Come on men not so cheap you sound like Troll. Linux needs more config then BSD? Give me an example please, ever tried to configure a "normal" office postscript printer with BSD, i want to use all 3 separate paper draws..good luck, in Mandrake or Redhat thats done in 5 clicks, yeah i am a newbie and looser but even i know BSD needs a lot more config that Linux! Anyway i am not willing to feed the Trolls but i could not resist......
Gnu/Linux is a great product, BSD in general is a somewhat great product, MacOSX is a not so great product because:
( i use Mac for over 5 years now and Linux about 2 years)
1. its not Free (Free as in Freedom a speech not free beer) 2. It only runs on Mac hardware (exept for Darwin but then i would prefer FreeBSD) 3. Its just ugly (that is a personal point of view) 4. It is REAL slow (i use it almost everyday) 5. I does not run all Mac software nativly (you must buy upgrades or even whole new packages, very expensive!) 6. I just love Penguins
IBM is working closly toghter with Suse with brining Suse/Linux to the s/390z series so off course they have a little step up but wait just for Warp 5.0 its coming...i guess it will be Linux based.
In fact they are running Apache in space..in
the russian spacestation MIR. Thats why its still
up...but what goes up must go down also if it
runs apache;-(
Yeah..off course..not a great deal but still
it saves money..more important is that if Linux is not better then NT, why then not use the free OS?
NT as a router is in my eyes a stupid choice....Linux is more suited for the job and is free..so??
Also Linux can run on older/cheaper equipment that also can push down their cost..so overall i would say:
YES!
Slashdot Mirror
Come on men not so cheap you sound like Troll.
Linux needs more config then BSD?
Give me an example please, ever tried to configure
a "normal" office postscript printer with BSD, i want to
use all 3 separate paper draws..good luck, in
Mandrake or Redhat thats done in 5 clicks, yeah i am
a newbie and looser but even i know BSD needs a lot more config that Linux!
Anyway i am not willing to feed the Trolls but i could
not resist......
Gnu/Linux is a great product, BSD in general is a somewhat great product, MacOSX is a not so great product because:
( i use Mac for over 5 years now and Linux about
2 years)
1. its not Free (Free as in Freedom a speech not free beer)
2. It only runs on Mac hardware (exept for Darwin but then i would prefer FreeBSD)
3. Its just ugly (that is a personal point of view)
4. It is REAL slow (i use it almost everyday)
5. I does not run all Mac software nativly (you must buy upgrades or even whole new packages, very expensive!)
6. I just love Penguins
SHAKE was released for Linux.
;)
I use it often and its one of those apps you
NEED on Linux to do serious editing.
you may find a demo version of Shake on
alt.binaries.warez.linux
Question In General
What about the libary structure?
/usr/lib
/lib
/usr/X11R6/lib
etc.
Can there be not just one
with subdirs for X and system?
IBM is working closly toghter with Suse with
brining Suse/Linux to the s/390z series so off course
they have a little step up but wait just for
Warp 5.0 its coming...i guess it will be Linux based.
Humans can make problems even without making calculations. I therefor highly recommend that computers apply humans to less difficlut questions
answer: drop the mirror!
i am on 14k4 :(
In fact they are running Apache in space..in the russian spacestation MIR. Thats why its still up...but what goes up must go down also if it runs apache ;-(
Yeah..off course..not a great deal but still it saves money..more important is that if Linux is not better then NT, why then not use the free OS? NT as a router is in my eyes a stupid choice....Linux is more suited for the job and is free..so?? Also Linux can run on older/cheaper equipment that also can push down their cost..so overall i would say: YES!