The article states: Prior to the addition of the CC license on Klowner's wallpaper site, there was no specific copyright, although standard international copyrights still hold.
And since (link on the article) the default with regard to copyright on works (art, or whatever) is that if there is no mention of something else things are copyrighted. It would stand to reason that if Linspire "borrowed" the art before the artist changed to the CC license, they were still breaking copyright laws, and so would anyone else who without the authors explicit permission copied the work in question.
The fact that mutt (being a text client) only displayes text (you could open html emails in a browser if you really wanted but why would you), does not change that the email is bloated and are probably several times larger than the text really justifies, since som big JPEG image tags along.
No but the signature gives it more legal weight, since almost any idiot can write an email which appers to have been sent from your email (you could argue this in court). This is somewhat harder if your digital signature is on the email.
Slashdot Mirror
Seems more to me like they are saying they are spying on you:D ownload
http://www.alexa.com/site/help/privacy?&qterm=&p=
It would be, then again if the company you called did nothing about your inquiries what would you do but keep calling about the issue?
If you read the slashdot text it says 15 seconds to compile and "start" to boot the kernel, not 15 seconds to compile AND boot the kernel.
My guess it the kernel would probably be alot slower, since I doubt tinyCC optimises much
A large PI, in place of the Sigma means you multiply the terms instead of adding them.
The article states:
Prior to the addition of the CC license on Klowner's wallpaper site, there was no specific copyright, although standard international copyrights still hold.
And since (link on the article) the default with regard to copyright on works (art, or whatever) is that if there is no mention of something else things are copyrighted. It would stand to reason that if Linspire "borrowed" the art before the artist changed to the CC license, they were still breaking copyright laws, and so would anyone else who without the authors explicit permission copied the work in question.
The fact that mutt (being a text client) only displayes text (you could open html emails in a browser if you really wanted but why would you), does not change that the email is bloated and are probably several times larger than the text really justifies, since som big JPEG image tags along.
No but the signature gives it more legal weight, since almost any idiot can write an email which appers to have been sent from your email (you could argue this in court). This is somewhat harder if your digital signature is on the email.