do you actually doubt that that's what they want to do? you might disagree with what defines great, you might disagree with how to get there... but i don't think anyone could actually reasonably argue that anyone in a 'maga' hat at one of those rallies didn't want the best for america.
i'm with her... yes? no? i don't really know because i don't know where that woman stands... and i should because I should have access, as an american, to every unclassified email she sent as secretary of state:)
what i do know is that apparently, the olympics are already trying to figure out what to do with natural women that produce more testosterone than normal testosterone. and i don't know where i heard it, but i seem to recall that MTF trans people are still elevated pretty high over the range of normal females even after hormone therapy... the point being, there's not only legacy issues with MTF transitions, there may also be ongoing issues with testosterone.
it's only a reach if you don't think that if you leave a loophole everybody will be too pleasant for anyone to exploit it. look at the second link that i put up off the original chain, some lawyer took another look. canadian laws are screwy.
if there's a reason people overestimate the rates of sexual assault in this country... well there's someone to blame for that too.
i wonder who.
the fact is. you draw the line somewhere, the because if you give an inch, it's an excuse to ask for another fucking inch. and bathrooms, yes they're trivial, but you know what's not?
blowing apart the female category in sports, for title 9 purposes... hey, if you just wanted to go back to men dominating all sports and no women's counterparts... all you had to do was ask?
the next step is some assholes complaining that it's discrimination that I don't want to date a transexual. because to paraphrase jordan peterson... 'individual sexual discrimination/monogamy is the ultimate discrimination, and that fights coming within 5 years, squaring that with sexual assault will be a difficult one' nothing within their philosophy prevents that from being a valid stance.
the earth has been significantly warmer than it is today. and significantly cooler.
shore lines change? and? does that mean people can't move?
do you think we'll have global famine? this is very quick for a geologic timescale, and even a generational timescale... but we live on neither of those. as it warms, certainly some arable farmland will become less suitable. but does that mean that new land will not open up? can we perhaps farm canada? it wouldn't be terribly hard to conquer them, and then we get all that juicy juicy new non-permafrost land for food.
water and weather? some might argue that warmer temperatures will lead to more precipitation, and lucky for us, we need more water. hurricanes bad, but it's not like we don't already have those. the world will be slightly more dangerous and in the meantime we'll keep innovating at a pace that isn't hampered by our lack of energy.
unless you feel like opening up nuclear, that'd certainly be acceptable to a lot of people.
this reeks of someone exploring a new avenue of grievance. not everything needs to be interpreted in power hierarchies. and he's overreaching with some of his examples. yes, western powers decided that they'd preclude the arabs from finding peace by making it harder for them to text. well played. it couldn't be that the communications technologies were developed in the western world because western values allowed for scientific inquiry. nope... oppression.
yes, how it's presented can alter slightly a message. but the map is not the territory. neither the typeface, nor the words themselves are as dangerous or powerful as the thoughts behind them.
you have no right to cross borders. you have no right to immigrate or visit. these are privileges granted to you by those living there, and those living there holding the huge honking guns.
the only rights we have on the international stage, are those enforced by strength of arms. morality between countries is not a thing.
i think it's because we're currently seeing a lot more islamists trying to terrorize us collectively, than we are of the israelis.
criticize israel, sure, but do it in proportion to their crime, and maybe in proportion to how much you criticize other countries for similar things.
yes, the israelis are committing a genocide against the palestinians.... are you fucking kidding me?
stalin killed 6 million Ukrainians by accident. through starvation. you telling me the jews can't wipe out the palestinians if they really gave it the old college try? the armenians?
what evidence could change your opinion on the israel-palestinian conflict? what proof would you need to flip you? ask yourself that about every issue, and see how reasoned your position is.
and i'd say little timmy won't get a chance to die of lung cancer because his dad is out of work because burdensome regulation caused his plant to move overseas.
Slashdot Mirror
'make america great again', vs 'i'm with her'
do you actually doubt that that's what they want to do? you might disagree with what defines great, you might disagree with how to get there... but i don't think anyone could actually reasonably argue that anyone in a 'maga' hat at one of those rallies didn't want the best for america.
i'm with her... yes? no? i don't really know because i don't know where that woman stands... and i should because I should have access, as an american, to every unclassified email she sent as secretary of state :)
pre-puberty... maybe maybe.
what i do know is that apparently, the olympics are already trying to figure out what to do with natural women that produce more testosterone than normal testosterone. and i don't know where i heard it, but i seem to recall that MTF trans people are still elevated pretty high over the range of normal females even after hormone therapy... the point being, there's not only legacy issues with MTF transitions, there may also be ongoing issues with testosterone.
i been in the ladies room.
was tipsy and confused as to why this building didn't believe in urinals.
it's only a reach if you don't think that if you leave a loophole everybody will be too pleasant for anyone to exploit it. look at the second link that i put up off the original chain, some lawyer took another look. canadian laws are screwy.
nah, not fear-mongering. some of the lawyers agree that that could be a potential consequence.
it's all down to how current and future tribunals rule and what kind of message they want to send.
but they are empowered to fine you or compel you to apologize if they find you wrong.
Compel speech.
https://litigationguy.wordpres...
same bill being considered, from one of them law people.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
does using the wrong pronoun count?
or.. having your employee use the wrong pronoun?
if they pass, they more or less pass the friggin test don't they.
if there's a reason people overestimate the rates of sexual assault in this country... well there's someone to blame for that too.
i wonder who.
the fact is. you draw the line somewhere, the because if you give an inch, it's an excuse to ask for another fucking inch. and bathrooms, yes they're trivial, but you know what's not?
blowing apart the female category in sports, for title 9 purposes... hey, if you just wanted to go back to men dominating all sports and no women's counterparts... all you had to do was ask?
the next step is some assholes complaining that it's discrimination that I don't want to date a transexual. because to paraphrase jordan peterson... 'individual sexual discrimination/monogamy is the ultimate discrimination, and that fights coming within 5 years, squaring that with sexual assault will be a difficult one' nothing within their philosophy prevents that from being a valid stance.
that problem sounds soluble.
how much climate change will kill us?
the earth has been significantly warmer than it is today. and significantly cooler.
shore lines change? and? does that mean people can't move?
do you think we'll have global famine? this is very quick for a geologic timescale, and even a generational timescale... but we live on neither of those. as it warms, certainly some arable farmland will become less suitable. but does that mean that new land will not open up? can we perhaps farm canada? it wouldn't be terribly hard to conquer them, and then we get all that juicy juicy new non-permafrost land for food.
water and weather? some might argue that warmer temperatures will lead to more precipitation, and lucky for us, we need more water. hurricanes bad, but it's not like we don't already have those. the world will be slightly more dangerous and in the meantime we'll keep innovating at a pace that isn't hampered by our lack of energy.
unless you feel like opening up nuclear, that'd certainly be acceptable to a lot of people.
it's the patriarchy.
this reeks of someone exploring a new avenue of grievance. not everything needs to be interpreted in power hierarchies. and he's overreaching with some of his examples. yes, western powers decided that they'd preclude the arabs from finding peace by making it harder for them to text. well played. it couldn't be that the communications technologies were developed in the western world because western values allowed for scientific inquiry. nope... oppression.
yes, how it's presented can alter slightly a message. but the map is not the territory. neither the typeface, nor the words themselves are as dangerous or powerful as the thoughts behind them.
little timmy will starve.
no he's definitely a hero.
because our upper education is dominated by the left these days. and cowed by a certain type of individual.
adults they are... I see no evidence of that from the media coverage of the current crop.
the demand is higher than the supply. if these snowflakes have bad attitudes. i'm sure there are other snowflakes willing to have better ones.
yes. ...
http://www.nationalreview.com/...
no, just #blacklivesmatter 100 times.
because fuck standards.
maritime
you have no right to cross borders. you have no right to immigrate or visit. these are privileges granted to you by those living there, and those living there holding the huge honking guns.
the only rights we have on the international stage, are those enforced by strength of arms. morality between countries is not a thing.
i think it's because we're currently seeing a lot more islamists trying to terrorize us collectively, than we are of the israelis.
criticize israel, sure, but do it in proportion to their crime, and maybe in proportion to how much you criticize other countries for similar things.
yes, the israelis are committing a genocide against the palestinians. ... are you fucking kidding me?
stalin killed 6 million Ukrainians by accident. through starvation. you telling me the jews can't wipe out the palestinians if they really gave it the old college try? the armenians?
what evidence could change your opinion on the israel-palestinian conflict? what proof would you need to flip you? ask yourself that about every issue, and see how reasoned your position is.
it's also nice how you attribute the culpability of the rioters to the cartoonists.
don't draw a cartoon of muhammed... the muslims will riot.
the muslims will CHOOSE to riot. why are they not responsible for their choice?
and i'd say little timmy won't get a chance to die of lung cancer because his dad is out of work because burdensome regulation caused his plant to move overseas.
see? i can do it too.
bernie is a socialist. i don't like socialism. i think socialism killed more people than world war 2.
because equality has come to code for equality of outcome. equality of opportunity is something we pretty much already have.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
economic mobility is a pretty good indicator for that. and the US is pretty good at that.
modern day, chobani, in the past, carnegie.
and before all else, more important than each of those is equality before the law.