Slashdot Mirror


2001: A Space Laptop

Phrogman writes: "SpaceRef has posted an exclusive and detailed article concerning NASA's use of laptops in space including information on the LAN configuration aboard the Space Shuttle Atlantis (with full-color diagrams); lists of software run on the Shuttle laptop computers (with screenshots like this); laptop specs; descriptions of the LAN to be installed on the Space Station; and a lot of other related official NASA materials and links." It's a neat primer on Taking Your Computer to Space, too -- it addresses things like the available power sources, the need for velcro, and quirks of operating in zero G.

226 comments

  1. Hrm... by InfinityWpi · · Score: 2

    I wonder what sort of ping times you get from there...

    "Dammit, I just got fragged by another Earth-bound runt again..."

    I wonder if a Napster server in space could get sued?

    1. Re:Hrm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Please wait while trying to download some security patches from www.microsoft.com. These patches are necessary for the safe operation of [Insert one of the programs listed here].

    2. Re:Hrm... by Hellmongr · · Score: 1

      You just had to bring Napster into this didn't you... ;)

    3. Re:Hrm... by The_Messenger · · Score: 1
      "Ping Master?" "Water Dump?" "Pistol Grip Tool?" "File Sniffer?" Wow, those astronauts sure know how to party.

      ---------///----------
      All generalizations are false.

      --

      --
      I like to watch.

    4. Re:Hrm... by Bob+Costas · · Score: 1

      Once again a triumphuntly UN-funny post has overcome all odds to be modded up to 3. Can he do it again 4 years later?
      ---

      --
      Bob Fucking Costas. Does anyone else hate that motherfucker?
    5. Re:Hrm... by InfinityWpi · · Score: 1

      You're just jealous because I managed to get the top post without putting "First Post" in it, aren't you? :)

    6. Re:Hrm... by Bob+Costas · · Score: 1

      I am afraid that I will have to award to you the Bronze medal for getting Third, not First.
      ---

      --
      Bob Fucking Costas. Does anyone else hate that motherfucker?
  2. storm by British · · Score: 1

    Expect a storm of "OH my ghod they are running WINDOWS?" comments.

    1. Re:storm by Phrogman · · Score: 2

      The article does mention that they also use Linux and MacOS systems in space as well. Hopefully we will see a follow up article on the use of Linux as well.

      --
      "The first time I got drunk, I got married. The second time I bought a chimpanzee, after that I stayed sober" Arian Seid
    2. Re:storm by Bob+Costas · · Score: 1

      Not that linux is any better.
      ---

      --
      Bob Fucking Costas. Does anyone else hate that motherfucker?
    3. Re:storm by leperjuice · · Score: 1
      Am I the only one who noticed the mention of "InterPlaNet", the "), the networking protocol whereby we'll communicate across our solar system via the expansion of the Internet"? What the hell?

      And I see no mention if the processors are radation hardened or not. I don't know if they have to be if they are inside the shuttle, but that's something be concerned about.

      --

      -- "I am disrespectful to dirt. Can you not see that I am serious!"

  3. Maybe not but, by FIGJAM · · Score: 2

    I wonder if the hard drive would perform better in zero gravity.... stupid thought maybe...

    --
    Do your best, hope for the best, suspect the worst.
    1. Re:Maybe not but, by .sig · · Score: 1

      Well, how would zero-g affect the hardware in a computer? I'm sure it'd have at least some effect on drive spin times. If they kept the main hardware in a vaccum room, then heat would also be a totally different issue. It'd sure be a bitch to use a mouse; gotta keep a grip on it at all times....

      Anyone know? I dunno, I've always been more of a software kinda guy (no pun intended =P), but I've taken enoough hardware classes to build a computer from scratch.

      --
      -Space for rent
    2. Re:Maybe not but, by compwiz3688 · · Score: 1

      It'd sure be a bitch to use a mouse; gotta keep a grip on it at all times
      Perhaps the astronauts are the first to try the 3D movement of the mouse!
      But then again it's a laptop, so it's gonna be a pad, or whatever they call it.
      ---
      dd if=/dev/random of=~/.ssh/authorized_keys bs=1 count=1024

    3. Re:Maybe not but, by itarget · · Score: 1

      It might require less energy to keep the platters spinning, but beyond that I can't think of any improvements from zero-g.
      ---
      Where can the word be found, where can the word resound? Not here, there is not enough silence.

      --

      "Where shall the word be found, where will the word resound? Not here, there is not enough silence." -T.S. Eliot
    4. Re:Maybe not but, by silicon_synapse · · Score: 1

      I don't think a vacuum room would work. Wouldn't the hard drive crash? If I remember right, the read/write head rides on a small cusion of air extremely close to the disk. Remove the air and the head crashes into the disk tearing up the surface. I suspect they won't be using HDDs in a vacuum environment though. It's hard to say what effect the zero-g will have on them though. I don't think it'll make much difference.

    5. Re:Maybe not but, by compwiz3688 · · Score: 1

      HDD's are sealed tight so that dust and other particles don't get jammed between the platter and the read/write head. That means, no matter where you are, the HD would still work fine (assuming no other effects regarding zero-g)
      ---
      dd if=/dev/random of=~/.ssh/authorized_keys bs=1 count=1024

    6. Re:Maybe not but, by nobody69 · · Score: 1

      I don't think that microgravity would make any difference, since the mass of the disk would be the same even if the weight was less. Hmmm, that would imply that the spin times would be the same on Jupiter as well, so I could be way off base on that. The astronauts always seem to be struggling with the larger pieces of equipment, but they are able to move them.

      Anybody who remembers more of Physics I than I do have an answer?

      --
      "Bugger this, I want a better world." - Jenny Sparks
    7. Re:Maybe not but, by decaym · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure the Shuttle uses IBM ThinkPads. I'm very sure the ISS does. This probably means that the track point on the keyboard is the preferred method of control. Of course, the astronaut would have to be strapped down or they would drift away every time they touch the keyboard.

      --
      World Beach List, my latest project.
    8. Re:Maybe not but, by silicon_synapse · · Score: 1

      That's assuming of course that the seal is strong enough to hold the air inside when put in a vacuum environment. I can't say I've ever tried it. Besides, this is the government we're talking about. I'm sure they can find a way to spend several hundred grand to get a better seal. I think this is a moot point anyway. There's no reason I can think of a hard drive would need to be in a vacuum environment. Of course if the cabin lost pressure you wouldn't want your systems to crash because of a weak seal. That could ruin your whole day. Oh well. Maybe they could just use solid state hard drives or something.

    9. Re:Maybe not but, by Detritus · · Score: 2

      Most hard drives have a filtered pressure equalization port that allows air to move in and out of the drive housing.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    10. Re:Maybe not but, by carlos_benj · · Score: 1
      That means, no matter where you are, the HD would still work fine (assuming no other effects regarding zero-g)

      I dunno. My hard drive quit working at the bottom of my pool and even with buoyancy that's nowhere near zero gravity.

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

    11. Re:Maybe not but, by joekool · · Score: 1

      put it at an angle other than 90 degrees to the ground , and you sure can feel something!--you can feel it trying to return to a more normal position--it fun!

      --

      Slackware: old school feel, new school gear.
    12. Re:Maybe not but, by CausticPuppy · · Score: 1

      Well, how would zero-g affect the hardware in a computer? I'm sure it'd have at least some effect on drive spin times.

      None whatsoever. Spin times only have to do with rotational inertial (moment of inertia) and the torque of the motor. Air drag plays a tiny part too-- but not gravity, unless the bearings are so bad that turning the drive on its side (in gravity) causes extra drag due to the sideways loading.

      It would primarily affect the cooling of the hardware-- in a computer case, you couldn't rely on convection in zero-G, so you gotta make sure that all your fans are blowing in the right places.
      I will be a very happy man the day that I have to worry about how to cool my case in microgravity...

      --
      -CausticPuppy "Of all the people I know, you're certainly one of them." -Somebody I don't know
    13. Re:Maybe not but, by wwphx · · Score: 1

      Not enough mass, coupled with not enough RPM's, for it to be really perceptible.

      Now, if you had one of those old 14" platters (IBM S/34ish, areal density something like 300k/square inch) like the one sitting in my living room that I want to build into a coffee table....

      --

      --
      When you sympathize with stupidity, you start thinking like an idiot.
  4. Running Windows? by kruczkowski · · Score: 1

    Does NASA trust there computers with Windows? I don't even trust my mother's Windows 98 box.

    --
    hmm... for fun I enjoy launching DDoS attacks against 127.87.42.5
    1. Re:Running Windows? by THEbwana · · Score: 1

      Well, just look at Mir - they got infected with a macrovirus...#sigh#
      ESA uses Linux in their satellites though...

    2. Re:Running Windows? by IHateEverybody · · Score: 2


      Does NASA trust there computers with Windows?

      They use Windows on the laptops they carry up with them. It's not like they'll be running anything mission critical on them. They probably just want to get in a few rounds of Diablo II in between spacewalks.

      --
      Does this .sig make my butt look big?
    3. Re:Running Windows? by decaym · · Score: 2

      I'm one of those sick people who actually watches NASA TV during shuttle missions. It's kind of a out of this world reality TV show. Anyway, the laptops onboard do lockup from time to time. They just reboot and try again. As was said earlier, nothing mission critical is run on them.

      --
      World Beach List, my latest project.
    4. Re:Running Windows? by compwiz3688 · · Score: 1

      earth.world.com is running Sol/4.5Billion on Milkyway
      Why'd you ask?
      ---
      dd if=/dev/random of=~/.ssh/authorized_keys bs=1 count=1024

    5. Re:Running Windows? by guacamole · · Score: 1

      There is a big difference between WindowsNT/2000
      and Windows98.

    6. Re:Running Windows? by FunOne · · Score: 1

      there should be 'their'

      Unofficial =GR=
      FunOne

      --
      FunOne
    7. Re:Running Windows? by faqBastard · · Score: 1
      Does NASA trust there computers with Windows?

      Sounds to me like an administrative decision -- "Nobody ever got fired for buying Microsoft."

      Also might be a legacy decision -- They've been flying with IBM Thinkpads since the early '90's ? (Read as, since Linux 0.01) Perhaps they didn't want to port all their software over -- the stuff for locating the shuttle in orbit, etc.

    8. Re:Running Windows? by jakdin · · Score: 1

      You're not sick man. I love watching NASA TV!!! I even asked my cable company if they had it, but they had no idea what the hell it was!! ..guess only us real fans know what it is.

      I watch it all the time at work, online, that is:
      www.nasa.gov/ntv/ntvweb.html.

      Watch it! it ROCKS!

      --
      "As I always say, why jack-off when you can jack-in!" - Plughead from "Circuitry Man" (1990)
    9. Re:Running Windows? by fishbowl · · Score: 2

      "nothing mission critical is run on them."

      No system is "mission critical" until the mission relies on it.

      History has shown that it can come down the the number of plastic bags on board. If these systems are "unimportant" to the mission then why are they on board?

      So they're somewhere between "useless mass" and "mission critical." Sooner or later, a mission's success may hinge on the operation of some or all of the computers onboard, perhaps to a purpose that was not forseen in the mission planning phases.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  5. Duct Tape In Space! by John_Prophet · · Score: 5

    Quoting from the article:
    The PGSC, and everything else inside the Shuttle, needs to be able to be attached to a stable surface to keep it from floating away. Next to duct tape (also known as "gray tape" at NASA), one of the standard means of attaching one thing to another in space is the use of Velcro.

    Heh. Duct tape and velcro are holding our space program together? Seems somehow appropriate. Maybe they can swing over to MIR and patch up some of THEIR problems. Apparently, those stupid russians have been using ordinary masking tape.


    -The Reverend

    --
    -The Reverend (I am not a Nazi nor a Troll)
    =(.\')=
    1. Re:Duct Tape In Space! by Erbo · · Score: 2
      Duct tape and velcro are holding our space program together? Seems somehow appropriate.

      Remember Apollo 13? Duct tape was essential for assembling that temporary CO2 filter that helped keep the astronauts from choking to death.

      Don't you keep a roll of duct tape around your house "just in case?" The astronauts sure do - they can't just run out to the hardware store for some when they're in Earth orbit...

      Eric
      --

      --
      Be who you are...and be it in style!
    2. Re:Duct Tape In Space! by troeg · · Score: 1

      So was the earth for navigation.

    3. Re:Duct Tape In Space! by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1
      I think the MIL-SPEC tape is called "100 Mile an Hour tape".

      This isn't the stuff you get at ACE Hardware.

      Thing is, if Velcro and duct tape work, why change it? You don't want to have a lot of extra weight, so the flexibility of Duct tape is pretty much perfect

    4. Re:Duct Tape In Space! by geosync · · Score: 1

      And it is green

  6. Nice list of programs by compwiz3688 · · Score: 1

    Now let's cross our fingers and hope that the astronomers don't really rely on the laptop, 'cause if it GPFs, or BSODs...
    ---
    dd if=/dev/random of=~/.ssh/authorized_keys bs=1 count=1024

    1. Re:Nice list of programs by compwiz3688 · · Score: 1

      bleh... astronauts
      ---
      dd if=/dev/random of=~/.ssh/authorized_keys bs=1 count=1024

    2. Re:Nice list of programs by compwiz3688 · · Score: 1

      Oh, now you've revealed the true meaning of all these BSOD's: "Get better quality hardware and all your (BSOD) problems will go away!" - Bill Gates.
      No wonder my computer crashes all the time... :)
      ---
      dd if=/dev/random of=~/.ssh/authorized_keys bs=1 count=1024

    3. Re:Nice list of programs by aenomie · · Score: 1

      Windows does have a tendency to install multiple devices on the same IRQ - that alone probably accounts for a good percentage of problems. (w2k is actually worse than 98 at this in my experience)

      Windows 2000 (and WindowsME, for what its worth) will use ACPI (if your motherboard supports it). I don't know all the technical specifications of ACPI (Advanced Configuration and Power Interface), but it does make things look like they're all sharing the same IRQ (on my box almost everything on my device manager is on IRQ 11).

    4. Re:Nice list of programs by troeg · · Score: 1

      X? Is that the GUI thing you run as root? if knowledge = 0 then Functionality + Stupidity = reinstall

    5. Re:Nice list of programs by troeg · · Score: 1
      Stupidity = MSCE

      I say take the test, cause as the radio said you can make more than $70,000 a year!

      If you are already making that much, then hey you must already know this!

  7. Where'd the pretty pictures go? by itarget · · Score: 1

    The diagrams and pictures mentionned don't seem to be available... Maybe discovery.com is doing a little preemptive correction for the slashdot effect. :-P
    ---
    Where can the word be found, where can the word resound? Not here, there is not enough silence.

    --

    "Where shall the word be found, where will the word resound? Not here, there is not enough silence." -T.S. Eliot
  8. Interesting by DigitalDragon · · Score: 1

    That would be a lot of fun to trace the data - how much pr0n a day they download, or even better, imagine NASA cuts their line cuz they sucked up all the bandwidth with Gnutella and Napster. hmm..

    --
    http://dtum.livejournal.com
  9. When, when, when... by talesout · · Score: 1

    This may be slightly off-topic here, but why are they telling 'us normal people' this?

    Personally, I'd be much more interested in hearing when we would be able to visit space (as normal people) rather than 'how to use our laptop'.

    Here's hoping they actually do build a space elevator before I'm gone. Instead of another vacation to Colorado, I could take a vacation to the ISS and actually do something 'new and exciting'.

    --


    Bite my yammer.
    1. Re:When, when, when... by talesout · · Score: 1

      Trolling?

      Actually, there was an article here last week about just this topic. A space elevator isn't possible today, right now. But in approximately fifty years we could very well have the materials and the ability to build a space elevator.

      --


      Bite my yammer.
    2. Re:When, when, when... by talesout · · Score: 1

      The space elevator is supposed to hit speeds of 15,000 mph. Hardly sounds like it would be a boring ride.

      And the Slashdot article contained a link that was to a story that proclaimed the possibility of a space elevator being feasible in 50 years. Not that it will happen, I just hope it can.

      The real benifit was that the cost would be minor compared to the old fashioned way. $200 would be the average cost for going up as a passenger. If only they would actually do it.

      --


      Bite my yammer.
  10. Oh, no... by emerson · · Score: 3

    Everyone brace yourselves for the standard barrage of really dorky BSOD-in-space jokes moderated up as funny.


    --

    1. Re:Oh, no... by emerson · · Score: 2

      >Emerson: telling moderators what to do isn't "Informative", it's "Anal Retentive"

      The comma after "Informative" should go inside the quotation marks; also don't forget your closing punctuation.


      --

    2. Re:Oh, no... by belroth · · Score: 1
      >Emerson: telling moderators what to do isn't "Informative", it's "Anal Retentive"

      The comma after "Informative" should go inside the quotation marks; also don't forget your closing punctuation.

      Personally I'd agree with the second point, not the second.
      'Rules' for things like quoting have changed in the last few decades - I think it's explained in the Jargon File.
      ----
      --
      I hereby inform you that I have NOT been required to provide any decryption keys.
    3. Re:Oh, no... by emerson · · Score: 1

      I think you mean "not the first."

      And, yeah, the rules for quoting have been slipping (sadly) over the years, but the exceptions that are allowable have to do with changing the meaning of an actual quotation. In this case, quotation marks are being used to set off a word as interesting, not as an indicator of something someone actually said. So, the punctuation-inside rule should hold here.

      I can't believe I'm still paying attention to this non-thread... (*grin)


      --

  11. I don't want to see the Russki's power supply by Hairy_Potter · · Score: 5

    IBM ThinkPad series PGSCs are not the only laptops that have flown - or will fly in space. Computers using Mac OS and Linux have also flown as part of various payloads and are likely to continue to do so in the future. Meanwhile, the Russians will be using a Weiner Power laptop in their portion of the ISS. Other participating partners will likely bring their own laptops.

    All I can envision is wrapping wire around your penis and sticking it in and out of a magnet.

    1. Re:I don't want to see the Russki's power supply by craw · · Score: 1
      Russians will be using a Weiner Power laptop

      I think that you (and others) are thinking about a wiener (not weiner) powered laptop. Besides, they're Russians not Germans. They would be more likely to use a potato powered laptop.

    2. Re:I don't want to see the Russki's power supply by kaphka · · Score: 3
      All I can envision is wrapping wire around your penis and sticking it in and out of a magnet.
      Sigh... Figures we'd get a reaction like that from the six-digit-account-number crowd. Slashdot isn't what it used to be.

      How could anyone not picture an earnest little space dachshund, plodding away on a treadmill?
      --

      MSK

    3. Re:I don't want to see the Russki's power supply by fm6 · · Score: 1
      Sigh... Figures we'd get a reaction like that from the six-digit-account-number crowd.

      Great! You've invented a new kind of bigotry! What shall we call it? Digitism? Magnitudocracy? Priogenics? Slashdot isn't what it used to be. Was it ever?

    4. Re:I don't want to see the Russki's power supply by valintin · · Score: 1


      Sheesh, there ya don't go. This is just the attitude I'd expect from one of those even numbered people.

  12. To save you all some time reading... by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 2

    ... they run Windows 95...

    1. Re:To save you all some time reading... by guacamole · · Score: 1

      Look closer, they run NT. Idiot

    2. Re:To save you all some time reading... by llornkcor · · Score: 1
      Your half wrong...
      The standard operating systems for the PGSC is Windows 95

      and
      The network uses an OCA router (a PGSC laptop running Windows NT

  13. Network security and Space Internet by DrgnDancer · · Score: 2

    Why dont they just do what most Top Secret military facilities do and have seperate "public" and "private" network terminals? No access to the public internet for mission critical systems, but have a few public terminals that can be used for communications both ways

    --
    I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
    1. Re:Network security and Space Internet by ptomblin · · Score: 2

      Why dont they just do what most Top Secret military facilities do and have seperate "public" and "private" network terminals?

      You mean like how it was for Wen Ho Lee? Yeah, perfect security - at least until the lusers come along.

      --
      The next Cmdr Taco duplicate will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!
  14. I bet... by Psmylie · · Score: 1
    some incredibly important missions are going to be botched 'cause of some fool playing minesweeper instead of paying attention...

    --

    psmylie's dictionary: Godzillion (noun) Any number large enough to destroy Tokyo

  15. take mine! by antistuff · · Score: 1

    i want them to take my laptop to space so i can tell everyone "hey see this laptop, it was in space!"

  16. Cooling by GutterBunny · · Score: 1
    They mention that cooling can be a problem, such as the fact that hot air doesn't necessarily rise in space.

    I suppose that means that they won't be sending up any overclocked laptops anytime soon.

    --
    managers...why god invented purgatory
    1. Re:Cooling by Kierthos · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Heat dissapation is a major problem in space. Unless the laptop's heatsinks are properly configured, you could very easily burn out the laptop with only a hour's use.

      Also, I imagine that disk ejection systems and CD drives need to be reconfigured so you don't have spinning discs floating all over the place.

      Makes you wonder what frisbee would be like in 0 G...

      Kierthos

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    2. Re:Cooling by MrM · · Score: 1

      If cooling's a problem, they can always just hold the laptop out the window for a bit - that'll cool it off...

      --
      Karma? We don' need no steenkeeng karma!
  17. After The Slashdot Cruiser by Slashdot+Cruiser · · Score: 5

    I've put a lot of thought into this. Please don't dismiss me right away.

    We all recognize the phenomenal success of Slashdot/Andover/VALinux/OSDN/Plymouth/Whoever-the -hell-they-are-this-month. The company has literally gobs of liquid cash to burn. Thanks to the contributions of unpaid open source developers everywhere, expenses are low. Thanks to banner ad hits, hardware sales, and software distribution (or distrobution if you're a regular here), revenue is high.

    I think the time has come for Slashdot to think big. I mean bigger than the Slashdot Cruiser. With that in mind, I would like to make a modest proposal:

    Paint the Slashdot logo on the Space Shuttle

    It could work: Thanks to 8 years of post-Cold War Democratic cutbacks, NASA is hard up for money. Heck, it's a wonder the Shuttle doesn't already look like something out of the NASCAR Winston Cup series.

    Why not corporate sponsorship of the Space Shuttle? And who better to provide that sponsorship than the site bringing us "News for Nerds. Stuff that matters?"

    Picture it: The Space Shuttle -- painted Slashdot-Green with the /. logo on the vertical stabilizer. We could even paint "This spacecraft Copyright 1997-2000 OSDN" on the side. We could replace all the computers inside the Shuttle with overclocked VALinux boxes. We could supply the crews with /. coffee mugs and Penquin Mints. Missions could be completed in half the time!

    We could even go a step further. We could the entire Shuttle fleet! Instead of "Enterprise", "Endeavor", "Columbia", we could have "CmdrTaco", "JonKatz", and "Hemos".

    Imagine hearing a newscaster saying, "The Space Shuttle JonKatz lifted off this morning. It will remain in orbit for three weeks." Doesn't that make you feel a little funny inside?

    Is the idea of an open-source space program just a dream? Won't you share the dream with me?

    --

    Got a full tank of hot grits and a penis bird in the glove box.
    1. Re:After The Slashdot Cruiser by kcornia · · Score: 1

      Someone moderate this funny. I love it! The CmdrTaco shuttle... There would have to be a webcam linked to the earthbound site though, and not one that's screened by the govt. either. We want to see all the little green men...

    2. Re:After The Slashdot Cruiser by TWX_the_Linux_Zealot · · Score: 1

      "We could even go a step further. We could the entire Shuttle fleet! Instead of 'Enterprise', 'Endeavor', 'Columbia', we could have 'CmdrTaco', 'JonKatz', and 'Hemos'."

      Hmm.... the museum piece "Enterprise" being renamed "CmdrTaco"... are you trying to say something here?

      --

      IBM had PL/1, with syntax worse than JOSS,
      And everywhere the language went, it was a total loss...
    3. Re:After The Slashdot Cruiser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2
      This idea has been suggested before, on NASA Watch:

      http://www.nasawatch.com/humor/shut tle.ads.html

    4. Re:After The Slashdot Cruiser by Nightpaw · · Score: 1

      Instead of "Enterprise", "Endeavor", "Columbia", we could have "CmdrTaco", "JonKatz", and "Hemos".

      I wouldn't mind seeing the JonKatz shuttle go Challenger.

    5. Re:After The Slashdot Cruiser by Mtgman · · Score: 4

      "The Space Shuttle JonKatz lifted off this morning. It will remain in orbit for three weeks."

      Not nearly long enough. Send JonKatz to check out Europa, then maybe we'll be free of FUD for a while.

      Steven

      --
      -- I have marked myself unwilling to moderate-- I don't have other accounts to artificially inflate the karma of
    6. Re:After The Slashdot Cruiser by MochaMan · · Score: 1

      Paint the Slashdot logo on the Space Shuttle

      Not as unrealistic as you might have thought... As reported on Slashdot, Pizza Hut's logo appeared on the side of a Proton rocket recently.

    7. Re:After The Slashdot Cruiser by Fervent · · Score: 2
      "Slashdot, where rampant commercialism (like Microsoft) is unaccepted - except when it's us."

      Can you imagine the furious flame backlash if I had said "Let's paint the shuttle with a Microsoft icon?" :)

      --

      - I don't care if they globalize against free speech. All my best free thoughts are done in my head.

    8. Re:After The Slashdot Cruiser by fsck! · · Score: 1

      if anybody remembers the arnold superflop "last action hero", you may also recall that the studio that produced it had an ad painted on the side of that big brown fuel tank that helps put the shuttle up. we could interpert that to mean that nasa is open to the idea of corporate sponsorship, espically given the bad press that "faster, cheaper" nasa missions have gotten recently.

      forgive me for not knowing the technical name for that tank, or even the spelling of arnolds last name.

      OTOH, i'd rather see andover put their money into funding some more worthy software projects than painting a logo on my least favorite space craft. carl sagan put it best when he argued that "space exploration does not mean orbiting the earth".

    9. Re:After The Slashdot Cruiser by pne · · Score: 1
      We could replace all the computers inside the Shuttle with overclocked VALinux boxes.

      Read again what they said about cooling being limited, especially when they lower the pressure to prepare for EVA. I don't think low cooling and overclocking mix well.

      --
      Esli epei etot cumprenan, shris soa Sfaha.
    10. Re:After The Slashdot Cruiser by Felinoid · · Score: 1

      Paint the Microsoft Icon on the boster rockets that the shuttle disguards on it's way to space...
      Or better yet... after the fact CGI plant it on the failed mars launches...
      and after the fact CGI Slashdot on the successful launches

      --
      I don't actually exist.
  18. ShuttleOS Story in Fast Company by waldoj · · Score: 3

    Y'all might be interested in the Fast Company article that's somewhat related, entitled "They Write the Right Stuff." I believe that there was mention of this on /. some months back. It's about the computers that actually control the shuttle and the process of writing that software. Pretty hard-core.

    -Waldo

  19. Not according to this study... by gvonk · · Score: 1

    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=00/09/08/133024 6&mode=thread

    --


    El Karma: excelente(principalmente la suma de moderación hecha a los comentarios de los usuarios)
  20. good advice... by AntiPasto · · Score: 2
    for my telecommute while riding the space elevator... Anyway...

    This is cool to see... I've often seen them using rather archane things, and now I really do know a little bit more of what seperates me from an astronaut.

    Anyone think they could do better tho? heheh

    ----

    1. Re:good advice... by WillAffleck · · Score: 1

      for my telecommute while riding the space elevator..

      We're much more likely to see space elevators on Mars before they show up on Earth. Too much chance of lawsuits and terrorists. Just ask Stan Robinson, he's written some interesting stuff on that.

      --
      Will in Seattle
    2. Re:good advice... by Elgon · · Score: 1

      The space elevator idea is an old one.

      Arthur C Clarke wrote the first sci-fi book with one in that I know of (forgotten name but set in (Sri Lanka), but the idea was originally put forward by a Russian.

      Elgon

    3. Re:good advice... by Zagadka · · Score: 1

      Arthur C. Clarke wrote the first sci-fi book with one in that I know of (forgotten name but set in (Sri Lanka)

      Fountains of Paradise (please forgive the Amazon link)

    4. Re:good advice... by Zagadka · · Score: 1

      You forgot:

      "Earthlings go home!"

    5. Re:good advice... by Elgon · · Score: 1

      Excellent, muchas gracias.

      Elgon

  21. Re:Cooling (Pentium 4) by TWX_the_Linux_Zealot · · Score: 1

    We know then that the P-IV will never see use in space, unless they integrate it into the climate control system instead of using conventional heating coils... hell, the mass of the chip and required heatsink (my god!) is probably too heavy to meet payload launch standards anyway...

    --

    IBM had PL/1, with syntax worse than JOSS,
    And everywhere the language went, it was a total loss...
  22. Why they run Windows... by karzan · · Score: 1

    In space, no one can hear you scream.

    1. Re:Why they run Windows... by Pulzar · · Score: 1

      If Windows crashes in space, and no one is there to see the BSOD... it's still a piece of crap.

      --
      Never underestimate the bandwidth of a 747 filled with CD-ROMs.
    2. Re:Why they run Windows... by piku · · Score: 1

      Your right. I wouldn't want to hear the screams of a computer newbie with Linux either.

  23. hey no more tripping over cords! by incubus · · Score: 1

    I could just see my orbital apartment.. cables *everywhere*.. yay.... :-)

  24. Re:My Question by Kierthos · · Score: 2

    Well, like I said earlier, unless the heat sinks are properly configured, you could very easily burn out the processor by overcloaking it. Part of the problem with heat dissipation in space (and part of the problem with breathing...) is the lack of gravity. With no natural breeze, you get the same air trapped around the processor.

    Now, yes, you can use fans to move air about. But how do the fans work in 0 G? (Well, microgravity, but pretty much the same thing...) I imagine that the fans have to be reconfigured as well.

    I also imagine that the boards have to be reinforced to withstand the forces during takeoff, as well as the screen... the mouse is simple; use the same little pad you normally do with laptops.

    Kierthos

    --
    Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
  25. Re: Using a Mouse in Space by John_Prophet · · Score: 2

    It'd sure be a bitch to use a mouse; gotta keep a grip on it at all times....

    I'm not sure what, if anything, would forbid you from using a trackball, but it seems like a trackball (with a "velcro-modified" base :D) might be a better solution for Zero G pointer manipulation. Anybody care to point out how wrong I am?


    -The Reverend

    --
    -The Reverend (I am not a Nazi nor a Troll)
    =(.\')=
  26. Pistol grip tool ! by MarcoAtWork · · Score: 1

    I want it for my garage ! the coolness factor of this would be awesome.

    Not to mention that if a neighbour has it, and if it works via any type of hackable radio communication, one would be able to reprogram their torque/speed settings on the fly.

    Watch those bolts fly ;););)

    --
    -- the cake is a lie
  27. You can never have too much velcro by WillAffleck · · Score: 4

    Face it, when in variable G land (e.g. space), it's a really good idea to have too much velcro. And have suits with velcro-ended cables.

    Plus, the lack of air motion is very critical - you want a laptop with good heat dissipation and good fans, plus you need to be sure the fan motors can take varying G forces. Overclocking is a big no-no. Extra RAM is highly recommended.

    Then there's the CD. Remember, no gravity pulling down makes these very difficult to use. Best to have it in firmware or cartridge form. Spin effects can be very hard to clock right in low or zero-G, and it needs to survive the boost.

    Now, when will we see a smart company like Transmeta donate some laptops with low power consumption to NASA, both to sell the chip and to make them hot geek items? Heck, I can see the ads now "As Used By NASA In Zero-G", "The Laptop That Went To Space".

    What happens if you get the Blue Screen of Death - do you die?

    --
    Will in Seattle
    1. Re:You can never have too much velcro by Johnny+Starrock · · Score: 1

      Doubt it's a consern. Doesn't NASA usually have 3-4 backups where possible (laptop-yes, engines-no)?

      Besides, my guess is the QA on these things it still pretty tight. My guess is they licensed the Win source and hacked since stability is an issue
      -----------

      --

      end communication
  28. Overclocking by scott1853 · · Score: 1

    How much would you be able to overclock a 366 Celeron system if you put it outside the ship, and of course, in the shade?

    1. Re:Overclocking by wierdo · · Score: 1

      How much would you be able to overclock a 366 Celeron system if you put it outside the ship, and of course, in the shade?

      None. Hell, it would probly burn itself out pretty quickly. Remember, there's no air outside the ship, and most computers this side of a Cray are air cooled, and therefore would have no cooling in the near vacuum of space. Besides, space is not cold at all, even in the shade, what few molecules you find flying around tend to be very hot, not very cold, as they're moving around at quite a good clip. It's just that there's very few molecules around, so there's not a lot of heat transfer, except for radiant heat.

      -Nathan


      Care about freedom?
      --
      Care about freedom?
      Become a card carrying member of the GOA.
    2. Re:Overclocking by plankton14 · · Score: 1

      None. Of course, I haven't tried it, but I'd be surprised if you could get it running for any length of time even at 166, or at any speed. It's the whole "where does the heat go?" question. If the processor/heatsink is sitting in a vacuum, you've pretty much eliminated any cooling from conduction and convection, leaving only radiation (right? physics guys, help me out here).
      I seem to remember something about the amount of heat dissipated from radiation being tied to the temperature of the object that is radiating it. Bottom line: yeah, space is really cold when you're far away from any heat source, not creating any heat of your own, and have had plenty of time to radiate away your stored heat. But heat transfer sucks unless you're talking high temps (higher energy EM radiation).
      Then again, that cheap crack could be starting to effect (affect?) my posting skills...

    3. Re:Overclocking by wnissen · · Score: 1

      I'm not so sure that space is as warm as you think. Sure, there's no matter to dissapate heat into. but there is and almost unlimited deficit of radiant heat. That kind of heat is mostly infrared photons, so they will fly off with no problems. Since the sun (and reflected rays therof) provide the only appreciable source of rays, there is very little radiant heat coming in. Even if I were in a vacuum right now, I would still be comfortable in terms of temperature because I would be radiating heat away approximately fast as I was absorbing it. Besides, if space is so warm, why do the astronauts have heating devices in the suits they wear for EVMs?

      Walt

    4. Re:Overclocking by mindstrm · · Score: 2

      You wouldn't; vacuum is a perfect insulator.
      There wouold approximately 0 heat dissipation due to convection.

      Your chip would cook itself almost immediately.

    5. Re:Overclocking by wierdo · · Score: 2

      Even if I were in a vacuum right now, I would still be comfortable in terms of temperature because I would be radiating heat away approximately fast as I was absorbing it. Besides, if space is so warm, why do the astronauts have heating devices in the suits they wear for EVMs?

      Yes, space is as warm as I think, at least when the sun is shining upon you. When you are in sunlight, the radiant heat which you absorb is quite enormous, quite a good deal more than you radiate away, even if you have good thermal transfer between your "light" side and your "dark" side. The amount of heat which you radiate away is fairly constant, no matter how much radiant heat you are absorbing at a given time.

      If you were in a vacuum, and you weren't in space, you could be correct, however, in space, in the presence of a heat radiating body, such as the sun, will increase your temperature enormously, in the absence of such a thing, you eventually radiate all your heat away, save what little heat is transferred to you by collisions with the few molecules that are present in interplanetary space.

      IIRC, they're not heaters, but more "temperature regulators." Basically they either absorb heat or generate heat as necessary to keep the intrepid spacewalker from burning up at 400 degrees if he's in sunlight, or pretty much freezing to death in the event that he's in shade. However, most particles that one finds in space tend to be highly energetic, since they tend to move at a good fraction of the speed of light. However, there are very few of them per unit volume, and so one's trusty thermometer becomes decidedly un-trusty, and registers a temperature reading somewhere below -200F, unless, of course, the probe is in direct sunlight, in which case, depending on the design, the matter which makes up the probe gets nice and hot and registers quite a warm temperature.

      In the end, the "temperature" in space doesn't really apply anyway, since temperature is a measure of the energy level of a molecule, and space has no molecules. The only reason Earth has a temperature is of course because all of the molecules have a temperature, and the density of those molecules is such that they tend to bang into the temperature sensing device quite a lot.

      Hope that clears it up, -Nathan
      Care about freedom?

      --
      Care about freedom?
      Become a card carrying member of the GOA.
    6. Re:Overclocking by wnissen · · Score: 1

      I agree with two of your points: the extreme warmth of the sun, and the high energy of particles in space. I was more thinking of a situation where the CPU was outside in a vacuum in the Earth's shadow. Now, I'm not sure how much heat a processor will radiate, but the amount of energy being added to the processor from space is very low. There are of course plenty of very high energy particles whizzing about, most of them, as you point out, very close to the speed of light. But since they are so low density, they won't add a lot of energy either. Heck, most of the really high energy ones probably pass right through even if their "path" went straight through a P4 heatsink.

      Walt

  29. Re:My Question by Pope+Slackman · · Score: 2

    [...]you could very easily burn out the processor by overcloaking[...]

    Burn out? Naw, it'd just shimmer a bit and then disappear...

    --K
    (Sorry, had to. ;)
    ---

  30. Computer Positioning by zpengo · · Score: 2
    Image what it would be like to run servers in outer space...talk about CPU cooling! Just install an overclocked server farm on the far side of the moon, and watch how fast they go in the insane temperatures.

    --


    Got Rhinos?
    1. Re:Computer Positioning by Road · · Score: 1

      Try learning about black body radiation. Why do you think your windshield gets frost on it when it is above freezing all night?

  31. Approved Software! by tzanger · · Score: 1

    What, no Solitaire?

  32. Windows?!?!? by austad · · Score: 3

    One good thing comes of using windows... If their GPS box dies, they can replace it with a Word document with a tracking pixel.

    --
    Need Free Juniper/NetScreen Support? JuniperForum
  33. Did you spot the euler-quaternion converter by SIGFPE · · Score: 4

    Working in graphics I have endless problems with conversions of rotations between Euler angles and quaternions. It's funny to see that NASA must share these problems and actually have a stand alone tool to do the conversion. Can you imagine the situations where you actually have to type in those number by hand into a GIO like that!
    --

    --
    -- SIGFPE
  34. Linux on the Shuttle by decaym · · Score: 1

    There have been articles published in the past about Linux being used to operate experiments on the Space Shuttle. Some of the experiments have self contained computer systems for managment and data collection. Linux was ideal here.

    Now, I'd like to see a Linux/Apache web server in orbit. Even if it feeds nothing but text telemetry data, it would be impressive. Hmm, is there a TLD for LEO yet?

    --
    World Beach List, my latest project.
    1. Re:Linux on the Shuttle by jakdin · · Score: 1

      Whatever server they have up there, they just had to REBOOT the damn thing!

      Sitting here watching http://www.nasa.gov/ntv/ntvweb.html is the most satisfying part of my work day!

      --
      "As I always say, why jack-off when you can jack-in!" - Plughead from "Circuitry Man" (1990)
    2. Re:Linux on the Shuttle by fuckthetux · · Score: 1

      In fact they are running Apache in space..in the russian spacestation MIR. Thats why its still up...but what goes up must go down also if it runs apache ;-(

  35. Re:Duct Tape In Space! (Troll?) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm not the mod, but I would have mod'd you down too.

    Mir is a masterpiece of budget engineering, it has outlived it's expected lifespan by years. Could any other nation produce anything so successful? Not on current evidence.
    Your comment was uninformed, unfunny and - to some - flamebait.

    Consider yourself lucky to still be at 2.

  36. Re:Oh god, i now fear for my life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2
    A reply to all the predictable "They're running Windows!" posts:

    1. Only the laptops are running Windows. They're not trusting their flight-control systems to it.

    2. Would Linux be able better for what they need? They're not serving web-pages, or handling multiple users. They're not worried about the cost of the software. Windows is an acceptable solution in this case. The end-users were probably already familiar with it, which is always a benefit ...
    So, honestly, does it really matter?
  37. or segfaults by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

    Take a look at how stable netscape is or how long it takes staroffice to load before your criticize windows.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    1. Re:or segfaults by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      Yes, because Netscape and Star Office are operating systems that crash regularly. I have seen Linux crash, but I knew that I had entered the wrong information into my X server config file, and had the information to subsequently fix it. How many Win9x crashes have you had, and how much information was provided for you to track the cause down. Oh, but it was a buggy driver. How do you know? Point to the place in the Windows log or core dump where it says that in detail. Oh sorry I forgot, Windows 9x doesn't have these because they have no place in a modern consumer OS. Just an ex-Windows user who switched to an OS that gives control to the user, not to the predatory monopoly.

    2. Re:or segfaults by Delphis · · Score: 1

      I've never seen Linux crash. I've seen X-Windows crash, which I think is what you're refering to. A great many people confuse the two.. but don't realise that Linux is in fact working away quite happily in the background and a simple Ctrl-Alt-F1 will get you to a console where you can close or restart X if it's locked up. Or simply just reboot normally if it's easier.

      Actually, I lie.. I have seen Linux crash.. but that wasn't its fault.. I had a machine with a faulty SIMM socket and half the machine's memory
      disappeared on it for a moment.. no wonder it caused a kernel panic (that's a Linux crash - if the kernel doesn't panic, it's not a Linux crash)

      I agree with you that Windows is a pain in the ass to debug if there's problems as there's no really useful information or logs available.

      I can't believe NASA use Windows over Linux..

      PS: Netscape and Star Office are applications, not operating systems .. I'm not trying to be picky.. I just want to give you the correct terms :)

      --

      --
      Delphis
    3. Re:or segfaults by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      Sorry I forgot the tag for the first sentence about NS and SO. I have had X completely lock my machine, so that a reboot was the only option, along with the endless fsck. I'm not saying that Linux never crashes, but it's always due to my mistake and there's a wealth of info about why it happened, unlike the various flavours of Windows.

  38. Wiener Power!! by DuckIE · · Score: 1
    OK, funniest thing I've seen today:
    Meanwhile, the Russians will be using a Weiner Power laptop in their portion of the ISS.
    What?!? I guess meat-free wiener products such as the popular "Not-Dog" don't satisfy power requirements?
    --
    -- The Theorem Theorem: "If if, then then."
  39. Mission Critical Computers and the GRiD by CharmQuark · · Score: 1
    The article implies that NASA is using widows for mission critical computing. I know that NASA has run DOS, Windows, MacOS and even NeXTStep in supporting roles, but I didn't think these were allowed to run the important stuff. Several years ago NASA installed DEC workstations to run the mission critical applications. I have heard that the DEC machines were replaced. I have not heard that Windows is stable enough to stay up during an entire mission, which is what be required to run the missiion critical apps. Inquiring minds want to know.

    That said, there have been a number of portables flown in space. In particular, does anyone remember a time when a GRiD was the machine to have in space. Now that was a laptop. It seemed to be space-worthy right out of the box. Too bad it went away before I had the money to acquire one.

    1. Re:Mission Critical Computers and the GRiD by Vandenzob · · Score: 1

      Oh my god!! Yes!

      Gee, I guess it's under this thread that we will recognise the geekiest of them all.

      The GRiD compass, with it's sexy red plasma display. Always had dreams about it...

  40. Resume by Highlordexecutioner · · Score: 2

    Imagine how good sysadmin on the Space Shuttle would look on your resume.

    --
    Where am I going and why am I in this handbasket?
    1. Re:Resume by MURDOCK1 · · Score: 1

      Right up until the point where they find out that you used Windows NT as a router.

      --
      Eagles soar, but Weasels aren't sucked into jet engines.
  41. Y'all may be too young to remember this, but by plastik55 · · Score: 4
    The first laptop to fly aboard the Apace Shuttle was, in fact the Macintosh Portable, on STS-43. See the report from Apple here

    We all had a good laugh when the 16lb. beast became the first truly weightless laptop.

    --

    I have a positive modifier on Troll. When I mod someone Troll their karma should go UP!

    1. Re:Y'all may be too young to remember this, but by SheldonYoung · · Score: 2

      Did anybody else find this text at the bottom of the article from Apple funny?

      "APPLE EYES ONLY Information section - Apple Need-To-Know Confidential"

    2. Re:Y'all may be too young to remember this, but by ictatha · · Score: 1

      Well, actually is wasn't weightless. It only had the illusion of weightlessness caused by falling towards the earth at the same rate as the shuttle.


      Sorry, had to get that off my chest.

      --
      "... the advance of civilization is nothing but an exercise in the limiting of privacy" - Janov Pelorat
    3. Re:Y'all may be too young to remember this, but by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Umm, the net force due to gravity (colloquially, "Weight") was zero (well, if you want to get SUPER technical, very near zero). Therefore, it was, weightless. It was most emphatically NOT massless.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  42. Well, considering the shuttle is mid-70's tech... by decipher_saint · · Score: 1
    It's rather interesting when you think about the technology used in space exploration. Most of the shuttle technology is mid-70's to mid-80's. Makes you wonder what we (as an autonomous tech-collective) could come up with as far as space exploration is concerned. Could you imagine open-source space technology? Tech heads from around the world collaborating to create a better future in space (sounds like Star Trek or Gundam, don't it).

    Anyway, it was just a thought...

    Capt. Ron

    --
    crazy dynamite monkey
  43. Re:To save you all some time whining... by ichimunki · · Score: 1

    They seem to be doing so to provide legacy support to specialized DOS applications.

    --
    I do not have a signature
  44. And looks like they use Visual Basic too... by torpor · · Score: 2

    ... by the looks of those buttons.

    Ew.

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  45. Re:Oh, no...(very OT) by belroth · · Score: 1
    Oh yes - "not the first" :-)
    That's what comes of previewing for spelling and not content!

    As to quoting, I use "geek" (ahem) quoting almost exclusively, so to me the "interesting" is a semantic element in its own right and I would put the comma after it, as if it were a word that is spelt with quotation marks.
    I suppose that it comes from the programming mindset - sort of analagous to avoiding overlapping tags in html?

    So I appreciate your comment, and sympathise with your stand against linguistic degradation, It just doesn't really bother me. :-) (Does punctuation go before or after the smiley?)

    One thing that does bother me, and I have only recently started to notice this, is the american way of saying
    "How Good Of A Unix is Mac OS X?", and not "How Good A Unix is Mac OS X?". Why is this? Leaving aside that I ought to say "an unix" and not "a unix" that is.
    ----

    --
    I hereby inform you that I have NOT been required to provide any decryption keys.
  46. Re:Printer by devjoe · · Score: 1
    I was wondering about that too. The ink might not actually be a problem; it does use a jet of ink, after all, and the rollers inside should still keep the paper in place while it's printing.

    But certainly, the printer pictured in the Nominal LAN Topology (see link in the /. story) would have trouble keeping its paper in the tray (open, gravity-dependent tray like on the cheaper inkjet models). Either NASA did another $million modification job on that, or they used a higher-end printer with an enclosed, internal tray (perhaps further modified, if necessary, to keep the paper from floating around inside the tray).

  47. What? No DOOM? by piku · · Score: 2

    How could they last without DOOM?

  48. Cost?!? by vbrtrmn · · Score: 1

    I remember reading awhile ago that NASA paid $600 for a toilet seat. According to several sites, one can get a normal toilet seat for $10.

    That's a 60:1 ratio.

    I think the average laptop cost is $2500, using the same ratio, NASA would be paying $150,000 for each of these laptops.

    Though they probably paid more :)

    --
    you are not what you own

    --
    it's a sig, wtf?
    1. Re:Cost?!? by MeowMeow+Jones · · Score: 1

      I hate to be one of those guys who cut and paste, but you should read the sidebar:

      . I recall one meeting where I was being told that a adapting a commercially available battery recharger (for standard rechargable batteries you use every day) for flight aboard the space station (a process often called "flybridizing") would cost $1.5 million. I was not at all pleased to hear this number. This was 1991. I am sure that the cost of making this item flight qualified has not gone down in the past 9 years.

      --

      Trolls throughout history:
      Jonathan Swift

  49. Cooling in space is not easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Back in my school days, part of my work study job was to model the temperature behavior of a balloon borne neutron detector. It consisted of a lot of plastic and a hand built computer contained in a 3ft x 1ft aluminum cylindrical pressure vessel.

    The maximum altitude was about 120Kft. Even at that altitude the combination of solar input plus the heat generated by the computer it was hard to dump enough heat to keep the computer from overheating. At night of course we had the opposite problem of keeping the computer warm enough.

    The software I used was written in Fortran (by someone else) on cards, ran on a Univac and modeled the detector as a set of concentric spheres! We did pretty well modeling the overall temperature but of course the local hot spots in the computer were a pain.

    Conduction and convection weren't too efficient at 120Kft and we were left with radiative transfer as the major means to dump the heat. I never knew there were so many differences between kinds of white paint! The shuttle uses the same approach by using the cargo bay doors as radiators (which is why the doors are always open at orbit).

    In case you are interested, the detector was EOSCOR (Extended Observation of Solar and COsmic Rays) built at CWRU in the late '70s and flown in Texas and Australia. The principle investigator was Glen Frye with Steve Schinder and Rocky Koga as associates. They were looking for neutrons emitted by Solar flares, but I don't think they ever found any.

    My how times have changed. ;)

  50. Trolls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Subject: Clique Theory
    From: (Dr Drew)
    Newsgroups: uk.local.yorkshire

    THE DR. BREW LECTURE

    Good morning, students. Today I am going to outline an exciting new
    aspect of theoretical physics. It concerns the behaviour of particles
    when interacting with Neusgroupinos: also called TANTRUM MECHANICS.
    This is CLIQUE theory.

    The particle in question is officially called the T+ particle, but is
    known colloquially as the Troll. Trolls often come in bonded pairs, the
    troll and the antitroll. These pairs behave oddly: sometimes
    reinforcing one another, sometimes cancelling each other out.
    Occasionally a troll loses its antitroll partner and can then behave
    quite unpredictably, according to the rules of chaos: firing off random
    quarks (known as "posts") in an attempt to bond with a new antitroll.
    The existence of trolls was first proved by Hans Akrosstheocean in his
    famous "double-prat experiment", or the "experiment with two morons".

    Trolls, whether bonded to antitrolls or not, also interact with
    neusgroupinos. Neusgroupinos are stable hadrons with a tendency to
    resist interaction with trolls. As far as the troll is concerned, this
    resistance comes about through the neusgroupino's outer shell, or
    CLIQUE (I will explain the etymology of this term later). CLIQUEs are
    generally impervious to trolls, unless the troll has a particular
    "spin" that conforms to the already-existing structure of the
    neusgroupino. Most trolls possess either "top" or "bottom" spin as well
    as other "strange" or "charmed" characteristics. For instance, a given
    neusgroupino may interact with "charmed, bottom" trolls, but not
    "strange, top" ones.

    If a CLIQUE resists interaction with the troll, this can again cause
    unpredictable activity. The troll may fire off quark/posts in an
    attempt to break down the integrity of the neusgropino. These bursts of
    activity do not last long. Eventually, the troll decays, although many
    are more persistent than others.

    However, I have not yet touched upon the most interesting part of this
    theory at all, the element that reveals the central mystery of Tantrum
    Mechanics. It is this: _the CLIQUE only exists from the "perspective"
    of the troll_. From within the neusgroupino, particles are free to come
    and go. Indeed, the "outer shell", the perceived CLIQUE, is not a
    unified, integral and impervious entity at all. Many particles are
    quite free to interact with the neusgroupino, regardless of spin, as
    long as they do not take on the specific characteristics of the troll.
    It is impossible to state with certainty whether or not a given
    particle internal to the neusgroupino is in this outer shell at any
    given time or not. This is known as _Wilkinson's Uncertainty
    Principle_.

    Hence the derivation of the term CLIQUE: an acronym for CLearly
    Imaginary QUantum Entity.

    Thank you.

  51. hooha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Bulwer-Lytton's by (David Pacheco)'

    It seemed so long ago, and yet at the same time not so long ago, but
    only from the perspective of a twin traveling at close to light speed
    away from the original observer.

    "I'm yours!" she exclaimed lustily, as he tried desperately to contain
    the nosebleed.

    "Onomatopaeia," he thought to himself against the drip-drip backdrop of
    the rain as he petted his meowing cat, while the tick-tock of the
    hallway grandfather clock synchronized with the thump-thump of his
    heart, "is really fucking annoying."

    As he fell backwards into the Time Distortion Loop, Lt. Michaels had
    less than a second to pull the trigger on his Gravitational Field
    Modifier, which would pull him out in the nick of time and allow him to
    save the Earth from assured destruction, but unfortunately he had left
    the safety on.

    Melinda Gates cursed her husband's tardiness, as her pregnancy entered
    its thirty-sixth month.

    "Don't do it!" I yelled as I woke up from the dream in which I relived
    the moment when she died, for the tenth time in as many days... and as
    the sobs racked my body, I tried to push out of my head the image of her
    with the gun to her head, the trigger being pulled in slow motion, and
    my surprise at the amount of blood inside a cocker spaniel.

    "Anthropomorphism," grumbled Peter Cottontail as he rubbed the calluses
    on his feet caused by human-shaped shoes on feet that were never meant
    to wear them, "is a bitch."

    I surveyed the carnage once more, trying to remain clinically detached
    as my razor-like mind took in the detail of the blood everywhere, on the
    walls, on the floor... the corpses, the lifeless eyes of the victims, as
    I wondered "Who the hell eats this much chicken?"

    Space travel has its drawbacks, and the crew of the Enterprise was about
    to discover one of them: authors with no imagination for inventing names
    for spaceships, and authors with a particular distaste for redshirts.

    "We're not in Kansas anymore, Toto" yelled the roadie as the tour bus
    passed the "Welcome to Omaha" sign.

    Pablo's hemorrhoids had been causing him discomfort for weeks, so the
    nail clippers seemed appropriate.

    "It's a good day to be alive!" cried the zombie.

  52. Interesting IP address. by egm · · Score: 1

    The Time Vector Server screen shot has a very interesting IP address: 132.123.5.17 and seems to be assigned to the Army National Guard Bureau. Are they developing/testing the software or was it just a random IP with a interesting owner?

  53. What a juxtaposition of new and old technology. by AFCArchvile · · Score: 1

    A 10/100 LAN on a 10 year old space shuttle, that's a riot. Considering the laptop probably runs about 16 times faster than the five computers aboard the shuttle. Is it just me or does NASA seem extremely behind the times? (well, at least they aren't junking the entire rocket in space like they did in the sixties; I think we already have a space trash asteroid belt)

    --
    "Ancillary does not mean you get to rule the world." --U.S. Circuit Judge Harry Edwards, speaking to the FCC's lawyer
    1. Re:What a juxtaposition of new and old technology. by sxpert · · Score: 1

      no, they have to use old stuff, as it also need to be somewhat radiation resistant (they have to change the laptops every onece in a while, as charged particles f**k chips up
      remember, when they changed the computer on Hubble, they installed a special 486 which was "hardened" that cost about 5 grand per processor...

    2. Re:What a juxtaposition of new and old technology. by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      I have to say, your sig is hilarious when compared to the rest of your message. You're bashing NASA for being behind the times, and then you go on and say that simply having the ability isn't enough reason to go ahead and do something. Sure NASA could upgrade those five slow computers that run things. But guess what: they work! They work very well! Plus, they've been tested for twenty years, so it's known that they are very reliable. What more could they do with more modern equipment in that context?

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
  54. Re:Duct Tape In Space! Slightly OT by Elgon · · Score: 1

    My Pa always has a saying,

    'A good laboratory runs on three things: Mars Bars, Blutack and Araldite.'

    Although I prefer 'A good scientist/techie/engineer (delete as appropriate) amways has the following three things to hand: Dr Pepper, Duct tape and wherever possible, pizza.'

    Elgon

  55. Deorbit Manager? by dr_strangelove · · Score: 1

    Well... I guess it coulda been worse.

    They could have called it "DeOrbit Wizard"...

    Oy!

    --
    "...they may harpoon us, but they ain't gonna pick us up on no radar screen!"
  56. Re: Using a Mouse in Space by Alien54 · · Score: 2
    I can remeber trackballs embedded into the tops of radar workstations on navy ships. They were the size of bowling balls, but maybe only exposed 60 degrees of surface area. I actually like them alot, and everything else has seemed to be way too small for my taste since then. In this context, this type of technology embedded into an arm rest or desktop might be interesting.

    - - - - - - - -
    "Never apply a Star Trek solution to a Babylon 5 problem."

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  57. Re:Duct Tape In Space! (Troll?) by JanKotz · · Score: 1

    Some slashbot probably took exception to explaining that the Russians use duct tape because they are stupid, rather than making some lame, dated joke about the long lines expreienced during the communist era and saying that they didn't pack any because the wait was four weeks.
    --

    --
    "A witty saying proves nothing" - Voltaire
  58. i have not read any replies by (void+*)0x00000000UL · · Score: 1

    yet I'm sure there will be a million message saying "What? The NASA runs windows software on the shuttle ?"

  59. Re:My Question by wierdo · · Score: 1

    Well, like I said earlier, unless the heat sinks are properly configured, you could very easily burn out the processor by overcloaking it. Part of the problem with heat dissipation in space (and part of the problem with breathing...) is the lack of gravity. With no natural breeze, you get the same air trapped around the processor.

    The configuration of the heat sink has nothing to do with it. Assuming that the computer in question at least has a fan, the lack of gravity shouldn't affect its cooling in any way. In an actual vacuum, however, there will be very little heat dissipation, since radiating heat off takes quite a while, as opposed to heat transfer through another substance.

    Now, yes, you can use fans to move air about. But how do the fans work in 0 G? (Well, microgravity, but pretty much the same thing...) I imagine that the fans have to be reconfigured as well.

    Fans work just as well in microgravity, assuming that they're attached to something to keep them from moving. All a fan does is push air away from it. (relatively speaking, of course) Since your standard heatsink is attached to the processor or motherboard in some way, that's not a problem. The only problem would be the exhaust of the air from the case, which would produce a force enough to move the laptop around, probably. But that's why they velcro the things down.

    I also imagine that the boards have to be reinforced to withstand the forces during takeoff, as well as the screen... the mouse is simple; use the same little pad you normally do with laptops.

    I wouldn't see why. The forces aren't more than 20 g's I'm sure, and most hard drives, when off, are rated for anywhere from 30 to 60G's. The LCD screen, however, I don't know enough about to know whether the G forces would affect it, but I wouldn't have any reason to believe that it wouldn't work. The actual circuit boards also tend to be fairly well attached to the case, and therefore wouldn't have much capacity for shifting, so wouldn't be damaged by the G's either. In short, one's standard computer would probably work fairly well in microgravity. Even most CD-ROM drives would probably work, given that they usually have those little tabs to keep the disc from doing weird things when you mount the drive sideways.

    -Nathan


    Care about freedom?
    --
    Care about freedom?
    Become a card carrying member of the GOA.
  60. Sigh. by slothbait · · Score: 2

    Sigh... Figures we'd get a reaction like that from the six-digit-account-number crowd. Slashdot isn't what it used to be.

    I might expect such a comment from a five-digit-account-number poster like yourself. Slashdot isn't what it used to be. Far Side pics? On Slashdot? How frivolous! I remember back when the only acceptable allusions on Slashdot were to man pages, Linus quotes, and kernel source. What a soft lot we've become...

    Besides, any real geek would have thought up a Monty Python reference.

    --Lenny, who owns a dachshund

    1. Re:Sigh. by ptomblin · · Score: 3

      I might expect such a comment from a five-digit-account-number poster like yourself. Slashdot isn't what it used to be.

      Geez, you over 2000-account-number guys are touchy, aren't you? Why, back in my day...

      --
      The next Cmdr Taco duplicate will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!
    2. Re:Sigh. by drendite · · Score: 3

      And don't even get me started on those two-plus-digit-account-numbers ..

    3. Re:Sigh. by nathanh · · Score: 1

      "This is a DEAD dachshund. It is DECEASED. KAPUT. Gone to dachshund heaven. If it hadn't been nailed to the kennel it would have fallen off."

    4. Re:Sigh. by shogun · · Score: 1

      Lets not say to much about those people with non-prime numbered account numbers too.

  61. Someone beat you to it. by _anomaly_ · · Score: 1
    Yep, it's true.
    Destination Mir

    --
    "I have no special gift, I am only passionately curious." - Albert Einstein
  62. Quirks-- porn? by Gefiltefish · · Score: 1

    I wonder what "quirks" the astronauts have run into while surfing the big porn sites... I imagine zero-g could present some major problems in that department.

  63. Re:Oh, no...(very OT) by jonnythan · · Score: 1

    I have to agree with my other anonymous poster regarding your grammar skills. The sentence beginning "As to quoting" is a run-on.

    The sentence beginning "So I appreciate your comment" has a comma splice: the comma before "and sympathise [sic]" is incorrect. Additionally, The following comma should be a period.

    I'm not going to touch the last paragraph - the beginning is a mess and not a complete sentence at all. The last sentence is also a fragment.

    Enjoy..and let me know if you need an editor for some papers ;)

  64. Re:Oh, no...(very very very very OT) by emerson · · Score: 1

    >I suppose that it comes from the programming mindset - sort of analagous to avoiding overlapping tags in html?

    I tend to think of it sort of programmatically, too -- precedence of operators... "" go outside punctuation, () inside, etc, etc.... In any case, programmatic language conventions ("asdf","foo","bar") are as inapplicable to English as German ones (compound words, capitalized common nouns, etc).

    (*shrug) All of this stemming from me being anal-retentive Grammar Cop; I'm the one that corrects my friends when they split infinitives.

    >Leaving aside that I ought to say "an unix" and not "a unix" that is.

    Not necessarily -- the a/an rule is one of what the French call elison, which is a rule of spoken language, putting in a spare consonant between distinct vowel sounds in separate words. You wouldn't say 'an unix' any more than you'd say 'an yo-yo' -- conversely, 'an historical event' is correct for the same reason 'an isthmus' is.


    --

  65. Amazing piece of hardware! by hhg · · Score: 1

    I want to buy myself one of those shuttles too!

  66. The Immortal 750 by fm6 · · Score: 1
    ThinkPad models have been flown in space since 1993 starting with the 750C model. One of the 750C models is likely to set a record for time spent in space inasmuch as it was left in Mir's collision damaged (and now abandoned) Spektr module.

    Someone should retrieve that sucker. The various 750s seem destined to live forever. I bought a couple of remaindered base 750s several years ago because they were cheap. I was suprised to find an active user base for this box. I was even able to get an unauthorized copy of the stylus driver for Win95 that IBM never released. You can still buy memory, 1-gig disks, and spare batteries. Doesn't support a lot of later Thinkpad goodies (such as the drop-in Zip drive), alas.

    The base 750 is a particularly interesting model. It has a very nice gray-scale display, and folds flat so you can use it as a sort of book-sized PDA. Alas, if you use it in this mode, you're pretty much stuck with running Win3.1 -- the 486 doesn't have enough cycles to run both the handwriting recognition (which is pretty good) and a 32-bit OS.

  67. In space, nobody can hear you scream.... by Eggplant62 · · Score: 1

    When your Thinkpad blue screens while running NT or Win95. Yeah, I can see it now. "Hold on, Houston, I have to reboot the PGCS, it just locked up on me."

    1. Re:In space, nobody can hear you scream.... by llornkcor · · Score: 1

      If you listen or watch NASA-TV, you would know that they HAVE had to 'reboot' on occasion, actually, a power cycle. I think, on the last mission, they had to power cycle their printer server.

    2. Re:In space, nobody can hear you scream.... by Dest · · Score: 1

      During that mission they were still using outdated technology, right?

  68. overclocking in the vaccuum of space by tonyt · · Score: 1

    this is a serious question.

    how much could you over clock a processor in the coldness of space?

    would you need to shield from gamma rays or solor wind or whatever the hell is out in space?

    is it true that in space, no one can hear you overheat?

    --
    -=tonyt=-
    1. Re:overclocking in the vaccuum of space by Dest · · Score: 1

      But space is like -something degrees dude

    2. Re:overclocking in the vaccuum of space by nihilogos · · Score: 2

      how much could you over clock a processor in the coldness of space?

      Not much, cooling devices for CPUs rely on conductive and convective methods of transferring heat away from the CPU. In the vacuum, which I imagine is what you meant by the 'coldness of space' the only available method of heat transfer is radiative. And for a running CPU this isn't much.

      --
      :wq
  69. Re:Oh, no...(very very very very OT) by belroth · · Score: 1
    Splitting infinitives is something that not all linguists disparage. I used to avoid this but after hearing a professor of English explaining it as being acceptable I am less bothered by it. :-)

    From the OED:
    elision: the act of dropping out or suppresing a letter or syllable in pronunciation.
    What you may mean is
    liaison: french phonetics. The joining of a final consonant (which would in pause or before a consonant be silent) to a following word beginning with a vowel or 'mute' h. &ltibid.&gt

    Philosophically written language must derive from the oral, surely?
    I suppose it's another vagary of the non-phonetic nature of written english that there are multiple vowel sounds for the same symbol:
    we have an umbrella and a unix, and even I'm not going to start saying "an oonix" instead of "a yoonix"!

    I do get irritated by the grammar checker in Word informing me that I use the passive voice excessively. I know what I'm trying to say and it's how I was taught to write reports.
    No-one has told me why USians use "of" in the way I mentioned though.... :-)
    ----

    --
    I hereby inform you that I have NOT been required to provide any decryption keys.
  70. Re:it occurs to me by CmdData · · Score: 1

    Excuse me but I happen to work for a company that has one of the largest NT server farms in the US and our LAN guys are always having major problems with MS Exchange, WINS, and just TCP/IP problems in general. And IBM's SNA protocol on NT totally sucks. As far as Linux doing all that stuff you mentioned, well that is easy for Linux to do on a much smaller system. Run X/KDE, serve 500 client computers with sql server, SAMBA server for file sharing to those same 500 clients. And much more. I do it every day. The things you mentioned that your win* box can do is easy because they are not I/O intensive.

  71. NO ONE is setting foot on my station! by ComradePenguin · · Score: 1
    Me and Comrade M claimed this orbiting bucket of bolts months ago on Everything2, Russia's been nice enough to let us stay here, and now some corporate jerk decides to award trips here with out my consent?

    Prepare my Ion Cannon! I'm going to transform into Senshi Red and take some names!
    ------------------------

    --
    ------------------------
    Thus Spake ComradePenguin
  72. Re:Well, considering the shuttle is mid-70's tech. by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

    Sure, but do you have enough faith in what this crowd could develop collectively to bet your life on it?

    NASA never uses the latest thing because they test their stuff out rigorously. And honestly, I'm happy with that. Some day Andy Griffith will make it into space, but not just yet.

    --
    -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
  73. Space Shuttle, Space Station by Applied+Alliteration · · Score: 1
    Surely space should shoulder sharing symbolisms. Shouldn't such scientific success show superior social savy?

    "Share!", say psychologists.

    "Space!", say scientists.

    "Share Space!", say savvy social studiers, seeing surrounding success superfluous, showing sound sense.


    -Intense introspection
    -Into interesting interpretations
    -Involving intellectual indulgences

  74. Gives new meaning to a Windows CRASH... by Shanep · · Score: 1

    Ahhhhhh, Huston... We have a blue screen...

    --
    War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?
  75. Re:Oh, no...(very OT) by belroth · · Score: 1
    I have to agree with my other anonymous poster regarding your grammar skills. The sentence beginning "As to quoting" is a run-on. I hope this comment was not too serious, or I shall have to start making much longer posts and quote the previous two or three posts to provide full context, and not use the customary conversational style ;-)
    e.g.
    emerson: I think you mean "not the first."

    belroth: Oh yes - "not the first" :-)
    That's what comes of previewing for spelling and not content!

    emerson:And, yeah, the rules for quoting have been slipping (sadly) over the years, but the exceptions that are allowable have to do with changing the meaning of an actual quotation. In this case, quotation marks are being used to set off a word as interesting, not as an indicator of something someone actually said. So, the punctuation-inside rule should hold here.

    belroth: As to quoting, I use "geek" (ahem) quoting almost exclusively, so to me the "interesting" is a semantic element in its own right and I would put the comma after it, as if it were a word that is spelt with quotation marks.
    I suppose that it comes from the programming mindset - sort of analagous to avoiding overlapping tags in html?

    etc. etc.
    I suppose that comes of using a conversational mode for discussing written style.
    So, no it would be a run-on if taken in isolation, but the rest of the thread isn't taken that way so why pick on this message and not its parent also?
    I admit to not understaing your objection to my use of the comma, in my view I incorrectly capitalised "it" and the sentence has two commas - i.e. I did not omit a full stop. The "[sic]" is debatable because I suspect we are from opposing sides of the Atlantic and you refer to the 's'/'z' spelling option?.

    Why is the last Paragraph a mess? I will plead guilty to bad formatting, I thought the
    &LT BR&GT tag after "saying" would make it easier to read, but it didn't.
    The last sentence could have been better phrased "Ignoring the question of whether one should use 'an unix' or 'a unix'.".

    When I write papers I use a highly formal style, unlike that used by most posters to slashdot.


    ----
    --
    I hereby inform you that I have NOT been required to provide any decryption keys.
  76. Have you considered by dr_labrat · · Score: 1

    putting your slashdot account on ebay...?

    --
    The secret of success is honesty and fair dealing. If you can fake those, you've got it made. (Marx)
  77. Re:Oh, no...(very very very very OT) by emerson · · Score: 1

    >after hearing a professor of English explaining it as being acceptable I am less bothered by it. :-)

    Yah. I've heard a lot of things described as acceptable that I still think of as inelegant. Mostly it seems to me that if you have to split an infinitive, your sentence is constructed in an unclear fashion in the first place. But that's just me.

    >elision: the act of dropping out or suppresing a letter or syllable in pronunciation.
    >liaison: french phonetics. The joining of a final consonant (which would in pause or before a consonant be silent) to a following word beginning with a vowel or 'mute' h.

    Le Doh! I thought I had those two straight. Been a few years since high school, it seems. I stand corrected.

    >No-one has told me why USians use "of" in the way I mentioned though.... :-)

    At least it's not as bad as 'should of' or 'would of,' which I see in print from people that should know better, all the time....


    --

  78. Blue Screen? by kevlar · · Score: 2

    And what happens when their Winblows box blue screens?

    1. Re:Blue Screen? by mindstrm · · Score: 2

      Like the article says; the way they have things set up, it's no big deal. A quick restart, and they are back to a known.

      Remember, it doesn't *MATTER* what the OS is capable of, only that the apps they need to run run with acceptable reliability.

      These aren't flight control computers with realtime acquisition and feedback.. those are custom built.

      They are PC's, for general purpose stuff.

  79. BSODs by sheetsda · · Score: 1
    Anyone else reminded of the BSODs in airport terminals, ATMs, big outdoor screens, etc.?
    "NASA" =~ s/N/MS/;

    "// this is the most hacked, evil, bastardized thing I've ever seen. kjb"

  80. Re:Oh, no...(very very very very OT) by belroth · · Score: 1
    Yah. I've heard a lot of things described as acceptable that I still think of as inelegant. Mostly it seems to me that if you have to split an infinitive, your sentence is constructed in an unclear fashion in the first place. But that's just me.

    I agree, I still try to avoid it where reasonable, but there are occasion where I would have to contort a sentence beyond other peoples tolerance. I am still this picky sometimes though!

    At least it's not as bad as 'should of' or 'would of,' which I see in print from people that should know better, all the time....

    You have no argument here ;-)
    I object less to sloppy english where the meaning is clear, but I still object.

    One of the english misuses which irritates me most is a gem from London Underground:
    "passengers must produce on demand a valid ticket for their entire journey" - so when someone asks I have to hold my ticket up for an hour? Why can't they think about getting word order right sometimes?
    ----

    --
    I hereby inform you that I have NOT been required to provide any decryption keys.
  81. Re:Duct Tape In Space! Slightly OT by dhuff · · Score: 1
    'A good laboratory runs on three things: Mars Bars, Blutack and Araldite.'

    OK, I got curious and looked up the last, two items. Blu-Tack is a clay-like, reusable adhesive made by Bostik. Here's a page that describes it.

    Araldite 502 is an epoxy resin embedding medium. Here's a page that describes it as well.

  82. They seem to use Inprise C++ builder by sxpert · · Score: 1

    If you check the icon at the top left of the screen capture there it is the standard icon for C++ builder apps (hey they could recompile everything using Kylix...)

  83. Re:the sig by AFCArchvile · · Score: 1

    My signature is my statement against the Javascript programmers, the Perl-script llamas, and those kernel-weasels out there coding "just because." At least NASA has some rhyme and reason for their actions. Lightning just struck nearby, so I'll shut up for now.

    --
    "Ancillary does not mean you get to rule the world." --U.S. Circuit Judge Harry Edwards, speaking to the FCC's lawyer
  84. Re:HD in low air pressure by starman97 · · Score: 1

    If the pressure drops too low, wont the heads crash on the platter. Hard drives rely on a 'cushion' of air under the head. If the air pressure drops, that means the head is going to get closer to the platter, making head crashes more likely. If the laptop is exposed to vacuum while the disk is spinning, then there will be no gap between the head and platter...

    --
    Starman97@Gmail.com (bring it on spammers)
  85. Velcro on the pad by DragonHawk · · Score: 2

    Duct tape and velcro are holding our space program together?

    Remember Apollo 13?

    Remember Apollo 1? Velcro in a high-pressure, high-oxygen environment is what turned a small spark into a fire that killed three astronauts.

    --

    dragonhawk@iname.microsoft.com
    I do not like Microsoft. Remove them from my email address.
    1. Re:Velcro on the pad by Velox_SwiftFox · · Score: 1

      Nope, the pure oxygen environment at high (earth) pressure made a good fraction of the capsule's interior - wiring insulation, etc - highly flammable. The solution, of course, was to not use so much oxygen, not to blame the concept of hook-and-loop fasteners and abandon those.

    2. Re:Velcro on the pad by gorilla · · Score: 3
      Where do you get this idea?

      The Offical findings include

      • No single ignition source of the fire was conclusively identified.
      • The Command Module contained many types and classes of combustible material in areas contiguous to possible ignition sources.
      • Coolant leakage at solder joints has been a chronic problem.
      • The coolant is both corrosive and combustible.
      • Deficiencies in design, manufacture, installation, rework and quality control existed in the electrical wiring.
      • These deficiencies created an unnecessarily hazardous condition and their continuation would imperil any future Apollo operations.
      • The Command Module Environmental Control System design provides a pure oxygen atmosphere.
      • This atmosphere presents severe fire hazards if the amount and location of combustibles in the Command Module are not restricted and controlled.

      The only mention I can find of velcro in the whole report is when velcro straps burn, but this is some 15 seconds after the start of the fire, so they're obviously not the cause.

  86. Space Cownerds: I can see it now. by Chas · · Score: 1

    Linus Torvalds is working on a satellite in orbit, stripping out the Windows OS and installing Linux.

    From the top of the screen, John "Maddog" Hall floats in, inverted, wearing sunglasses with a big, evil grin on his face.....


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  87. Re:the sig by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

    Yeah, different situations and motivations. I realize your quote doesn't quite apply, but it's still amusing to see two sentiments that are so different expressed right next to each other by the same person.

    --
    Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
  88. Lunar-based server solutions... by No+Such+Agency · · Score: 1
    Just install an overclocked server farm on the far side of the moon...

    Well, it'd do well, for a while (assuming you had a way to dissipate CPU heat that didn't involve blowing air at it with a fan!). Of course, what you're forgetting is that the "far side" of the moon is NOT the "DARK side" of the moon. When the moon is between the sun and the Earth, your "far side server" would cook real nice in the unshielded sunlight.

    (edit) Of course, there are some deep crater floors near the lunar poles which are probably in permanent darkness. You could try one of those. You'll still feel dumb when some socketed component thermo-creeps out of place and it costs you $500 million for a service call.

    --
    Freedom: "I won't!"
  89. Too much velcro is a bad thing. by AgentGray · · Score: 1

    Apollo 1

    Wasn't it the velcro that was highly flammable in an oxygen rich atmosphere?

    I imagine that the air composition and the velcro problems since then have been resolved...

    --
    "Power corrupts. PowerPoint corrupts absolutely."
    1. Re:Too much velcro is a bad thing. by hengist · · Score: 1

      Velcro under normal atmospheric pressure in air does not burn readily at all (it just kind of melts). Velcro under high-pressure pure oxygen (a la Apollo 1) will explode into flame quite happily. The shuttle does not use a pure oxygen atmosphere, it is closer to ordinary air (an O/N mix). This is why astronauts have to pre-breathe pure oxygen before going EVA, they have to purge the nitrogen from their bloodstreams.

  90. Great Link; waaay more interesting than /.'s! by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 1
    This is the sort of thing that Slashdotters should be reading and writing about. If we really held, say, Linux to standards anything close to those described in the article, maan, would we have stability!

    It is not a big stretch to think that the problem with most software--planning too loosely, coding too soon--is worse for OSS than for commercial software. OSS really is a patchwork of code looking for a purpose. The whole point is that there is no overarching script. (That would be boring, as I am sure writing shuttle code is).

    Then again, there are companies around who could easily afford to fork out $35Mil for 500,000 lines of perfect code. There are good reasons why this doesn't happen. It takes a long time, is slow to adopt new features, discourages upgrades, and apparently wastes lots of paper (read the linked article!). Still, we can dream of an enlightened government, or a federation of governments, that recruits an army of patient but otherwise ordinary programmers to write a 5,000,000 line operating system and then distributes it for free. Talk about a lubricant for the the digital economy--a perfectly-written OS! If the costs are comparable, this would run us about $350 Million. Hell, I think we've made movies that cost more! I'm sure that if you add the money spent each year by just the European governments it comes to more than this.

    The more I think about it the more I find it stupid that no governments have done this already. It seems this would start paying off pretty quickly as they eliminate the need to import software, plus they would save their citizens money which would have gone to Microsoft and can now go to buying more domestic products (provided the country in question is not the US). Plus, imagine the increases in productivity created by a perfectly architectured and coded operating system. I hold out little hope that my country (the US) is enlightened enough to do this, with all the lobbying power from the software supercompanies. Canada is our bitch so we wouldn't let them try this either. Fine. But how about Europe, or India? Why is China doodling around with Linux when they should be writing the perfect OS from scratch? (Because they're cheap bastards and they want results soon, two reasons I can understand, but still I think it's a shame.)

    Well, anyway, interesting article, thanks for the link.

    Dave

    1. Re:Great Link; waaay more interesting than /.'s! by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      If the costs are comparable, this would run us about $350 Million. Hell, I think we've made movies that cost more! I'm sure that if you add the money spent each year by just the European governments it comes to more than this.

      Dumb Americans.

  91. Fine, how about... by Kris_J · · Score: 3
    "In space, no one can hear you segfault."

    Although inhabitants of nearby planets might catch a brief flash...

  92. A conventional mouse wouldn't work.. by schon · · Score: 2

    A conventional mouse relies on gravity to work.. take away the gravity, the mouse becomes useless

    If you need proof, try this:

    Turn your mouse upside down (or on its' side, any orientation that's not normal), and place a book over the bottom, then move the book around.. you'll notice that the screen pointer doesn't move..

    Ball point pens don't work in zero G either, for similar reasons.

    Optical mice would be a different story

    1. Re:A conventional mouse wouldn't work.. by gorilla · · Score: 2
      Depends a lot on the design of the mouse.

      Some have lots of room within the ball compartment, so if gravity isn't pulling the ball to the hole, the ball falls (or floats) away. Other designs have a tight ball compartment, so they're not affected.

      (Hope this message isn't filtered as pr0n, with all this talk of tight balls)

    2. Re:A conventional mouse wouldn't work.. by leperjuice · · Score: 1
      Ball point pens don't work in zero G either, for similar reasons.

      Ah, but you forget the power of Wacky American Ingenuity.

      From what I understand, all they did was pressurize the ink to keep it flowing in zero-G.

      On a side note, and this may be an urban legend, but it apparently cost millions of taxpayer dollars to design and fabricate this pen that would write in space (first flown in 1967). The Russians just used pencils.

      --

      -- "I am disrespectful to dirt. Can you not see that I am serious!"

  93. Re: Using a Mouse in Space by Kris_J · · Score: 1

    Surely you'd use a trackpad to keep the size and number of moving parts to a minimum. You can even get external ones of these, should you wish.

  94. Re:My Question by Kris_J · · Score: 2
    With no natural breeze, you get the same air trapped around the processor.
    I work in an office like this. With no fan, if I run my fanless Ultralight at 100% (MP3s, SETI@home, D.Net, etc) from the beginning of the day it crashes between 2-4pm. But any fan even vaguely close to the unit will cool it sufficently for surviving the whole day.
  95. Gives you Linux Zealots something to think about by NeoMeridian · · Score: 1


    MS Windows apps on the Shuttle; gives you Linux Zealots something to think about, eh?

    I suppose you'll all be mail-bombing NASA now about their choice of OS.

  96. Readily available cooling... by Dan+Jagnow · · Score: 1

    Want to overclock that hardware? Imagine running a bundle of cable through the skin of the craft so you could put your CPU out in space. A fan wouldn't do much for you there!

    --
    The heart has reasons that reason does not understand. - Jacques Bènigne Bossuet
  97. Re:That's fake! by The_Messenger · · Score: 1
    Demand the real goatse.cx, do not accept cheap ass substitutes.

    Now when you say that, do you mean a subsitute that is "cheap ass[ed]", or an ass substitute that is cheap?

    ---------///----------
    All generalizations are false.

    --

    --
    I like to watch.

  98. Shuttle avionics hardware / software interesting.. by Johnzo · · Score: 1
    Not exactly on-topic, but there's a lot of awesome information about shuttle engineering available at http://www.ksc.nasa.gov/shu ttle/technology/sts-newsref/.

    In particular, I was impressed with the avionics computers and software. They have five computers to handle this. During ascent and descent, four of them are running identical software concurrently, and any two computers can vote another out of the loop, if they sense it's malfunctioning. The fifth computer runs an avionics package with identical specs but from a different vendor, in case a bug is discovered in the primary software. The captain or pilot can drop to the alternate software with a press of a button.

    This is all pretty impressive stuff to me .. I'm just a Web peon who has to write and maintain Perl scripts. Never seen such an interesting exhibition of how stuff is engineered when lives are on the line.

  99. Re:Gives you Linux Zealots something to think abou by MadCamel · · Score: 1

    Perhaps. I think BSD would b the best choice however, much more stable. The problem is, there would have to be a very usable GUI that the astronauts wouldn't need much training for. They have enough things to worry about don't you think? I would say FreeBSD with fvwm95, a UI that they are probably already familiar with. Linux has it's place, but not in mission critical applications imho. They should not be running windows however.

  100. Space is Not Cold yo ! by javaDragon · · Score: 1

    The void of Space has simply No Temperature.
    The problem is to evacuate heat.
    Just think that Thermos bottles have a double envelope with void in between, just to keep the coffee hot longer.

    --
    -- javaDragon is an instance of JavaDragon.
  101. IPN Interplanetary Network by os2mac · · Score: 1

    they had a couple of links to a story about it... FSCK being a shuttle sysadmin. Imagine what being the Sysadmin of Jupiter would like like on your resume.

    --
    "I don't code the things you use, I make the code your things use better."®
  102. Re:Gives you Linux Zealots something to think abou by Bat+Breath · · Score: 1

    I *really* wouldn't want to see the blue screen of death on a space station. Brrrrrr! I get the willies just thinkin' about it!

    --
    --- Millihelen -- The amount of beauty required to launch a single ship.
  103. COPYLEFT by laptop006 · · Score: 1

    'nuf said
    --
    Laptop006 (RHCE: That means I know what I'm talking about! When talking about linux at least...)

    --
    /* FUCK - The F-word is here so that you can grep for it */
  104. Eudora upgrade offer in Earth's gravity well? by Limited+Vision · · Score: 1

    So, if someone on the station installed Eudora and upgraded to the paid version, would they get a statue on the lawn of Qualcomm's headquarters?

  105. Think different by Pseudonymus+Bosch · · Score: 2

    I would expect that in 0 or low gravity, designers would be free of many of the constraints operating on Earth-bound computers.

    Laptops? I would have imagined thinks like that personal assistant floating ball that Slashdot said NASA found in Star Wars.

    Imagine computers around you, portables, projection screens, holograms, keyboards on your trousers, shaped as a ball, a tube, wahtever, but no laptops.
    __

    --
    __
    Men with no respect for life must never be allowed to control the ultimate instruments of death.
    GW Bu
  106. I can see the headlines now.. by Zeddicus_Z · · Score: 1
    Reuters 24/12/2000, 1705GMT;

    "NASA Astronaughts aboard the International Space Station turn on new multibillion dollar Hybrid Astro-Computational K-rad Eratta Disseminator computer system only to be greeted by...

    "j00 r 0w3nd b|47h"

    --
    Janie took my gun...
  107. Overclocking on the Far Side by wiredog · · Score: 1

    Just install an overclocked server farm on the far side of the moon, and watch how fast they go in the insane temperatures.

    Especially during the day when it hits 200+ in the full sunlight!

  108. wouldn't make a difference by CausticPuppy · · Score: 1

    Since hard drives today are designed to perform identically in any physical orientation with respect to gravity (ie sideways, upside down) then it seems it would perform the same if there wasn't any gravity at all.

    --
    -CausticPuppy "Of all the people I know, you're certainly one of them." -Somebody I don't know
  109. oops by CausticPuppy · · Score: 1

    Er... Naturally, I meant moment of inertia of the platters, and the motor's torque.

    --
    -CausticPuppy "Of all the people I know, you're certainly one of them." -Somebody I don't know
  110. alpha software? by unsui · · Score: 1

    Anyone notice the prominent "(Alpha)" notice on the Shadow screenshot?

    Can't imagine it's referring to the CPU, either.

    --
    semper ubi sub ubi
  111. Use the duct tape, Luke! by VSarkiss · · Score: 1
    Duct tape is just like the Force: it has a light side, a dark side, and it keeps the universe together.

    Not original, but I forgot where I heard it.

  112. no wealth of info there by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

    Yeah that hard lock really gave you a log or wealth of info.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    1. Re:no wealth of info there by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      The 'No mouse found' message in the log was a dead giveaway, and it was due to me not inserting the right module for my USB mouse. And what useful debugging info does 'Windows is waiting for the close program dialog' on a blue screen give you exactly?

  113. Re:HD in low air pressure by leperjuice · · Score: 1
    Perhaps not. Hard drive heads fly across the platters because of the Bernoulli principle.

    So basically the head acts as an airplane wing, and this helps act as a cushion for shocks and vibrations. However, since the heads are engineered to avoid contact (they don't just fall to the drive surface when you turn the machine off), I imagine that in a microgravity environment, if the air were non-destructivly evacuated from a hard drive (I.E. it didn't blow apart or happen while in use), the drive would probably keep working.

    But one small bump and the heads would probably go farming.

    Note: I am not a NASA engineer, and my use of the word probably reflects this.

    --

    -- "I am disrespectful to dirt. Can you not see that I am serious!"

  114. Re:cost of the OS is insignificant by fuckthetux · · Score: 1

    Yeah..off course..not a great deal but still it saves money..more important is that if Linux is not better then NT, why then not use the free OS? NT as a router is in my eyes a stupid choice....Linux is more suited for the job and is free..so?? Also Linux can run on older/cheaper equipment that also can push down their cost..so overall i would say: YES!

  115. Re:Overclocking Space is cold not HOT! by usagiy2k · · Score: 1

    true a vacuum is a perfect insulator. but that is against conduction and convection transfer of heat. conduction is from one material to another material. and convection is when a substance flows over another like air from a fan. what about radiation of heat? Laws of thermodynamics and equilibrium of heat and energy. an objects heat should attempt to create equilibrium with the space around it, which in this case is an incredibly vast vacuum. And because space as a vacuum has virtually no particles like atmosphere to hold an ambient temperature around the object to create equilibrium with, it should then theoretically lose all heat into space until it reaches absolute zero. Note: If heat isnt radiated in space, then neither should any other form of energy, but explain the sun and the stars. how do we see light from them, or feel heat from the sun (aside fromstreaming particles hitting us) if heat and energy is not raidated in a vacuum?

  116. Re:Duct Tape In Space! (Troll?) by wwphx · · Score: 1

    Why is it that I can see a comedy remake of Apollo 13 (or any other space disaster movie) made with Tim "The Tool Man" Taylor?

    Personally, I think that'd be pretty cool!

    --

    --
    When you sympathize with stupidity, you start thinking like an idiot.
  117. ACK! No convection-cooling?! by Krioni · · Score: 1
    Great point, CausticPuppy!

    That would cause some problems for Apple's current trend. They use convection to cool the iBook (which I'm using now), the PowerBook, and the G4 Cube. And if I were NASA deciding to use a Mac in space, I'd prefer one of those smaller systems to a big (but super-importantly expandable, according to all negative reviews of the Cube) G4 mini-tower.

    Mac users better start petitioning Apple to add fans back in so Macs can work on on the space computer market-share!

    Man, I wish that was actually an issue. Space travel has really let me down. I know even the boomers thought we'd have regular civilian space flight by now.

    Oh well, maybe nanotech will make space-flight cheaper...oops, don't have that yet, either.

    --
    Lose essential liberties to get temporary safety = get only hassles and security theater.
  118. I could be wrong by DragonHawk · · Score: 1

    Where do you get this idea?

    From a documentary movie ("From the Earth to the Moon"), a book (I forget the title), and various. I could be wrong, and apparently am. I stand corrected.

    No single ignition source of the fire was conclusively identified.

    This I knew, but I wasn't saying otherwise.

    This atmosphere presents severe fire hazards if the amount and location of combustibles in the Command Module are not restricted and controlled.

    And, in the case of a high-pressure, pure-oxygen environment, just about anything can be considered a combustible. :-(

    --

    dragonhawk@iname.microsoft.com
    I do not like Microsoft. Remove them from my email address.