No, I'm just saying that I don't believe anything you say, because you are provably an idiot. Proven by quoting the Daily Fail as a source. No matter what you say, all you'll get from me is pointing and laughing.
The credibility of a source matters. You have none.
as long as we insist on executing people, inert gas is far more reliable than our other methods, painless
(emphasis mine)
You hit the nail on the head here. Most death penalty proponents do not want to execute criminals, they want to see what they see as Bad People(tm) suffer. They don't want execution. They want torture, the more horrible the better.
Actually, if your energy demand is high, the fat-derived molecules will stay in your blood and trigger a glucagon response, which wil lbreak them down. The chilomicrons only get removed from your blood and stored as fat if you really don't need the energy.
The general for calories is: they hit the bloodstream first, and only if you don't need them they get stored. Which is why, as you imply, you need a balanced diet tailored to your expected physical exertion; also why there is no silver bullet diet.
A lot depends on the expected physical demands on your body. Once the food hits your digestion, your body will (usually) release reserve sugars into your bloodstream. If you need more, because for example you are doing strenuous exercise, taking your calories as sugars is better, because this will replenish your reserves faster.
Fat takes longer to process into a form your body can use, carbohydrates are somewhere in between. Fat therefore is nice if you don't expect immediate physical exertion, or long-term low-grade exertion (there's a reason the usual breakfast of day labourers was rather...hearty)
If you stuff yourself with various sugars and don't immediately burn them off, your body will note it gets excess energy and convert the sugars to long term storage, aka body fat.
So your exertion pattern in combination with the digestion speed of the energy source determines whether or not you burn the calories or store them as fat. But on the whole you are right, the total amount of intake vs the total actually consumed by your body averaged over a day is what counts in the end.
we'll send you updates on new offerings and events that are targeted to what you've ordered in the past as well as what you've liked/followed. It proves to yield a higher level of follow-on sales.
In other words, you're a fucking spammer. I hope the GDPR kills your 'bizniz'.
Or at least minimally covered. If you have a sensible IT architecture to start with, all you need is reasonable security and to be able to delete info on request.
What's that you say? You are too incompetent to have invested in decent infrastructure? Oh no, you are competent, but you're a fucking data miner wanting to get rich off of leeching my info? Fuck off and die then.
That canard again. IP address logging for the purposes of site operation has never fallen under EU privacy guidelines, unless that data is kept for longer than its intended purpose and used for data mining.
Which is exactly the point of the GDPR: it says 'Don't do that and you'll be fine'. If you look at the FAQ you see that the GDPR does not cover this use of data.
Does my business need to appoint a Data Protection Officer (DPO)?
DPOs must be appointed in the case of: (a) public authorities, (b) organizations that engage in large scale systematic monitoring, or (c) organizations that engage in large scale processing of sensitive personal data (Art. 37). If your organization doesnâ(TM)t fall into one of these categories, then you do not need to appoint a DPO.
Unless that one person shop does engage in large scale processing of sensitive personal data, of course, but then they either have enough revenue to afford a DPO, or they are a shady 'ethicul biznizman' (aka spammer).
Tell me, what of my personal data beyond billing and shipping data for my most recent order would a Mom and Pop shop need?
This is the usual right-wing talking point about 'onerous regulation' and it is bullshit. It is not about the small businesses, unless they are merely a bait-and-switch operation trying to gain my data to sell it on to unscrupulous marketeers. It is about massive corporations that want to be free to pillage my life for their profits, and there is always an idiot falling for their 'but think of the poor small businessmen' shtick.
Slashdot Mirror
Here you go
No, I'm just saying that I don't believe anything you say, because you are provably an idiot. Proven by quoting the Daily Fail as a source. No matter what you say, all you'll get from me is pointing and laughing.
The credibility of a source matters. You have none.
Yes, the messenger is suspect. It's the Daily Mail. If they say the sun rises in the East, you had best take a compass out the next morning to check.
The fact that you uncritically believe them is a tell: you're an idiot.
The Daily Mail? The DAILY MAIL?!
<points and laughs>
Syria, Iran, they're all towelheads anyway, right?
(emphasis mine)
You hit the nail on the head here. Most death penalty proponents do not want to execute criminals, they want to see what they see as Bad People(tm) suffer. They don't want execution. They want torture, the more horrible the better.
Actually, if your energy demand is high, the fat-derived molecules will stay in your blood and trigger a glucagon response, which wil lbreak them down. The chilomicrons only get removed from your blood and stored as fat if you really don't need the energy.
The general for calories is: they hit the bloodstream first, and only if you don't need them they get stored. Which is why, as you imply, you need a balanced diet tailored to your expected physical exertion; also why there is no silver bullet diet.
Bullshit.
Powell has form. He was also responsible for the initial whitewashing of My Lai.
I've never understood the American media and public swallowing his whole 'man-of-integrity' shtick.
A lot depends on the expected physical demands on your body. Once the food hits your digestion, your body will (usually) release reserve sugars into your bloodstream. If you need more, because for example you are doing strenuous exercise, taking your calories as sugars is better, because this will replenish your reserves faster.
Fat takes longer to process into a form your body can use, carbohydrates are somewhere in between. Fat therefore is nice if you don't expect immediate physical exertion, or long-term low-grade exertion (there's a reason the usual breakfast of day labourers was rather...hearty)
If you stuff yourself with various sugars and don't immediately burn them off, your body will note it gets excess energy and convert the sugars to long term storage, aka body fat.
So your exertion pattern in combination with the digestion speed of the energy source determines whether or not you burn the calories or store them as fat. But on the whole you are right, the total amount of intake vs the total actually consumed by your body averaged over a day is what counts in the end.
I note you do not deny being a spammer.
In other words, you're a fucking spammer. I hope the GDPR kills your 'bizniz'.
"Legitimate interest"
More I am not going to tell you. Do your own fucking homework.
Good. Due diligence is not something you can outsource. You can't be bothered to protect my data? Go bankrupt. Instant Karma.
Or at least minimally covered. If you have a sensible IT architecture to start with, all you need is reasonable security and to be able to delete info on request.
What's that you say? You are too incompetent to have invested in decent infrastructure? Oh no, you are competent, but you're a fucking data miner wanting to get rich off of leeching my info? Fuck off and die then.
Learn to read. I posted a link to the FAQ, and it amply covers this use case.
Do you have to work at being this stupid? All these scenarios are not covered by the GDPR.
RTFFAQ, this is not covered under "large scale systematic monitoring" or "large scale processing of sensitive personal data"
RTFFAQ, this is not covered under "large scale systematic monitoring" or "large scale processing of sensitive personal data"
RTFFAQ
That canard again. IP address logging for the purposes of site operation has never fallen under EU privacy guidelines, unless that data is kept for longer than its intended purpose and used for data mining.
Which is exactly the point of the GDPR: it says 'Don't do that and you'll be fine'. If you look at the FAQ you see that the GDPR does not cover this use of data.
A one person shop does not need a DPO:
(Source: GDPR FAQ)
Unless that one person shop does engage in large scale processing of sensitive personal data, of course, but then they either have enough revenue to afford a DPO, or they are a shady 'ethicul biznizman' (aka spammer).
Tell me, what of my personal data beyond billing and shipping data for my most recent order would a Mom and Pop shop need?
This is the usual right-wing talking point about 'onerous regulation' and it is bullshit. It is not about the small businesses, unless they are merely a bait-and-switch operation trying to gain my data to sell it on to unscrupulous marketeers. It is about massive corporations that want to be free to pillage my life for their profits, and there is always an idiot falling for their 'but think of the poor small businessmen' shtick.
This just in: serial killer wants to be called a good person because he only killed 1 person this week instead of 2.
You realise that Europeans are free to buy the same SUVs, right? And yet they don't in the same numbers.
But thank you for pointing out the obvious sickness in the American Mind.