Xfree86 is limited in its power in terms of the ability to render interfaces.
It cant even do alpha channel, hardware scaling, rotation, and polygons in the interface.
Until Xfree86 allows you to use all your video cards special effects on the interface, then theres not many ambitious projects you can do because everything that can be done is already being done in terms of making an interface better than Windows98, its done, KDE is on XPs level right now.
In terms of making something compareable to OSX that hasnt been done, E17 will try to do it, but E17 is using software tricks because Xfree86 is so weak.
Perhaps by promoting berlin you'd get more people to develop window managers.
If berlin were supported, Then i have some ideas, but we need a better backend which allows hardware specific effects while also we need to add stuff such as voice recognition, video recognition(to replace passwords) and so on.
Perhaps anyone reading my Msg will start a project and do just that.
I'm on a 400mhz machine, so obviously its not your CPU, YOU NEED MORE RAM!!! NO OS CAN RUN ON 64 megs of ram!!
Windows 98 was made in 1998 when 64 megs of ram was NORMAL!!!
Normal today is 256 megs of ram, UPGRADE!!! Linux Mandrake is not made to compete with Windows98, its Competiting with WindowsXP and OSX, both which require about 256 megs of ram, which means Mandrake requires 256 megs of ram.
I have 256 megs of ram and it runs smooth as hell, much faster than Windows 2000.
But hey if you only have 64 megs of ram i guess its going to run slow as hell eh? Trying to run next generation software on first generation hardware is not going to work, At least not if you run KDE, You can try running blackbox.
Stop making stupid excuses, either you compile the kernel yourself, or you dont use Linux because its too powerful for your weak machine
Weak machines cannot run state of the art software, Thats why people upgrade.
What do you expect from more powerful software?
on
Mandrake 8.1 Released
·
· Score: 1
Isnt this why people buy these new Pentium 4s with 512 megs of ram??????? YES!! To run more powerful software, stop running a 386. I'm tired of software lagging drastically behind the hardware because some people are afraid of upgrading.
Upgrade your computer and you wont care if Linux is a gig and has every feature in the world.
Talking negatively about the government leads to illegal anti government activity such as the terrorist attack, as a result freeom of speech must be taken away from all americans.
Everyone who complains about speed doesnt know anything about how computers work.
New software is bigger, more powerful, and NEEDS a more powerful computer, RAM IS CHEAP, dont tell me Mozilla uses too much ram when you can buy a gig of ram for under $200.
Get a faster harddrive, if mozilla is slow you are most likely using cheap IDE crap.
Now, if you have a modern computer THEN you may use modern browsers and modern software, if you have a computer which was made before Netscape 4.7 was released, then you should be using netscape 4.7, your computer will never be powerful enough to run mozilla.
We dont know if its Fischer, but who else is it going to be? Fischer cant play games in person, whoever is playing these games just happens to live near where fiscer lives and likes playing fischer random chess
A Computer cannot adapt with such speed.
on
Bobby Fischer Online?
·
· Score: 1, Insightful
When a Computer is playing chess, its not going to play games like that, at blitz speed.
No computer ever has started with the kinds of openings seen in the movelists, and if its a blitz game theres not enough time for a human to be using the computer in the backround to help him.
Not to mention this annoymous fischer has played fischer random chess as well and that style of chess no computer can properly play.
This is what we need to give everyone a good education.
1 teacher per student (impossible yes, but we have computers.
Using computers to teach students, students can then email teachers to answer their questions from home while doing their homework on the computer, and talk to other students via the internet to help them figure out their homework.
Better teachers are also needed, so we need more specialized teachers and this should start in elementary school NOT middleschool. Teachers should be very specialized, meaning they dont go to school to learn alittle of everything buy to learn all of one thing.
Students should be very specialized in school, instead of focusing on making well rounded students, Students should be able to choose exactly what they want to learn and how much they want to learn about it.
By giving students freedom, it makes them learn to ENJOY learning, Learning doesnt feel like a chore if you are learning what you WANT to learn.
These key things wuold make everyone smarter, yet more specialized, everyone would be a genius in their own given field.
Eventually those jobs at mc donalds wont exsist, i give it 10 years, 10 years from now people wont work at mc donalds, a computer will most likely give you your food a the push of a button from a machine.
kinda like you can buy a tonic now without going to a store.
Xfree86 is limited in its power in terms of the ability to render interfaces.
It cant even do alpha channel, hardware scaling, rotation, and polygons in the interface.
Until Xfree86 allows you to use all your video cards special effects on the interface, then theres not many ambitious projects you can do because everything that can be done is already being done in terms of making an interface better than Windows98, its done, KDE is on XPs level right now.
In terms of making something compareable to OSX that hasnt been done, E17 will try to do it, but E17 is using software tricks because Xfree86 is so weak.
Perhaps by promoting berlin you'd get more people to develop window managers.
If berlin were supported, Then i have some ideas, but we need a better backend which allows hardware specific effects while also we need to add stuff such as voice recognition, video recognition(to replace passwords) and so on.
Perhaps anyone reading my Msg will start a project and do just that.
I'm on a 400mhz machine, so obviously its not your CPU, YOU NEED MORE RAM!!! NO OS CAN RUN ON 64 megs of ram!!
Windows 98 was made in 1998 when 64 megs of ram was NORMAL!!!
Normal today is 256 megs of ram, UPGRADE!!! Linux Mandrake is not made to compete with Windows98, its Competiting with WindowsXP and OSX, both which require about 256 megs of ram, which means Mandrake requires 256 megs of ram.
I have 256 megs of ram and it runs smooth as hell, much faster than Windows 2000.
But hey if you only have 64 megs of ram i guess its going to run slow as hell eh? Trying to run next generation software on first generation hardware is not going to work, At least not if you run KDE, You can try running blackbox.
Stop making stupid excuses, either you compile the kernel yourself, or you dont use Linux because its too powerful for your weak machine
Weak machines cannot run state of the art software, Thats why people upgrade.
Isnt this why people buy these new Pentium 4s with 512 megs of ram??????? YES!! To run more powerful software, stop running a 386. I'm tired of software lagging drastically behind the hardware because some people are afraid of upgrading.
Upgrade your computer and you wont care if Linux is a gig and has every feature in the world.
If you want no bloat, use Dos.
Talking negatively about the government leads to illegal anti government activity such as the terrorist attack, as a result freeom of speech must be taken away from all americans.
Well in that case lets all just move to china.
USAMA
I'm willing to sacrafice my way of life, and my country to keep my privacy and to keep peace in the world.
What good is living at all if you dont have any freedom?
And defending a country, if it kills more people than he saves, may not be worth it
right now we dont know what will happen to the middle east, i just hope millions dont die over this.
Every programmer who works for this company is one less programmer working for Mandrake.
Community support given to this company is less support given to Mandrake and Redhat.
WE HAVE the two main distros, we dont NEED more choices, we need to enhance what we already have
spreading yourself thin and reinventing the wheel is why linux is behind windows.
Lynx is lightning fast. its perfect for a nix user who wants weak yet fast software.
Everyone who complains about speed doesnt know anything about how computers work.
New software is bigger, more powerful, and NEEDS a more powerful computer, RAM IS CHEAP, dont tell me Mozilla uses too much ram when you can buy a gig of ram for under $200.
Get a faster harddrive, if mozilla is slow you are most likely using cheap IDE crap.
Now, if you have a modern computer THEN you may use modern browsers and modern software, if you have a computer which was made before Netscape 4.7 was released, then you should be using netscape 4.7, your computer will never be powerful enough to run mozilla.
Netscape 4.7 is older, WEAKER, of course its going to be faster.
Think about it.. the most powerful browser cannot be the fastest browser.
Money means nothing to these people.
Fools mate? Perhaps he was just beaten.
If Fischer is rusty, its not hard to imagine.
And these are blitz games, and he was using random openings!
Do you really think Nigel Short could be beaten by a Weak Computer?!
He says He'd play any machine in this interview.
http://queen.chessclub.com/philchess/rjfischer2
Its never good to hate a large group of people, meaning millions of people
Why? Hating anyone is BAD, Hate is always a BAD thing.
Bobby doesnt know how to control his own fury.
Its Definately a Human playing these games.
We dont know if its Fischer, but who else is it going to be? Fischer cant play games in person, whoever is playing these games just happens to live near where fiscer lives and likes playing fischer random chess
When a Computer is playing chess, its not going to play games like that, at blitz speed.
No computer ever has started with the kinds of openings seen in the movelists, and if its a blitz game theres not enough time for a human to be using the computer in the backround to help him.
Not to mention this annoymous fischer has played fischer random chess as well and that style of chess no computer can properly play.
http://www.chlodwig.com/Fischer/Fi_Games_ICC.ht
This is no computer, NO computer would ever play a game like this.
Haha
I bet hes reading this story now and knows everyones looking for him, i doubt he will play online anymore
I'm sure it comes complete with the HIV virus.
Schools arent safe anymore either
Just think of all the money now they will spend on beefing up security,
Really, schools would be safer and would require less security if schools were smaller.
This is what we need to give everyone a good education.
1 teacher per student (impossible yes, but we have computers.
Using computers to teach students, students can then email teachers to answer their questions from home while doing their homework on the computer, and talk to other students via the internet to help them figure out their homework.
Better teachers are also needed, so we need more specialized teachers and this should start in elementary school NOT middleschool. Teachers should be very specialized, meaning they dont go to school to learn alittle of everything buy to learn all of one thing.
Students should be very specialized in school, instead of focusing on making well rounded students, Students should be able to choose exactly what they want to learn and how much they want to learn about it.
By giving students freedom, it makes them learn to ENJOY learning, Learning doesnt feel like a chore if you are learning what you WANT to learn.
These key things wuold make everyone smarter, yet more specialized, everyone would be a genius in their own given field.
Eventually those jobs at mc donalds wont exsist, i give it 10 years, 10 years from now people wont work at mc donalds, a computer will most likely give you your food a the push of a button from a machine.
kinda like you can buy a tonic now without going to a store.
We dont need to pay teachers more, we need to improve the teacher per student ratio.,