There are courses for Photoshop. Would it help me to take one of them?
There are also many online tutorials especially written for Gimp. While you can reflect many Photoshop principles onto Gimp, I think that a dedicated tutorial is a bit more fun and ease to deal with.
Re:Ask /.: Has anything changed in the console cfg
on
Linux 2.6.0-test3 Released
·
· Score: 2, Informative
Make sure to activate CONFIG_INPUT, CONFIG_VT, CONFIG_VGA_CONSOLE and CONFIG_VT_CONSOLE in the configuration. You can find out if you did that by looking into your.config file.
Do you use devfs? Than you will want to compile devpts, too, and mount it to/dev/pts. The devfs in kernel 2.4 used to have it's own devpts, but this is no longer the case.
Good point. What would be (IMHO) much more interesting are oldies which still does their stupid jobs.
If someone had a webcam pointing to a computer printing bills since 1980 - THAT would make a great story! Or if a boy called B1FF still hab his C64 online - well, that could be a myth.
What about another uptime contest, minimum uptime ten years (no, I can't contribute)?
Slashdot Mirror
There are also many online tutorials especially written for Gimp. While you can reflect many Photoshop principles onto Gimp, I think that a dedicated tutorial is a bit more fun and ease to deal with.
You will find loads of information in the Gimp section of dmoz.org.
Make sure to activate CONFIG_INPUT, CONFIG_VT, CONFIG_VGA_CONSOLE and CONFIG_VT_CONSOLE in the configuration. You can find out if you did that by looking into your .config file.
/dev/pts. The devfs in kernel 2.4 used to have it's own devpts, but this is no longer the case.
Do you use devfs? Than you will want to compile devpts, too, and mount it to
Did you compile RTC access for applications into the kernel and configured XMMS to use it? That helps a lot, even on slow systems.
OTOH, it's nice just to sit there and let the pr0n roll in.
Whoa, that means you have both hands free!
Of course you don't have much referals from other search engines because you don't pay them for a better placement in their search results! ;-)
Pseudonym wrote:
> It doesn't work, it's just intact.
Good point. What would be (IMHO) much more interesting are oldies which still does their stupid jobs.
If someone had a webcam pointing to a computer printing bills since 1980 - THAT would make a great story! Or if a boy called B1FF still hab his C64 online - well, that could be a myth.
What about another uptime contest, minimum uptime ten years (no, I can't contribute)?
[x] ulf