure that you're not indespensible.

  55. Re:I'm one of those Programming Cancer-Types (fmt) by JoshDM · · Score: 1

    I didn't get my port taken out for a few months after treatment (just in case), and when I went in to get it flushed with whatever it is they put in to keep it from clotting - THAT nearly made me sick every time. I had the underskin one; like a bump on my chest. Was always afraid of getting hit in the chest by something. I tasted both the saline and that anti-clot stuff (when they inject, it goes straight to your taste senses). Blech. The iodine/barium from the CAT Scans is sicko too. Berry Fruit Flavored Bariumshake ? More like Metal Ass Flavored Bariumshake. Not that I know what ass tastes like. Oh, this is going to take the thread in the wrong direction. My original point (that I missed) was that I was going to start a blog about my Hodgkin's, but held out because I just didn't have the time or energy to dwell on it (and I had a serious lack of energy). Kudos to the author for keeping it going.

  56. Re:Incurable cancer business plan by Reverend528 · · Score: 1

    I'd recommend omitting step 4 and letting nature take its course. It's a widely known fact that people who commit suicide become social workers in the afterlife.

  57. Re:I'm one of those Programming Cancer-Types (fmt) by porcupine8 · · Score: 1
    Oh my god... Just your mentioning barium made me heave a little. I didn't even realize it had that much of an effect on me, although I did notice at my last CT that it had gotten a lot harder to choke down.

    I kept a blog (my slashdot username at deadjournal, if you're interested - complete with hair-falling-out pics) because my family was so far away and it was an easy way to keep them updated. But yeah, typing is harder than I expected when you're wiped from chemo. Playing video games is much easier. I was also on a hodgkin's yahoo group - if any new cancer patients are reading this, I highly recommend this kind of thing. Online support groups meet whenever you have a question, unlike real-life ones!

    --
    Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
  58. I don't think so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But even if it were selfless (which it isn't, since being dispensable has numerous benefits of its own), would it always be good?

    If you sacrifice yourself for the benefit of an evil person, is that really altruism? Or is it just exploitation?

  59. Survival etc. by trud · · Score: 0

    When I read some of these responses, I understand the "me first" sentiment I hear but for those programmers and others that might express such thoughts please consider this.... Is your job just a job? Is the time you spend working only a waste of what would be better spent on leisure? Are you not obsessed with what you do every day in your chosen field? If you are not happy doing with what you do then go ahead and put "me first" and find something to make you happy because you otherwise are wasting your life. I've been doing this technology thing for 25 years and the reason I'm still in it is rooted in my incurable obsession with this silliness. Think....! Life is short, then you die. Be interested in one thing profoundly and in a thousand things well.

  60. Article is more about things to do to keep clients by ChaseTec · · Score: 1

    The article says that if you have incurable cancer to spend time with your family and maybe use your computer to keep up to date on new cures. Otherwise it seems to be more about convincing your clients that a) you'll still be around and they shouldn't jump ship and b) your code is so clean and commented that they won't lose any of their investment by continuing to use your services even if you dropped dead.

    --
    My Hello World is 512 bytes. But it's also a valid Fat12 boot sector, Fat12 file reader, and Pmode routine.
  61. Re:I'm one of those Programming Cancer-Types (fmt) by JoshDM · · Score: 1

    Barium barium barium barium barium barium marion barium barium eggs and barium. :-) Yeah, ick. I think I'm gonna ralph too. Nah, but my throat is having sympathy pains. Drink that stuff and if you think of metal, it's like a thousand razor blades going own your throat. Make sure to drink your water after the scan, kiddies! Gotta whiz it all out. And my last bit of wisdom for this: Chemo Patients Always Flush Twice!

  62. oblig. Bender by DaFallus · · Score: 1

    Afterlife? If I thought I had to go through another life I'd kill myself right now!

    --
    No one cares what your captcha was

    Houston TX, USA
  63. cancer and the IT workplace by cubistdude · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As a testicular cancer survivor, I agree with most of the article. I was fortunate enough to have an employer who allowed me a six month leave of absence during my treatment. Thoughout that time, (before blogs) I kept an email correspondence with family, friends and co-workers. I went through two major surgeries and two rounds of intense chemo. That was now three years ago and by following through with the recommended followup diagnostics, I am still "cured". The down-side of this is that I had a great employer and medical plan. The medical bills for my six month treatment came to over $110,000 USD. If I was not on salary and insured, I would have been financially devestated. I was also extremely fortunate that my employer allowed me to come back after six months in the same position and same pay as I had before the leave. I don't think many people have that opportunity. So the jist of my response is, realize that extreme circumstances can happen to you and if/when they do, you will be amazed as to how anyone in your life will resond. (mostly in the postive)

  64. Re:Incurable cancer business plan by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 1

    I may be wrong. But the last time I filled out the paperwork to purchase a firearm (in the US), I don't remember "Are you terminally ill?" being among the questions like "Are you a convicted felon?" or "Are you a fugitive from justice?"

    --
    Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
  65. Later payoff by Namlak · · Score: 1

    But what if those 80+ hour weeks are to pay off big time at some later date?

    On a related note, anyone interested in buying 14,000+ shares of dvdexpress.com stock?

    1. Re:Later payoff by Euler · · Score: 1

      they won't pay off. Unless it's firmly in your contract that they have to pay with real equity at some point. ...by the way, i get your sarcasm... Your bosses (the business type) know this and they would never agree to such a thing. That's why they drive fancy cars, have big houses and hot wives.

  66. Re:This is not for people who are actively dying.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you ever had a potential terminal disease? I dont it. So anyone who has not does not know anything of what they would do. I have had that disease and was told to buy a casket. So luckily they were wrong. Its been 17years and counting since I became in remission. I had hodgekins disease for my 21st birthday. I had to have treatment for 1.5 years, i know usually its 3 months. All you think about is surviving, I could do nothing else but wake up eat , throw up, and sleep.

  67. Re:This is not for people who are actively dying.. by porcupine8 · · Score: 1
    Yes, actually. You might search the page for my other posts - I'm a fellow Hodgkin's survivor. Thanks for asking.

    By the way, chemo for Hodgkin's has really advanced in the past 20 years. I only had to stop working/going to class for a couple weeks during treatment, when my blood counts were really low. Though I did make sure I had nothing scheduled the day or two after chemo, when I was sickest. I know it was much worse back in the MOPP days (which is probably what you had), but ABVD/Stanford V are much less harsh.

    --
    Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
  68. Face it, people are selfish! by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Fu.. my employer, fu.. my coworkers, I'm gonna die, TO HELL with 'em.

    Very human attitude. Granted. But it's what you leave behind that defines you as a person. We, as coders, are in a very bad position for that. Whatever we leave behind at work has, at best, a lifespan of a few years. If what we leave behind is "alive" 10 years after we're gone, it's most likely very obsolete code. I mean, think back about 10 years, consider the code you developed back then and ponder how much of said code is still productive.

    Hardly any.

    Some of us have a family. And if you have one, then yes, fu.. work, spend time with them. That's what you're gonna leave behind.

    But from my point of view, I don't have a family. I won't have one. I don't really have that much money to leave some kind of foundation behind. What I have is my knowledge and my experience. Of both, I have lots, I dare say.

    So my last plan would be to pass this on.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Face it, people are selfish! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you know that you can say "fuck" on slashdot? Fuck, fuck, fuck. There. Censoring yourself only makes you look like a moron. If you're not willing to use that word, then just use a different one entirely.

  69. You're dying, and you worry about code? by Morganth · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you are working on a big project, write helpful comments, and when a major milestone release comes out, write a nice, detailed document which you can call the "Maintainer's Guide," which is the first thing a future developer working on your project will look at to understand the project.

    All developers should do this.

    Here's my advice for developers who find themselves with a terminal illness:

    (1) Stop using a computer, and give all your source code/documents to your closest coworkers.

    (2) Sell all your posessions.

    (3) Pick a country where global economical differentials and exchange rates make your couple hundred thousand dollars a huge amount of usable capital.

    (4) Move there.

    (5) Start a business you can do in the sunlight, smelling a nearby ocean breeze, hopefully. Or simply live off the money you saved.

    (6) Really, just _don't_ use your computer anymore.

    That's my advice.

  70. Re:Article is more about things to do to keep clie by j.a.mcguire · · Score: 1

    on the contrary I believe that if you disclosed your illness to a client and supplied the source code for their convenience they more than likely would jump ship, and sooner rather than later.

  71. Re:This is not for people who are actively dying.. by Enzo+the+Baker · · Score: 1
    Maybe it's really for managers of people who are diagnosed with something terminal. If you write an article that says, "If you have an employee that is about to die, make sure they take care of x, y, and z, before the end." that would seem horrible and heartless. On the other hand, an article that says, "If you are about to die, make sure you take care of x, y, and z for your employer, before the end." that seems much nicer, if a little weird. If you're a manager, just read between the lines.

    Should it bother me that I thought of that?

    --
    I may twist orthodoxy to partly justify a tyrant. But I can easily make up a German philosophy to justify him entirely.
  72. takes the cake for most idiotic article of year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this must be the stupiest post of the year

  73. Good Article by galenaway · · Score: 1

    I just returned to work after several months on disability leave for cancer treatment. The article makes several good points. But, I'd also add that dropping the C-bomb (the word "cancer") on folks should be strongly avoided. It freaks many folks out and shouldn't be used unless absolutely necessary.

    As for the folks that mentioned that family should be first, this article didn't address that point directly, but it should be obviously true to anyone. However, I have many friendships with my coworkers. They deserve honesty and respect when dealing with obvious personal issues such as health. Who are you kidding anyway; work is a large percentage of your life. So don't downplay the impact of your coworkers in your life.

    I chose to make my illness public (anyone who had observed me for any length of time would have concluded something seriously was wrong with my health anyway). The result was an amazing amount of support from my coworkers including many coworkers helping my family by bring by dinner and occasionally taking me to doctor appointments. These were small things to them, but made a big impact on me and my family.

    So far everything has gone well. I'm coming up on my 1st year anniversary of being diagnosed and am healthy again. I've been back to work for a few months. I was treated with kid gloves for awhile, but folks are getting used to me being back again. So now it's back to the grindstone...

  74. Drink green tea! by TallDave · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think drinking green tea while you code is the best advice.

    Google it, there's a lot of studies showing anti-cancer effects. /greentearant

  75. Go on with life by AlpineR · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I'm pleased to see that the author's advice is similar to my own outlook. I was diagnosed with a rare form of metastatic colon cancer at age 31, just months out of graduate school and employed in my computer-focused career.

    After surgery to remove the primary tumor, I was faced with chemotherapy and a 50% chance of dying within two years. My first reaction was like many of yours: give up work and move home to be close to family and friends. Or, pack up and travel the world with my remaining days.

    But then I realized that giving up work and moving home would be depressing. I'd just be a cancer victim sitting around, waiting to die. It's hard to have any more good times in such a grim situation.

    And traveling the world wouldn't be much fun either. One of the problems when you're sick with cancer is that you don't feel good. It's not like the doctor says "you have two weeks to live" after which you feel fine for two weeks and then pass away in your sleep. No, when the end is that close it's a struggle just to stay comfortable and enjoy things like food and warmth. So traveling the world would mean feeling crappy in a foreign land surrounded by strangers.

    So I decided that I liked where I was in my life and would keep doing what I liked doing. That meant continuing to work, continuing to meet new people, continuing to learn things and watch movies and play games. That meant trying to be a person plus cancer, rather than a person destroyed by cancer. Sure, my perspective changed. I straightened out my personal relationships and felt freer to express my own quirky personality.

    Continuing with normal things helped me to survive chemotherapy and more surgeries. And with the help of a great employer and coworkers I continued to be productive -- a little bit on bad days and a lot on good days -- and feel good about myself. The benefit of working with computers was that I could be productive from home and the computer would wait patiently when I was hit with a bout of nausea or fatigue.

    These days I'm feeling fine but I know that any day the cancer could rear its ugly head again. My motto is to go on with life as if you have two years to live. Don't panic and drop everything and curl up on the couch. But remember that you don't have forever to do the things you want to do.

    AlpineR

    1. Re:Go on with life by DougReilly · · Score: 1

      You are the type of person I am mostly writing about - someone not dying tomorrow, with an uncertain diagnosis. i congratulate you and your employer, who did the right thing, as all my employers and most of my clients have done...

    2. Re:Go on with life by cerberusss · · Score: 1

      Great story. If you get ever in shit again, open up a Paypal account and see if we can chip in for a nice holiday or something (no offense meant).

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
  76. Re:Prostitute Schedule for Mar. 8 at the MBOT in S by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    $40!! $60!!! $100!!!!! Where the hell am I going to get that kind of money?!! I'm an open source programmer! I have no money!

  77. Cancer doesn't get 'cured' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have cancer.

    My cancer is currently in remission. That means there's not enough of it to show up on a test.

    How much is there? Is it gone? How long will I live?

    If your Oncologist is honest you will be told that there is no way of knowing.

    There is no way of knowing because the probability of a relapse NEVER FALLS TO ZERO.

    In fact, once you've develped a measurable amount of one type of cancer, the odds of developing a completely different type are now higher.

    And that's not because of having rad or chemo -- all though having rad or chemo will further increase the odds.

    The basic working assumption is that all human will have cells that mutate into 'cancerous' forms. Some people will supress or eliminate those 'cancer cells' and some won't.

    Cancer appears to be a basic part of life. Animals get cancer, hell even plants get cancer.

  78. "type faster" by md10024 · · Score: 1

    "When asked what he would do if he only had six months to live: Type faster.". Isaac Asimov

  79. What is wrong with your jobs? by Benzido · · Score: 1

    A lot of you are saying 'forget the job, spend all your remaining time with your families.' Do so many of you just work for the money? In my experience, nerds tend to seek out jobs they find interesting and compelling, so that it matters to them whether or not their work gets finished. I see absolutely nothing wrong with going to work until the day you die, if it is important to you. Of course, don't neglect your family (if you have one) but don't just burn all your colleagues (if you have them) either. Honestly, if you could just dump your career tomorrow to go to hang out with your family, maybe it means you have a great family, but more likely it means you should find a new job. If you're a nerd, you're smart, you'll figure it out.

    1. Re:What is wrong with your jobs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Do so many of you just work for the money?

      Yes.

      In my experience, many nerds, geeks and computer guys in general enjoyed their studies very, very much; but are utterly pissed by the corporate life. Not everybody can get a job at Google you know...

  80. Or the old programmer saying by aCapitalist · · Score: 1

    If you get hit by a bus...

  81. What are we doing here? by quokkapox · · Score: 1
    An interesting story. It prompts one to question what we do with the (possibly quite limited) time we have here in this life.

    If you wouldn't want to show up at work, at least for a little while, during the last day you happen to live, why would you plan to get up in the morning and go there tomorrow, and the next day and the next, unless tomorrow's workday is just a temporary stepping stone to something you'd rather be doing, and which you can realistically transition to in the forseeable future?

    It's all a matter of perspective.

    Life does not consist of what you might have a chance to say in those last moments, days, or weeks. That isn't what they'll remember about you. What's important is what you actually do every day, how you grow as a human being and how you influence and help others in a positive way.

    After all, you never know when you'll get hit by a bus. Or a car. Which isn't fun, but is a rather sobering experience...

    --
    it's a blue bright blue Saturday hey hey
  82. Re:Incurable cancer business plan by HuguesT · · Score: 1

    I hear that morphine is also good for step (4), also pure grade heroin.

  83. If it means living at the office, 40hrs=sleep by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    Tell the boss, yeah, ill sleep between 00:00-08:00 and count that on my time sheet JACK-ASS

    And make sure to copy all the source code onto that 40gig IPOD before leaving too, and leave a few
    real real bad bugs before resigning.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  84. Re:Article is more about things to do to keep clie by DougReilly · · Score: 1

    People do the right thing more often than you think. Of 4 major clients, one seems to have stepped away, the others are waiting for my recovery.

  85. I survived cancer in 1994-5 by Mycroft_514 · · Score: 1

    Some of his stuff is ok, some of it is just plain wrong.

    Just for the list. I was diagnosed with Malignant Large Cell Lymphomia, medium to high grade, stage IV. By the time of diagnosis, I was already in the hopsital, and had thrown temperatures of 103.9, along with other fun symptoms, like losing 60 pounds in 60 days.

    There was no way of shielding it from my employer, I went out on disability for 6 months. While I was out, word filtered around the company (consulting firm) that I was already DEAD.

    I reached 10 years clear last year, and the Onocologist threw me out of his office, telling me never to come back again (With a big ole smile on his face!).

    In the meantime, I have prevailed in an ADA suit against my former employer (they settled out of court) as they let me go just after I came back. For a while I did not tell employers, at least not right away. Now it doesn't matter anymore.

    As for the "tips" on coding, well, I always coded that way.

    Where I am now, I could get hit by a bus. The other people in my group would have to work harder to pick up the slack, but they know where everything is.

  86. Some Employers Will Fire You by oldCoder · · Score: 1

    If you get a serious illness, you may cause the company's insurance premiums to go up. The additional costs add up so companies try to keep "Unhealthy" people off the roles. Further, some companies are "Self-insured" and probably have under-the-table access to your medical records, anyway. Is business in the business of firing sick workers? See this article on lobbying efforts to change the law in the US.

    --

    I18N == Intergalacticization
  87. Comments here vs. reality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Man!

    The comments here are ridiculous. As terminal cancer patient, formerly self-employed as a consultant, most of what I read in the article rang true with me.

    Then I made the mistake of reading the comments written by immature opinionated fools here. If nothing else, it shows what a selfish immoral tendency there is on Slashdot, when viewed collectively. "Screw everyone, I'm just out for myself." Is that supposed to be my attitude? (I'm alone in life here.) No thanks.

    Cancer is many things, most of them not good, but it does give one an opportunity to assess what is and is not of true value. Self-respect is not something I'd discard as readily as those spewing recommendations here would suggest.

    Doing well to others (and yes even including strangers) is something I would recommend to any with a terminal illness. It's certainly of greater reward than the stupid selfishness advocated in the comments here.

  88. Even if you're dying... by Headw1nd · · Score: 2, Insightful
    there's one thing you need to remember. Not everyone else is.

    A lot of posts, yours included, seem to have this mythical concept that you can simply drop everything and gather your family to your side for all your remaining days. Well, guess what? You can't. Why? Because they have lives too. Your kids can't drop oiut of school, your wife is going to need to keep up with her job (she'll be the family's only source of income after you die) Hell, maybe your ass needs to put in a little more work to pay off those bills that the insurance doesn't cover. If you think they're all going to be covered, you must not have any familiarity with the system. You let them prepare for their future even as you prepare for your lack thereof. You do these things because you love your family, and in the little time you have left you need to make sure they are in the best position possible. I'm glad that the people in my own family who have died were never as selfish as you.

    to tell you the truth, I was planning to give you a somewhat more civil response, but having seen how you've treated porcupine when she shared her, much more realistic, way of dealing with her cancer, I've come to the conclusion that you really don't deserve any respect. You seem put out that she made the mature decision to plan for her 80% chance of life as opposed to her 20% chance of death. Well, since she's alive and posting to /., it seems to me she made the right choice. I'm sorry for whoever must have died and left you with these angry feelings, but you need to get over them.

  89. WTF? by phorm · · Score: 1

    Why should you view the warning that you potentially have 30 or 40 years left any differently than the warning that you have 3 months left?

    Exactly... why not party every day, drink lots, eat fatty foods, and spend cash like there's no tomorrow?

    Oh, wait, maybe it's because there will be a tomorrow, and perhaps the whole long-term planning aspect of things might be a little important.

    Perhaps you've always wanted to vacation in Hawaii... but then you've got the choice between paying your current mortgage or taking the trip. Well, if you're expecting to live another 30-40 years, you've got plenty of time to hit Hawaii and in the short-term... get those bills settled. On the other hand, if you've only got 30-40 days, then chances are you're not going to see much of those sunny skies and coconut drinks unless you make some chances to the plan - perhaps like selling the house and spending your last while happy.

    There are other considerations, of course. You can't very well sell the house and uproot if you've got a wife and kids (at least not in most situations), but there are still a lot of lifestyle adjustments to make.

    There's something to be said for enjoying the more immediate moments in life, but it's a balance with long-term planning/saving as well. When your longest term is suddenly shortened to about 5% of what you expected, plans must adjust themselves accordingly.

    Personally, depending on how long I might have (assuming I was given forenotice of a shortened lifespan), I'd probably work for awhile yet, but dump that intended-for-mortgage cash into heading someplace a little happier for my last bit of sunny enjoyment, before returning home to have my final rest.

    1. Re:WTF? by Greyfox · · Score: 1

      All your plans would go awry if you were hit by a bus tomorrow. I'm not saying party like there's no tomorrow. I'm saying don't be miserable today just because you think there'll be a tomorrow.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  90. Mother's Story (must read for porcupine8 ) by woolio · · Score: 1

    My mom was diagnosed with hodgkin's lymphoma when she was about 27 [~1982]. [I was born two years earlier]. I think it all started with a strange lump on her neck...

    She was treated with chemothearpy and things seemed okay. Two years later, it came back. This time, she was treated with chemothearpy + radiation (using a bone-marrow transplant on her own marrow).

    Things were fine for about 10 years. The only lasting effects of her treatment were reduced energy [she got tired very easily]. Otherwise she led a normal life and got to see me grow up.

    When the 10 years passed, she suddenly became very weak. My understanding is the bone marrow went kaput and stopped producing good blood cells. She went in for a bone-marrow transplant (her brother's), which required more chemothearpy --she died a few weeks later. She was barely 41 years old, had good eating habits, did not smoke nor drink, exercised, and maintained good body weight her whole life, and had regular check-ups [for the cancer].

    Both the 2nd & 3rd treatments were performed at Stanford -- which was/is supposed to be on the leading edge for this kind of stuff.

    It sound like your treatment went well and you are back on your feet. I sincerely hope so. I believe methods for hodgkins' treatment have progressed considerably in the past 20 years.

    Regardless, life (or death) has ways of surprising us, throwing curves when we least expect them.

    After all, for my mom living 10 years without cancer and being in good health, one might has though she would have almost certainly seen me graduate from high school. But that didn't happen. She died during my Junior year.

    The improbable does happen. And when it does, it has life-changing consequences for more than just one's self.

    Hopefully for you it won't come back. But would you plan your life differently knowing that it would in 10-15 years? You may not find out until it's too late to do things differently.

    1. Re:Mother's Story (must read for porcupine8 ) by porcupine8 · · Score: 1
      But would you plan your life differently knowing that it would in 10-15 years?

      Right now? Not at all. If the experience confirmed one thing for me, it's that I'm on the right path in my life.

      I'm well-aware that more could happen. The Hodgkin's could come back, I could get leukemia in 5-10 years from the radiation, I could get breast cancer or heart disease from the radiation, etc etc.

      Yes, the unlikely does happen. But I don't think people should put their life on hold because of the possibility that *something* could happen - otherwise, no one would ever live their life.

      You and the other poster seem to think that I (and my husband) should have quit our jobs and moved 1,000 miles away because there was a 5-10% chance of something happening. Well, at what point would it be "safe" for me to finally resume my life? After treatment? Two years after treatment, when the possibility of recurrence drops significantly? Five years after, when I'll be "cured"? Or should I stay within ten miles of my parents for the rest of my life, just on the off chance that some other health problem strikes? What about my husband? His family lives 12 hours from mine, how can we keep him near them all the time? No, he doesn't have cancer, but there are plenty of other unexpected problems that could arise.

      Sorry, but I think it's completely unreasonable to plan one's life around remote possibilities of bad things happening. If the possibility gets less remote, that's one thing. But that should be dealt with when and if it happens.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
  91. Source code. Doesn't everyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know, but even if I don't have some disease I always make sure my clients have all the code they should. Anyone who doesn't do that isn't doing their job, duh. And I always make my stuff understandable by the staff that will be working with it in the future. Who doesn't? I mean, I don't want to be debugging their crap two years from now. I want to move on to new projects and not babysitting the other code monkeys.

    Also, I know this sounds harsh but I hope this guy doesn't have any kids. I mean damn dude, to pass on those crappy genes should be criminal.

  92. Oh, by the way... by porcupine8 · · Score: 1
    Here's a question for you:

    If all goes as planned, I'm planning on starting to have kids in about 4-5 years. One of my biggest fears is the maybe 1% chance of getting leukemia in 5-10 years, due to radiation. The idea of dealing with the treatment while having small children is bad enough, but I certainly don't want to leave my husband raising them alone, barely remembering their mother.

    So what do you think I should do? Do you think I should put off having kids for an extra 5 years or so, until the threat of leukemia has mostly passed? Or maybe have them now, whether or not we're ready for it financially and career-wise, so that if anything happens at least they'll be older by then?

    Are you starting to see how silly it is to plan one's life around the small possibility of illness? I am far more likely than most of the population to get leukemia, but it is still only a remote possibility. Most people would think it crazy to change my life plans, especially something as major as when I have kids, based on this tiny 1% chance.

    Personally, I am still planning to start having kids in 4-5 years. Yes, there is a tiny chance that something bad will happen. But there's a 99% chance that it won't, and that having the kids sooner or later would be a worse idea. If something bad does happen (whether it's leukemia or something totally unrelated to my cancer that no one could have foreseen), I'll deal with it then.

    --
    Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.