The claim was made that init was a "perfectly good one".
The fact that any other init system exists alludes to the fact that, no, init was not perfectly good.
It's like the hatred for systemd is so irrational that people would go the other extreme and say init is "perfectly good" that other people couldn't see shortcomings in init.
Even though I almost always have my hands on the wheel, I get about five to ten nags per hour — often several nags within a minute or two.
Five to ten nags per hour is once every 6 mins. If you "almost always" have your hand on your wheel, then that sounds about right, because you don't always have your hands on the wheel, per your admission.
If there's one thing we learned from over a century of operating machinery is that humans are not reliable narrators and tend to over estimate their abilities/compliance. This is why we have audits and logging and blackboxes.
Huang reportedly complained that the car’s Autopilot option kept veering the car toward the same barrier on Highway 101, near Mountain View, into which he crashed the car last Friday.
If you've noticed unsafe behaviour and have made complaints about it, why the fuck would you keep using it?
Not surprising that an Apple engineer has no common sense.
And the only common sense thing for Tesla to do is to disable the damn thing. People are too stupid to be trusted with anything.
Just because they don't have something called the First Amendment doesn't mean they don't have the actual rights. Stupid Americans who think they invented rights and only they have rights.
At least you're fucking admitting you'd rather turn your weapons on other citizens, in league with the government, rather than rebelling against a tyrannical government like you lot so like to claim.
In the end, you guys are bunch of cowards with hopes of imposing your own martial order, instead of the defenders of freedom you think you are.
It shows the constitution is not written in stone, you dumb cunt. And that the constitution is not above being changed one way or the other. Are Americans really so retarded?
That's the problem with Texans. They imagine it's going to be like a movie with a stand off.
Well guess what? Life is not a fucking movie. If an Islamic extremist wants to kill you with a truck, he'd do it while you weren't prepared.
Guns seem to take people's IQ down by 10 points or something. Giving you delusions where people only attack you when you're prepared. If guns are so great, why isn't the Middle East an epitome of peace? You have rebels and governments with weapons. What happened to your cosy fantasy where peace breaks out because of guns?
At one point, prohibition was in the Constitution. If you think "the constitution" is a valid argument, then you must be in favour of prohibition, otherwise you're a hypocrite.
Car videos don't promote crashing into things. Guns - you can only show them shooting at things to kill or destroy them.
If car channels start making videos that only shows things being run over, or making light of driving dangerously on public roads, then they should absolutely be taken down.
Car enthusiasts don't (yet) suffer the mental delusions of gun nuts.
All the gun nuts complaining out there: you obviously had no problem with extremist Islamic videos being taken down, so why shouldn't Youtube also take down videos that supports a culture that is responsible for more deaths in the US than Islamic extremism?
Then why did you only blame Clinton? Clinton was one democrat.
Why didn't the Republican congress stop it then?
Clinton? Don't you mean the Republican congress?
So?
The claim was made that init was a "perfectly good one".
The fact that any other init system exists alludes to the fact that, no, init was not perfectly good.
It's like the hatred for systemd is so irrational that people would go the other extreme and say init is "perfectly good" that other people couldn't see shortcomings in init.
If init was a perfectly good one, why were there so many competing replacements?
Even though I almost always have my hands on the wheel, I get about five to ten nags per hour — often several nags within a minute or two.
Five to ten nags per hour is once every 6 mins. If you "almost always" have your hand on your wheel, then that sounds about right, because you don't always have your hands on the wheel, per your admission.
If there's one thing we learned from over a century of operating machinery is that humans are not reliable narrators and tend to over estimate their abilities/compliance. This is why we have audits and logging and blackboxes.
The real question is why is Tesla putting out a faulty expensive product and beta testing it on our roads?
Yes, so why would you keep using it?
Huang reportedly complained that the car’s Autopilot option kept veering the car toward the same barrier on Highway 101, near Mountain View, into which he crashed the car last Friday.
If you've noticed unsafe behaviour and have made complaints about it, why the fuck would you keep using it?
Not surprising that an Apple engineer has no common sense.
And the only common sense thing for Tesla to do is to disable the damn thing. People are too stupid to be trusted with anything.
Just because they don't have something called the First Amendment doesn't mean they don't have the actual rights. Stupid Americans who think they invented rights and only they have rights.
No one said not to defend yourself. You're just deliberately conflating self-defence with guns. You don't need guns for self-defence.
But they have GUNS. Guns are supposed to be magic, according to gun nuts.
Thus making "the Constitution" not a valid argument. Just like "the Bible" is not a valid argument.
At least you're fucking admitting you'd rather turn your weapons on other citizens, in league with the government, rather than rebelling against a tyrannical government like you lot so like to claim.
In the end, you guys are bunch of cowards with hopes of imposing your own martial order, instead of the defenders of freedom you think you are.
It shows the constitution is not written in stone, you dumb cunt. And that the constitution is not above being changed one way or the other. Are Americans really so retarded?
Yeah, and if you read the first thing in that comment, you'd know I was using the phrase "run over" in the context of "promote crashing into things".
That's the problem with Texans. They imagine it's going to be like a movie with a stand off.
Well guess what? Life is not a fucking movie. If an Islamic extremist wants to kill you with a truck, he'd do it while you weren't prepared.
Guns seem to take people's IQ down by 10 points or something. Giving you delusions where people only attack you when you're prepared. If guns are so great, why isn't the Middle East an epitome of peace? You have rebels and governments with weapons. What happened to your cosy fantasy where peace breaks out because of guns?
"The Constitution" is not a valid argument.
At one point, prohibition was in the Constitution. If you think "the constitution" is a valid argument, then you must be in favour of prohibition, otherwise you're a hypocrite.
Car videos don't promote crashing into things. Guns - you can only show them shooting at things to kill or destroy them.
If car channels start making videos that only shows things being run over, or making light of driving dangerously on public roads, then they should absolutely be taken down.
Car enthusiasts don't (yet) suffer the mental delusions of gun nuts.
What a great idea. Arm people who already can't be trusted with guns, with military weapons.
All the gun nuts complaining out there: you obviously had no problem with extremist Islamic videos being taken down, so why shouldn't Youtube also take down videos that supports a culture that is responsible for more deaths in the US than Islamic extremism?
Too bad you also probably don't support a government having the power to break up monopolies (or oligopolies).
If someone is driving a truck at you, your puny weapons wouldn't do shit.
I'm pretty sure this is part of the security mindset which Linus Torvalds claims makes all the security-above-all-else types incredible.
Any evidence that this bridge was built on diversity hiring practices?
Are you incapable of understanding what the concept of being number one is?