Provide Three examples - Since, for some reason know to know one but you, you are obsesed with my posting history it should not be a hard thing for you to do.
No, WoW is blowing everything away because of the gameplay AND the graphics as the graphics, while not the absolute best in the word, look great on the majority of systems out there even if the systems are not fully up to date.
Can't say the samething about some of the other MMORPGs
A child is any human under the age of 18 years. This would restrict the sale of almost every product to the under 18 age group as most products have the potential to cause harm.
Think about how expensive it would be to keep the under 18 age group away from all the potentialy harmful products...
"Why the fuck should stores have the right to sell potentially harmful things to children? "
The original post believes that stores should be prohibited, by the State, from selling anything that has the potential to harm a child. Every think I listed has the POTENTIAL to harm a child.
It's not about things being regulated, the OP wants the sale of 'potentially harmful' thinks BANNED.
This is rather fun, but you still need to provide three exampes, if I was wrong I will say so.
Otherwise you are just full of shit.
Re:Will someone please think of the parents?
on
The Law as a Parent
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
Damn near every house hold cleaner can kill you if you eat/drink it. So can batteries, OTC drugs, most automobile oils/fluids, food in glass jars and almost all toys are potentially harmful to kids.
Perhaps you need to rethink what you are saying as your lack of thinking things out makes you a dangerous person.
Perhaps you should read the GOP's Contract with America. They, like you, seem to have forgotten what they said they would do. But, hell, they are in power now so why should they keep any of their promises?
Just because the otherside does it too does mean your side doing it is OK.
Then explain Bush's support of the No Child Left Behind act and the Prescription Drug plan for seniors. Also, try defending his proposed military cuts.
No Child Left Behind Act. Pill plan for old people. Increased corp welfare spending. Social Security Agreement with Mexico. Cuts in the Military (1 CBG, delay in procurment of new ships for ht Navy and new hardware for the USMC) Goverment mandated mental helt screenings for school childern. Increased spending at the DoE (non NCLBA related)
The first two, over 10 years, equates to over 1.375 Trillion in NEW socialist spending...
Fuuny, but the 'Force of Arms' that is the US Military is one the seen and has been described, by the UN no less, as worth its weight in gold. I mean we have an entire Carrier battle group helping.
It also helps keep the petty thugs from acting on the disaster and trying to overthrow any of the countries affected by this.
No, a portion of the 'left over' money will be used to pay the millions that the Red Cross uses to pay the executives and to fund said execs perks. All the Red Cross expense records are public, so look it up for yourself and I think you will be suprised.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Slashdot Mirror
Provide Three examples - Since, for some reason know to know one but you, you are obsesed with my posting history it should not be a hard thing for you to do.
No, WoW is blowing everything away because of the gameplay AND the graphics as the graphics, while not the absolute best in the word, look great on the majority of systems out there even if the systems are not fully up to date.
Can't say the samething about some of the other MMORPGs
You can't even keep your story straight. Do I lie EVERY time or just every other time?
Please try to keep up.
A child is any human under the age of 18 years. This would restrict the sale of almost every product to the under 18 age group as most products have the potential to cause harm.
Think about how expensive it would be to keep the under 18 age group away from all the potentialy harmful products...
Try reading the post I responed to. From the OP:
"Why the fuck should stores have the right to sell potentially harmful things to children? "
The original post believes that stores should be prohibited, by the State, from selling anything that has the potential to harm a child. Every think I listed has the POTENTIAL to harm a child.
It's not about things being regulated, the OP wants the sale of 'potentially harmful' thinks BANNED.
I am willing to defend any of my posts, all you have to do is provide links which is something you refuse to do.
You might as well stop as I can keep this up forever.
This is rather fun, but you still need to provide three exampes, if I was wrong I will say so.
Otherwise you are just full of shit.
Damn near every house hold cleaner can kill you if you eat/drink it. So can batteries, OTC drugs, most automobile oils/fluids, food in glass jars and almost all toys are potentially harmful to kids.
Perhaps you need to rethink what you are saying as your lack of thinking things out makes you a dangerous person.
Provide 3 examples.
Perhaps you should read the GOP's Contract with America. They, like you, seem to have forgotten what they said they would do. But, hell, they are in power now so why should they keep any of their promises?
Just because the otherside does it too does mean your side doing it is OK.
Then explain Bush's support of the No Child Left Behind act and the Prescription Drug plan for seniors. Also, try defending his proposed military cuts.
No Child Left Behind Act.
Pill plan for old people.
Increased corp welfare spending.
Social Security Agreement with Mexico.
Cuts in the Military (1 CBG, delay in procurment of new ships for ht Navy and new hardware for the USMC)
Goverment mandated mental helt screenings for school childern.
Increased spending at the DoE (non NCLBA related)
The first two, over 10 years, equates to over 1.375 Trillion in NEW socialist spending...
Please point out my lies, and just because you don't agree with what I say doesn't mean it is a lie.
This is a post made on /.
We live on planet Earth.
Now you can never use that statment again as the above is a true statement.
And the fact that she bought 70 million US of GulfStream5s while laying off people shows that I am right and those degress do not mean shit.
Then explain the actions of the History Major that runs HP.
Her actions are all about making money and buying perks for her and her fellow execs.
No, under capitalism you are free to startup your own factory to make this product if you so desire.
Please provide ANY supporting proof that 'private' WoW servers exist.
You are leaving out the fact that those Red Cresent 'ambulances' were being used to transport armed terrorists, weapons and explosives.
But leaving that little bit out does help you 'prove ' your point.
Fuuny, but the 'Force of Arms' that is the US Military is one the seen and has been described, by the UN no less, as worth its weight in gold. I mean we have an entire Carrier battle group helping.
It also helps keep the petty thugs from acting on the disaster and trying to overthrow any of the countries affected by this.
No, a portion of the 'left over' money will be used to pay the millions that the Red Cross uses to pay the executives and to fund said execs perks. All the Red Cross expense records are public, so look it up for yourself and I think you will be suprised.
No, the RIAA is USING THE GOVERMENT to assist in the searching and that brings the USCON into the situation.
Please point out were I said it did.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.