It's interesting that FreeBSD influence is getting recognition at SUN... Maybe now they will be persuaded to support some of their products on FreeBSD.(aka Java, and yes, i know about the FreeBSD java group and their agreement on the 1.3.X jdk with sun)
Did anyone forget the Xbox developement Kit.. Which is basically a dual g5 powermac with a custome XP version on it. Plus windows WILL run on the PPC... The Xbox will be PPC, so there will be a version, which actually a lot of titles...
Hrmmm. I wonder if the next Gen of Xbox ModChips wont be add on cards to your favorite powermac.. hehe
Well, while not code forks per say.. the Berkley releases contributed much more than userland back to bell labs.. VM, tcp stack, scheduler, and so on...
SunOS 4.X and previous?/usr/ucb in later version, plus many other sprinkles? most of the newer parts of the original ATT code base WERE taken from BSD, aka, the USL lawsuit settlement..
Most other unixes have a LOT of BSD based userland... Not only by taking directly from the bsd releases, but by the mere fact that ATT ITSELF took some of the parts of the BSD releases.
But, replying to the prent above, that IS the whole point of BSD. This was PUBLIC university research, and as such, ALL tax payers, even corporations, are allowed equal access. A simple fact most of the GPL zealots forget. Public money, Public domain ( well, it should at least, lets not go into details.. hehe )
But like most people in the city, i take public transportation.. it's just not practical most
of the time to drive into the city. specially to go to work.
Step in to a nyc subway, and you will find ALL parts of the economic spectrum.. From homeless,
to CEO's...
So, it is possible to have a widely accepted mass transit system. You just HAVE to make it NEEDED, USEFUL , and RELIABLE.
( although after the damn 2 train became local, I don't know if I'll stick to the damn reliable part:-P )
They are pushing the use of source packages,
that would need to be compiled, hence, they can
adapt to each platform. They only advocated
the use of binary packahges when the developement
tools ( mainly gcc, automake ) are not available.
It's basically an RPM based FreeBSD ports tree.
Novel idea.. but am not sure the use of RPM
is the best choice...
They are pushing the use of source packages,
that would need to be compiled, hence, they can
adapt to each platform. They only advocated
the use of binary packahges when the developement
tools ( mainly gcc, automake ) are not available.
It's basically an RPM based FreeBSD ports tree.
Novel idea.. but am not sure the use of RPM
is the best choice...
Slashdot Mirror
A good vm should do enough accoutning to allow you to log back in and kill those.
So, try this in FreeBSD, and be amazed, now try it in any 2.4 or 2.6 linux kernel, and be disgusted.
Is it me or is the yahoo indexer more upto date
:) ).
;) hehe
and encompassing than google these days.
I've done many obscured searches that have turned up no results on google, but many on search.yahoo.com
(accurate results to boot too..
Could this be related?
I guess the one trick pony is up for some rough riding
PS: I do work for yahoo, but not in the search or any other related group, so take my comments with a grain of salt.
http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/features/articles/sola ris_zones.html
It's interesting that FreeBSD influence is getting
recognition at SUN... Maybe now they will be persuaded
to support some of their products on FreeBSD.(aka Java, and yes, i know about the FreeBSD java group
and their agreement on the 1.3.X jdk with sun)
Did anyone forget the Xbox developement Kit..
Which is basically a dual g5 powermac with a
custome XP version on it. Plus windows WILL run
on the PPC... The Xbox will be PPC, so there
will be a version, which actually a lot of titles...
Hrmmm. I wonder if the next Gen of Xbox ModChips
wont be add on cards to your favorite powermac.. hehe
249 for the 100i
. ht ml
499 for the 500i
http://www.imaging-resource.com/NEWS/1097689832
Well, while not code forks per say.. the Berkley releases contributed much more than userland back to bell labs..
VM, tcp stack, scheduler, and so on...
SunOS 4.X and previous?
Most other unixes have a LOT of BSD based userland... Not only by taking directly from the bsd releases, but by the mere fact that ATT ITSELF took some of the parts of the BSD releases.
But, replying to the prent above, that IS the whole point of BSD. This was PUBLIC university research, and as such, ALL tax payers, even corporations, are allowed equal access. A simple fact most of the GPL zealots forget. Public money, Public domain ( well, it should at least, lets not go into details.. hehe )
I see so many posts about how this would make them switch from perl to php.. but perl has had this for ages...
http://www.indigostar.com/perl2exe.htm
http://par.perl.org/
HEH!!!
1 + 1 = 3
:)
As 1 -> approaches 1.5
You must be freking kidding right...? Sub-selects
and a working optimized join are still missing
from MySQL..
( and don't talk about the upcoming 4.X version...
It's still not copletely ready...
These are critical features needed in most apps..
and having to do shity work arounds is not the way )
how much are you going to pay me then?
:-P
Using ipfw and dummynet on freebsd is the way
I have gone in a VERY high traffic hosting
and colo company.
you can not only simultae a link of a certain speed, but can also limit any ip that hits a certain destination to a max speed...
have you?
They have the OEM number right on the cd...
Is this the first article with a BFA?
(Big F**cking Ad)?
Well, as long as it brings revenue is not so bad..
but ona side note.. it really did make me read the damn thing... bastard marketeers.. lol
try adding a 15 inch LCD INSTEAD OF A CRT...
when you do so, the price is $20 apart.
HEH.
Now, the bigger question is.. why would linux's vm allocate empty pages?
This is not a flame, am really just curious...
:-D..?
I compiled and ran the "memory hogger" application
and it did not eat more than 424K on FreeBSD..
I know you have a lot more to do thatn to answer silly simple questions BUT.. why is that
Thx in advance..
I do own a car in the city...
But like most people in the city, i take public transportation.. it's just not practical most
of the time to drive into the city. specially to go to work.
Step in to a nyc subway, and you will find ALL parts of the economic spectrum.. From homeless,
to CEO's
So, it is possible to have a widely accepted mass transit system. You just HAVE to make it NEEDED, USEFUL , and RELIABLE.
( although after the damn 2 train became local, I don't know if I'll stick to the damn reliable part
I did not mean C-like syntax..
I am aware of verilog and other hdl's with "c-like" syntax...
but the way he worded that question seemed to imply something very different
This just reminds me of the differences in thought between EE and CS...
HDL's in java or C? HEH... What's next? x86 assembler implemented in java? ( pun
Maybe you should take a look here http://philip.greenspun.com/humor/eecs-difference
Damn CS's
They are pushing the use of source packages,
that would need to be compiled, hence, they can
adapt to each platform. They only advocated
the use of binary packahges when the developement
tools ( mainly gcc, automake ) are not available.
It's basically an RPM based FreeBSD ports tree.
Novel idea.. but am not sure the use of RPM
is the best choice...
We shall see...
They are pushing the use of source packages,
that would need to be compiled, hence, they can
adapt to each platform. They only advocated
the use of binary packahges when the developement
tools ( mainly gcc, automake ) are not available.
It's basically an RPM based FreeBSD ports tree.
Novel idea.. but am not sure the use of RPM
is the best choice...
We shall see..
http://www.news.cornell.edu/releases/Dec97/Torng.b s.html
b s.html
For the Lazy.. http://www.news.cornell.edu/releases/Dec97/Torng.
Because he prolly was not really sure/aware that they were violating it.
Out of Order execution...
:-P
And yes, it's a patent that affects most cpu's
And the reason that it does? well, it's because
most cpu designers read his published works
( i think he published the findings in 89,
and the first intel cpu to use it was the pentium )
Hey, i admitt, i was lazy.. :-D
:-D hehe..
But still doesn't take from the fact that he
didn't seem to enjoy teaching that class..
Plsus some other things that i rather not mention
since it would border on slander