Slashdot Mirror


User: Wonko+the+Sane

Wonko+the+Sane's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
2,379
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 2,379

  1. Re:Fear & Ignorance on 2010 Election Results Are In · · Score: 1

    Not all of the bankers are unapprehended felons.

    Prosecute the ones that are, liquidate the corrupt institutions to pay for the losses and let the honest ones take up the slack.

    You can't have a free market if some of the players are free to commit crimes and avoid punishment for it yet everybody else has to play by the rules.

  2. Re:Obama should just call for elections on 2010 Election Results Are In · · Score: 1

    not necessarily personal benefits.

    You mean like all the children who lost private health insurance because their plans would have become too expensive and were therefore dropped before the new mandates took effect?

  3. Re:Fear & Ignorance on 2010 Election Results Are In · · Score: 1

    That's not at all what happened in 1929. Hoover ramped government spending and bailed out the banks. That's why we got a decade and half of depression instead of 2 years of panic and a quick rebound like in 1920.

  4. Re:Should be good for the economy on 2010 Election Results Are In · · Score: 1

    The bankers are just middle-men, and they got really screwed in case you missed the news.

    They are not simple middlemen and they made out like bandits. Haven't you heard about how much they paid out in bonuses and continue to do so?

    They intentionally sought out borrowers were were unable to pay because that was the only way to make the scam work.

    Watch The Producers (the 1968 version). That's basically what these banks did. It's not a theory any more, they've been caught red-handed.

  5. Re:Should be good for the economy on 2010 Election Results Are In · · Score: 1

    Consumers around the world who had too much debt. People racked up all sorts of debt because they thought they could just put it on a credit card or take out a loan and forget about it - but eventually, the bill comes due and they couldn't pay it.

    So who gave them the loans?

    Banks knew the loans were no good and they kept making them and selling them anyway. In fact, they intentionally sought out loans that would fail because then they could sell the same loan to more than one investor and pocket the extra cash.

    Then intentionally set up their pools so that the tranches that they expected to get wiped out wouldn't own enough of the pool to sue them.

    Unfortunately for them they miscalculated and the losses extended even into the senior tranches and those investors are jumping into the lawsuits as well.

    Yes Congress and the borrowers messed up but the banks were there enabling all of it and egging them on so that they could scam an ever-increasing number of investors and pocket the loot.

  6. Re:The most astute economist on 2010 Election Results Are In · · Score: 1

    Bernanke just announced his intent to monetize the entire federal deficit next year, diluting the value of the currency by 20%.

    So at least we have that to look forward to.

  7. Re:Should be good for the economy on 2010 Election Results Are In · · Score: 1

    Maybe the CRA forced them to make questionable loans.

    It did not force them defraud investors, shred the evidence and pocket the loot.

    It did not force them to grant HELOCs to people they knew couldn't pay and that they knew for a fact would fail just for the purpose of ripping off pension funds and pocketing even more loot.

  8. Re:Should be good for the economy on 2010 Election Results Are In · · Score: 1

    The reason inflation has been tiny to non-existent is because all that printed money has yet to hit circulation.

    It's circulating in other economies and starting to hit commodities.

  9. Re:Should be good for the economy on 2010 Election Results Are In · · Score: 1

    Gridlock prevents the situation from getting even worse than if special interests are able to get more special favors passed into law than already are.

  10. Re:Should be good for the economy on 2010 Election Results Are In · · Score: 1

    You'd think it would be in Wal*Mart's, Sony's, Exxon's, Apple's, Microsoft's best interests to make sure as many people as possible can buy their crap.

    Too bad those corporations aren't pulling the strings.

    The Goldman Sachs, JP Morgans and Banks of America don't care about anything as long as they have Ben Bernanke's infinite electronic dollar well to draw from to their benefit.

    They can borrow from the Federal Reserve for practically 0% and use that money to play the markets of the entire world.

  11. Re:Should be good for the economy on 2010 Election Results Are In · · Score: 1

    They needed the derivatives to cover up for the original fraud. I agree that it's all part of the same story.

  12. Re:Should be good for the economy on 2010 Election Results Are In · · Score: 1

    I'm doubtful that the bankers set out to do a pump and dump

    You don't accidentally sell mortgages more than once.

    An industry that has been known for hundreds of years as experts in document retention doesn't accidentally lose the original loan paperwork.

    Bank executives have testified to Congress under oath that as early as 2005 they knew at the boardroom level that 80% of their loans were bad and they keep making them and selling them to investors anyway.

    That's not an accident, it's fraud.

  13. Re:Fear & Ignorance on 2010 Election Results Are In · · Score: 1

    We've got a huge set of financial problems that have resulted from a decade of bad decisions compounding and turning into a huge global mess, and then we pitch a fit when a couple hundred people can't turn it all around in a year and a half.

    No, no, no. It wasn't bad decisions or mistakes - it was premeditated crime . We should be pitching a fit because no one, regardless of party, will apply indictments and handcuffs to the banksters.

  14. Re:Should be good for the economy on 2010 Election Results Are In · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Comparatively, a 1% increase in the cost of consumables is spitting in the ocean.

    It's not that relevant if your are in the upper middle class or above but for the families that are barely scraping by increasing food and energy prices will absolutely crush them, just like it did last time.

  15. Re:You're right, let's lower taxes and start wars! on 2010 Election Results Are In · · Score: 2, Informative

    Don't misunderstand me - the GOP will fix absolutely nothing, just like the Democrats fixed absolutely nothing.

  16. Re:Wrong, Moron on 2010 Election Results Are In · · Score: 1

    Wait - you voted Republican, didn't you.

    Wrong, troll.

  17. Re:Should be good for the economy on 2010 Election Results Are In · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Some inflation will help them by reducing their existing debt in comparison to their income because it will increase to match inflation.

    How? What mechanism will make incomes go up? A larger percentage of the population is out of work than at any time in the last 20 years. Companies have no margin with which to raise wages and commodity inflation is going to make this worse, not better. Average income except for Wall Street hasn't risen for the last 10 years, so how is inflation helped you?

  18. Re:Should be good for the economy on 2010 Election Results Are In · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Inflation due to rising incomes and margins is entirely different than inflation due to currency devaluation.

  19. Re:Should be good for the economy on 2010 Election Results Are In · · Score: 1

    What happened to the economy when gasoline prices reached $4 per gallon?

    Why do you think it's different this time?

  20. Re:Fear & Ignorance on 2010 Election Results Are In · · Score: 4, Informative

    There is no solution to be found in either major political party, unfortunately.

    The answer is to restore the rule of law and prosecute the banksters.

  21. Re:Should be good for the economy on 2010 Election Results Are In · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There's no denying that banks played a major role in the collapse, largely due to not properly ensuring that borrowers were capable of repaying the loans.

    They didn't want the borrowers to repay the loans. The whole thing was a scam from day one.

    The sold unpayable loans to generate more fees by forcing borrowers to refinance.

    They sold the same mortgage more than once so that when it defaulted the investors would not realize that it had been pledged two, three or four times over and blame the default for their loss. (Think of the plot of The Producers)

    The Republicans and Democrats both know this but neither one is willing to throw their benefactors in jail.

  22. Re:Fear & Ignorance on 2010 Election Results Are In · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The following 1.5 years has been relatively stable.

    The federal government is borrowing and spending 12% of GDP and all they can manage to do is barely keep things stable? Do you realize how insane this is?

    Despite this massive amount of deficit spending the economic fundamentals are deteriorating.

    What could possibly go wrong?

  23. Re:Should be good for the economy on 2010 Election Results Are In · · Score: 1

    I'm not claiming that hyperinflation is coming. Hyperinflation requires wages to increase.

    What we are getting is going to be much worse.

  24. Re:Wrong, Moron on 2010 Election Results Are In · · Score: 1

    The second great depression started a few years ago. Running up debt is covering it up for the moment but eventually the credit card will run out and they won't be able to hide it any more.

  25. Re:Should be good for the economy on 2010 Election Results Are In · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The laws that enforce the terms of contracts are automatically bad for the economy?

    Those laws were passed decades and centuries ago. New laws are not needed for that.