And then governments get the notion to sue, which of course raises messy issues of jurisdiction, discovery, &c.
1. So Apple pays a fine to Germany.
2. Germany bails out Greece.
3. Euro crisis solved. Profit!!!
Screw you, Underpants Gnomes!
Do keep in mind the the Constitution is a set of constraints binding the federal government.
Except where otherwise tweaked by law, private companies have a great deal more leeway, e.g. refusing service and escorting you off premises if they don't like what you're saying.
Protip: if you're really concerned about privacy, you stay in the medieval 'root' cellar and have no education except by dead tree books, transact everything in cash, and never get sick.
If you do a pattern somewhere on the keyboard with alternate raising/lowering of the SHIFT key, you can balance all but the most asinine password regimes with the capacity to remember them.
Well, we could subsidize all the Dunder Mifflins out there, and then outlaw paper. ..
But then people could carve the passwords into the furniture. ..
Outlaw furniture?
But Congress never holds itself accountable, so there'd be a bunch of people standing/laying on the Mall, calling Congress a pile of dicks.
Something should be done to make people more controllable.
But, like all attempts at legislating morality, it's doomed. Just doomed.
I get at the point of DRM when I say, "Check out this Joe Satriani!"
The kid says, "Hey, that's cool, let me rip that."
"Dude. We've got to keep Joe Satriani in guitar strings. Let me give you this. I'll buy another copy."
This is an example of busting somebody's chops in a positive way. The focus is on the artist, not the fact that the kid's nascent grasp of economics is both immoral and a threat to the market. Better still, there isn't a godforsaken politician or lawyer in sight.
It just has a bit of a creepy vibe that's hard to ignore.
I'm not saying that Google itself would ever out-Huxley Huxley, but the possibility of some governments out-Orwelling Orwell is undeniable.
Of course, technology is a honey-badger affair. When the've integrated Google Glass with ">Silhouettes, there won't be any way to tell who's the Great Big Little Brother, and who's the simple colleague.
Seriously. If the U.S. becomes that odious a benevolent overlord, the rest of the world will not TALK, it will DO.
If you want to complain about a U.S. institution, start with the Federal Reserve.
"Observe that due to its lobbyist infestation, the USoA government is just as unsuitable as any crackpot dictator. China, of all places, is more consistent and predictable, and thus stable, in how it treats its domestic internet."
Oh, really? One should like to position you there, or Egypt, for a while, to see if your spew holds true.
Can come up with its own protocols, build a network and tell the U.S. government where to go, and what to do upon arrival.
Such an effort is hindered by. ..uh. . .
Slashdot Mirror
No, that looks right for jQuery. Modern JavaScript feels like falling into rotating machinery.
Proof link.
<head></head>
<body>
I am an HTML coder.
There are many like me.
I can has job?
</body>
</html>
Lilacs and contraband
I've got Santa Monica in my hand
A little.... Beatle mania when I can
And I've got two big bags of old Japan
So I got that goin' for me. Which is nice.
And if I'd left off the URL, I'd've gotten the rubber chicken flogging for doing it ronngg.
And then governments get the notion to sue, which of course raises messy issues of jurisdiction, discovery, &c.
1. So Apple pays a fine to Germany.
2. Germany bails out Greece.
3. Euro crisis solved. Profit!!!
Screw you, Underpants Gnomes!
No, he's married with two kids: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yo_yo_ma. Wait, what?
1. Mindfullness
2. Coexist
3. Tolerance
4. Inclusiveness
5. Redistribution
There will be a quiz when Progress has returned us to that http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noble_savage state.
Dude, this is way but-chen.
Under Emacs.
Your network's hairy
Your servers are duds
Only one way to shave it
And that's drown it in suds!
Burma Shave
Do keep in mind the the Constitution is a set of constraints binding the federal government.
Except where otherwise tweaked by law, private companies have a great deal more leeway, e.g. refusing service and escorting you off premises if they don't like what you're saying.
Protip: if you're really concerned about privacy, you stay in the medieval 'root' cellar and have no education except by dead tree books, transact everything in cash, and never get sick.
If you do a pattern somewhere on the keyboard with alternate raising/lowering of the SHIFT key, you can balance all but the most asinine password regimes with the capacity to remember them.
But when FaceBook becomes FacePlant, you wind up in a steaming pile of Faces.
You have a strong root password, and a simple, site-specific suffix.
Well, we could subsidize all the Dunder Mifflins out there, and then outlaw paper. . . .
But then people could carve the passwords into the furniture. .
Outlaw furniture?
But Congress never holds itself accountable, so there'd be a bunch of people standing/laying on the Mall, calling Congress a pile of dicks.
Something should be done to make people more controllable.
But, like all attempts at legislating morality, it's doomed. Just doomed.
I get at the point of DRM when I say, "Check out this Joe Satriani!"
The kid says, "Hey, that's cool, let me rip that."
"Dude. We've got to keep Joe Satriani in guitar strings. Let me give you this. I'll buy another copy."
This is an example of busting somebody's chops in a positive way. The focus is on the artist, not the fact that the kid's nascent grasp of economics is both immoral and a threat to the market. Better still, there isn't a godforsaken politician or lawyer in sight.
I'm not saying that Google itself would ever out-Huxley Huxley, but the possibility of some governments out-Orwelling Orwell is undeniable.
Of course, technology is a honey-badger affair. When the've integrated Google Glass with ">Silhouettes, there won't be any way to tell who's the Great Big Little Brother, and who's the simple colleague.
Seriously. If the U.S. becomes that odious a benevolent overlord, the rest of the world will not TALK, it will DO.
If you want to complain about a U.S. institution, start with the Federal Reserve.
"Observe that due to its lobbyist infestation, the USoA government is just as unsuitable as any crackpot dictator. China, of all places, is more consistent and predictable, and thus stable, in how it treats its domestic internet."
Oh, really? One should like to position you there, or Egypt, for a while, to see if your spew holds true.
Your comment does not explain the technical reasons why competition is impossible.
Linux Weekly News--best signal-to-noise ratio on the whole flipping internet.
Can come up with its own protocols, build a network and tell the U.S. government where to go, and what to do upon arrival. .uh. . .
Such an effort is hindered by. .